Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Advertisements

Direct Binding of CoREST1 to SUMO-2/3 Contributes to Gene-Specific Repression by the LSD1/CoREST1/HDAC Complex  Jian Ouyang, Yujiang Shi, Alvaro Valin,
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Shitao Li, Lingyan Wang, Michael A. Berman, Ye Zhang, Martin E. Dorf 
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
Direct Interactions of OCA-B and TFII-I Regulate Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Gene Transcription by Facilitating Enhancer-Promoter Communication  Xiaodi.
MAGE-RING Protein Complexes Comprise a Family of E3 Ubiquitin Ligases
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Direct Binding of CoREST1 to SUMO-2/3 Contributes to Gene-Specific Repression by the LSD1/CoREST1/HDAC Complex  Jian Ouyang, Yujiang Shi, Alvaro Valin,
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Structural Basis for Recognition of Diubiquitins by NEMO
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
The PHD Finger/Bromodomain of NoRC Interacts with Acetylated Histone H4K16 and Is Sufficient for rDNA Silencing  Yonggang Zhou, Ingrid Grummt  Current.
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 141, Issue 7, Pages (June 2010)
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 275-284 (July 2011) PHD Finger Recognition of Unmodified Histone H3R2 Links UHRF1 to Regulation of Euchromatic Gene Expression  Eerappa Rajakumara, Zhentian Wang, Honghui Ma, Lulu Hu, Hao Chen, Yan Lin, Rui Guo, Feizhen Wu, Haitao Li, Fei Lan, Yujiang Geno Shi, Yanhui Xu, Dinshaw J. Patel, Yang Shi  Molecular Cell  Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 275-284 (July 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.006 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 PHDUHRF1 Recognizes Unmodified Histone H3 Tail (A) Schematic representation of domain structure of human UHRF1. Numbers indicate amino acid positions at the boundaries of various domains. (B–D) In vitro binding assays using various biotinylated histone peptides containing the indicated modifications. Either recombinant full-length UHRF1 or PHDUHRF1 was incubated with biotinylated histone peptides immobilized onto streptavidin Sepharose beads. Bound proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE and stained by Coomassie blue. (E) ITC plots for binding of histone H3(1-10) to Tudor, PHD, and SRA domains of URHF1 with dissociation constant (Kd) values indicated. UD, undetectable. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 275-284DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Crystal Structures of PHDUHRF1 Bound to H3(1-9) and H3(1-9)K4me3 Peptides (A) Shown is a ribbon (protein) and stick (peptide) representation of the 1.80 Å crystal structure of PHDUHRF1 bound to H3(1-9) peptide. The PHDUHRF1 is colored in light blue, with the pre-PHD not shown in this view. The bound H3 peptide is colored in yellow, with interacting residues on PHDUHRF1 colored in magenta. Intermolecular interactions are depicted as magenta-colored dashed lines. A bridging water molecule involved in intermolecular recognition is shown as a red sphere. (B) Shown is an electrostatic (protein) and stick (peptide) representation of the crystal structure of PHDUHRF1 bound to H3(1-9) peptide. The bound peptide is in yellow, and the side chain of R2 is positioned within the red-colored acidic surface patch of the protein. (C) A stereo view of the superposition of the crystal structures of PHDUHRF1 in the free (light blue) and H3(1-9) peptide-bound (magenta) states. The H3(1-4) segment of the bound peptide is shown in yellow. (D) A ribbon (protein) and stick (peptide) representation of the 1.95 Å crystal structure of PHDUHRF1 bound to H3(1-9)K4me3 peptide. See also Figures S1 and S6. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 275-284DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ITC Measurement of Interaction between PHDUHRF1 and Histone H3 Tail (A) Superposed exothermic ITC enthalpy plots for the binding of PHDUHRF1 to H3(1-10), H3(1-10)R2me1, H3(1-10)R2me2s, H3(1-10)R2me2a, and H3(1-10)R2A peptides. The insert lists the measured binding constants. (B) Superposed exothermic ITC enthalpy plots for the binding of PHDUHRF1 to H3(1-15)K4me0, H3(1-15)K4me1, H3(1-15)K4me2, H3(1-15)K4me3, and H3(1-15)K9me3 peptides. The insert lists the measured binding constants. (C) Superposed exothermic ITC enthalpy plots for the binding of PHDUHRF1 to H3(1-10), H3(1-10)K4A, H3AA(1-10), N-acetyl H3(1-15), and H3(1-15)T3ph peptides. The insert lists the measured binding constants. (D) Comparison of exothermic enthalpy plots for wild-type with D350A and D347A mutants of PHDUHRF1 bound to H3(1-10) peptide. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 275-284DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Identification of Target Genes Directly Regulated by UHRF1 (A) H3R2 binding is likely to be dispensable for UHRF1 PCH localization. dsRed-fused wild-type and mutant UHRF1 constructs were transfected into NIH 3T3 cells, and immunostaining was performed 2 days posttransfection. Representative cells were highlighted by dashed circles. (B) Validation of microarray expression data with RT-qPCR. Twenty-six genes upregulated in our microarray were randomly selected for further validation. RNAs were prepared from plko.1-control shRNA and UHRF1-sh2-treated HCT116 cells and were reversed transcribed into cDNA for qRT-PCR. Error bars represent SEM calculated from three independent experiments. (C) RNAi of UHRF1 results in decreased UHRF1 occupancy at its target genes (ADAM19 and SUSD2). Error bars represent SEM calculated from three independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 275-284DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 UHRF1 Direct Target Genes, ADAM19 and SUSD2, Lack H3R2me2s and H3K9me3 but Have DNA Cytosine Methylation at Their Promoters (A) ADAM19 an SUSD2 promoters lack H3R2 symmetric dimethyation. H3R2me2s-specific polyclonal antibodies developed in the Guccione lab in Singapore were used for the ChIP experiments, and the Sp2 promoter was used as a positive control. Error bars represent SEM calculated from three independent experiments. (B) UHRF1 direct targets are associated with low levels of H3K9me3. The same primers used in Figure 4C were used for H3K9me3 ChIP. The SAT2 repetitive sequence representing heterochromatic regions and the housekeeping gene RPL30 were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Error bars represent SEM calculated from three independent experiments. (C) ADAM19 and SUSD2 promoters are cytosine methylated, and methylation appears to require UHRF1. The 5-methyl-C antibodies were used for MeDIP analysis. MeDIP results were expressed as values relative to their corresponding input. RARβ and RPL30 were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Error bars represent SD calculated from two independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 275-284DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 UHRF1 Binding H3R2 Is Critical for Its Ability to Regulate Target Gene Expression (A) Superimposed ITC enthalpy plots for the binding of full-length UHRF1 (wild-type or mutant) and histone H3 peptides with the estimated binding affinity (Kd). UD, undetectable. (B) Rescue experiments. RNAi-resistant wild-type UHRF1, but not the H3R2 binding-defective mutant of UHRF1 (D347A/E348A), restored repression of two UHRF1-reguated genes, SUSD2 and ADAM19, in UHRF1 RNAi cells. HCT116 stable cell lines were established that coexpress control or UHRF1 shRNA and/or indicated flag-tagged UHRF1 constructs. mRNA expression of SUSD2 and ADAM19 was measured by qPCR. GAPDH was used as an internal control. SEM was obtained from three independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 275-284DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.006) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions