Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
Advertisements

Professional Growth and
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 9, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Math Content Network Update The Power of Mistakes Student Engagement Culture of Learning Growth Mindset Congruent Tasks.
Professional Learning
Integration: LDC/MDC Strategies & the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) SREB August 26, 2013 KDE Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
Making Your Own Luck with PGES: “What Happens When Preparation Meets Opportunity” Overview by Jill Cabrera, PhD Educational Administration, Leadership.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Professional Growth and
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Monica Osborne, presenter KDE Effectiveness Coach 1.
Student Growth Goals Professional Learning Jenny Ray, PGES Consultant (KDE) 1.
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Next Generation Professionals Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Interim Joint Committee on Education July 12, 2010.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS) District 97 pilot involvement December 11, 2012.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
WELCOME Professional Growth and Evaluation System.
TPGES & PPGES Training Modules TOOLS FOR SUPPORTING PGES IMPLEMENTATION.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
Mid-Course Check In, Data Tracking and Preparation for Summative Cycle T-PGES Daviess County Public Schools February 2015.
The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.
Peer Observation & Connecting to the Kentucky Framework for Teaching.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
XXXXX School District Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project: Instructional Framework Selection.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Introduction to Peer Observations.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Professional Growth & Effectiveness System. DECISION REQUIRED BY MARCH 2013 Current Evaluation and PD Models The current evaluation plan was last revised.
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Nelson County December CDIP Update. Goal: Professional Growth and Effectiveness System: Increase the percentage of effective teacher from ____ in 2015.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Pike County Schools Implementing PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Focus on the Students Sherri Heise, Director of Instruction Tonia.
Teacher Effectiveness Project
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Teacher Evaluation Training
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Five Required Elements
Ongoing Lead Evaluator
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Educator Effectiveness System Overview
Owatonna Public Schools Teacher Development PLAN (TDE)
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
Why do we have to change? Every student is taught by an effective teacher and every school is led by an effective principal. Fair and equitable statewide.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Student Growth Measures
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview Boone County Schools Intro is meant to inform on the process for next year, how all pieces fit together for an evaluation of job performance, and then a focus on the Danielson Framework. This framework is the basis of the “Professional Practice” half of TPGES.

Today’s Agenda Overview and Timeline of 2013-2014 Pilot Full Implementation 2014-2015 Dig into the Framework Self-Reflection First 2 are in the intro, last 2 are led by the pilot teachers in the afternoon.

Boone County Implementation Timeline

Professional Growth and Effectiveness System 2013-14 – Statewide pilot in each district 2014-15 – Statewide implementation without consequences (no use of the system for personnel decisions) Statewide Pilot of Other Professionals 2015-16 – Statewide implementation with consequences (use the system to make personnel decisions) Summary—this year was a pilot for a few, next year is a trial run for everyone in addition to the old evaluation system, and 15-16 is live

The top half contains all parts of TPGES except Student Growth, including: Observation, Student Voice Survey, Professional Growth Plans, Self Reflections, and Conferences/Conversations. Some of the details here are still to be worked out and negotiated, but SGGs are a significant piece of evaluation and is still evolving—different than what the pilot teachers did. We will begin working on SGGs Friday in ILTs and continue in the fall.

The table on the left resolves any differences in performance levels on the Professional Practice Rating, and the table on the right is how the Overall PGES score is determined based on Professional Practice rating and Student Growth.

Time to Talk and Reflect: Thoughts? Things to Share? Questions? Share thoughts, questions at tables and then share out with the group

The Pilot Teachers’ Path Early Fall: Self-Reflections on 22 Components Professional Growth Goal and Student Growth Goal Late Fall: First 2 Mini-Observations Winter: Peer Mini-Observation Spring: Full Observation Student Voice Survey Should look the same next year, but no definite dates set as of yet. Bulk of teacher work is early, and reflections will likely be first piece to complete (maybe within first month). Stress that 22 reflections need to be complete by the start of school.

Our Focus Today: Self-Reflection and the Danielson Framework 22 Components, and one self-reflection for each Complete in Word, transfer to CIITS later Must understand the Framework, and this is time-consuming Not just a task… Reflect on domains 1 through 4 (not 5). Don’t put anything into CIITS until told to do so (at least mid-July, maybe later). Digging into the Framework is time consuming, individual reflections take time and process speeds up as you go. Heard from many that the time taken to reflect has been very valuable and led to some changes—supposed to lead directly into Professional Growth Goal.

Review of Framework Organization Planning & Preparation Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities Student Growth As a review, the Kentucky Framework is composed of 5 domains. Planning & Preparation, Classroom Environment, Instruction, Professional Responsibilities and Student Growth. The first 4 domains represent the Charlotte Danielson framework. This work is research based and has been determined to be valid and reliable. The last domain is what Kentucky has added - Student Growth. Student Growth is included in Kentucky’s waiver for the No Child Left Behind. The student growth component is currently being reviewed by a number of different subcommittees with teacher representation who will make recommendations, along with the field test group, to the steering committee and KDE on the implementation process. Each domain is broken down into its important components. There are a total of 23 components in the Framework.

Multiple Measures/Framework for Teaching Alignment Here is how the pieces of TPGES fit into the domains of the framework. Note that Domains 1 and 4 come primarily from reflection and conference conversations. Domains 2 and 3 add evidence from observation and the student voice survey.

Domain 5: Student Growth This slide outlines each of the domains and their related components. Our work today will be to overview the 4 teaching domains and prepare/write reflections. For those that have completed reflections this will serve as a refresher and a revisit of your reflections, but also think about one component you would like to work on for your Professional Growth Goal that will most impact student learning in your classroom. Domain 5: Student Growth 5a Student Growth