PROMISE: the Barnahus type MD/IA methodology and tracking tool Service Exchange Meeting 2, Reykavik 14-16 June 2016

Content of the presentation Introduction: what do we want to achieve with the methodology and the tracking tool and how? Time table: development and pilots Content Discussion in groups Next steps

Introduction: the methodology Aim: to develop a tool which can be used by services in their process to be(come) a Barnahus type MD/IA and to define what is still missing in order to finalise this process The methodology is a self-evaluation tool for data collection and analysis of current practice The methodology is meant to INSPIRE, not to JUDGE

Introduction: the tracking-tool Aim: to perform a simple and quick check for services, based on the methodology The tracking-tool is a user-friendly tool for services Stoplight-model

Timetable development methodology and tracking tool Step 1: Identification of working elements: December 2015- January 2016 Step 2: Identification of existing self-assessment-tools: December 2015-January 2016 Step 3: Development of methodology and tracking tool: February – October 2016

Timetable pilot tracking tool Step 1: Selection pilots: October-November 2015 Step 2: Piloting tracking tool and good practice guide CBSS: November 2016 –January 2017 Aims: a) verification of the tracking tool by testing its user friendliness and b) ‘a state of the art’ report of the main goals concerning being a Barnahus type MD/IA service in the pilot countries

Step 3: Analysis of the Pilot: February –March 2017 Step 4: Finalisation of the tracking-tool: March 2017 –May 2017

Content Background of the methodology: Excell grid PROMISE PRINCIPLES: child friendly interventions PROMISE CRITERIA: Barnahus type model MD/IA PROMISE STANDARDS: quality of services The methodology monitors the process of being an Barnahus type MD/IA service, NOT the quality

Goals and Subgoals related to scores Three perspectives Comment Box Link good practices guide CBSS

2. Who fills in the methodology? A representative of the Barnahus type MD/IA service together with key stakeholders within the service

3. How does the representative collects the data? Hand-out: instructions for the representative Meetings: 1 with management, 1 with professionals Small survey among clients with SMILEY-PICTOGRAMS Analysing the results in a score-system and give feedback to to the responsible persons

Discussion points in working groups Content of the methodology. Please your constructive comments on: A. the basis of the goals and subgoals related to the PROMISE principles, criteria and standards B. the way it has to be filled in by a representative of a service: organizing 2 meetings and 10 small questionnaires clients C. the questions for clients (children)

2. Which goals and subgoals are the most relevant for the development of the tracking tool and why(a distillation from the methodology)?

Next steps Till October we will work on: Finalise the methodology Finalise the first concept tracking-tool Program both in Excell Link both products to the good practice guidance CBSS Present final product methodology in Linköping Prepare the pilots: in the beginning of November the pilot countries will get invited to fill in the concept tracking tool.

Bedankt voor uw aandacht o.i.d. Thank you for you attention and constructive input!! Jodi Mak jmak@verwey-jonker.nl Bedankt voor uw aandacht o.i.d.

Discussion in small groups Reading the table in the concept note concerning the methodology (10 minutes) Discussing the methodology (30 minutes) A. the basis of the goals and subgoals related to the PROMISE vision, criteria and standards B. the way it has to be filled in by a representative of a service: organise 2 meetings and 10 small questionnaires clients C. the questions for clients (children)

3. Short break (10 minutes) 4. Discussing the main goals/sub-goals for the development of the tracking-tool (30 minutes) 5. Plenary discussion (20 minutes)