Protein Dynamics: Moore's Law in Molecular Biology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages R18-R21 (January 2008)
Advertisements

Sea turtles Current Biology
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages R447-R448 (June 2017)
The nature of Drosophila melanogaster
Eukaryotic Evolution: The Importance of Being Archaebacterial
Laminopathies: Too Much SUN Is a Bad Thing
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages R18-R21 (January 2008)
Pericycle Current Biology
Generalizable Learning: Practice Makes Perfect — But at What?
Cell Walls: Monitoring Integrity with THE Kinase
Sensory-Motor Integration: More Variability Reduces Individuality
Visual Categorization: When Categories Fall to Pieces
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Kinetochores: NDC80 Toes the Line
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Honeybee Vision: In Good Shape for Shape Recognition
Cell Biology: Microtubule Collisions to the Rescue
Cell Division: Experiments and Modelling Unite to Resolve the Middle
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages R837-R838 (October 2011)
Jeffrey A. Hussmann, Hendrik Osadnik, Carol A. Gross  Current Biology 
Insect Vision: A Neuron that Anticipates an Object’s Path
Marr's vision: Twenty-five years on
Morphogens: Precise Outputs from a Variable Gradient
Molecular dynamics simulations
Infant cognition Current Biology
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 23, Pages R1025-R1026 (December 2013)
Hydra  Kristine M. Glauber, Catherine E. Dana, Robert E. Steele 
Antarctic sea ice losses drive gains in benthic carbon drawdown
American birds: Audubon was not the first
RecA Current Biology Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages R395-R397 (June 2007)
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages R414-R415 (June 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages R60-R61 (January 2014)
Polyphasic feedback enables tunable cellular timers
Bright spots of sustainable shark fishing
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages R364-R365 (May 2013)
Evolution: Mirror, Mirror in the Pond
Sea turtles Current Biology
Marr's vision: Twenty-five years on
Neurogenetics: Short-Circuiting Sexually Dimorphic Behaviors
Plant Stem Cells Current Biology
Imaginal discs Current Biology
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
Insect Vision: A Neuron that Anticipates an Object’s Path
Non-cortical magnitude coding of space and time by pigeons
Planar Cell Polarity: Microtubules Make the Connection with Cilia
It’s all about the constraints
Volume 15, Issue 13, Pages R483-R484 (July 2005)
Pericycle Current Biology
Magic and cognitive neuroscience
DNA Replication Fidelity: Proofreading in Trans
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Meiosis: Checking Chromosomes Pair up Properly
Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages R784-R785 (September 2012)
Aging: Filtering Out Bad Mitochondria
FOXO transcription factors
The Cell Biology of Genomes: Bringing the Double Helix to Life
Inteins Current Biology
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages R353-R355 (May 2009)
Conservation Biology: The Importance of Wilderness
Tight junctions Current Biology
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages R58-R60 (January 2018)
American birds: Audubon was not the first
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Basal bodies Current Biology
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Endosperm Imprinting: A Child Custody Battle?
Volume 24, Issue 20, Pages R987-R988 (October 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Protein Dynamics: Moore's Law in Molecular Biology Michele Vendruscolo, Christopher M. Dobson  Current Biology  Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages R68-R70 (January 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.062 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Moore's law in molecular biology. (A) Growth in the timescale accessible to molecular dynamics simulations of proteins. After the first (in vacuo) simulation of a protein [4] (red point, bottom left), the timescale accessible to all-atom simulations in water has been increasing exponentially, indeed doubling every year, to reach the millisecond range [5] (red point, top right). By 2020, it should therefore be possible to follow the trajectories of small proteins for seconds and beyond. (B) Growth in the size (in number of atoms) of the protein systems studied by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. The blue line is a theoretical limit derived by assuming that the growth in system size goes as the square root of the increase in timescale, as the number of interactions scales as the square of the number of atoms. The largest post-1990 simulations tend to fall below this limit, partly because of the lack of high-resolution all-atom structures of large macromolecular complexes, and partly because it is often not useful to devote a great deal of resources to simulating a very large system if it can be achieved only for, very short timescale. (C) Change with time in the limits of the timescales and system sizes accessible by molecular dynamics simulations. The blue and red diagonal lines define the boundaries at given times; for example, the current limit (red line labeled as ‘2010’) runs through the millisecond simulation of small proteins [5], and the nanosecond multi-million atoms simulations of the ribosome [8], whose structure is shown in (B). If the current trends continue, it will be possible to simulate the dynamical properties of the ribosome for milliseconds by 2030 (green cross). Current Biology 2011 21, R68-R70DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.062) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions