James W.W. Wong, MD, Koon-Hou Mak, MD, FACC

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Surgical Versus Medical Therapy for Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: A Meta-Analysis of 32 Studies Christos G. Mihos, DO, Romain Capoulade, PhD, Evin Yucel,

Advertisements

Hisato Takagi, MD, PhD, Takuya Umemoto, MD, PhD

Longitudinal Outcome of Isolated Mitral Repair in Older Patients: Results From 14,604 Procedures Performed From 1991 to 2007 Vinay Badhwar, MD, Eric.

Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Dialysis Patients: A Propensity- Matched Comparison Dale M. Kobrin, BA, Fenton H. McCarthy, MD,

Robert Brewer, MD, MHSA, Patricia F. Theurer, BSN, Chad M

Constantin Stefanidis, MD, Albert M

Outcomes of Reintervention on the Autograft After Ross Procedure

Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Prophylaxis After Lung Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Lars Peter Riber, MD, PhD, Torben Bjerregaard Larsen,

Niv Ad, MD, Linda Henry, PhD, Sharon Hunt, MBA, Sari D. Holmes, PhD

The Outcome of the Cox Maze Procedure in Patients With Previous Percutaneous Catheter Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation Niv Ad, MD, Linda Henry,

Preoperative Serum Soluble Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-κB Ligand and Osteoprotegerin Predict Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing.

Hancock II Bioprosthesis for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Gold Standard of Bioprosthetic Valves Durability? Tirone E. David, MD, Susan Armstrong, MS,

Intermediate to Long-Term Results of Radiofrequency Modified Maze Procedure as an Adjunct to Open-Heart Surgery Willem P. Beukema, MD, Hauw T. Sie, MD,

Prolonged Cross-Clamping During Aortic Valve Replacement Is an Independent Predictor of Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality: Analysis of the Japan Cardiovascular.

Minimally Invasive Versus Sternotomy Approach for Mitral Valve Surgery in Patients Greater Than 70 Years Old: A Propensity-Matched Comparison David M.

Impact of Intravenous Magnesium on Post-Cardiothoracic Surgery Atrial Fibrillation and Length of Hospital Stay: A Meta-Analysis Nickole N. Henyan, PharmD,

Sean M. Bagshaw, MD, MS, P. Diane Galbraith, BN, MS, L

Left Atrial Reduction Enhances Outcomes of Modified Maze Procedure for Permanent Atrial Fibrillation During Concomitant Mitral Surgery Vinay Badhwar,

Does Diabetes Affect the Postoperative Outcomes After Total Arterial Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery in Multivessel Disease? Jae-Sung Choi, MD, PhD,

Harm H. H. Feringa, MD, Leslee J

Long-Term Outcomes of the Maze Procedure Combined With Mitral Valve Repair: Risk of Thromboembolism Without Anticoagulation Therapy Su Kyung Hwang, MD,

Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: Development of a Predictive Risk Algorithm Mitchell J. Magee, MD, Morley A. Herbert,

Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Is Associated With Reduced Survival After Aortic and Double Valve Replacement Richard Schulenberg, MD, Polychronis Antonitsis,

Linda Henry, PhD, RN, Linda Halpin, MSN, RN, Sharon Hunt, MBA, Sari D

Outcomes of Early Mitral Valve Reoperation in the Medicare Population

Outcome of Concomitant Cox-Maze III Procedure Using an Argon-Based Cryosurgical System: A Single-Center Experience With 250 Patients Bobby Yanagawa,

Right Isthmus Ablation Reduces Supraventricular Arrhythmias After Surgery for Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Francesco Onorati, MD, Antonio Esposito, MD,

Amedeo Anselmi, MD, Gianfederico Possati, MD, Mario Gaudino, MD

Chordae Replacement Versus Resection for Repair of Isolated Posterior Mitral Leaflet Prolapse: À Ègalité Joerg Seeburger, MD, Volkmar Falk, MD, PhD,

Analyzing Effectiveness of Routine Pleural Drainage After Nuss Procedure: A Randomized Study Krystian Pawlak, MD, PhD, Łukasz Gąsiorowski, MD, PhD, Piotr.

Intraoperative Modified Cox Mini-Maze Procedure for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Yong Qiang Cui, MD, PhD, Ling Bo Sun, MD, PhD, Yan Li,

James D. St. Louis, MD The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Who Do You Say You Are? The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Surgical Dilemmas: Diagnosis and Treatment of Atrial Plasmacytoma

A Systematic Review of Biocompatible Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits and Clinical Outcome Marco Ranucci, MD, Anna Balduini, AHA, Antonio Ditta, CCP,

Hisato Takagi, MD, PhD, Takuya Umemoto, MD, PhD

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in Nonagenarians Stratified by Transfemoral and Transapical Approach Christian McNeely, MD, Alan Zajarias,

Minimally Invasive Fibrillating Heart Surgery: A Safe and Effective Approach for Mitral Valve and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Paul S. Massimiano,

Sternal Closure With Tie Bands: A Word of Caution

Mallory L. Irons, MD, MBE, J. William Gaynor, MD, Thomas L

Lei Yu, MD, Tianxiang Gu, MD, PhD, Zongyi Xiu, MD, PhD

Comparison of Conservative Treatment and Thymectomy on Myasthenia Gravis Outcome Emanuela Taioli, MD, PhD, Philip Kent Paschal, Bian Liu, PhD, Andrew.

Xujun Chen, MD, PhD, Ryan S. Turley, MD, Nicholas D

Determinants of Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Repair of Chronic Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation Vincent Chan, MD, MPH, Marc Ruel, MD, MPH, Elsayed.

Sublobar Resection Provides an Equivalent Survival After Lobectomy in Elderly Patients With Early Lung Cancer Jiro Okami, MD, PhD, Yuri Ito, PhD, Masahiko.

Embolized Methyl Methacrylate to the Right Atrium After Kyphoplasty

Editorial Board, January 2010

Midterm Outcome of Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Inherited Connective Tissue Disorders Hiroshi Tanaka, MD, PhD, Hitoshi Ogino, MD, PhD, Hitoshi.

Completely Thrombosed Tricuspid Pouch Mimicking a Cardiac Tumor

The Impact of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome on Surgical Repair Outcomes of Conotruncal Cardiac Anomalies Bahaaldin Alsoufi, MD, Courtney McCracken, PhD,

Surgical Treatment of Aortic Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: A 20-Year Single-Center Experience Sossio Perrotta, MD, Anders Jeppsson, MD, PhD, Victoria.

John M. Stulak, MD, Rakesh M. Suri, MD, DPhil, Joseph A

L. Wiley Nifong, MD, Evelio Rodriguez, MD, W. Randolph Chitwood, MD

What Is the Role of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery in High-Risk Patients? A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies Marco Moscarelli, MD, Khalil.

Sequential Design for Clinical Trials Evaluating a Prosthetic Heart Valve Cody Hamilton, PhD, Michael Lu, PhD, Steven Lewis, PhD, William Anderson, PhD

Sander Bramer, MD, Albert H. M. van Straten, MD, PhD, Mohamed A

Age at Repair Affects the Very Long-Term Outcome of Sinus Venosus Defect Giovanni Battista Luciani, MD, Francesca Viscardi, MD, Mara Pilati, MD, Roberto.

Defining Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch and Its Effect on Survival in Patients With Impaired Ejection Fraction David A. Cotoni, DO, Robert T. Palac, MD,

Steve K. Singh, MD, Gilbert H. L. Tang, MD, Manjula D

“Transitions” for Cardiothoracic Surgeons Now Listed on the Web:

John M. Stulak, MD, Joseph A. Dearani, MD, Harold M

Potassium and Magnesium Supplementation Do Not Protect Against Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Operation: A Time-Matched Analysis Timothy S. Lancaster,

Sagar U. Nigwekar, MD, Praveen Kandula, MD, MPH

Right Minithoracotomy Versus Full Sternotomy for Mitral Valve Repair: A Propensity Matched Comparison Rüdiger Lange, MD, PhD, Bernhard Voss, MD, Victoria.

John M. Stulak, MD, Thoralf M. Sundt, MD, Joseph A

Joshua D. Adams, MD, Lynn M. Fedoruk, MD, Carlos A

Dumbor L. Ngaage, MD, FRCS (C-Th), Michael E. Cowen, FRCS

The Impact of New Technology on Cardiothoracic Surgical Practice

Domenico Galetta, MD, PhD, Lorenzo Spaggiari, MD, PhD

Risk of Valve-Related Events After Aortic Valve Repair

Presentation transcript:

Impact of Maze and Concomitant Mitral Valve Surgery on Clinical Outcomes James W.W. Wong, MD, Koon-Hou Mak, MD, FACC The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages 1938-1947 (November 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.108 Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

Fig 1 (A) Postoperative sinus rhythm conversion or freedom from atrial fibrillation rates in the concomitant maze group (solid bars) versus control group (open bars) in the seven matched-controlled studies. (yr = year.) (B) Comparison of sinus rhythm conversion and freedom from atrial fibrillation between the concomitant maze and control groups in the seven matched-controlled studies. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2006 82, 1938-1947DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.108) Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

Fig 2 (A) Postoperative sinus rhythm conversion or freedom from atrial fibrillation rates in the concomitant maze group (solid bars) versus control group (open bars) in the four randomized-controlled studies. (yr = year.) (B) Comparison of sinus rhythm conversion and freedom from atrial fibrillation between the concomitant maze and control groups in the four randomized-controlled studies. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2006 82, 1938-1947DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.108) Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

Fig 3 (A) Postoperative freedom from stroke or embolism rates in the concomitant maze group (solid bars) versus control group (open bars) in the seven matched-controlled studies. (ns = not significant; yr = year.) (B) Comparison of stroke and embolism rates between the concomitant maze and control groups in the seven matched-controlled studies. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2006 82, 1938-1947DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.108) Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

Fig 4 (A) Postoperative freedom from stroke and embolism rates in the concomitant maze group (solid bars) versus control group (open bars) in the four randomized-controlled studies. (ns = not significant; yr = year.) (B) Comparison of stroke and embolism rates between the concomitant maze and control groups in the four randomized-controlled studies. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2006 82, 1938-1947DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.108) Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

Fig 5 (A) Postoperative long-term survival rates in the concomitant maze group (solid bars) versus control group (open bars) in the seven matched-controlled studies. (ns = not significant; yr = year.) (B) Comparison of long-term survival rates between the concomitant maze and control groups in the seven matched-controlled studies. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2006 82, 1938-1947DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.108) Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

Fig 6 (A) Postoperative long-term survival rates in the concomitant maze group (solid bars) versus control group (open bars) in the four randomized-controlled studies. (ns = not significant; yr = year.) (B) Comparison of long-term survival rates between the concomitant maze and control groups in the four randomized-controlled studies. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2006 82, 1938-1947DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.108) Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions