WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ozone and nitrogen deposition from Colorados Craig powerstation.
Advertisements

Nitrogen Deposition at Rocky Mountain National Park: the RoMANS Study Mike Barna Bill Malm Bret Schichtel Kristi Gebhart Air Resources Division National.
Update on WestJump model runs Mike Barna May 13, 2013 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior.
Modeling the Role of Oil and Gas Emissions on Regional Ozone in the Intermountain West: Using CAMx HDDM for W126 Ozone Mike Barna, NPS-ARD Tammy Thompson,
Southern Ute Indian Tribe’s Participation in the 2011 Passive Ammonia Study Conducted by EPA Region 6.
ROMANS Nitrogen Source Sensitivity Analysis Mike Barna 1 Marco Rodriguez 2 Kristi Gebhart 1 Bill Malm 1 Bret Schichtel 1 Jenny Hand 2 1 ARD-NPS, Fort Collins,
Ozone Modeling over the Western U.S. -- Impact of National Controls on Ozone Trends in the Future Rural/Urban Ozone in the Western United States -- March.
Modeled Ammonia Nitrogen Deposition Source Apportionment at Rocky Mountain National Park for RoMANS2 Mike Barna 1 Marco Rodriguez 2 Kristi Gebhart 1 Bret.
Paul Wishinski VT DEC Presentation for: MARAMA-NESCAUM-OTC Regional Haze Workshop August 2-3, 2000 Gorham, New Hampshire LYE BROOK WILDERNESS CLASS I AREA.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Technical Scope of Work: Tom Moore, WESTAR/WRAP on behalf of University.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
REFERENCES Maria Val Martin 1 C. L. Heald 1, J.-F. Lamarque 2, S. Tilmes 2 and L. Emmons 2 1 Colorado State University 2 NCAR.
Ozone in Colorado: Issues and Reduction Strategies Presentation to the Colorado Environmental Health Association October 2,
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
West-wide Jumpstart Air Quality Modeling Study Modeling Results November 7, 2013 Technical Project Team ENVIRON, Alpine Geophysics, Univ. of North Carolina.
Regional Air Quality Analysis: Four Corners
Sensitivity Modeling Update University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) April 29, 2015 Western States Air Quality.
AoH Report Update Joint DEJF & AoH Meeting, Las Vegas November , 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
TSS Data Preparation Update WRAP TSS Project Team Meeting Ft. Collins, CO March 28-31, 2006.
OMI HCHO columns Jan 2006Jul 2006 Policy-relevant background (PRB) ozone calculations for the EPA ISA and REA Zhang, L., D.J. Jacob, N.V. Smith-Downey,
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
Regional Issues Facing Colorado and Other Western States WESTAR Spring Business Meeting Denver, Colorado March 30, 2010 Paul Tourangeau Director Colorado.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS 2011 Modeling Update University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International.
Presents:/slides/greg/PSAT_ ppt Effects of Sectional PM Distribution on PM Modeling in the Western US Ralph Morris and Bonyoung Koo ENVIRON International.
1 Summary of LADCO’s Regional Modeling in the Eastern U.S.: Preliminary Results April 27, 2009 MWAQC TAC June 15, 2009.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
Chemical transport modeling in support of NPS-CIRA activities Mike Barna 1 Marco Rodriguez 2 Kristi Gebhart 1 Bret Schichtel 1 Bill Malm 1 Jenny Hand 2.
Ozone National Air Quality Standard Review WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Boise, Idaho September 2006.
Determining Alternative Futures - Urban Development Effects on Air Quality Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin and Darko Koracin May 2007 Zagreb, Croatia.
Annual Simulations of Models-3/CMAQ: Issues and Lessons Learned Pat Dolwick, Carey Jang, Norm Possiel, Brian Timin, Joe Tikvart Air Quality Modeling Group.
Impacts of MOVES2014 On-Road Mobile Emissions on Air Quality Simulations of the Western U.S. Z. Adelman, M. Omary, D. Yang UNC – Institute for the Environment.
Western States Air Quality Study Background Air Quality Modeling University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) May.
Western Ozone Conference Understand the nature, causes and trends of ozone in the western U.S. outside CA Identify additional assessment work needed to.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS/3SDW Progress Review to the 3SAQS Technical Committee University of North.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Pilot Project Modeling Overview University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON.
Evaluation of 2002 Multi-pollutant Platform: Air Toxics, Mercury, Ozone, and Particulate Matter US EPA / OAQPS / AQAD / AQMG Sharon Phillips, Kai Wang,
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.
Report to WESTAR Technical Committee September 20, 2006 The CMAQ Visibility Model Applied To Rural Ozone In The Intermountain West Patrick Barickman Tyler.
WRAP Stationary Sources Joint Forum Meeting August 16, 2006 The CMAQ Visibility Model Applied To Rural Ozone In The Intermountain West Patrick Barickman.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
2018 Emission Reductions from the Base 18b Emission Inventory Lee Gribovicz Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, California February 22-23, 2007.
Western Air Quality Issues and Photochemical Modeling - An Industrial Perspective Doug Blewitt, CCM AQRM Dana Wood, PE BP.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS 2011 CAMx Model Performance Evaluation University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) WAQS Workplan and Modeling Update University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) Ramboll-Environ.
Western Regional Technical Air Quality Studies: support for Ozone and other Air Quality Planning in the West Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) Model Performance Evaluation CAMx and CMAQ 2011b University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
Applicability of CMAQ-DDM to source apportionment and control strategy development Daniel Cohan Georgia Institute of Technology 2004 Models-3 Users’ Workshop.
Georgia Institute of Technology Air Quality Impacts from Airport Related Emissions: Atlanta Case Study M. Talat Odman Georgia Institute of Technology School.
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
WRAP Technical Work Overview
Western Regional Technical Projects 2011 through 2013
VISTAS 2002 MPE and NAAQS SIP Modeling
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
Source Apportionment Modeling to Investigate Background, Regional, and Local Contributions to Ozone Concentrations in Denver, Phoenix, Detroit, and Atlanta.
Source apportionment of reactive nitrogen deposition
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW)
Policy-driven priorities for improvements to the CMAQ photochemical modeling system Heather Simon, Kristen Foley, Sharon Phillips, Norm Possiel, Shawn.
Quantification of Lightning NOX and its Impact on Air Quality over the Contiguous United States Daiwen Kang, Rohit Mathur, Limei Ran, Gorge Pouliot, David.
Sensitivity Analysis of Ozone in the Southeast
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States
Scorecards.
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
CAMx-PSAT Source Apportionment Modeling Results
Presentation transcript:

WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego Preliminary CAMx assessment of oil and gas emissions on ozone in the Four Corners region Mike Barna1 and Marco Rodriguez2 1Air Resources Division, National Park Service Fort Collins, CO 2Co-operative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, CSU WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego 3 November 2006 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Introduction CAMx runs at NPS-CIRA 2002 annual simulations (36 km) emissions, meteorology from WRAP-RMC evaluate oil & gas impacts, N deposition 2006 RoMANS simulations (36/12/4 km) RoMANS: Rocky Mountain Atmospheric Nitrogen and Sulfur Study Source apportionment to estimate contributions to N and S deposition at Rocky Mountain NP Update RMC 2002 inventory to 2006: mobile, point, NH3, fire National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Introduction Significant increases in NOx and VOC for oil and gas development in WRAP region largest emission increases in NM, CO, UT, WY To evaluate contribution to regional air pollution (e.g., ozone and fine nitrate PM) from O&G, consider two CAMx simulations base emissions base emissions minus O&G run SMOKE’s MRGGRID to combine all base02 emission categories except O&G National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Introduction The difference between these two runs represents the impact of O&G emissions on regional air pollution Results reflect an ‘emissions sensitivity test’, not a true source apportionment (could use CAMx’s OSAT for that) National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Emissions from oil and gas in WRAP region NOx VOC Oil and gas emissions within WRAP: NOx: 125,000 tons/yr (3% of total) VOC: 363,000 tons/yr (2% of total) National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Ozone error and bias for all WRAP fractional error fractional bias National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Ozone performance stats for all WRAP LINEAR REGRESSION Pred = A + B * Obs A = 0.0247769 B = 0.396364 R^2 = 0.251872 MEAN AND GLOBAL STATISTICS Mean Estimation: 0.0414590 Mean Observation: 0.0420879 Standard Deviation of Estimation: 0.0130819 Standard Deviation of Observations: 0.0165641 DIFFERENCE STATISTICS Mean Bias Error: -0.000628896 Mean Normalized Bias Error: 30.9135 Mean Absolute Gross Error: 0.0116230 Mean Absolute Normalized Gross Error: 54.7857 Standard Deviation of Residual Distribution: 0.0150998 Fractional Gross Error: 0.324408 Fractional Bias: 0.0338645 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

NO3 error and bias for all WRAP fractional error fractional bias National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Example summertime ozone, 6 August 2002 Mesa Verde NP: 65 ppb max hourly concentration National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Ozone at Mesa Verde fractional error fractional bias National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Ozone performance stats for Mesa Verde LINEAR REGRESSION Pred = A + B * Obs A = 0.00854282 B = 0.815839 R^2 = 0.436083 MEAN AND GLOBAL STATISTICS Mean Estimation: 0.0457161 Mean Observation: 0.0455645 Standard Deviation of Estimation: 0.0127932 Standard Deviation of Observations: 0.0103552 DIFFERENCE STATISTICS Mean Bias Error: 0.000151609 Mean Normalized Bias Error: 2.22746 Mean Absolute Gross Error: 0.00773626 Mean Absolute Normalized Gross Error: 18.2195 Standard Deviation of Residual Distribution: 0.00979441 Fractional Gross Error: 0.176218 Fractional Bias: -0.00634921 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Example ozone increase from O&G emissions, 6 August 2002 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Ozone enhancements at Mesa Verde from O&G July – August 2002 August 6 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Summary Acceptable ozone performance in WRAP annual average ozone: 42 ppb (observed) vs. 41 ppb (predicted) fractional error: 0.32, fractional bias 0.03 biases overpredict: fall through spring underpredict: summer low concentrations are overestimated National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Summary (cont’d) Nitrate performance not as good, but falls within bugle plot limits wintertime overpredictions, summertime underpredictions Largest impacts from O&G emissions on regional ozone occur in Four Corners at Mesa Verde NP on 6 August 2002 8 ppb ozone enhancement peak ozone concentrations of 65 ppb National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Summary (cont’d) Currently evaluating O&G impacts on ozone and nitrate for all Class I areas for 2002 enhanced ozone in the summer enhanced nitrate in winter Does increased ozone from O&G emissions significantly affect 1 hr and 8 hr NAAQS? ozone enhancements appear to correspond to days with high ozone National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University

Acknowledgements WRAP-RMC: emissions, meteorology Environ: assistance with CAMx National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University