Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aerodynamic Characteristics of Airfoils and wings
Advertisements

February 17, Aerodynamics 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang.
Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones
Michael DeRosa Master of Engineering Final Project Exploration of Airfoil Sections to Determine the Optimal Airfoil for Remote Controlled Pylon Racing.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review #2 Team Members Oneeb Bhutta, Matthew Basiletti, Ryan Beech, Mike Van Meter.
What is engineering? Engineering - The branch of science and technology concerned with the design, building, and use of engines, machines, and structures.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review #1
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
D & C PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 November 4, 2003
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Critical Design Review Team 1.
Aerodynamics PDR #1. Objective To examine airfoil choices To examine wing shape choices Structural and Manufacturing Concerns.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
The Barn Owls Chris “Mo” Baughman Kate Brennan Christine Izuo Dan Masse Joe “Sal” Salerno Paul Slaboch Michelle Smith.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
Team 5 Aerodynamics QDR Presented By: Christian Naylor Charles Reyzer.
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Structures 1 PDR Team “Canard” October 12th,
March 1, Aerodynamics 3 QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang Joe.
Lesson 13 Airfoils Part II
Aerodynamics QDR AAE451 – Team 3 October 9, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian.
Team 5 Aerodynamics PDR Presented By: Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer.
Michael DeRosa Master of Engineering Final Project
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag Aerospace Engineering
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
Introduction Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of A Non Planar C Wing using Experimental and Numerical Tools Mano Prakash R., Manoj Kumar B., Lakshmi Narayanan.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
Basic aerodynamics relationships
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
2D Airfoil Aerodynamics
1 Lecture 4: Aerodynamics Eric Loth For AE 440 A/C Lecture Sept 2009.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
Bridget Fitzpatrick Patrick Dempsey Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Review #2 October 23, 2000.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 18, 2003.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review October 3, 2000 German National Holiday Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis Chris.
Airfoils. Airfoil Any surface that provides aerodynamic force through interaction with moving air Moving air Airfoil Aerodynamic force (lift)
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Review #1 October 3, 2000.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS QDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 6, 2003.
VEHICLE SIZING PDR AAE 451 TEAM 4
Team “Canard” September 28th, 2006
Airfoil Any surface that provides aerodynamic force through interaction with moving air Aerodynamic force (lift) Moving air Airfoil.
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag Aerospace Engineering
Aerodynamics PDR AAE451 – Team 3 October 21, 2003
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
Dynamics & Controls PDR 1
Team 5 Final Design Review
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 October 3, 2006
Airfoils and Simulation
AIRFRAME NOISE MODELING APPROPRIATE FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION AIAA Serhat Hosder, Joseph A. Schetz, Bernard Grossman and.
Structures and Weights Preliminary Design Review
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 27, 2006
Team One Purdue University AAE 451 Project Debriefing 28 April, 2005
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag Aerospace Engineering
Critical Design Review 24 March, 2005
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
DYNAMICS & CONTROL QDR 1 TEAM 4
UAV Wing Design For Efficiency At Low Reynolds Numbers
Prototype Fabrication, Economic, & Test Plan QDR
Team 5 Aerodynamics PDR #2
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006
Structures and Weights 1 QDR
CDR: Aether “Angry Mosquito”
Aerodynamics PDR # 2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 18, 2003
Airfoils and Simulation
Team 5 Aerodynamics QDR #1
Airfoils and Simulation
Dynamics N Controls 1 PDR
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 6, 2006
Presentation transcript:

Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006 Aerodynamics 1 QDR Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006 Mark Davis Ashley Gordon Hank Kneitz Ryan Mulligan Joshua Rodewald Brandon Wampler Mathieu Hautier Samantha Pearcy

Aircraft Geometry The Angry Mosquito 4.4 ft 0.285 ft 3.54 ft 0.75 ft Quarter chord to quarter chord 0.75 ft The Angry Mosquito May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Aerodynamic Design Point Max speed at steady, level flight α = 0º V = 175 ft/s (~120 mph) Sea level From vehicle sizing W = 5.5 lb S = 3.25 ft2 (W/S) = 1.7 lb/ft2 May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Wing Airfoil Selection Process Airfoil Criterion “Low” Reynolds number, Re = 808,000 High lift to drag ratio Machinable geometry Research RC pylon racers Agricultural crop dusters Single engine, homebuilt May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Wing Geometry Design Process Set Parameters: Aspect ratio, AR = 6 Initial value based on team experience Will be optimized for minimum induced and parasite drag taking structural considerations into account Taper ratio, l = 0.45 Best approximation for elliptical loading Calculate based on the above: Span, b Root/tip chords, Croot Ctip TE sweep, LTE TBD May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Wing Geometry Wing Airfoil MH 24 S 3.25 ft2 Aspect Ratio 6 Taper Ratio 0.45 Leading Edge Sweep 0° Quarter Chord Sweep -3.6° Trailing Edge Sweep -24.5° Dihedral yes Quarter chord line 3.6° .45 ft 1 ft 24.5° 2.2 ft May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Wing Airfoil Section MH-24 Used on pylon racers Optimized for “low” Re May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Fuselage Design Based on Raymer historical data From Raymer, Table 6.3 Agricultural aircraft Homebuilt – metal/wood From Raymer, Table 6.3 a = 4 C = .23 Wo = 5.5 lbs Length = 5.9 ft May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Tail Geometry Design Process Calculate required tail areas Historical data from Raymer cHT = 0.5 cVT = 0.04 SVT = 0.165 ft2 SHT = 0.333 ft2 May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Tail Geometry Design Process V-Tail consideration V-tail requires same total tail area as conventional configuration Stails = 0.5 ft2 (total - conventional) Sv-tail = 0.25 ft2 per tail Dihedral angle 35º May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Tail Geometry V-Tail Airfoil NACA 0009 S 0.25 ft2 - each Aspect Ratio 3.25 Taper Ratio 0.45 Leading Edge Sweep 0° Quarter Chord Sweep -6.66° Trailing Edge Sweep -29° Dihedral -35° Quarter chord line 6.66° .17 ft 0.38 ft 29° 0.9 ft May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Tail Airfoil Section NACA 0009 Symmetric Low t/c May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Aircraft Wetted Area Calculations May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Fuselage Wetted Area Estimation Use scaled grid to estimate top and side fuselage areas Top Area ~ 3 ft2 Side Area ~ 2.8 ft2 1 sq box = 0.25 sq ft May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Aircraft Drag Polar e = 0.75 Cfe = 0.006 k = 0.0707 CDo = 0.032 Historical data from Raymer CDo = 0.032 e = 0.75 Historical data from Raymer k = 0.0707 May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Aircraft Drag Polar May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Aircraft Lift Polar Cla = 8.3/rad Clo = 0.139 Raymer “90% est” From XFOIL & online data Clo = 0.139 From XFOIL & online data Raymer “90% est” 2-D to 3-D CLo = 0.9 Clo CLo = 0.125 CLa = 7.95 /rad May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Lift Coefficient Curve *a in radians /rad May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Maximum Lift Coefficient Justification Wind Tunnel Data: NACA 0009 Wind Tunnel Data: NACA 64-006 MH 24 Clmax = 1.0 2-D CLmax = 0.9 3-D CLmax,flaps = 1.6 Approximate a 0.7 increase to allow room for controllability May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

The Angry Mosquito

Wing/Tail Geometry Equations Span Root chord Tip chord TE sweep c/4 sweep May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace

Overview Aircraft Geometry Airfoil Selection Wing and tail geometry Aspect Ratio Taper Ratio Sweep angle Dihedral Angle Aircraft wetted area Key Coefficients Lift coefficient Drag Polar Maximum lift coefficient May 24, 2019 AAE 451, Aether Aerospace