Crossover Homeostasis in Yeast Meiosis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
Advertisements

The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Crossover and Noncrossover Pathways in Mouse Meiosis
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Jianbin Wang, H. Christina Fan, Barry Behr, Stephen R. Quake  Cell 
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Randy W. Hyppa, Gerald R. Smith  Cell 
Reciprocal Crossovers and a Positional Preference for Strand Exchange in Recombination Events Resulting in Deletion or Duplication of Chromosome 17p11.2 
Brca1 Controls Homology-Directed DNA Repair
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 120, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Pei-Yun Jenny Wu, Paul Nurse  Molecular Cell 
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Short Telomeres in Yeast Are Highly Recombinogenic
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Pervasive and Essential Roles of the Top3-Rmi1 Decatenase Orchestrate Recombination and Facilitate Chromosome Segregation in Meiosis  Shangming Tang,
Chromosome-wide Rad51 Spreading and SUMO-H2A
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
The Single-End Invasion
TALEN-Induced Double-Strand Break Repair of CTG Trinucleotide Repeats
Hsin-Yen Wu, Hsuan-Chung Ho, Sean M. Burgess  Current Biology 
Sarah K. Deng, Yi Yin, Thomas D. Petes, Lorraine S. Symington 
Volume 125, Issue 7, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Thorsten Allers, Michael Lichten  Cell 
Hideo Tsubouchi, G.Shirleen Roeder  Developmental Cell 
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Single Holliday Junctions Are Intermediates of Meiotic Recombination
Comprehensive, Fine-Scale Dissection of Homologous Recombination Outcomes at a Hot Spot in Mouse Meiosis  Francesca Cole, Scott Keeney, Maria Jasin  Molecular.
Intermediates of Yeast Meiotic Recombination Contain Heteroduplex DNA
Meiosis-Specific DNA Double-Strand Breaks Are Catalyzed by Spo11, a Member of a Widely Conserved Protein Family  Scott Keeney, Craig N Giroux, Nancy Kleckner 
Reciprocal Crossovers and a Positional Preference for Strand Exchange in Recombination Events Resulting in Deletion or Duplication of Chromosome 17p11.2 
Noa Raz, Ella Striem, Golan Pundak, Tanya Orlov, Ehud Zohary 
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Jill E. Falk, Andrew Chi-ho Chan, Eva Hoffmann, Andreas Hochwagen 
An AT-Rich Sequence in Human Common Fragile Site FRA16D Causes Fork Stalling and Chromosome Breakage in S. cerevisiae  Haihua Zhang, Catherine H. Freudenreich 
Volume 15, Issue 18, Pages (September 2005)
Targeted Stimulation of Meiotic Recombination
Telomere Dysfunction Increases Mutation Rate and Genomic Instability
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
The Meiosis-Specific Hop2 Protein of S
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2011)
Gradual Implementation of the Meiotic Recombination Program via Checkpoint Pathways Controlled by Global DSB Levels  Neeraj Joshi, M. Scott Brown, Douglas K.
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 125, Issue 7, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Generating Crossovers by Resolution of Nicked Holliday Junctions
Hsin-Yen Wu, Sean M. Burgess  Current Biology 
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Simon W.-L Chan, Elizabeth H Blackburn  Molecular Cell 
Zhu Zhu, Woo-Hyun Chung, Eun Yong Shim, Sang Eun Lee, Grzegorz Ira 
Huan Chen, Michael Lisby, Lorraine S. Symington  Molecular Cell 
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (March 2015)
Increased Recombination Intermediates and Homologous Integration Hot Spots at DNA Replication Origins  Mónica Segurado, Marı́a Gómez, Francisco Antequera 
Meiotic DNA Breaks at the S. pombe Recombination Hot Spot M26
Trisomy Correction in Down Syndrome Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Xiaorong Wang, Peter Baumann  Molecular Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Crossover Homeostasis in Yeast Meiosis Emmanuelle Martini, Robert L. Diaz, Neil Hunter, Scott Keeney  Cell  Volume 126, Issue 2, Pages 285-295 (July 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.044 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Reduction of DSBs Does Not Decrease the Number of Crossovers in Parallel (A) Effects of a SPO11 allelic series on DSBs on chromosome III. High-molecular-weight genomic DNA was isolated from three or four independent cultures of rad50S strains carrying the indicated SPO11 genotype (HA, spo11-HA; yf, spo11yf-HA; da, spo11da-HA). DNA was separated by pulsed-field electrophoresis and analyzed by Southern blotting and indirect end-labeling with a probe from the left end of chromosome III. M, lambda concatemer size markers. The plot on the right shows traces of representative lanes (asterisks), color coded as above the autoradiograph. (B) Genetic intervals on chromosomes III, VII, and VIII. (C) Genetic distances for wild-type and three spo11 mutants. Error bars are standard errors. A single asterisk indicates intervals where wild-type was significantly different from at least one mutant (p < 0.017, G test). A double asterisk denotes a statistically significant difference between spo11 mutants (p < 0.017, G test). (D) Nonlinear relationship between DSBs and crossovers. Y-axis values are means ± SD for all eight intervals examined. X-axis values are means ± SD for DSB measurements on all three chromosomes (Table 1). The gray line is as expected for a linear relationship. Cell 2006 126, 285-295DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.044) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Crossover Homeostasis Occurs at the Expense of Noncrossovers (A and B) Maps of the assay region showing configuration of the arg4 alleles and flanking markers. (C) Random spore analysis of recombination at ARG4. Random spores from strains heterozygous for arg4-Nsp and arg4-Bgl were plated on SC-arginine to select for Arg+ recombinants. Spore clone colonies were patched onto SC-arginine plates, then replica-printed onto SC-uracil and SC-threonine to score flanking markers. Examples of parental and nonparental clones are indicated. (D) Reduced Spo11 activity is accompanied by an increased crossover/noncrossover ratio. The ratio of crossovers to noncrossovers for Arg+ recombinants was calculated from the random spore data after correcting for incidental crossovers (see text). Gray lines show expected patterns for no homeostasis and for complete homeostasis. The curve for complete homeostasis was calculated assuming that 70% of crossovers in wild-type were interference sensitive, with the remainder not subject to crossover homeostasis. Similar curves are obtained for interfering crossover values of 60%–85% (data not shown). Cell 2006 126, 285-295DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.044) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Crossover Interference Is Maintained when Spo11 Activity Is Reduced Interference was assessed by comparing the genetic distance in an interval with versus without a crossover in the adjacent interval (see text for details). Solid black arcs connect adjacent intervals that showed significant evidence for interference. Numbers above the arcs are the average of interference ratios for each interval pair. The smaller the number, the stronger the interference. Dashed lines indicate adjacent intervals for which no statistically significant evidence for interference was observed (“n.s.,” not significant). Cell 2006 126, 285-295DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.044) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Little or No Crossover Homeostasis at the HIS4LEU2 DSB Hotspot (A) Maps of the HIS4LEU2 alleles (middle) and flanking markers (top). Restriction sites: X, XhoI; P, PstI. A Southern blot of XhoI-digested genomic DNA from a meiotic culture shows migration of parental length fragments and reciprocal crossover recombinants (Rec1, Rec2). (B) Two-dimensional gel assay for crossover and noncrossover recombination products. XhoI-digested DNA was separated in the first dimension, then digested in the gel with BamHI, and electrophoresed in the second dimension. Southern blotting and indirect end labeling revealed eight spots—two parental species (Mom[Bam] and Dad[Ngo]), two noncrossover gene conversion species (Mom[Ngo] and Dad[Bam]), and four crossover species (Rec1 and Rec2). (C) Effects of the SPO11 allelic series on DSBs at HIS4LEU2. Genomic DNA was prepared at the indicated times from rad50S strains and breaks were measured at the major DSB site in the HIS4LEU2 locus. Data points are the means ± SD of three independent cultures for each strain. Values in parentheses are relative DSB frequencies (percent of wild-type at 6 hr). Diamonds, SPO11/SPO11; squares, spo11-HA/spo11-HA; closed circles, spo11da-HA/spo11-HA; open circles, spo11da-HA/spo11da-HA. (D) Reduced Spo11 activity causes parallel reductions in both crossover and noncrossover products at HIS4LEU2. Values are means ± SD of ≥4 independent cultures. Crossovers and noncrossovers are plotted on different scales to provide visual correction for the 2-fold overrepresentation of crossover products (see text). Asterisks indicate values significantly lower than wild-type (p < 0.025, one-tailed t test). (E) Crossover homeostasis in an interval flanking the HIS4LEU2 hotspot. Genetic distances (cM ± standard error) were measured in 150–523 four-spore-viable tetrads from the indicated strains. The double asterisk indicates the only value significantly different from wild-type and other mutants (p < 0.017, G test). Cell 2006 126, 285-295DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.044) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions