Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (September 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Genomic Rescue: Restarting failed replication forks MI/BCH/BIO 615 Andrew Pierce Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics University of Kentucky.
Advertisements

Figure 1. PARP1 binds to abasic sites and DNA ends as a monomer
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Crystal Structure of T7 Gene 4 Ring Helicase Indicates a Mechanism for Sequential Hydrolysis of Nucleotides  Martin R Singleton, Michael R Sawaya, Tom.
Phage Mu Transposition Immunity: Protein Pattern Formation along DNA by a Diffusion- Ratchet Mechanism  Yong-Woon Han, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Molecular Cell 
Satoru Suzuki, Marcia Grabowecky  Neuron 
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 115, Issue 4, Pages (November 2003)
The Real-Time Path of Translation Factor IF3 onto and off the Ribosome
Volume 151, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
MunJu Kim, Katarzyna A. Rejniak  Biophysical Journal 
Recombination Mechanisms
Yeast RNA Polymerase II at 5 Å Resolution
Self-Organization of Myosin II in Reconstituted Actomyosin Bundles
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Division of Labor in an Oligomer of the DEAD-Box RNA Helicase Ded1p
Kinetic Discrimination of tRNA Identity by the Conserved Motif 2 Loop of a Class II Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase  Ethan C. Guth, Christopher S. Francklyn 
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
He Meng, Johan Bosman, Thijn van der Heijden, John van Noort 
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages e4 (September 2017)
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Volume 131, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 129, Issue 7, Pages (June 2007)
Satoru Suzuki, Marcia Grabowecky  Neuron 
DNA Translocation Governed by Interactions with Solid-State Nanopores
Stefan Lakämper, Edgar Meyhöfer  Biophysical Journal 
Direct Observation of Single MuB Polymers
Forward and Reverse Motion of Single RecBCD Molecules on DNA
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Georg B. Keller, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Mark Hübener  Neuron 
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Mechanism of Force Generation of a Viral DNA Packaging Motor
Mathematical Models of Protein Kinase Signal Transduction
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (March 2015)
Olga Tsaponina, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
Short-Term Memory for Figure-Ground Organization in the Visual Cortex
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Chandan Shee, Janet L. Gibson, Susan M. Rosenberg  Cell Reports 
by Matthew J. Comstock, Kevin D
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Mechanistic Basis of 5′-3′ Translocation in SF1B Helicases
Revisiting the Central Dogma One Molecule at a Time
Rikiya Watanabe, Makoto Genda, Yasuyuki Kato-Yamada, Hiroyuki Noji 
Modeling of the RAG Reaction Mechanism
Large-Scale Expansions of Friedreich's Ataxia GAA Repeats in Yeast
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Yariv Kafri, David K. Lubensky, David R. Nelson  Biophysical Journal 
Maria Spies, Stephen C. Kowalczykowski  Molecular Cell 
Daniel L. Kaplan, Mike O'Donnell  Molecular Cell 
Reconstitution of an SOS Response Pathway
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Yufang Wang, Ling Guo, Ido Golding, Edward C. Cox, N.P. Ong 
Figure 1. Removal of the 2B subdomain activates Rep monomer unwinding
The Recombination Hot Spot Chi Is Embedded within Islands of Preferred DNA Pairing Sequences in the E. coli Genome  Robert B Tracy, Frédéric Chédin, Stephen.
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages 647-654 (September 2003) A Molecular Throttle  Maria Spies, Piero R. Bianco, Mark S. Dillingham, Naofumi Handa, Ronald J. Baskin, Stephen C. Kowalczykowski  Cell  Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages 647-654 (September 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00681-0

Figure 1 Recognition of χ Results in a Pause, Followed by a Reduction in the Rate of RecBCD Enzyme Translocation (A) Analysis of a representative video visualizing RecBCD-mediated unwinding of a single DNA molecule (shown schematically at the right of the graph) containing χ positioned 8.2 kb from the DNA end and an additional reverse-oriented χ at 7 kb from the DNA end. The length of the dsDNA molecule was measured for each frame and presented as a time trace (red squares). Zero time corresponds to the moment when the RecBCD-DNA-complex was transferred to the ATP-containing channel. The rates of RecBCD-mediated DNA unwinding and both the duration and the position of the pause were determined by fitting the data corresponding to phases II, III, and IV to a continuous three-segment line (blue line). (B) Schematic representation of the phases of RecBCD-mediated unwinding of χ-containing dsDNA. (I) RecBCD-DNA-bead complex is trapped in the sample side of the flow cell. (II) dsDNA unwinding by RecBCD enzyme results in a linear decrease in the dsDNA length upon relocation of the bead-DNA-RecBCD complex to the reaction (ATP-containing) side of the flow cell. (III) interaction with χ results in a pause in RecBCD enzyme translocation. (IV) the χ-modified enzyme continues to unwind the DNA, but at significantly reduced rate. (V) RecBCD enzyme dissociates from the DNA. (C) Representative frames from the movie analyzed in (A). The green arrow in frames I–III indicates the end of the dsDNA molecule, where RecBCD enzyme acts, while the white arrow in frames IV–V points to the putative ssDNA. Cell 2003 114, 647-654DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00681-0)

Figure 2 RecBCD Enzyme Pauses Precisely at χ Representative time courses for RecBCD-mediated unwinding of dsDNA molecules with different positions and orientations of χ. The substrates are shown schematically on the right. Black arrows point to the correctly oriented χ sequences. Movies showing the unwinding of these substrates are provided in the Supplemental Data. Cell 2003 114, 647-654DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00681-0)

Figure 3 After Recognition of a χ Sequence, RecBCD Enzyme Does Not Alter Its Translocation Behavior at the Downstream χ Time courses for RecBCD-mediated unwinding of the χ7K(8K) dsDNA. The χ7K(8K) dsDNA contains two correctly oriented χ loci, which are indicated by solid arrows in the schematic representation of the substrate molecule. The unwinding of a representative molecule in which a pause occurs at the upstream χ (blue arrow) is represented by blue circles and a light blue line. The red circles and an orange line represent the unwinding of DNA where the downstream (red arrow), but not the upstream, χ was recognized. The nearly identical rates of unwinding are purely coincidental. Cell 2003 114, 647-654DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00681-0)

Figure 4 The Rates of RecBCD Enzyme Translocation before and after χ Recognition Are Independent of One Another (A) Distribution of RecBCD enzyme translocation rates assigned to 100 bp/s intervals. Rates before χ (red bars) are summarized for all substrates (see Table 1), whereas rates after χ (blue bars) are only for molecules that displayed a pause at χ. The data were fit to Gaussian distribution curves with the following parameters: mean rate = 598 ± 34 bp/s, standard deviation = 210 ± 35 bp/s before χ, and mean rate = 309 ± 14 bp/s, standard deviation = 121 ± 14 bp/sec after χ. (B) Scatter plot to illustrate the absence of correlation between rates before and after χ recognition. Cell 2003 114, 647-654DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00681-0)

Figure 5 Model for the Control of the DNA Translocation Behavior of RecBCD Enzyme by χ RecBCD enzyme is shown as a bipolar helicase with its two motor subunits translocating on the opposite strands of the DNA substrate molecule. In panels IIa–IIIa, RecD subunit is assumed to be the leading motor subunit prior to χ recognition. RecD is proposed to be inactivated at χ, and the pause reflects the time required for the slower (RecB) motor subunit to catch up with RecD and RecC stalled at χ. In panels IIb–IIIb, translocation of both motor subunits is assumed to occur at the same velocity. Pausing at χ in this model reflects the time required for the conformational change within RecBCD enzyme required to inactivate the RecD subunit. After χ recognition, the modified RecBCD enzyme is proposed to lack RecD function and, hence, translocates slowly. See text for more details. Cell 2003 114, 647-654DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00681-0)