Beam Halo Considerations for Back Angle Running

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1Beam Line Review. 17th November Detector parameters Fermilab Beam line monitors built to replaced SWICS Scintillating fibre tracker – readout.
Advertisements

PANDA Collaboration Meeting Backward Endcap Calorimeter Geometry David Rodríguez Piñeiro GSI Darmstadt PANDA Collaboration Meeting GSI
Yury CHESNOKOV Crystal Collimation workshop, March 7, 2005 CALIBRATION of CMS CALORIMETERS with LHC PROTON BEAM DEFLECTED BY CRYSTAL CALIBRATION of CMS.
Beam Position Monitors MICE CM Harbin January, 2009.
Concept for the New Detector Chamber at the ESR Ion beam Internal Target Region  Lab *)  Flange axis Covered  range Flange size in mm A90° – 80°83°95°
Liquid Xenon Gamma Screening Luiz de Viveiros Brown University.
GlueX Simulations Status Report on CD3 geometry Richard Jones GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, January 10-12, 2008.
Ultra-sensitive HALO monitor N. Vinogradov, A. Dychkant, P. Piot.
IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama. Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
New particle ID detector for Crystal Ball at MAMI-C Daniel Watts, University of Edinburgh John Annand 1, B. Briscoe 3, A. Clarkson 2, Evie Downie 1, D.
AM test sample. outside 20 mm inside 19 mm wallthickness 1 mm height features 4 mm.
S PIN A SYMMETRIES ON THE N UCLEON E XPERIMENT ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Experiment Nuclear Physics Group Meeting Hampton University May 11, 2009.
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003.
20to2T5m100cm Images Van Graves February 13, 2014.
Xiao-Yan Zhao Beam Instrumentation Group Accelerator Center, IHEP BEPCII Background Issues: Beam Loss Measurement.
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised August 1, 2003 updated.
G5 Beam Instrumentation D. Gassner, E. Pozdeyev 4-09.
HPS T EST R UN C ONTINGENCY P LAN S. Stepanyan JLAB.
Beam Studies December 2014 Runs: 7820 – 7860 December 27, 2014.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
Neutron Flux Measurement at the CYRIC T. Horiguchi and A. Ishikawa (Tohoku University) For the FPCCD group.
SksMinus status Hyperball collaboration meeting 2009/3/11 K. Shirotori.
Material and thickness for pi0 Y.Sudo Univ. of Tsukuba 2008/07/18.
Vyacheslav Klyukhin, SINP MSU Simulation of magnetic toroids for CMS forward muon detection April 22, 2013V. Klyukhin, General Muon mtg, CERN1.
Start and Vertex Detector W. Boeglin, A.Klein Current Design: 3300 scintillating fibers 1mm diameter 3 double layers (1 axial, 2 stereo) cylindrical geometry.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
May 26-27, 2005Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U), KRare05 at Frascati, Italy1 Studies on High QE PMT Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U.) Contents –Motivation –Performance.
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
Progress report of the GLAST ACD Beam Test at CERN (Backsplash study) simulation and analysis Tsunefumi Mizuno, Hirofumi Mizushima (Hiroshima Univ.) and.
SANE Collaboration ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Hampton University January 12, 2010 Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio at High Q 2 by Using The.
Results From the Radphi LGD Dan Krop 12/11/03. The Radphi Experiment Radphi Experiment Took Data in Jlab Hall B From May to July Hours Of Beam.
Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.
330 mm 290 mm 210 mm 60 mm 20 mm The magnet Beam through a hole of 75 mm in the yoke Pole gap: 90 mm.
ILC IP SR and PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC IR engineering workshop IRENG07 Sept 17-21, 2007.
FTOF Status Anton A. Izotov, Frascati
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised.
LCWS Paris – April 19-23, 2004 Polarimeter Issues K. Peter Schüler Polarimeter Issues 1 Polarimeter Studies for TESLA O General Considerations O.
Gloria Corti, LHCb LHCb background on detector. Gloria Corti Page 2 Evaluating impact on experiment Increasing the inner coverage of the TT detector will.
XML Description of Beam Pipe Geometry  For XML description of Beam Pipe were used: Det/XmlDDDB/v6, Det/XmlEditor/v4, Det/DetDesk/v8, Vis/GaudiLab/head.
ODR Diagnostics for Hadron Colliders Tanaji Sen APC.
SuperB Gen meeting Oct 5-9, 2009 IR Interface 1 IR Interface Issues M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni, P. Raimondi, et al.
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
Interaction Region and Detector
Forward Tagger Simulations
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
IHEP group Shashlyk activity towards TDR
EBTF Design Review Technical Meeting Group
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
SHMS Downstream Beamline Large SHMS/HMS Angles (Config-1)
Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator
Magnetic gap calculation
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
Source term test in Hall C
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Additional Upstream Coil Shielding
SHMS Master Layout-Rays
I250Y-R: Target Expt –(05/31/2011) Viewer as seen by camera
Gas cell apertures with dimensions (original)
DIRC Background Status
SHMS Downstream Beamline
GLD IR optimization and background study
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
Presentation transcript:

Beam Halo Considerations for Back Angle Running There are two ways that significant beam halo could potentially be problematic for the experiment. Interaction of beam halo with the thick parts of the G0 target flange: The < 1 x 10-6 outside of a 3 mm radius comes from the desire to minimize interaction of beam with thick part of G0 target flange (radius = 5.5 mm). During forward angle running, this was monitored continuously with our calibrated halo monitor system (6 mm diameter hole in 2 mm thick Al target + downstream PMTs for monitoring). The specification was routinely achieved for the potentially more problematic 31 MHz beam. Interaction of the beam halo with some small upstream aperture: Beam halo interacting with a small upstream aperture could potentially generate background that gets detected in our scintillators. We measure this with no G0 target and no halo target. This background was negligible during forward angle running, but the detectors were downstream of the magnet then. For the back angle running, the detectors are upstream of the magnet in a potentially more exposed location. The smallest upstream aperture appears to be the ceramic pipe (inner diameter = 22 mm) through the fast raster magnets. We are in the process of doing some simple rate estimates to get an upper limit on the potential detector rate due to interaction of beam halo in the ceramic tube.