Percentage of patients reporting improvements ≥MCID and NNTs to achieve an MCID in (A) PtGA, (B) pain, (C) HAQ-DI, (D) FACIT-F and (E) SF-36 domains and.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Proportion of patients reporting scores ≥age-matched and gender-matched normative PRO values at baseline and 24 weeks in the (A) AMBITION and (B) ADACTA.

Advertisements

Mean change from baseline in (A) DAS28-4(ESR), (B) CDAI and (C) HAQ-DI

Mean change in patient-reported outcomes from baseline to Week 25 with biweekly or monthly pegloticase compared with placebo. Mean change in patient-reported.

Radiographic progression among three therapy groups (triple therapy group, anti-TNF treatment group and MTX responders) stratified by MBDA categories at.

Percentage of patients achieving DAS28 (CRP) < 3

Conversion to ACPA and RF seronegative status in patients with early RA treated with abatacept+MTX compared with MTX alone. Conversion to ACPA and RF seronegative.

Mean DAS (A), HAQ (B) and percentages in low disease activity, DAS remission and drug-free DAS remission (C) during 5 years in the DAS ≤2.4 steered (BeSt)

Kaplan-Meier survival plots for survival without: (A) progression to RA according to the number of joints with significant synovitis defined by GS≥ grade.

Percentage of patients achieving EULAR response

Efficacy end points: the percentage of patients achieving an improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) of (A) 20% (ACR20), (B) 50% (ACR50)

ASAS 20/40 response rates, and mean change from baseline in BASDAI through week 156* of treatment. *For patients who discontinued, the end of treatment.

Association of disease parameters at the time of methotrexate reinitiation during the OLE based on propensity score matching. Association of disease parameters.

Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes following up to 3 years of open-label adalimumab as monotherapy after 2 years of adalimumab+methotrexate.

Improvement in PROs, TJC, SJC and PGA at month 6 in patients achieving (A) ACR50, (B) CDAI LDA and (C) HAQ-DI

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes for patients randomised to CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg Q4W to week 96. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Correlations between observed patient-reported outcomes and disease activity scores at week 24. Correlations between observed patient-reported outcomes.

Mean concentrations (mM) of PG1+2, PG3 and PG4+5 in patients with or without MTX-related toxicity at baseline, week 4 and week 24/26 in (A) CONCERTO and.

Frequency of patients in flare at each time point over 3 months

Disease activities evaluated as a comparison between abatacept plus MTX and placebo plus MTX groups. Disease activities evaluated as a comparison between.

HAQ-DI change from baseline and proportion of patients achieving MCID after 24 weeks in patients treated with PBO, IXEQ4W or IXEQ2W alone or in combination.

ACR response rates at 24 weeks in patients treated with PBO, IXEQ4W or IXEQ2W alone or in combination with cDMARDs or MTX. The proportions of patients.

The severity of fatigue over 8 years of disease in early rheumatoid arthritis patients. The severity of fatigue over 8 years of disease in early rheumatoid.

OR for baseline predictors of MDA at weeks 12, 24, 48, 96 and 144 by univariate analysis of observed data. OR for baseline predictors of MDA at weeks 12,

OR for selected baseline predictors of MDA at weeks 12, 24, 48, 96 and 144 by multivariate analysis of observed data. OR for selected baseline predictors.

Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥65 years versus younger patients: ACR outcomes at (A) week 12 and (B) week 24. Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥65.

Ratings of core domains stratified by stakeholder group in the second Delphi round. Ratings of core domains stratified by stakeholder group in the second.

Box plot of HAQ-DI scores at baseline, week 96 and week 144 categorised by baseline PsA duration. Box plot of HAQ-DI scores at baseline, week 96 and week.

Response rates for patients achieving 50% (A), 70% (B), and 90% (C) improvement in ACR criteria, and normal physical function (D) over the course of 10.

Additional efficacy outcomes for the 12-week study of Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with baricitinib or placebo. Additional efficacy.

Patient-reported outcomes: proportion of patients with clinically meaningful improvements in (A) SF-36 PCS and MCS at Week 52 and Week 104*†‡ and (B) HAQ-DI.

Column bar graphs showing Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores and pain score on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (scale 0–10) that were collected at.

Association between PGIC and change (Δ) in (A) Pain (VAS), (B) PGA, (C) FIQ, (D) HAQ, (E) Body Map, (F) MPQ). Association between PGIC and change (Δ) in.

Levels of participation in the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) development process. Levels of participation in the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact.

SF-36 domain scores at baseline and 24 weeks compared with age-matched and gender-matched normative values in the (A) AMBITION and (B) ADACTA trial populations.

Matrix risk model showing the probability of SRP in patients with moderate disease activity after 3 years of MTX treatment. Matrix risk model showing the.

Multivariate analysis for SRP after 3 years in patients with moderate disease activity despite MTX treatment. Multivariate analysis for SRP after 3 years.

Clinical response in patients with early and established RA at month 24. *p

Least squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline in (A) Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Total score and (B) Ankylosing.

Relative impact of the different levels of education on the physical and mental components of SF-12 across the different chronic disorders. Relative impact.

Patients with RA on csDMARDs with and without GC, bDMARDs/tofacitinib with and without GC on the x axis. Patients with RA on csDMARDs with and without.

Adjusted estimates of DAS28 (95% CI) and RAPID3 (95% CI) scores over time based on multivariate models a priori adjusted for possible confounders: age,

Kaplan-Meier One Minus Survival plot showing cumulative progression to clinical arthritis for patients with clinically suspect arthralgia divided in four.

Improvement in PROs, TJC, SJC and PGA at month 6 in patients achieving (A) ACR70, (B) CDAI REM and (C) SDAI REM. For tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID treatment.

Percentages of patients reporting improvements from baseline ≥minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and number needed to treat (NNT) in (A) patient-reported.

Improvement in FACIT-F fatigue score according to ACR20 response status (ACR, American College of Rheumatology; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic.

Percentage of patients with RA achieving DAS28(CRP)<2

Joint damage progression evaluated as a comparison between abatacept plus MTX (grey bar) and placebo plus MTX groups (open bar). Joint damage progression.

Cox proportional-hazards model of time to first RA flare after treatment withdrawal for patients who entered the re-treatment period (n=146). Cox proportional-hazards.

Spydergram of mean SF-36 domain scores at baseline and weeks 12 (A) and 24 (B) for sarilumab 150 mg and 200 mg+csDMARDs compared with placebo+csDMARDs.

Rates of ACR50 response and prespecified MTX-related adverse events in patients in the (A) CONCERTO study over 26 weeks and (B) MUSICA study over 24 weeks. ACR50, American.

Least squares mean changes from baseline (and 95% CIs) at month three for (A) HAQ-DI, (B) FACIT-F and (C) SF-36 physical functioning domain observed in.

Percentage of patients achieving 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria at week 12 by patient demographic and disease characteristics.

Percentage of responders at month 6 by (A) ACR50, SDAI/CDAI LDA, and HAQ-DI

Characteristics of the included trials on non-pharmacological treatment. Characteristics of the included trials on non-pharmacological treatment. ASDAS,

Frequency of methotrexate (MTX) doses at 24 months (plot) and summary of MTX doses across the MTX dosing categories (low, medium, high) based on data at.

Patient disposition after 2 years of treatment.

Proportion of patients reporting improvements from baseline in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) ≥ the MCID at (A) 16 weeks in OPTION, (B) 12 weeks in BREVACTA.

Study design. *Randomisation stratified by corticosteroid use at baseline. Study design. *Randomisation stratified by corticosteroid use at baseline. DAS28-CRP,

Satisfaction with control of RA

The proportions (and 95% CIs) of anti-CCP+/RF+, anti-CCP+/RF-, anti-CCP-/RF+ and anti-CCP-/RF- patients receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg two times a day.

Explanatory power of the LPA solution for clinical and functional outcomes compared with the conventional threshold-based discordance definition. Explanatory.

Mean profiles over 1 year from the observed Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) data for the methotrexate (MTX)-exposed patients after stratifying by predicted.

DAPSA LSM change from baseline (A), patients achieving DAPSA ≤28 (MDA) (B), DAPSA ≤14 (LDA) (C) or DAPSA ≤4 (REM) (D) after 24 weeks in patients treated.

LPA groups display vastly different outcomes.

Patient-level radiographic progression of structural joint damage at year 1 and year 2 by original randomisation. Patient-level radiographic progression.

Multivariable model of adjusted

ACPA and RF titres in patients with early RA treated with abatacept+MTX compared with MTX alone. ACPA and RF titres in patients with early RA treated with.

WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) symptoms in the operated knee and contralateral knee over time and by treatment. WOMAC.

Percentage of patients achieving remission by conversion to ACPA seronegative status. Percentage of patients achieving remission by conversion to ACPA.

Post hoc analysis of differences from placebo in the percentage of patients reporting improvements ≥MCID at week 24. Post hoc analysis of differences from.

Presentation transcript:

Percentage of patients reporting improvements ≥MCID and NNTs to achieve an MCID in (A) PtGA, (B) pain, (C) HAQ-DI, (D) FACIT-F and (E) SF-36 domains and summary scores. Percentage of patients reporting improvements ≥MCID and NNTs to achieve an MCID in (A) PtGA, (B) pain, (C) HAQ-DI, (D) FACIT-F and (E) SF-36 domains and summary scores. In (E) (SF-36), each bar is divided by colour (white, black or grey) to represent the treatment groups. The number displayed within each treatment group is the percentage of patients reporting improvements ≥MCID (number of patients achieving MCID divided by the total number of patients in that treatment group). The number displayed in parentheses is the NNT of that treatment compared with MTX. *p<0.05; **p<0.001; ***p<0.0001 vs MTX. All data are FAS, no imputation. BID, two times a day; FACIT-F, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; FAS, full analysis set; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; HRQoL, health-related quality of life; MCID, minimum clinically important difference; MTX, methotrexate; NA, not applicable (ie, NNT is negative); NNT, numbers needed to treat; Pain, Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain; SF-36, Short Form-36. Vibeke Strand et al. RMD Open 2016;2:e000308 Copyright © BMJ Publishing Group & EULAR. All rights reserved.