(A) Design of the PhosphoPep database.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
David Campbell 1,, Eric Deutsch 1, Henry Lam 1, Hamid Mirzaei 1, Paola Picotti 2, Jeff Ranish 1, Ning Zhang 1, and Ruedi Aebersold 1,2,3 1.Institute for.
Advertisements

Finish up array applications Move on to proteomics Protein microarrays.
EADGENE and SABRE Post-Analyses Workshop 12-14th November 2008, Lelystad, Netherlands 1 François Moreews SIGENAE, INRA, Rennes Cytoscape.
Copyright OpenHelix. No use or reproduction without express written consent1.
Networks and Interactions
Microtubule perturbations affect pathway variability η2(P) and transmitted signal P at or upstream of the Ste5 recruitment step Microtubule perturbations.
GFP‐Sed5p localization defect in sgt2Δ.
Abundance of proteins matching selected subcellular locations and functions in CaCo‐2 cells. Abundance of proteins matching selected subcellular locations.
Global comparison of MinSpan pathways with databases of human‐defined pathways The pairwise connection specificity index (CSI) was calculated for all pathway.
Mutant EGFR complexes in lung cancer cell lines and immortalized human bronchial epithelial cells. Mutant EGFR complexes in lung cancer cell lines and.
Statistical analysis of the influence of network regulators on topology clusters in the oleate network. Statistical analysis of the influence of network.
Network topology reflects target gene expression profile and function.
A kinetic model reconciles observed ERK phosphorylation, localization, and activity responses A Schematic of a simple kinetic model including cytosolic.
Usage of l‐carnitine antimetabolites for the treatment of HCCl‐Carnitine and metabolites in the l‐carnitine biosynthetic pathway, as well as two essential.
Distribution of disorder in the cytosolic phosphoproteome
CNA‐driven network of glioblastoma.
Analysis of in silico flux changes along the exponential growth phase: (A) In silico flux changes from 24 to 36 h, from 36 to 48 h, and from 48 to 60 h.
Distribution of phosphorylation sites identified in the cytosolic phosphoproteome.A, numbers of approved phosphopeptides, previously phosphorylated peptides,
Hypothetical example of co‐complex interactions being scored by weighted matrix model Hypothetical example of co‐complex interactions being scored by weighted.
Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the interaction networks with known cancer driver proteins Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the.
Validation of the CCE associations by mass spectrometry.
(C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing both baits and preys) for selected groups of baits. (C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing.
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Structure of in‐frame deletions.
Comparative analysis of RNA and protein profiles.
Highly correlating interaction profiles can predict functional similarity Highly correlating interaction profiles can predict functional similarity AROC.
Identify D. melanogaster ortholog
Large‐scale image‐based CRISPR‐Cas9 gene perturbation profiling
Luminex phosphorylation measurements are reproducible and have broad dynamic range Individual difference in insulin‐induced phosphorylation of ERK measured.
Correlating protein to mRNA and proteins per mRNA ratios
Network derived from large‐scale fractionation predicts 48 protein complexes and communities Network derived from large‐scale fractionation predicts 48.
Hierarchical structure in the yeast transcription regulatory network.
Heat maps showing global relative growth phenotype and comparison between measured and predicted values. Heat maps showing global relative growth phenotype.
INDRA Statements constructed from TRIPS NLP extractions, BioPAX, and BEL INDRA Statements constructed from TRIPS NLP extractions, BioPAX, and BEL An identical.
MITF upregulation leads to Hsp90i resistance
Networks of ERK substrates.
Physical EGFR interactome generation and core network proteins identification. Physical EGFR interactome generation and core network proteins identification.
Direct dFOXO targets in wild‐type adult flies.
Dynamic map of the Nap1p/Kcc4p interaction.
Fast, Quantitative and Variant Enabled Mapping of Peptides to Genomes
Dynamic changes of protein phosphorylation identify ERK1/2 substrates from cytosolic and nuclear compartments. Dynamic changes of protein phosphorylation.
Examples for intrachromosomal mRNA co‐regulation patches
Schematic representation of proteogenomic annotation strategy.
Interaction networks of the regulated phosphoproteins.
Characterization of Factor 5 (oxidative stress response factor) in the CLL data Characterization of Factor 5 (oxidative stress response factor) in the.
High level view of the MAE algorithm.
Francis Crick's central dogma of biology revolves around the transcription of mRNA from DNA, the translation of proteins from mRNA, and the degradation.
Transcriptomic and epigenetic changes associated with Factor 1 in the scMT data Transcriptomic and epigenetic changes associated with Factor 1 in the scMT.
48 clinically relevant GPCR receptors mapped using MYTH
Comparison of proteomics and RNA‐Seq data.
Transformation of expression data to identify more direct consequences of perturbation Expression changes under amino acid starvation conditions (30 min,
An integrated NHR network.
Design and optimization of the computational model.
Subnetworks enriched for the hallmarks of cancer.
Melting behavior of protein complexes
Nedd4 proteins. Nedd4 proteins. (A) Schematic representation of rNedd4‐1, hNedd4‐1 and hNedd4‐2 (not to scale), with % amino‐acid identity between them.
Schematic representation of the data structure.
SDS-PAGE of IGFBP-5 from 32P-labeled T47D cells and separation of tryptic phosphopeptides separated by HPLC.a, an autoradiograph (lane 1) is shown next.
Global and focused views of human interaction map.
Dynamic regulatory map and static network for yeast response to AA starvation. Dynamic regulatory map and static network for yeast response to AA starvation.
Integrative omic approaches for the study of host–pathogen interactions Integrative omic approaches for the study of host–pathogen interactions (A) Proteomic.
Integration of proteomic data into the model
Building a model from natural language with INDRA
The transcriptional behavior of GREB1 changes with estrogen dose and exhibits considerable cell‐to‐cell variation (see also Fig EV2 and Movie EV2)‏ The.
Sequence dependence of Met4 recruitment.
Proteomic analysis of human transcription factors Disease correlation of 19 TFs and 4 well‐studied FOX family members, based on their GO annotations. Proteomic.
Proteomics Informatics David Fenyő
Mathematical modeling of affinities between measured species
Genome‐scale metabolic models (GEMs) provide a scaffold for integrative analysis of clinical data. Genome‐scale metabolic models (GEMs) provide a scaffold.
MS3 for peptide identification and mapping phosphorylation sites
Presentation transcript:

(A) Design of the PhosphoPep database. (A) Design of the PhosphoPep database. By using the ‘Search interface’ (α) PhosphoPep can be interrogated for single proteins, a set of proteins or pathways. For each protein, several types of information including the observed phosphopeptides is shown in the ‘Protein information’ page (see panel B and β. Single proteins or a set of proteins can be placed into their pathways (χ). From this ‘Pathway view’ all phosphoproteins can be exported to Cytoscape (Shannon et al, 2003) (δ). This software tool allows integrating data from PhosphoPep with external data such as protein–protein interaction networks (ε). For most phosphopeptides, consensus MS2 spectra (ϕ) are given which can be exported for targeted proteomics experiments such as multiple reaction monitoring (Domon and Aebersold, 2006) (γ). As we supply an online spectral matching search tool, results generated by such experiments can be validated using PhosphoPep. (B) Representative output of the PhosphoPep database. The PhosphoPep (www.phosphopep.org) database contains more than 10 000 phosphorylation sites from nearly 3500 gene models and nearly 5800 phosphoproteins derived from the FlyBase (Grumbling and Strelets, 2006) nonredundant database (r4.3). For each phosphoprotein, the phosphopeptide sequence, the protein annotation and the predicted subcellular location is shown. Furthermore, additional information for each phosphopeptide is given: The probability, the number of tryptic ends, the dCn value, the mass, how often it was observed and to how many gene models and transcripts it maps. The phosphopeptides are represented in both the protein sequence and in a graphical representation, the protein map. Finally, a link to the ‘Pathway view’, to the ‘Cytoscape export’ function and to http://scansite.mit.edu/ (Obenauer et al, 2003) is given as represented by the three symbols besides the FlyBase gene entry. Bernd Bodenmiller et al. Mol Syst Biol 2007;3:139 © as stated in the article, figure or figure legend