NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Prolyl Oligopeptidase
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
A Model for Arrestin’s Regulation: The 2
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Structural View of the Ran–Importin β Interaction at 2.3 Å Resolution
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Activation Mechanism of the MAP Kinase ERK2 by Dual Phosphorylation
Volume 118, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Crystal Structure of SRP19 in Complex with the S Domain of SRP RNA and Its Implication for the Assembly of the Signal Recognition Particle  Chris Oubridge,
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1995)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation  Margareta K. Sorenson, Soumya S.
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure Richard C. Yu, Reinhard Jahn, Axel T. Brunger  Molecular Cell  Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 97-107 (July 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80191-4

Figure 7 Model of Conformational Changes in NSF Based on the Structural Similarity to EF-Tu (A) Nucleotide-dependent conformation of EF-Tu. The switch II helix, which changes conformation upon loss of the gamma phosphate of the bound nucleotide, is shown in purple. The nucleotide, drawn in ball-and-stick, is cradled by the conserved P loop region, drawn in red. The GMPPNP- (top) and GDP-bound (bottom) conformations are aligned by a least-squares fit of the P loop and nucleotide atoms in domain 1 (orange). Upon nucleotide hydrolysis, domains 2 (green) and 3 (yellow) twist and move back into the plane of the figure and remain fixed relative to each other during this rotation. During this movement, domain 1 swings approximately 90° about an axis through domains 2 and 3. PDB accession codes for GMPPNP- and GDP-bound EF-Tu are 1EFT (Kjeldgaard et al. 1993) and 1TUI (Polekhina et al. 1996), respectively. (B) Model of nucleotide-dependent motions in an NSF hexamer, held together by a ring of D2 domains (red). In the ATP-charged state, the N domains (yellow and green) are flared outward from the pore of the hexamer. After ATP hydrolysis, N rotates and twists relative to D1 (orange). This model is consistent with estimated hexamer dimensions derived from EM studies (Hanson et al. 1997; Hohl et al. 1998). Molecular Cell 1999 4, 97-107DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80191-4)

Figure 2 Representative Electron Density and Subdomain Interface (A) Density-modified experimental map around Phe-138, contoured at 1.5 σ. (B) 2Fo − Fc map of same region as (A), contoured at 1.5 σ and calculated with both model and experimental phases. (C) Stereo rendition of buried water molecules (red spheres) in the interface region between subdomains NA (blue) and NB (red). Side chains of interface residues are drawn as gray sticks, and helices α1, α2′, and α3′ are rendered as ribbons. Red dashed line indicates disordered residues 162–166. Molecular Cell 1999 4, 97-107DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80191-4)

Figure 1 Secondary Structure and Topology of N The red dashed line indicates disordered residues 162–166. (A) Ribbon diagram rendering of N. Secondary structure was assigned using DSSP (Kabsch and Sander 1983). The two distinct subdomains of N are referred to as NA (residues 1–84, blue to pink) and NB (residues 87–201), pink to red. (B) Ribbon diagram of NA from another perspective. (C) Topology diagram for NA. Shaded regions indicate the ψ loops. (D) Aromatic ladder consisting of phenylalanine and tyrosine residues lining helix α3′ in NB. Molecular Cell 1999 4, 97-107DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80191-4)

Figure 3 Structural Similarity between N and EF-Tu Stereo backbone alignments of subdomains NA and NB to EF-Tu domains 2 and 3, respectively. Thick segments are considered equivalent by DALI and were used for Cα alignment. (A) NA from blue (N terminus) to pink (C terminus), EF-Tu domain 2 from dark green to light green. (B) NB from pink to red, EF-Tu from light green to yellow. Equivalent strands from NA and EF-Tu domain 2 align with a Cα rmsd of 2.9 Å, and those from NB and EF-Tu domain 3 align with a Cα rmsd of 3.2 Å. Red dashed line indicates disordered residues 162–166. Molecular Cell 1999 4, 97-107DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80191-4)

Figure 4 Surface Features of N Right-handed 90° rotations from top to bottom row are shown. (A) Surface of N colored according to the electrostatic potential computed by GRASP (Nicholls et al. 1991) using OPLS charges (Jorgensen and Tirado-Rives 1988). The electrostatic surface was contoured between −5 kT/e (red) and +5 kT/e (blue). (B) Primary sequence conservation of residues mapped to solvent-accessible surface. (C) Cavities found using a 2.0–5.0 Å radius probe computed by SURFNET (Laskowski 1995). Grooves are labeled 1 (light green), 2 (blue-green), and 3 (orange). Note that groove 3 overlaps with a very positive cavity in (A) and conserved regions in (B), making it a likely binding site for the negatively charged, helical C terminus of α-SNAP. Molecular Cell 1999 4, 97-107DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80191-4)

Figure 5 Sequence Alignment of CHO NSF to Other Known Orthologs CHO NSF aligned with mouse, human, Drosophila (two isoforms), C. elegans, yeast S. cerevisae, and yeast C. albicans. Sequences were aligned using ClustalW (Thompson et al. 1994), then conservation values were calculated with AMAS (Livingstone and Barton 1993). Colors indicated weak (light blue) to absolute (violet with white lettering) conservation. The top line indicates regions of β sheet strand (arrow) and α- or 310-helix (box) as assigned by DSSP (Kabsch and Sander 1983). Numbers indicate residue number of CHO NSF. The dashed line indicates disordered regions. Molecular Cell 1999 4, 97-107DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80191-4)

Figure 6 Model of α-SNAP Binding to Groove 3 of N Assuming that the position of D1 is near the C terminus of N, binding of the C terminus of α-SNAP to groove 3 would allow for the penultimate residue of α-SNAP to interact with D1. Molecular Cell 1999 4, 97-107DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80191-4)