Psychology Department, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Visual Sensation & Perception How do we see?. Structure of the eye.
Advertisements

The visual system Lecture 1: Structure of the eye
The Effect of Object Size and Speed on Time to Collision Estimation in the Horizontal Plane Douna Montazer, Valdeep Saini, Nicole Simone, Danielle Thorpe.
Correlation and Prediction Error The amount of prediction error is associated with the strength of the correlation between X and Y.
LOGO Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption Professor: Liu Student: Ruby.
Motion Perception Deficits and Reading Impairment It’s the noise, not the motion A. Sperling, Z-L. Lu, F. Manis & M. Seidenberg.
Signal Detection Analysis of a Three Alternative Forced Choice Signal Detection Analysis of a Three Alternative Forced Choice in a Stereoacuity Context.
Processing visual information - pathways
Psychology 304: Brain and Behaviour Lecture 28
Jessie Briggs & Andrew Karpinski
Exploring Spatial Frequency Channels in Stereopsis
Ch. 3 The Human Color-Imaging System
Visual Sensory System.
PERCEIVED BEAUTY OF RANDOM DENSITY PATTERNS
WASL Data Only Slides Mathematics & Reading Grade 8
ECE 638: Principles of Digital Color Imaging Systems
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 9-16 (January 2007)
Within a Mixed-Frequency Visual Environment
The Visual System.
Eddie Gonzalez & Tyler Muscianes Kin 330L
Memory for Actions: A two-way mirror?
Visual Processing Processing in the Retina
Backward Masking and Unmasking Across Saccadic Eye Movements
VS142 Visual Neuroscience
Illusory Jitter Perceived at the Frequency of Alpha Oscillations
Perceptual processes and development
Untangling the Web between Eye and Brain
Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Mind, Brain & Behavior Wednesday February 12, 2003.
Ryota Kanai, Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Frans A.J. Verstraten  Current Biology 
Aqueous Humour Vitreous Humour. Aqueous Humour Vitreous Humour.
James H. Marshel, Alfred P. Kaye, Ian Nauhaus, Edward M. Callaway 
Minami Ito, Gerald Westheimer, Charles D Gilbert  Neuron 
Colin J. Palmer, Colin W.G. Clifford  Current Biology 
Motion-Based Analysis of Spatial Patterns by the Human Visual System
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (January 2017)
Saccadic suppression precedes visual motion analysis
Bartlett D. Moore, Caitlin W. Kiley, Chao Sun, W. Martin Usrey  Neuron 
Saccades actively maintain perceptual continuity
Adaptive multi-voxel representation of stimuli, rules and responses
Serial Dependence in the Perception of Faces
Nob Mice Wave Goodbye to Eye-Specific Segregation
Fundamentals of Sensation and Perception
Attention Governs Action in the Primate Frontal Eye Field
A Pixel-Encoder Retinal Ganglion Cell with Spatially Offset Excitatory and Inhibitory Receptive Fields  Keith P. Johnson, Lei Zhao, Daniel Kerschensteiner 
Liu D. Liu, Christopher C. Pack  Neuron 
Human Striatal Responses to Monetary Reward Depend On Saliency
Motion-Based Mechanisms of Illusory Contour Synthesis
Human colour discrimination based on a non-parvocellular pathway
Edward S Boyden, Jennifer L Raymond  Neuron 
Segregation of Object and Background Motion in Visual Area MT
Traditional Meana (SD)
Shin'ya Nishida, Alan Johnston  Current Biology 
Human vision: physical apparatus
Normalization Regulates Competition for Visual Awareness
Representation of Color Stimuli in Awake Macaque Primary Visual Cortex
Stability of Cortical Responses and the Statistics of Natural Scenes
Visual Adaptation of the Perception of Causality
same area of visual space – same region of the brain
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e6 (August 2018)
Stan Van Pelt and W. Pieter Medendorp
Colin J. Akerman, Darragh Smyth, Ian D. Thompson  Neuron 
Outline Announcements Human Visual Information Processing
Outline Human Visual Information Processing – cont.
John B Reppas, W.Martin Usrey, R.Clay Reid  Neuron 
Judging Peripheral Change: Attentional and Stimulus-Driven Effects
Manuel Jan Roth, Matthis Synofzik, Axel Lindner  Current Biology 
Optimizing Visual Motion Perception during Eye Movements
on Local and Global Stereo Acuity
Motion-Induced Blindness and Motion Streak Suppression
Presentation transcript:

Psychology Department, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH Measuring the Influence of ON- and OFF- Cell Contrast Asymmetries on Motion Induced Blindness Amanda LeBel, Hanne Hansen, Emma DePierro, Nicholas Duggan, Alison Meurer, William Stine, & Andrew Kitt Percent = (contrast – background contrast) background contrast Psychology Department, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH Introduction Results Motion Induced Blindness is a natural phenomenon where a salient target seems to disappear when a moving mask is presented with it (Bonneh et al., 2001) ON- and OFF- cells are ganglion cells thought to be responsible for measurement of light increments and decrements, respectively These pathways synapse in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus (LGN) before continuing on to V1 The OFF pathways is considered to be stronger until V1, where they are thought to be equal in strength (Westheimer, 2007), however some research has found differences past this point The purpose of this study is to measure the contrast response of ON and OFF channels in MIB http://brainmind.com/BrainLecture9.html Methods Discussion Subjects were placed in a dark room 0.91 m away from a MacBook pro with their chin resting on a chin rest An MIB stimulus was presented using Mathematica with one of 4 different 2-frame motion luminance masks equally spaced on a logarithmic scale of 15 cd/m2, 61.3 cd/m2, 84.3 cd/m2, 95.9 cd/m2, 119.1 cd/m2, 130.6 cd/m2, 153.8 cd/m2, and 200 cd/m2, and 1 of 5 different lengths Subjects responded whether or not the stationary dots seemed to disappear Each subject ran for a total of 15 runs with 160 trials per run Each point on a psychometric function was estimated by 30 trials The confidence intervals around the psychometric functions are score confidence intervals The error bars on the mean plots are standard error bars, estimated using bootstraps Results corroborated previous results in lab (Stine et al., 2017) Dark mask always more effective than light over dark and light targets Higher contrast took less time for disappearance than comparable low contrast As contrast decreased, time to disappear increased significantly Shows that low level processing such as contrast plays a role in MIB Suggests that the ON- and OFF- cell pathways maintain some differences up through V5 Works Cited: Bonneh et al. (2001). Motion Induced Blindness in Normal Observers. Nature. 411, 798-801. Stine et al. (2017). MIB Using Luminance Increments and Decrements. Submitted for Publication. Westheimer, G. (2007). The On-Off Dichotomy in Visual Processing: From Receptors to Perception. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 26, 636-648.