Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Self-Management Program for Thai Patients with Metabolic Syndrome Anut Sakulsupsiri, MSc, Phantipa Sakthong, PhD, Win Winit-Watjana, PhD Value in Health Regional Issues Volume 9, Pages 28-35 (May 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2015.10.004 Copyright © 2016 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Markov model with description. Arrow (→), connecting two different states to indicate the state transition; both, both microvascular and macrovascular complications; curved arrow (↩), probability of staying at the same state; CHD, coronary heart disease; death-all, death from all causes; death-specific, death caused by the specific disease; macro comp., macrovascular complications; micro comp., microvascular complications; stroke, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke; type 2 DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. Value in Health Regional Issues 2016 9, 28-35DOI: (10.1016/j.vhri.2015.10.004) Copyright © 2016 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Tornado diagram. Value in Health Regional Issues 2016 9, 28-35DOI: (10.1016/j.vhri.2015.10.004) Copyright © 2016 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Probabilistic sensitivity results with description. (A) Cost-effectiveness plane of the self-management program compared with ordinary care (the black dot denotes the base-case value) and (B) acceptability curve of the self-management program for patients with metabolic syndrome compared with ordinary care. QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; WTP, willingness to pay. Value in Health Regional Issues 2016 9, 28-35DOI: (10.1016/j.vhri.2015.10.004) Copyright © 2016 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Terms and Conditions