Modeling current and projected carbon storage in wood and paper

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key sources of uncertainty in forest carbon inventories Raisa Mäkipää with Mikko Peltoniemi, Suvi Monni, Taru Palosuo, Aleksi Lehtonen & Ilkka Savolainen.
Advertisements

Harvested Wood Products in the U.S. National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: Methodology and Accounting.
Effects of Land Use Change on Forest Carbon Budgets Throughout the Southern USA from 1900 to 2050 Peter B. Woodbury Crop and Soil Sciences Department,
How Does Nature Reuse Materials?
Forest Products Industry Calculation Tools Reid Miner, Brad Upton, Jim Palumbo, NCASI Member Associations of ICFPA.
An Introduction to Carbon Modelling Developing Forestry and Bioenergy Projects within CDM Quito, Ecuador March, 2004.
Peter Ince U.S. Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, WI.
Understanding the carbon footprint of wood and paper products Presented to: State of California, Department of General Services EPP Task Force PCRC Paper.
1.3 Extracting Energy from Biomass
Managing for Forest Carbon Storage. Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change.
Carbon Cycle.
Carbon and forest management Robert Matthews Forest Research Biometrics, Surveys and Statistics Division Alice Holt Research Station, Farnham.
Biomass Carbon Neutrality in the Context of Forest-based Fuels and Products Al Lucier, NCASI Reid Miner, NCASI
Forest Inventory Methods and Carbon Analysis Linda S. Heath Richard A. Birdsey USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station In Support of the United.
Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International Measuring.
Forest Carbon Budgets, with examples, mainly with a US temperate forest perspective Linda S. Heath USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station Durham,
Carbon Emissions from Harvesting Wood Products and Bioenergy Justin Ford-Robertson.
Carbon Offset Projects and the FIA Neil Sampson March 3, 2009.
Energy policies and management of carbon balance in Estonia Olga Gavrilova, Tiina Randla, Raivo Vilu Tallinn University of Technology.
InVEST Tier 1 Carbon Model. In the Tier 1 model we estimate carbon stock as a function of land use / land cover. Storage indicates the mass of carbon.
Carbon Sequestration in Farm and Forest Ecosystems Sarah Hines April 2009
Estimation, Reporting and Accounting of Harvested Wood Products - Overview of the Technical Paper (FCCC/TP/2003/7 and Corr.1) UNFCCC Secretariat Lillehammer,
Views on harvested wood products estimation, reporting and accounting Presentation by Canada SBSTA Workshop on Harvested Wood Products Lillehammer, 30.
Forestry and Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum Workshop #5: Meeting the Challenges of a Rapidly Changing Climate Policy Environment April 6-9,
Global Warming. Rising Levels of Greenhouse Gases Carbon dioxide accounts for 49% of the human-caused input of greenhouse gases. Major Sources of CO 2.
43.Biomass energy sources are all around us. They include many types of plants and plant- derived material. List examples. agricultural crops and wastes;
1Jukka Muukkonen Carbon binding and forest asset accounts Forest related issues in greenhouse gas inventory Connections between SEEA2003 forest asset accounts.
Agriculture Agriculture Sector Inventory Training Workshop, Agriculture Sector 7/72008 Khartoum Higher Council for Environment and Natural Resources.
Is Biomass Burning Worse than Coal? Kevin Bundy & Brian Nowicki Center for Biological Diversity
Hamilton County, Ohio Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Inventory ( Baseline Year 2006) Cory R. Chadwick, Director Hamilton County Department of Environmental.
Cycles That Occur in Nature. Water cycle  Moves between atmosphere, oceans & land  1 – water evaporates from the ocean  2 – water also evaporates.
Inventory Approaches to Forest Baselines: MAV Bottomland Hardwoods Case Study James E. Smith and Linda S. Heath Northeastern Research Station Durham, NH.
Review. Day Extracting Energy From Biomass.
What is a renewable energy? -Resource that can be replenished rapidly through natural processes as long as it is not used up faster than it is replaced.
Alternative Energy: Biomass Erica Cabaluna and others.
Recycling is the process of making new products from used materials. This not only has many benefits for the environment, but also for the future of the.
Status: Criterion 5—Maintenance of forest contribution to global carbon cycles Linda S. Heath James E. Smith USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research.
Biomass Energy Biomass is organic material made from plants and animals (microorganisms). Biomass contains stored energy from the sun.
Summary of the Harvested Wood Products Workshop Rotorua, New Zealand, February 2001 Justin Ford-Robertson and Angela Duignan.
Carbon in United States Forests and Wood Products, : State-by-State Estimates Richard A. Birdsey George M. Lewis USDA Forest Service Global Change.
Australian Greenhouse Office Jaakko Pöyry Consulting Development of a National Wood Products Model Chris Borough & Hamish Crawford.
What is the Carbon Cycle????
Climate Change and Carbon Management USDA Forest Service Research and Development Dr. Richard A. Birdsey Dr. Alexander L. Friend Northeast Research StationNorth.
Nolan Brown and Nimmy Babu Biomass By: Nolan Brown and Nimmy Babu.
Biomass and Bioenergy Approaches to Assessing Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential Carly Green 20 November 2003IEA Bioenergy Task 38 National Meeting -
The Cliff Notes on Biomass Fuels and Greenhouse Gas Levels Clean Air Task Force 18 Tremont Street Suite 530 Boston, MA Prepared for 2016 Northeast.
Tomas Lundmark SLU Sweden
Plants and Their Adaptations
2015 RPA Update: Forest Carbon Projections for the United States
UK approach to HWP (and some personal reflections)
Presented by: Salah Musleh 9th Boys
The carbon implications of restoring management to neglected forests in England Carly Whittaker, Robert Matthews, Ewan Mackie, and Ian Shield International.
OA2.1 Understand energy and its conservation
23rd London Group Meeting San Jose Costa Rica, th October 2017
OGWC – Forest C Bev Law Prof. Global Change Biology & Terrestrial Systems Science Oregon State University Oct 6, 2016.
With assistance from NCASI
U.S. Forest Carbon Budget
A Forest Industry Perspective on Carbon Accounting
Carbon Accounting in the UK: An overview of progress and issues
Comments on HWP estimation methods
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
Cycles Within an Ecosystem
Biogeochemical Cycles
Global Forest Carbon Budget (tons of C/y)
Massachusetts Forest Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study
The global carbon cycle for the 1990s, showing the main annual fluxes in GtC yr–1: pre-industrial ‘natural’ fluxes in black and ‘anthropogenic’ fluxes.
Modern Soil Health.
Don O’Connor NBB Sustainability Workshop September 27, 2018
Karen Abt USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station
Presentation transcript:

Modeling current and projected carbon storage in wood and paper Ken Skog USDA Forest Products Lab Madison, WI

Modeling current and projected carbon storage in wood and paper Model Framework Accounting for Imports and Exports Data needs/ uncertainty Results

Cycling of Carbon Through Wood and Paper Products Atmosphere Burned Decayed Forests Harvest Products Recycling Wood-in- use Methane and CO2 Landfills

The System Framework – Harvested wood carbon Stock change and Atmospheric Flow approaches Emissions Imports Products in use Products in landfills Harvest Points If you focus on measuring flows and emissions you can still get estimates of change in stocks. If you focus on measuring change in Stocks you can still get estimates of emissions. Darkar report suggested incorrectly that you could not get an estimate of stock change if you only have emissions data. Exports ΔProduct stocks = Harvest + Imports – Exports – Emissions Net Flow to system = Harvest - Emissions Net Flow to system = - ΔProduct stocks - Net Imports

ΔProduct stocks = Harvest – Emissions The System Framework – Harvest wood carbon stocks and flows for Production approach Emissions Products in use Products in landfills Harvest Exports Points The production approach focuses on estimating change in domestic product stocks and export product stocks The production approach has a “production emissions” counterpart which would focus on emissions of a countries wood harvest. Production approach would require estimates of how a countries exported products decay in countries where they are shipped. ΔProduct stocks = Harvest – Emissions Flow to system = Harvest - Emissions

Data needs Low uncertainty (±10%) Wood and paper product production Product exports Product imports Product use by end use (e.g. construction) Medium / High uncertainty (±20%+) Waste when using products and disposition of waste Years products are in use Disposition of products after use – burn, decay, landfill Rate of decay in landfills Maximum decay in landfills (% ever emitted) Data on wood and paper products production, and trade and end uses is fairly accurate for the U.S. and is available for all countries from FAO. FAO fuelwood data is less accurate than indurtrial product data Data is less accurate on lifetimes of wood in use, disposition after use, landfill decay rates and limits

Decay of wood and paper in landfills Material type in landfill Maximum released Sold wood (lignin attached) 3% Newsprint 18% Coated paper 20% Boxboard 35% Office paper 43% One key factor that limits U.S. decay in our calculations is the estimate that decay of wood and paper in landfills if limited. While oxygen is available white-rot fungus can decay lignin. After Oxygen is depleted, lignin is not decayed by anaerobic bacteria and any cellulose incased in lignin is not decayed. Exposed cellulose will be decayed by anaerobic bacteria.

Disposition of 1990 harvested wood used for paper through 2050 (Tg) 1990 harvested wood that goes into paper and paperboard (or imports) goes through it’s life cycle shifting from product in use to emissions and to landfills. Paper goes out of use quickly but is retained in landfills – after 50 year 24% is still retained in landfills. 24% in stocks in 2050 In use In landfills

54% in stocks in 2050 In landfills In use Disposition of 1990 harvested wood used for fuel and solid wood products in the U.S. through 2050 (Tg) 54% in stocks in 2050 After 50 years 54% of harvest used for fuel and solid wood products is estimateed to still be in use or landfills due to long used life and limited decay in landfills. In landfills In use

41% in stocks in 2050 In landfills In use Disposition of 1990 wood harvest used for fuel and all products in the U.S. through 2050 (Tg) 41% in stocks in 2050 For 1990 U.S. harvest used in U.S. products 41% is estimated to still be in stocks in 60 years later. In landfills In use

Sensitivity to use life and decay rates -- Year 2000 Harvested wood carbon in 2050 58% 76% Emitted The persistence of carbon is stocks is particularly sensitive to estimates of use life and limits of decay in landfills. But even if we cut use life estimates in half, assume all paper and half of wood in landfills decays 20% of harvested wood carbon is still in stocks after 60 years.

U.S. Net Annual Changes to Stocks, and Emissions from Harvested Wood* Emitted Energy We have estimated flows of harvested carbon since 1910 with projections to 2050. Landfill accumulation is estimated to have increased in recent years. Since the 1980s wood and paper goes to landfills rather than dumps where much was burned and decay was greater. Landfill Products *Includes net imports. SOURCE: Skog and Nicholson, 2000

Managed forest lands, US, 2008-2012 Avg. annual C stock change C taken up by trees in managed forests 381.9 C released by harvesting trees -276.0 Net C taken up in Soil 52.4 Net C taken up in Floor 12.8 Net C taken up in Understory 0.7 Net C accrued in live biomass & soil 171.8 C increase in logging residue 26.1 C in products in use 39.1 C in products in landfills 51.3 C stored in products & landfills 90.4 Net C removals related to managed forests 288 +/- 15% MMT/yr NOTE: the model is currently being updated, and we expect these estimates to change. However, all indications are that the trends and relative size of the estimate will be similar. The update is expected to be completed by spring of 2001. (Most of the work is writing manuscripts about the model for peer-review.) This table shows the carbon flux estimate by component for the first commitment period. Positive values indicate carbon is being removed from the atmosphere and stored in the forest or transferred into another forest-related pool; a negative value indicates a release of carbon to the atmosphere or a transfer to another forest-related pool. The modeling system produces carbon stock projections for the years 2005, 2010, 2015, etc. Carbon stock change is calculated as the difference between inventories. Estimates for the period 2008-2012 are weighted averages of the periods (1 January) 2005-2009 (end of December), and 2010-2014. The amount of net carbon accrued in live biomass & soil is the subtotal of the first five rows. Of the C released by harvesting trees (-276 Million Metric Tons/yr), 26.1 MMT/yr is transferred to logging residue, and 90 MMT/yr is transferred into products in use or landfills. The sum of the subtotals indicates 288 MMT per year is sequestered in the forest sector during 2008-2012. The uncertainty is estimated at plus/minus 15% at the 80% confidence interval.

Modeling current and projected carbon storage in wood and paper Current studies Develop generic national method using FAO product statistics Assess effects of uncertainty on U.S. estimates Project carbon storage associated with 2000 RPA Timber Assessment projections