Wrt 105: practice of academic writing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WRA 150: EVOLUTION OF AMERICAN THOUGHT THURSDAY, OCT. 31, 2013.
Advertisements

 Rhetoric is persuasion. It is the opposite of a fight.  In Rhetoric, you argue. Argument is the means by which you persuade people to side with you.
METACOGNITION MAN Super-Powerful Reading Strategies!
Aristotle’s PeRsuasive Audience appeals. ARISTOTLE In Rhetoric, Aristotle describes three main types of rhetoric: ethos, logos, and pathos. Rhetoric (n)
The Three Means of Persuasion
Speech Drafting Basics June 1/2 Do Now – 5 Minutes List 5 Promises You would make if elected President Number them Most Important to You 1 Least.
The Rhetorical Triangle (Aristotelian Triangle)
Aristotle’s Three Ways to Persuade
Norton’s Field Guide to Writing
Introduction to Rhetoric
Norton’s Field Guide to Writing
Activity 1.7: Visual Argument
Weekly Assignments I Last Class: Next Class: What causes us to change?
Weekly Assignments I Last Class: Next Class: What causes us to change?
Writing an Argument CH. 8.
Persuading your Audience
Reminders Rhetorical Appeals Quiz – tomorrow
“Can you see the argument??”
RWS: Day Two.
Activity 1.7: Visual Argument
Persuasive Language Techniques
Rhetorical Situations
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
What’s new in class this week?
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
How are Beyonc e ,Pope Francis and Hashtags the Same?
Keys to Convincing Others That You Are Right.
Introduction to Rhetoric
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
Rhetorical Appeals & The Art of Rhetoric.
Persuasion Understanding the Elements of Persuasion for Writing, Speaking, and Debating.
Wrt 205: critical research
How are they used and Why
Argument Goals: Understand Aristotle’s offices of rhetoric
WRT 105: practices of academic writing
WRT 205: critical research
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
“Speech is power: speech is to persuade, to convert, to compel”
Wrt 205: critical research
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
Wrt 205: critical research
Rhetoric The Greek Philosopher Aristotle defined rhetoric as “the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion.”
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing

Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
Wrt 205: critical research
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
WRT 105: practices of academic writing
WRT 205: critical research
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
WRT 205: Critical Research
Wrt 205: critical research
WRT 205: Critical Research
wrt 205: critical research
Wrt 205: critical research
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
Wrt 205: critical research
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
WRT 105: Practices of academic writing
Wrt 205: critical research
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
Wrt 205: critical research
Weekly Assignments: Today Is… 3/14/16 I 2nd and 6th DUE FRIDAY
Wrt 205: critical research
Journal #5: Intro to Rhetoric
Presentation transcript:

Wrt 105: practice of academic writing Dr. Rusty Bartels Monday, October 29th, 2018 Week 10, Day 1

Overview Some thoughts Leith Freewrite Wrap-up

Some Thoughts In this freewrite, I want you to use this time as you need to. Use this as an opportunity to process your thoughts and feelings. Use this as an opportunity to think about how some of these things might be impacting you if you haven’t already, or haven’t already needed to. I’m going to give us 4 minutes for this.

Leith First, I want to frame the chapter by how Leith describes rhetoric & invention: “Aristotle said that the basic job of the rhetorician was to “discover the best available means of persuasion.”” (45) Invention: “not making things up, but exploring what there is to say on a subject…to find what’s available to be said…doing your homework.” (45) The whole point is to persuade your audience

Leith Break out into groups of 2-4. Each group will be assigned an appeal. In your group, you will: Summarize Leith’s discussion of the appeal - how you might define or describe it Identify any specialized terms that Leith uses, providing a definition if available in-text (or given usage clues) Provide an example of your own that expresses your understanding of this appeal Ethos — The Appeal from Character, or Look Who’s Talking (48 - 55) Logos — Sounding Reasonable (56 - 65) Pathos — Make ‘Em Laugh, Make ‘Em Cry, Make ‘Em Agree (65 - 71)

Freewrite Think about an issue that’s happening in the world around - however large or small What is a conflict that has made that issue, an issue? What are the questions that are being ask? The problems that are trying to be solved? What are proposed or supposed causes of the issue? What are proposed or supposed solutions? What would you claim is the cause? Is a solution? What is a source, or who is a person, that you want to learn more about this issue from?

Wrap-up Today we: Addressed current events Utilized Leith to further understand the Appeals Next time: Reading: Birdsell & Groarke Focus: Visual argument Reminder: Reading Response 3 due uploaded to drive folder by beginning of class