Undulator Scope, Management, Organization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Environment, Safety and Health Steve Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting March 29, 2012.
Advertisements

Stephen Milton Undulator System 12 October 2004 Undulator System Update Stephen Milton, ANL.
FAC review, 10/27 D. Schultz 1 e-Beams System Update Injector System Installation has started. Linac System Preparing for ’06 installation. Controls System.
Geoff Pile FAC Review - Undulator 12 November 2008 LCLS Undulator System Overview and Fabrication Geoff Pile.
Marion M. White Undulator System 07 April 2005 LCLSLCLSLCLSLCLS Undulator System Tests Marion M. White ANL-ASD-LCLS.
FAC, 4/16/07 D. Schultz 1 e-Beams Systems Update People ARR Linac Installation Undulator Production MMF Operations David Schultz.
M. White – June 28, 2004 LCLS Requirements Meeting In a project, we live or die by the schedule. After we’re “baselined” it is our plan for what we will.
Dean R Walters Undulator Vacuum October 12-13, 2004 Facility Advisory Committee Undulator Vacuum System/Mechanical By Dean R Walters.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Marion White Magnets & Supports April 16, 2007 Undulator Magnets and Supports Status.
Stephen Milton Undulator System 20 April, 2006 LCLS Undulator System Update S. Milton, ANL FAC, April 20 th, 2006.
Stephen Milton Undulator System 14 November, 2004 Undulator System Overview Stephen Milton.
Undulator System Review Closeout Erik Johnson, Kem Robinson, Dieter Walz 4 March 2004.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Oct12-13, 2004 Meeting of the LCLS Facilities Advisory Committee LCLS Organization & Execution.
LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 3. Cost Estimate Gines, Fisher 2.Are the estimated cost and proposed schedule ranges realistic, consistent with the technical and budgetary.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
Fermilab Presentation Greg Bock, Pepin Carolan, Mike Lindgren, Elaine McCluskey 2014 SC PM Workshop July 2014.
David Saenz Readiness for Oct 12, 2006 # Meeting of the LCLS Facilities Advisory Committee LCLS Conventional Facilities.
Procurement and Manufacture of LCLS Undulators FY 04 Activity: Complete design of Second Prototype Undulator This will include field control comb Procure.
Cost and Schedule Breakout Session Paul Weinman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
LCLS-II Project Overview David Schultz LCLS-II Deputy Project Director March 19, 2012.
Jan , 2008 LCLS Undulator Week Dean R. Walters 1 Vacuum Components Undulator System SH Lee, J Morgan, and D Walters.
November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Factory: Accelerator Costing, PEP-II Hardware and Schedule J. Seeman SLAC International Review Committee meeting November.
CBETA Project ALD’s Cost and Schedule Review February 6, 2017
Resource Loaded Schedule and Budget Profile
Project Management W. J. Foyt
LCLS-II Cost Details E. Daly / C. Hovater / M. Wiseman with help from Accel Ops and Engineering 03-AUG-2017.
Meeting of the LCLS Facilities Advisory Committee
Management Breakout: MREFC Budget Summary Victor L
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, 2004.
LCLS Undulator System Detailed Report
Linac Coherent Light Source Procurement
Undulator Scope, Management, and Organization
Linac Ops Budget Structure & Approach WBS 1 – LCLS Mgmt & Admin
PLANNING ENGINEERING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS)
Electron Beam Systems ETC and Methodology
Daresbury ESS In-Kind Contributions
Conventional Facilities (WBS 1
Details supporting the increase
Undulator Cost & Schedule Patric Den Hartog, ANL April 24, 2002
Project Management Issues John N. Galayda, SLAC April 24, 2002
DOE Review of the LCLS Project
LCLS Undulator System Status and Schedule
LCLS Undulator System Production Management
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS)
LCLS Undulator System Status and Schedule
LCLS Injector System Overview D. H
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS)
Installation Status & Operational Readiness Process
Undulator Long-Lead Procurement Preparation
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Conventional Facilities
Undulator System Overview
Undulator Integration Test Status
Electron Beam Systems ETC and Methodology
Undulators Subgroup Summary April FAC Review K. Robinson, J
LCLS Undulator System Detailed Report
Undulator Assembly and Installation Planning
LCLS e- Beams System Overview
CF Scope, Management & Organization
LCLS Undulator Scope, Management, Organization
DOE Status Meeting of the LCLS Project
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
CMGC Overview SLAC Site Plan Systems Description Construction Schedule
Presentation transcript:

Undulator Scope, Management, Organization Stephen Milton, ANL/APS

Outline Undulator System Scope Overall Organization Management Status of L3 Items Summary

Undulator Hall Schematic Baseline Layout

Responsibilities for the Undulator System ANL L2 Undulator System Management L3 at ANL Undulators, Quadrupoles, Primary Adjustable Supports Undulator System Diagnostics Undulator System Vacuum System Undulator System Controls

MMF Lay-out

Responsibilities for the Undulator System L3 at SLAC Magnet Measurement Facility (MMF) Fixed Supports

Laboratory Relationship and L3 Organization APS J.M. Gibson Assoc. Lab. Director LCLS Undulator S. Milton Project Director LCLS Project J. Galayda Project Director Accel. Systems. Div. R. Gerig Division Director D. Walters Vacuum/Diagnostics CAM Exp. Facilities Div. E. Gluskin Division Director M. White Magnet Systems CAM R.Ruland/MMF J. Welch/Fixed Support CAMs APS Operations Div. W. Ruzicka Division Director J. Stein Controls CAM

LCLS Undulator System PED Org. (Present) SLAC/AIM S. Milton LCLS Undulator Sys. F. Coose, Project Analyst F. Clark, PMCS ANL Indirect Support P. Mast PMCS Manager As needed D. Walters Vacuum/Diagnostics CAM M. White Magnet Systems CAM J. Stein Controls CAM J. Bailey, ME (NE) S.H. Lee, ME B.X. Yang, Phy I. Vasserman, Phy R. Dejus, Phy E. Traktenberg, ME G. Lawrence, ME E. Moog, Phy SLAC B. Dalesio This is not a complete list as we have drawn heavily from others within ANL and SLAC, but at a lower fraction than those listed SLAC R. Ruland Mag. Meas. Fac. J. Welch Fixed Support Interfaces

FTEs for the Undulator System 25 Max Scale 4 Max Scale ~17A/6S ~15A/7S ~12A/10S ~6A ~3A/1S Splits between ANL (A) and SLAC (S) are shown above This year ANL tapped into 24 different people from 4 different divisions to perform the work We will ramp up the amount we use these people next year APS is giving LCLS top priority in resource allocation Move to management section talk. SC3. Reconciled to April of 04 Ramp up not as bad as it seems Include an org. chart instead.

Ramp Up Plan of Action ANL/APS Project Management Argonne has recently established an Office of Project Management APS has a formalized Project Management System that encompasses all project large and small The LCLS project has been integrated into this system and has been assigned top priority Biweekly Meetings are held with Murray Gibson (the APS Director) (Provided we are both in town) These lead in to DD meetings and resource allocation Past Actions/Performance Last December/January we needed additional resources assigned. A letter was sent to Gibson requesting people. A meeting with the Division Directors was held. Additional resources were assigned to the project as per the request Future Actions We are using the P3 resource loaded schedule to define and broadcast our needs for future resources. With this in hand we will use a similar method as described above to obtain the required resources to complete the project as per the plan.

Labor vs. M&S Move over to breakout Give examples M&S dominates the distribution due to the limited number of unique items being produced and the large quantity of each item.

Undulator System Critical Path (1 of 3) Undulator Delivery Assembly Path FY06 Funding Goes in breakout Total Float = 164 days Driven by FY06 Construction Funding

Undulator System Critical Path (2 of 3) Undulator Delivery Assembly Path

Undulator System Critical Path (3 of 3) NOV 07 SEPT 08

Final Design, Plans, Issues associated with Procurement Complete Final Design Review Scheduled for Sept. 16 – 17 Plans and Issues Associated with Procurement Procure LLP Items Ti Strongback Magnets Magnet Poles Have a 1st article assembled in industry prior to going out for full production 1st article undulators are not in the baseline for FY05; however, awarding them in FY05 to coincide with delivery of first lot of long-lead items significantly reduces the undulator schedule risk. Issues Receiving the BA early enough to purchase all the Ti in one fiscal year Moving forward in FY05 with the 1st article Additional Details found in M. White’s Talk Move to breakout Add a last slide summary Major accomplishments Requiremnts approved Review of Baselined cost and schedule Ready to go Back awhile talk about key issues Tight thermal and alignment issues Finalize with key issues and risks over next year Action plan summarize

Other Items Not Found in Other Talks Diagnostics RF BPMs We have not done any additional work on RF BPMs this year. The budget was not sufficient for this. We are relying on work performed by the NLC collaboration that shows that the RF BPMs have resolution sufficient to meet the needs of the LCLS. We are also relying on the fact that the people that did this earlier work are at SLAC and are willing to contribute to the LCLS effort when called upon. Some additional studies of BPM systems are being carried out by other members of the LCLS group at SLAC. Quadrupole Focusing Permanent Magnet vs. Electromagnet Designs We are currently studying the pros and cons of using EM quadrupoles rather than PM quadrupoles Strength variation of EM quads can be used to validate the beam-based alignment process but… …so can moving a permanent magnet quadrupole out of the path of the beam provided it can be placed back exactly where it was to start with. There are cost tradeoffs as well. We need this decision soon (within 2 months)

Other Items Not Found in Other Talks Integration of the Complete Undulator System This is an excellent idea…but we need to work on it more. The budget was not sufficient for this. SLAC Undulator Integration Engineer SLAC will be hiring someone soon to be our point of contact for a smooth integration of our undulator system into SLAC Undulator System Deputy A deputy will be added to the Undulator System Team The Deputy’s duties will include system and engineering integration.

Summary We understand the scope We have a plan We are organized to carry out that plan We have the internal support we need to perform the plan Through success in this review we will obtain the external support needed to perform and carry out the plan