Translational Diffusion of Fluorescent Proteins by Molecular Fourier Imaging Correlation Spectroscopy  Michael C. Fink, Kenneth V. Adair, Marina G. Guenza,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Prismless confocal total internal reflection (CTIR) microscope. 532-nm light is.
Advertisements

Picosecond Multiphoton Scanning Near-Field Optical Microscopy
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 91, Issue 8, Pages (October 2006)
Resonant Reflection Spectroscopy of Biomolecular Arrays in Muscle
K-Space Image Correlation Spectroscopy: A Method for Accurate Transport Measurements Independent of Fluorophore Photophysics  David L. Kolin, David Ronis,
High-Density 3D Single Molecular Analysis Based on Compressed Sensing
3-D Particle Tracking in a Two-Photon Microscope: Application to the Study of Molecular Dynamics in Cells  Valeria Levi, QiaoQiao Ruan, Enrico Gratton 
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages (February 2013)
Measurement of Single Macromolecule Orientation by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy  Joseph N. Forkey, Margot E. Quinlan,
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Evanescent Excitation and Emission in Fluorescence Microscopy
Molecular Dynamics in Living Cells Observed by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy with One- and Two-Photon Excitation  Petra Schwille, Ulrich Haupts,
Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
The Mobility of Phytochrome within Protonemal Tip Cells of the Moss Ceratodon purpureus, Monitored by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy  Guido Böse,
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 91, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Orientational Changes of Crossbridges During Single Turnover of ATP
Sapun H. Parekh, Young Jong Lee, Khaled A. Aamer, Marcus T. Cicerone 
Jeremy D. Wilson, Chad E. Bigelow, David J. Calkins, Thomas H. Foster 
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Cylindrical Illumination Confocal Spectroscopy: Rectifying the Limitations of Confocal Single Molecule Spectroscopy through One-Dimensional Beam Shaping 
Dynamic Light Scattering Microscopy
A. Delon, Y. Usson, J. Derouard, T. Biben, C. Souchier 
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Optical Pushing: A Tool for Parallelized Biomolecule Manipulation
Vassili Ivanov, Min Li, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Biophysical Journal 
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages (February 2018)
Mechanical Distortion of Single Actin Filaments Induced by External Force: Detection by Fluorescence Imaging  Togo Shimozawa, Shin'ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical.
Christopher Deufel, Michelle D. Wang  Biophysical Journal 
CW and CCW Conformations of the E
Probing Red Blood Cell Morphology Using High-Frequency Photoacoustics
T. Roopa, G.V. Shivashankar  Biophysical Journal 
Abir M. Kabbani, Christopher V. Kelly  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 94, Issue 7, Pages (April 2008)
Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Jun’ichi Wakayama, Katsuaki Inoue 
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
3D Protein Dynamics in the Cell Nucleus
Pulsed Interleaved Excitation
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Will J. Eldridge, Zachary A. Steelman, Brianna Loomis, Adam Wax 
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Static and Dynamic Errors in Particle Tracking Microrheology
Characterization of the Photoconversion on Reaction of the Fluorescent Protein Kaede on the Single-Molecule Level  P.S. Dittrich, S.P. Schäfer, P. Schwille 
Chien-Jung Lo, Mark C. Leake, Richard M. Berry  Biophysical Journal 
High-Pressure Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy
Felix Kohler, Alexander Rohrbach  Biophysical Journal 
Single-Molecule Three-Color FRET
Polarized Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Calcium-Induced Alterations in Mitochondrial Morphology Quantified in Situ with Optical Scatter Imaging  Nada N. Boustany, Rebekah Drezek, Nitish V. Thakor 
Kevin McHale, Andrew J. Berglund, Hideo Mabuchi  Biophysical Journal 
Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Jun’ichi Wakayama, Katsuaki Inoue 
Ashley R. Carter, Yeonee Seol, Thomas T. Perkins  Biophysical Journal 
The Mobility of Phytochrome within Protonemal Tip Cells of the Moss Ceratodon purpureus, Monitored by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy  Guido Böse,
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
Orientation of the Myosin Light Chain Region by Single Molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy  Margot E. Quinlan, Joseph.
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Translational Diffusion of Fluorescent Proteins by Molecular Fourier Imaging Correlation Spectroscopy  Michael C. Fink, Kenneth V. Adair, Marina G. Guenza, Andrew H. Marcus  Biophysical Journal  Volume 91, Issue 9, Pages 3482-3498 (November 2006) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.085712 Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (A) Schematic of the M-FICS experimental geometry. A small population of optically resonant molecular dipoles is illuminated by a focused laser interference pattern (represented as gray-scale bars). The transverse beam profile is Gaussian with a waist, w∼100μm. The expanded view shows three fringes across the center of the beam profile; the minimal fringe number used is ∼30. A molecular configuration is specified (in three dimensions) by the set of vector positions {r1,r2,…,rN} and orientations μˆ1,μˆ2,…,μˆN. The fluorescence signal depends on fluctuations of the local orientational density, defined by Eq. 12. (B) At any instant, a static configuration of molecular dipoles is uniquely described by a sum of phasors in the complex plane, as described by Eq. 15. Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 3482-3498DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.085712) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 (A) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for M-FICS (described in text). (Abbreviations have the following meanings: APD, amplified photo-diode; M, mirror; AO1(2), Bragg cell 1 (2); BS, beam splitter; PBS, polarizing beam-splitter; PS, periscope; and λ/2, half-wave plate.) A spatially and temporally modulated interference fringe pattern illuminates a sample positioned at the object plane of a fluorescence microscope. The pattern is produced using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) with acousto-optic Bragg cells placed in the two beam paths. The image of the excitation pattern is magnified and relayed through a Ronche ruling, and the resulting temporally modulated intensity is focused onto an APD. The APD signal is used as negative feedback to a servo, which corrects the relative path lengths of the MZI (via a piezo-mounted mirror), to minimize passive phase instabilities. The weak fluorescence from the sample is collected in an epi-configuration, filtered according to frequency and polarization (at the magic-angle), and detected using a second photon-counting APD module. The signal is processed using a time-of-flight histogram generator (described in Appendix B). A lock-in amplifier demodulates the resulting analog output. (B) A typical time-course for the random phase error (RPE) with feedback loop engaged (red, RMS RPE=4nm) and disengaged (black, RMS RPE=300nm), measured for dG=1.0μm. Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 3482-3498DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.085712) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 (A) Schematic of the total fluorescence intensity, If (ϕsig−ϕref (described by Eq. 14), relative to the reference phase. The modulated signal oscillates at the grating sweep frequency, νG=10MHz, with slowly varying amplitude I0|Oˆ| and phase γ. The mean fluorescence background I0Oˆ(0) is time-independent. In the strong signal limit (i.e., many detected photons per modulation period), the raw signal is continuous. (B) Rough schematic of a phase-dependent intensity histogram resulting from the compilation of n¯ independent measurements of single photon arrival times (relative to the reference) (see Appendix B). The phase is divided into m bin increments, numbered by the index j. (For clarity, m=10 in the figure; the actual value used is m=64.) Nj is the number of photons assigned to bin j. The average number of photons per bin shown in the figure is N¯/m ; 2. The actual value used is N¯/m ≥ 1250 / 64 ; 20. Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 3482-3498DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.085712) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Normalized self-ISF FS(k,τ) determined by M-FICS on 0.1-μm diameter Rhodamine-labeled poly(styrene) beads in aqueous suspension. The ISF is shown for wave numbers kG=2π/dG=2.09, 2.64, 3.27, and 3.90μm−1. (Values for the fringe spacings dG are given in the figure.) Dashed blue curves are plots of the Fickian model (Eq. 8) with DS=4.3μm2s−1. Data and models are shown on log-linear (A) and log-log (B) scales. Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 3482-3498DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.085712) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Normalized self-ISF FS(k,τ) determined by M-FICS on dilute solutions of DsRed in 95% (by volume) glycerol/water. The different decays correspond to wave numbers kG=2π/dG=2.45, 2.96, and 3.59μm−1. (Values for the fringe spacings dG are given in the figure.) For each wave number, measurements are superimposed corresponding to excitation intensities, I0=1.27 (black), 0.16 (gray), and 0.04 (white)×10−4μW μm−2(×10−5kWcm−2). Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 3482-3498DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.085712) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Normalized self-ISF determined by M-FICS on DsRed in 95% (by volume) glycerol/water solution. The different decays correspond to wave numbers kG=2π/dG=2.15, 2.45, 2.96, 3.59, 4.49, and 5.46μm−1. (Values for the fringe spacings dG are given in the figure.) Dashed white curves are plots of Eq. 8 with DS=0.072μm2s−1. Dashed gray curves are plots of Eq. 10 with DS=0.072μm2s−1 and Q=0.20. Data and models are shown on log-linear (A) and log-log (B) scales. Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 3482-3498DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.085712) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Normalized self-ISF (same data as Fig. 6) plotted versus k2D¯Sτ (Eq. 33) with D¯S = 0.072μm2s−1. The experimental data correspond to wave numbers kG=2π/dG=2.45, 2.96, 3.59, 4.49, and 5.46μm2s−1. Also shown are plots of Eq. 33 with D¯S = 0.072μm2s−1 and Q=0.2. (gray curve), and two model Fickian decays corresponding to a DsRed tetramer (solid black curve) and a DsRed octomer (dashed black curve). Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 3482-3498DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.085712) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Ray diagram for high numerical-aperture polarization-selective detection (described in Appendix A). A single molecular dipole (shaded gray) resides at the origin of the object frame, and emits a ray in the direction of the objective lens. The objective acts to refract the ray, changing its propagation vector from x0 (in the object frame) to x (in the laboratory frame), and its polarization vector from z0 to z. The angle ϕ between the polarization vector and the meridional plane (the plane containing the optic axis and the ray propagation vector) is the same in both the object and laboratory frames. Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 3482-3498DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.085712) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Schematic diagrams (A–E) depicting the function of the time-of-flight histogram generator (described fully in Appendix B). Biophysical Journal 2006 91, 3482-3498DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.085712) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions