Student Success: Imagine the Possibilities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Georgia Department of Education Division for Special Education Services Deborah Gay, Director.
State Systemic Improvement Plan: Preparing, Planning, and Staying Informed Presentation to Louisiana ICC July 10, 2013.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education Overview of Results Driven Accountability Assuring Compliance and Improving Results August.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
NC SSIP: 5 Things We’ve Learned Directors’ Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
NC SSIP: Top 5 Things We’ve Learned Mid-South Meeting January 7-8, 2015.
RESULTS DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY SSIP Implementation Support Activity 1 OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
Overview of Idaho’s State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Division of Special Education Dr. Charlie Silva State Director of Special Education 1.
District General Supervision: The Balancing Act Spring Leadership Meeting March 20, 2012.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
NC SSIP DAC Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
Time for Change: Examining Data Relating to Student Performance and Implementing a Plan to Improve Student Outcomes Glenna Gallo Director of Special Education.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
SSIP Implementation Support Visit Idaho State Department of Education September 23-24, 2014.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
The Significance Section Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. April 23, 2009.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Nancy T. Johnson, Ed.D. Exceptional Children Division, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Data Analyses for Indicator 17/
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
Arizona State Systemic Improvement Plan Update State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report  All indicators are still significant and will be.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Where’s Your Focus What we FOCUS on is what IMPROVES 2.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
What’s Happening in Georgia?. GaDOE GraduateFIRST SPDG Initiative School-level teams Improvement plans Address dropout prevention, instruction and behavior.
+ Minding the Gap: Data-Based Problem Solving Summer Leadership Conference August 2016.
Fostering a Culture of Data Use
Division of Student Support Services
Educator Equity Resource Tool: Using Comprehensive Equity Indicators
There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
Aligning Efforts to Improve Capacity
Equitable Access to Excellent Educators
Excellent Educators for All Initiative
MTSS implementation: Perspectives from the National Center on Intensive Intervention Allison Gandhi, Ed.D. American Institutes for Research.
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
Kristin Reedy, Co-Director June 24, 2016
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Grace Zamora Durán, Ed.D. April 19, 2010
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Local Control Accountability Plan Input
Data-Based Decision Making
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
Using Data for Program Improvement
Multi-Tiered System of Support
There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
Using Data for Program Improvement
Disproportionality Prevention Support
Networks and Partnerships for Success: SPED/CTE/VR/ID/DD
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
IDEA State Monitoring and General Supervision
Access, Equity, and Progress
Using Data to Build LEA Capacity to Improve Outcomes
IDEA State Monitoring and General Supervision
Presentation transcript:

Student Success: Imagine the Possibilities October 9, 2015

Background Information All states were required to develop a State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) that includes a comprehensive, multi-year focus on improving results for Students with Disabilities (SWD). Georgia has branded its SSIP as Student Success: Imagine the Possibilities (SSIP) and will address graduation outcomes for SWD.   5/27/2019

Student Success Video 5/27/2019

What are the Barriers to Student Success? Georgia must… Provide equitable access to the general curriculum for all students Provide equitable access to a positive school climate for all students Provide equitable access to specially designed instruction for Students with Disabilities 5/27/2019

What is the Theory of Action? 5/27/2019

State Leadership & Implementation Teams Georgia Collaborative Region There are 6 Collaborative Regions. Several GLRS Regional Teams make up a Collaborative Region. This example displays 1 GLRS Region with its district and school teams. GLRS Regional Team Georgia Collaborative Region School Improvement District Team District Team District Team District Student Success Coach District Student Success Coach District Student Success Coach School Team School Team School Team 5/27/2019

District standards will support these teams in driving the work! School and District Effectiveness (Formerly called School Improvement) identified 6 Collaborative Regions. Each Collaborative Region has a comprehensive TA team that will address the needs of those districts. District standards will support these teams in driving the work! The big idea is to align TA systems and garner support that will improve teaching and learning. Some supports will be universal for all districts in the region while others are targeted based on data and accountability designations. 5/27/2019

Division for Special Education has identified 18 GLRS Regions. Student Success has created smaller regional teams based on the GLRS Districts. Typically, there are three school districts identified in each GLRS Region to receive Intensive TA. 5/27/2019

What is the current accountability measure for the graduation rate? The Cohort Graduation Rate defines a graduate as a student who leaves high school with a General Education Diploma in the standard time (i.e., 4 years, 5 years). 5/27/2019

Annual Event Graduation Rate How will Georgia measure the improved graduation rate for Student Success? Annual Event Graduation Rate SWD who exit with a General Education Diploma during a school year Divided by All SWD who exit during a school year (Types of Exit: Sped Diploma, Certificate of Attendance, Gen Ed Diploma, and Dropouts) 5/27/2019

5 year trend 5/27/2019

The LEA Process- Stakeholder Engagement #1 How did the district select the designated stakeholders to create an inclusive team with varied perspectives? Was there a district stakeholder group that could be repurposed for this opportunity? If so, share any critical connections. Describe gaps or concerns that will require additional stakeholders to participate in the ongoing Student Success Process. How will the stakeholders continue to support the work? 5/27/2019

Current Capacity and Initiatives – Student Success #2 What initiatives and current resources are already designated to support outcomes in this area (e.g., PBIS, GraduateFirst, School Improvement, Title One, SIG, etc.)? What resources are needed? How might these initiatives align with the Student Success Process? Do those initiatives have a district-level component? If yes, please discuss. Describe policies that must be created or amended to improve this area. Describe concerns and/or gaps that must be addressed to strengthen the district’s infrastructure and capacity.  5/27/2019

General Supervision- Student Success #3 Describe how a noncompliance in one or more of the following areas might be contributing to the problem. Describe the district procedures that support compliant practices and improved results that impact graduation outcomes. How does the district provide job embedded learning and training for personnel around these procedures? How does the district monitor and support targeted schools and/or staff that require Technical Assistance? What aspects of this general supervision system are working well? What are the areas of opportunities? What systems, processes, and/or practices must change to support improved outcomes? 5/27/2019

Districts Analysis of Data Relative to Equity Gaps- #4 What kinds of data did the stakeholder team analyze for this work? What were the salient data trends? How did the trends for students with disabilities align with the trends for “all students” and/or other subgroups? Describe any equity gaps by groups, settings, or schools (e.g., gender, racial/ethnic groups, middle school, high school, disability categories, etc.). Describe how the team connected the dots among the data sets to tell a story and identify root causes for the problem. Describe the critical data sets that the stakeholder team will continue to review and analyze. How might these data sets support the identified coherent strategies and interventions? 5/27/2019

Identify Barriers -Student Success #5 What barriers must be addressed to improve outcomes for students with disabilities? Why did the district prioritize these identified barriers among other causes? Discuss how these barriers for students with disabilities relate to other groups of students. Describe any critical connections with the state identified barriers: (1) Access to Effective Instruction for All Students; (2) Access to Positive School Climate: and (3) Access to Specially Designed Instruction for Students with Disabilities. 5/27/2019

Identify the coherent strategies and critical next steps-Student Success #6 What are the critical next steps for the district? What specific strategies might be implemented district- wide? What specific strategies might be implemented for a targeted school(s)? What specific strategies might be implemented for targeted students? How might you continue to monitor implementation and progress? What proactive strategies could the district identify to eliminate additional concerns? How will the district address equity gaps that impact student outcomes? 5/27/2019

What is the work? Students Accessing Effective Instruction/Interventions in a positive climate will improve outcomes and graduate. 5/27/2019

A Problem Solving Process Implement, Monitor and Evaluate Develop or Revise Actionable Steps Identify Barriers Review Data and Tell Your Story Stakeholder Engagement 5/27/2019

Student Success Webpage http://www.gadoe.org/Curriculum-Instruction-and- Assessment/Special-Education-Services/Pages/SSIP- .aspx 5/27/2019