5 Why Process/Guidelines

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“A Focused Approach to Solving Chronic and/or Systemic Problems”
Advertisements

Quality Management System Corrective and Preventive Actions Argenis Osorio – Manager, Quality Assurance 19 September 2013 FACULTY MANAGEMENT.
Presented by YOUR NAME THE DATE
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download, adapt, and distribute this.
The ISO 9002 Quality Assurance Management System
Project Risk Management Risk Mitigation. Risk Management  The prime objective of risk management is to minimize the impact and probability of the occurrence.
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
© 2008 Prentice Hall11-1 Introduction to Project Management Chapter 11 Managing Project Execution Information Systems Project Management: A Process and.
Project Execution.
Training.
How to Implement, Process and Administer the Preventive Action Process
Preventive Action Training
Product Quality, Testing, Reviews and Standards
1 Accreditation and Certification: Definition  Certification: Procedures by which a third party gives written assurance that a product, process or service.
Software Quality Assurance Activities
Project Management : Techniques and Tools (60-499) Fall 2014 / Winter 2015.
Lecture 11 Managing Project Execution. Project Execution The phase of a project in which work towards direct achievement of the project’s objectives and.
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
Automated Statement of Accounts Project and Operational Guideline March 2011.
ISO NON-CONFORMANCE, CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTION.
SCOPE DEFINITION,VERIFICATION AND CONTROL Ashima Wadhwa.
1 1 Effective Administration of Commercial Contracts Breakout Session # Session D06 Name: Holly Walker, CPCM Corporate Learning Solutions and Contract.
Human Error Reduction – A Systems Approach.

Root Cause Analysis Roger Brauninger
Audit Findings.
Incident Reporting And Investigation Program
Software Testing.
Software Project Configuration Management
Causal Analysis & Resolution (CAR) Support Category
ISO 14001: 2004 Environmental Management Review Presentation
Module nine PMP® Mastery 2016 APMG Create WBS
CHANGE CONTROL.
Problem Solving Sheet Guidelines
Chapter 11: Software Configuration Management
BSBWOR301 Organise personal work priorities and development
DMRs and Corrective Actions (CA)
Off-spec Process Flow.
Project Management Managing Project Execution
LEAN ORGANIZATION SUMMARY
NEEDS & EXPECTATIONS: INTERESTED PARTIES TO ISO & AS9100
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Quarry Operator and Contractor Code of Conduct
Project Risk Management
c.net5 Online Management
Introduction to Internal Audits
KMCO CAPA System Training
SNMS Supplier Network Management System
Quality Management Systems – Requirements
Incident Reporting And Investigation Program
Root Cause Analysis for Effective Incident Investigation
GHSP Problem Solving Team Champion: Team Members: Team Mentor:
Internal Audit Training
Project Management Process Groups
Patient Safety Reporting Process
Root Cause Analysis: Why? Why? Why?
Chapter 11: Software Configuration Management
RISK REDUCTION PROCESS
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
Hands-On: FSA Assessments For Foreign Schools
When should root cause analysis be performed?
Supplier Problem Resolution Problem Improvement Request
ISSUE MANAGEMENT PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Workflows at Austin Water Labs
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Supplier Corrective ACTION RESPONSE REVIEW TRAINING
Quality Systems ISO 9000 Series QS-9000 TE-9000 AS9000
Presentation transcript:

5 Why Process/Guidelines SCIS Team

Supplier Expectation Definition 5 Why process Corrective Action Contents Supplier Expectation Definition 5 Why process Corrective Action Form/Document 3 Legged 5 Why

Expectations Suppliers are expected to be aware of all EDI demand requirements and any potential risk to assuring that those demands are met. Any identified risks are to be immediately communicated to your plant material representatives. When problems arise, suppliers are expected to contain the problem and response rapidly with permanent corrective action on non conforming deliveries Suppliers are responsible for coordinating the appropriate activities to identify and communicate material delivery risks, present containment recovery/action plans, and communicate to appropriate parties when the activity is complete Suppliers are expected to take ownership of the process, lead root cause investigations, and report on a timely basis as required by the assigned Navistar representatives. Information on the 5Why format and process follows, but suppliers are expected to obtain further training on the 5 Why methodology if needed The official document to be used is the 3 legged 5 Why. Summary reports or supplier internal formats will not be accepted

5 Why process - Definition The 5 Why process is a tool to push thinking about a potential cause down to the root level. Often stated to find the disease and not the symptom It is a simple process that asks why an event (missed POA/point of application shortage or other noncompliance) occurred enough times to get to a root cause. The number 5 is not rigid, but asking why enough times to get to a root cause is required Each subsequent why should ask why to the preceding statement. Starting at the bottom of the 5 why’s and stating therefore to each of the preceding why’s will maintain constant flow and assist in root cause determination Each root cause should have a countermeasure(s) attached Multiple 5Why’s may be required for different attributes to properly define the problem Example: Problem statement: Material (part number) impacted POA (point of application) at plant (x) on (date) Why? Part did not ship in time to customer Why? Production of part did not meet due date Why? Equipment experienced down time Why? Preventative Maintenance was not done Why? Equipment was not on PM Schedule

5 Why Process - Corrective Action It is often stated that the difficult part of the 5Y process is the root cause identification. If the correct root cause is identified then the solution can often be a logical conclusion Acceptance of a corrective action is if it prevents reoccurrence Training is NOT a corrective action. Personnel can leave and the same risk of occurrence remains. The best corrective action “pokeyoke’s” or error proofs the process to prevent reoccurrence A corrective action should also be “institutionalized”. If the problem existed with one part number, or one piece of equipment, etc., does the corrective action look at all processes that may exhibit the same condition

5Why document page 1 The supplier is required to complete this page, with Navistar support as necessary. The header information will all be sent on the email request defining POA (point of application) occurrence data Any check circle in red needs to be filled in and then a statement to that step listed under comments The bottom of the form also needs to be completed before acceptance Note: There may be some redundancy between this page and page 2. This is by design to assure we are getting to a root cause of the problem

5Why document page 2 This is the essence of the process. Note: The 5Y process is broken down into three sections Why was non conformance created (Specific Problem) Why did it reach the customer (Detection) Why did the system (process) allow this to happen. (Systemic) Each section needs a corrective action – owner – and date Note: Do not confuse containment with corrective action. This action should prevent reoccurrence

5Why document page 3 This counter measure page must be completed in order to accept the submission The status column must reflect the clock . This is a requirement and future corrective actions will be followed up with to assure compliance