Work Train Assess E2E Lean Process Review - Evaluate

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
Advertisements

Hendershott Consulting Inc
Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.
Mr. Mike Mosley Learning Standards Branch Head 04 Feb 2014
S Y S T E M S E N G I N E E R I N G.
Transforming the Procurement Process
NETC N7 Status Update to AIM FRB NETC N7 Status Update to AIM FRB Roy Hoyt, NETC N74 LCDR Brewster, NAVMAC Tiffany Dombrowski, AIM Pgm Mgr, NAWCTSD 18.
11 Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Surface Training Systems Briefing (STS) Training & Simulation Industry.
Putting It all Together Facilitating Learning and Project Groups.
TeamSTEPPS TM National Implementation Measurement The following slides are not part of the TeamSTEPPS Instructor Guide. Due to federal 508 compliance requirements.
Procurement Functions - Service Service Function - Provides client department with procurement services so clients can focus on their core responsibilities.
NETC N7 Status Update to AIM FRB NETC N7 Status Update to AIM FRB Roy Hoyt, NETC N74 George Vogel, NAVMAC 00C Tiffany Dombrowski, AIM Pgm Mgr, NAWCTSD.
The ADDIE Instructional Design Model by Christopher Pappas
OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.
Foundations of Geospatial System Development Todd S. Bacastow Professor of Practice for Geospatial Intelligence John A. Dutton e-Education Institute The.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative ANF IT Consolidation Website Publishing / IA Working Group Kickoff.
18 March th meeting of the Evaluation Expert Committie 1 Thematic Working Group „Ex post Evaluation Guidelines” State of play Jela Tvrdonova.
Monitoring and Evaluation Management of a Training Program.
NETC N7 Update to AIM FRB NETC N7 Update to AIM FRB Mike Mosley, NETC N74 23 April
@2002 Copyright, Itreya Technologies CMMI kick off July 2005.
By: Catherine Mendoza. Evaluate Implement Develop Analyze Design.
Identify a Health Problem Qualitative Quantitative Develop Program -theory -objectives -format -content Determine Evaluation -design -sampling -measures.
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 What is Solution Assessment & Validation?
Our Mission:Manage Army installations to support readiness and mission execution – provide equitable services and facilities, optimize resources, sustain.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
Foundations of Geospatial System Development Todd S. Bacastow Professor of Practice for Geospatial Intelligence John A. Dutton e-Education Institute The.
9/4/2003 Preparing Warriors Individually through Development and Distribution of Joint Knowledge 1 Joint Knowledge Development and Distribution Capability.
1 CP586 © Peter Lo 2003 Multimedia Communication Multimedia Development Team.
Employee Development Human Resource Management. Employee Training: Trends n Four economic and demographic trends u Unskilled and undereducated youth u.
Logistics Community Competency Initiative Update November 20, 2006 Mark Tregar, CNAC Judith Bayliss, DAU “The Total Force must continue to adapt to different.
COMMAND STAFFING Presented by Adrienne Somerville AIR 2.0 Technical Lead 26 July 2007 Enabling the Right Skills At the Right Time To Accomplish the Right.
Government-wide Talent Development November 20, 2014.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Sourcing Evaluation Life Cycle Go/No Go decision points Competition Alignment Discovery Con tract Modification Project Initiation Vendor Capabilities Contract.
Setting Performance Expectations
State Coordinator Intervention
Evaluation of Priority Gender Equality
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Teaching and Learning with Technology
TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION Long Range Planning
Updating the Value Proposition:
Designing and Implementing Local Faculty Development Programs
Strategic Planning & Management Training
© 2016, 2017 Change Healthcare Solutions, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Getting Started with Your Malnutrition Quality Improvement Project
Employment and Social Affairs Platform
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Project Plan Template (Help text appears in cursive on slides and in the notes field)
Software Measurement Process ISO/IEC
Monitoring vs Evaluation
Assessing learners’ needs
Direct Enhanced Scheme for People with Learning Disabilities
School of Dentistry Education Research Fund (SDERF)
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff:
Resource: Setting up a performance management system
Employee engagement Close out presentation
Adaptive Product Development Process Framework
The Technology Integration Planning Model
We Need Your Feedback Please complete your learning evaluations
Using data for instructional decision-making
Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
TESTING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION GA 3113 lecture 1
Alignment of curriculum, instruction and classroom assessments
Accreditation follow-up report
Stage Gate Process Template
WORK STREAM TEAM DELIVERABLES
Presentation transcript:

Work Train Assess E2E Lean Process Review - Evaluate Continuous Evaluation Cycle Continuous Cycle Begins with the “Work” Naval Education and Training Command (NETC) Maintain (Life-Cycle Maintenance) Evaluate Plan Draft NETC N7 Training Effectiveness Evaluation Plan (TEEP) (Program Management) Assess E2E Lean Process Review - Evaluate In a Systems Approach to Training A TEEP is Essential Perform Training Content Planning/Development/ Implementation Evaluate/Select Training Intervention Alternatives Content Surveillance/ Feedback / Maintenance A well defined Training Effectiveness Evaluation Plan (TEEP) allows us to: A TEEP is a quantitative evaluation strategy that identifies measureable performance outcomes and will identify Reaction, Summative, Behavior, and Result Evaluation criteria. Reaction Evaluations Level 1 Summative Evaluations Level 2 Behavior Evaluations Level 3 Result Evaluations Level 4 Data Collection Plan Comm Plan SWOT TEEP SIPOC Point 1 – Draft NETC N7 position regarding TEEP Policy by 1 Dec.

Work Train Assess E2E Lean Process Review – Evaluate Continuous Evaluation Cycle Continuous Cycle Begins with the “Work” Naval Education and Training Command (NETC Maintain (Life-Cycle Maintenance) Evaluate Plan Draft NETC N7 Training Effectiveness Evaluation Plan (TEEP) (Program Management) E2E Lean Process Review – Evaluate Assess In a Systems Approach to Training A TEEP is Essential Perform Training Content Planning/Development/ Implementation Evaluate/Select Training Intervention Alternatives Content Surveillance/ Feedback / Maintenance A well defined Training Effectiveness Evaluation Plan (TEEP) allows us to: 10/05/18 Strategic IPR Update Collaborating with N75 to review TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION for the NAVAL CONSTRUCTION FORCE CRANE TRAINING SYSTEM N95-TEE-F-80-1702 as a representative model standard Prototype TEEP checklist job aide validating data element requirements Drafted NETC Training Effectiveness Evaluation Plan Instruction posted to APAN Developing flowcharts and job aides for TEEP processes: TEEP Part 1 - Front Matter (e.g., Program data, POCs, RFT, etc.) TEEP Part 2 - Planned Evaluation (e.g., TSD current state, IPRD, TD desc.) TEEP Part 3 - Evaluation Strategy (e.g., data col. plan, empirical basis and controls) TEEP Part 4 - TEE Agent (TEEA) selection TEEP Part 5 - TEEP Approval process TEEP Part 6 - TEEP Results (e.g., findings, feedback, POA&M) A TEEP is a quantitative evaluation strategy that identifies measureable performance outcomes and will identify Reaction, Summative, Behavior, and Result Evaluation criteria. Reaction Evaluations Level 1 Summative Evaluations Level 2 Behavior Evaluations Level 3 Result Evaluations Level 4 Data Collection Plan Comm Plan SWOT TEEP SIPOC NETC N5 Learning Assessment Framework LAF Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) focus on improving life cycle management of technical training data that can be configured to the systems it supports OPNAV N12 TEEP development

Background: OPNAVINST 1500 Background: OPNAVINST 1500.76D draft incorporates a discretionary requirement for Training Effectiveness Evaluation Plans, additionally, NETC EAP governance is under review and revision Problem: NETC COI’s currently lack standardized, comprehensive governance wrt Evaluation and assessment programs and processes resulting in: An inability to determine if NETC COI content assessments align with requirement/resource sponsor program/end user activity performance requirements Standardized external feedback from end user activities wrt trainee performance An inability to use curriculum surveillance feedback to assess health of the curriculum and improve COI’s Solution: Develop standardized evaluation/assessment feedback programs that will : Quantitatively - reduce takt time to 1collect, receive, analyze end user feedback, 2plan/execute content change/revision processes, 3achieve end user performance metric requirements, 4reduce # of formal assessment time Qualitatively – 1align content assessment processes and standards with end user performance metric requirements, 2identify authentic assessment resources takt time: The total available work time per day (or shift) divided by customer-demand requirements per day (or shift). Takt time sets the pace of production to match the rate of customer demand. Examples: If your customers demand 480 spark plugs per day and your production line operates 960 minutes per day, takt time is two minutes If customers want two new contracts written per month, takt time is two weeks. Takt time increases if customer buys fewer products. Takt time decreases if customer buys more products. Ideally cycle time should equal takt time.

NCF TEE Review Three phase process Is there a TEEP/with template data elements completed Are planned evaluation, evaluation strategy (including analytics) specifically defined Does NETC training output meet: Requirements sponsor Kirk. 4 org goals/objectives, TFOM, readiness DRRS, #NECs, Sup/Grad survey feedback wrt LO’s, training solution treatments Kirk. 3

TEEP Representative Model Sample N95-TEE-F-80-1702 TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION for the NAVAL CONSTRUCTION FORCE CRANE TRAINING SYSTEM PREPARED BY: NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND TRAINING SUPPORT AGENCY (EX8) PREPARED FOR: DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS FOR WARFARE SYSTEMS NAVAL EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE DIVISION (N95) MANPOWER AND TRAINING BRANCH (N959) DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited. MARCH 2018