Adaptation to P Element Transposon Invasion in Drosophila melanogaster

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Advertisements

Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 157, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Jianbin Wang, H. Christina Fan, Barry Behr, Stephen R. Quake  Cell 
David J. Katz, T. Matthew Edwards, Valerie Reinke, William G. Kelly 
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Lacy J. Barton, Belinda S. Pinto, Lori L. Wallrath, Pamela K. Geyer 
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Drosophila piwi Mutants Exhibit Germline Stem Cell Tumors that Are Sustained by Elevated Dpp Signaling  Zhigang Jin, Alex S. Flynt, Eric C. Lai  Current.
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Hierarchical Rules for Argonaute Loading in Drosophila
A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3′ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation  Michal Rabani, Lindsey Pieper, Guo-Liang Chew,
Nikhila S. Tanneti, Kathryn Landy, Eric F. Joyce, Kim S. McKim 
Adrien Le Thomas, Georgi K. Marinov, Alexei A. Aravin  Cell Reports 
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Douglas J Guarnieri, G.Steven Dodson, Michael A Simon  Molecular Cell 
Adaptive Evolution Leads to Cross-Species Incompatibility in the piRNA Transposon Silencing Machinery  Swapnil S. Parhad, Shikui Tu, Zhiping Weng, William.
Volume 133, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patterns to Gene Expression
Germline Stem Cell Heterogeneity Supports Homeostasis in Drosophila
Mobile 24 nt Small RNAs Direct Transcriptional Gene Silencing in the Root Meristems of Arabidopsis thaliana  Charles W. Melnyk, Attila Molnar, Andrew.
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
A Major Epigenetic Programming Mechanism Guided by piRNAs
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
From Stem Cell to Embryo without Centrioles
Piwi Proteins and piRNAs in Mammalian Oocytes and Early Embryos
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 128, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
A Broadly Conserved Pathway Generates 3′UTR-Directed Primary piRNAs
Olga Minkina, Craig P. Hunter  Molecular Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2017)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
A Transcriptome-wide RNAi Screen in the Drosophila Ovary Reveals Factors of the Germline piRNA Pathway  Benjamin Czech, Jonathan B. Preall, Jon McGinn,
Steven Z. DeLuca, Patrick H. O'Farrell  Developmental Cell 
Piwi Is Required to Limit Exhaustion of Aging Somatic Stem Cells
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
The Role of Oocyte Transcription, the 5′UTR, and Translation Repression and Derepression in Drosophila gurken mRNA and Protein Localization  Carol Saunders,
Nicola Iovino, Filippo Ciabrelli, Giacomo Cavalli  Developmental Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2016)
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Maternally Inherited Stable Intronic Sequence RNA Triggers a Self-Reinforcing Feedback Loop during Development  Mandy Li-Ian Tay, Jun Wei Pek  Current.
Ismail Osman, Jun Wei Pek  Stem Cell Reports 
Small RNA-Mediated Quiescence of Transposable Elements in Animals
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Paracrine Signaling through the JAK/STAT Pathway Activates Invasive Behavior of Ovarian Epithelial Cells in Drosophila  Debra L. Silver, Denise J. Montell 
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Dicer-like Enzymes with Sequence Cleavage Preferences
Equivalent Parental Contribution to Early Plant Zygotic Development
Gene Amplification as a Developmental Strategy
The Drosophila Microtubule-Associated Protein Mini Spindles Is Required for Cytoplasmic Microtubules in Oogenesis  Woongjoon Moon, Tulle Hazelrigg  Current.
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Hierarchical Rules for Argonaute Loading in Drosophila
Bacterial Argonaute Samples the Transcriptome to Identify Foreign DNA
Presentation transcript:

Adaptation to P Element Transposon Invasion in Drosophila melanogaster Jaspreet S. Khurana, Jie Wang, Jia Xu, Birgit S. Koppetsch, Travis C. Thomson, Anetta Nowosielska, Chengjian Li, Phillip D. Zamore, Zhiping Weng, William E. Theurkauf  Cell  Volume 147, Issue 7, Pages 1551-1563 (December 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.042 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2011 147, 1551-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.042) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Phenotypic Adaptation to P Element Invasion (A) Diagram of crosses used to produce dysgenic (w1 × Har) and control hybrids (Har × w1). Har is a wild-type P strain harboring P elements, and w1 is a laboratory M stain that lacks these transposons. (B–D) Egg production (B), hatch rate (C), and fraction of eggs showing wild-type dorsal-ventral patterning (D) as a function of hybrid age. Control reciprocal hybrids (blue); dysgenic hybrids (red). (E) DNA damage in hybrid ovaries. Egg chambers were labeled for γH2Av, a modified histone associated with DNA breaks, and for DNA. Oocyte nuclei in 2- to 4-day-old reciprocal hybrids do not label for γH2Av (Har × w1, 2–4 day, arrow). Oocyte nuclei in 2- to 4-day-old dysgenic hybrids, by contrast, show prominent γH2Av foci (w1 × Har, 2–4 day, arrow). Oocyte nuclei in 21-day dysgenic hybrids do not label for γH2Av (w1 × Har, 21 day, arrow). Also see Figure S1. Cell 2011 147, 1551-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.042) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Vasa Localization and Expression during Hybrid Dysgenesis (A) At 2–4 days, only low levels of Vasa are present in the germarium of dysgenic hybrids (2–4 day, w1 × Har), whereas Vasa is dispersed in the cytoplasm and concentrated in perinuclear foci (nuage) in reciprocal hybrid controls (2–4 day, Har × w1). (B) At 21 days, by contrast, Vasa is present in the cytoplasm and nuage in both dysgenic hybrids and reciprocal control. Vasa also shows the expected accumulation at the posterior pole of stage 10 oocytes (right panels). (C) Western blot for Vasa in control and dysgenic ovaries. At 2–4 and 21 days, reciprocal hybrids express a species of the expected 72 kDa apparent molecular weight (MW). Two- to four-day-old dysgenic hybrids, by contrast, express low levels of this species and a prominent higher-mobility band. At 21 days, however, the 72 kDa band is restored. In (A) and (B), the distribution of Vasa is shown on the left, and a merge of Vasa (green), DNA (blue), and Lamin-C (red) is on the right. Note that Lamin-C is prominent in the terminal filament cells that occupy the anterior tip of the germarium and in the stalk cells located between egg chambers. Scale bars = 20 μm. Cell 2011 147, 1551-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.042) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Organization of the piRNA Processing Machinery Dysgenic and reciprocal control ovaries were labeled for the PIWI proteins Ago3 (A, D, and G), Piwi (B, E, and H), and Ago3 (C, F, and I). In 2- to 4-day-old and 21-day-old reciprocal Har × w1 controls, Aub and Ago3 show the expected localization to nuage, and Piwi is concentrated in nuclei. In 2- to 4-day-old w1 × Har dysgenic ovaries, by contrast, Aub, Ago3, and Piwi are dispersed (A–C). In 21-day w1 × Har dysgenic hybrids, by contrast, localization of all three proteins is comparable to reciprocal controls. Pairs of images show the distribution of the indicated PIWI protein on the left and a merge of the PIWI protein (green), DNA (blue), and Lamin-C (red) on the right. Scale bars = 10 μm. Cell 2011 147, 1551-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.042) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Transposon, Gene, and piRNA Precursor Expression (A) P element transcript levels in dysgenic hybrids (w1 × Har) and reciprocal controls (Har × w1). P element transcript levels were measured by qPCR and are expressed relative to an internal vasa mRNA control. (B and C) Whole-genome tiling array analysis of gene (B) and transposon family (C) expression in 2- to 4- and 21-day-old dysgenic ovaries relative to w1 controls. Each point represents a single transposon family or protein-coding gene. Points above the diagonal are overexpressed in dysgenic hybrids. Points in red indicate significant overexpression (FDR < 0.05). R = correlation coefficient. (D) Transcript levels form both strands of a 4th chromosome piRNA cluster carrying a paternally inherited P element insertion. RNA was measured by strand-specific RT-qPCR using primers that span the P element insertion site. Transcripts from both strands were significantly elevated in 2- to 4-day-old dysgenic hybrids relative to reciprocal controls. At 21 days, by contrast, dysgenic hybrids and reciprocal controls express similar levels of cluster transcripts. Transcript levels for an unlinked piRNA cluster on chromosome 2L (control) were not altered in the dysgenic hybrids. Bar graphs display mean and standard deviation. Also see Figure S2 and Table S1. Cell 2011 147, 1551-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.042) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 P Element and Resident Element piRNA Expression piRNA expression was determined by deep sequencing, normalizing for sequencing depth (see Experimental Procedures). (A and C) Two- to four-day-old dysgenic ovaries (w1 × Har) express low levels of P element piRNAs relative to reciprocal controls (C, Har × w1). (B and D) At 21 days, by contrast, dysgenic (B) and control (D) ovaries express P element piRNAs at similar levels. (E) Expression of piRNAs matching shared resident elements in 2- to 4- and 21-day-old hybrids, relative to control hybrids. Group III elements, which are enriched in somatic follicle cells, are in red. Group I elements, which are enriched in the germline, are in black. Group II elements show a sense strand bias and are in green. At 2–4 days, dysgenic ovaries overexpress group III piRNA and underexpress group I piRNAs. This likely reflects developmental arrest prior to germline expansion. At 21 days, by contrast, wild-type piRNA expression is restored. Also see Data S1. Cell 2011 147, 1551-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.042) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Transposon Mobilization during Hybrid Dysgenesis (A) New transposon insertions were detected by paired-end genome deep sequencing and quantified following normalization to a depth of 18.3-fold. Bars indicate normalized paired-end reads associated with new transposon insertions for specific transposon families in 2- to 4-day-old (blue) and 21-day-old dysgenic ovaries (red), relative to the parental Har and w1 genomes. The green bars indicate new insertions in the fertile progeny of 21-day dysgenic females mated to the parental w1 strain. These insertions are relative to the 21-day-old dysgenic females. Most transposon families are active in the dysgenic hybrids, and roo is more active than the P element trigger for hybrid dysgenesis. All transposon families show reduced activity in the progeny ovaries. (B) Site-specific insertion and germline transmission of an Ivk element in the 42AB cluster. Shown are the locations of paired-end reads defining a new insertion in dysgenic ovaries. Blue bars indicate plus-strand reads with their right end mapping to Ivk. Red bars indicate minus-strand reads with left ends mapping to Ivk. Grey bars indicate reads that cross the junction between unique genomic sequences and Ivk, which define the insertion site at the nucleotide level. Ivk is not detected in the paternal Har and w1 strains, but insertion-defining reads are present at 2–4 days, increase at 21 days, and are more abundant in the progeny of 21-day dysgenic hybrids ([w1 × Har] × w1). In all three datasets, insertion-spanning reads indicate transposition into precisely the same location, which defines novel junction sequences. (C) The sequence of plus (blue) and minus (red) strand piRNAs reads mapping to the lefthand Ivk junction, with the number of reads for each sequence indicated (reads, left columns). The number of junction-specific piRNA reads increases between 2–4 and 21 days, consistent with the increase in insertion-matching genome-sequencing reads (B). Ivk transposition thus leads to de novo production of junction-specific piRNAs. (D) Total piRNAs mapping to Ivk also increase between 2–4 and 21 days (Ivk piRNAs). The number of piRNAs that overlap by 10 nt, and the bias toward this overlap, also increase with hybrid age (normalized read pair). Also see Tables S2 and S3. Cell 2011 147, 1551-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.042) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Genome Distribution of Inherited Transposon Insertions Direct genome sequencing identified 132 transposon insertion sites in 21-day-old dysgenic females that were also present in their progeny at 25% or greater penetrance. The genomic distribution of these inherited insertions is indicated, with bar height indicating penetrance in the progeny genome. The six insertions that map to piRNA clusters are in red. All of these sites are in pericentromeric heterochromatin or heterochromatin on chromosome 2. Three of these insertions are in the major pericentromeric cluster at 42AB. Also see Tables S4 and S5. Cell 2011 147, 1551-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.042) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 Ovary Morphology as a Function of F1 Hybrid Age, Related to Figure 1 Plotted are percentages of ovaries that have 0 (rudimentary ovary), 1, 3–5, and >5 ovarioles that each contains >5 egg chambers. Cell 2011 147, 1551-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.042) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Gene and Transposon Expression in Dysgenic Ovaries, Related to Figure 4 Genome Browser screenshot showing the maternal w1 (blue), 2- to 4-day-old dysgenic ovaries (red), and 21-day-old dysgenic ovaries (green). The position of a 297 transposon is indicated by the red box. The element is silenced in the parental strain, but overexpressed in 2- to 4-day-old dysgenic ovaries. At 21 days, however, silencing is restored. Cell 2011 147, 1551-1563DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.042) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions