Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administrations Prospect Park School September 11, 2018

PARCC Expectations Students taking PARCC can score in 5 categories: Level 1: Did Not Yet Meet Expectations Level 2 Partially Met Expectations Level 3 Approached Expectations Level 4 Met Expectations Level 5 Exceeded Expectations Students who score in levels 4 and 5 are considered profient. Parents, guardians and community members who would like to know more about PARCC should visit the Department of Education website https://www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/parents/

Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and 2018 Comparison of Prospect Park’s Number of Students Tested Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy Grade Students Tested 2018 Students Tested 2017 Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and 2018 3 88 108 -20 4 97 105 -8 5 102 +5 6 103 89 +14 7 90 +2 8 82 +6 9 N/A 10 11* TOTAL 568 569 -11 Note: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy.

Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and 2018 Comparison of Prospect Park’s Number of Students Tested Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics Grade Students Tested 2018 Students Tested 2017 Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and 2018 3 88 108 -20 4 104 107 -3 5 103 97 +6 6 90 +14 7 91 +1 8* 80 74 Algebra I 9 8 Algebra II N/A Geometry TOTAL 579 574 5+5 *Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. Notes: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for Mathematics.

Change in Level 4 and 5 2016 to 2018** Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - District Percentages Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 Change in Level 1 and 2 2016 to 2018 Change in Level 4 and 5 2016 to 2018** 3 15.7 25 29.5 25.5 16.7 20.5 33.3 25.9 30.7 31.5 19.3 .9 + - 4 9 18.1 5.2 23.6 22.9 23.7 30.3 32.4 30.9 24.8 34 5.6 1.9 6.2 5 8.8 13.4 13.7 17.6 17.5 23.5 41.8 33 30.4 28.6 32 3.3 4.1 6 10.7 6.7 19 20.2 27.2 46.1 36.9 40.5 25.8 20.4 1.2 1.1 4.9 7 12.5 8.9 18.2 22.2 22.7 31.1 31.8 8 8.2 14.8 10.6 29.7 22.4 23 17 49.4 16.2 46.6 9.4 3.4 Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - District Percentages

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Sub Group Percentages (Hispanic or Latino) Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 3 17.1 29.1 26.7 27.1 17.7 16.7 31.4 22.8 35 24.3 21.7 1.3 4 7.7 15.3 7 23.1 20.8 25.4 30.8 37.5 28.2 33.8 23.6 32.4 4.6 2.8 8.5 5 8.7 10 12.9 20.3 20 47.8 35.7 32.9 34.3 2.9 6 7.9 7.6 10.5 17.5 18.2 27.6 34.9 51.5 35.5 38.1 21.2 22.4 1.6 1.5 3.9 8.6 16.9 9.1 20.7 21.5 24.2 31 27.7 30.3 34.5 24.6 31.8 5.2 9.2 4.5 8 8.9 9.3 12.1 10.7 22.2 26.8 25.9 44.6 38.9 45.5 3.7 **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Sub Group Percentages (Black or African American) Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 3 18.8 12.5 53.5 25 26.7 31.3 50 20 4 23.5 7.7 23.1 35.7 38.5 28.6 5 8.3 16.7 13.3 6 30 6.7 10 46.7 40 7 27.8 21.4 5.6 22.2 8 11.8 31.6 17.6 21.1 5.3 70.6 36.8 **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Sub Group Percentages (White) Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 3 8.3 25 16.7 41.7 12.5 33.3 62.5 4 22.2 23.1 50 22 30.8 5 14.3 30 18.2 20 27.3 28.6 40 57.1 10 6 37.5 44.4 7 11.1 8 42.9 **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Sub Group Percentages (Economic Disadvantage) Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 3 13.3 22.1 27.1 26.5 15.6 20.3 38.6 35.6 21.7 24.7 16.9 1.3 4 11 17..1 4.5 23.3 22 24.2 30.1 39 30.3 28.8 31.8 6.8 9.1 5 10.6 13.9 13.6 18.2 19 23.5 42.4 30.4 34.6 27.3 32.9 28.4 1.5 3.8 6 11.5 9.7 9.8 23 22.6 28 24.6 31.7 36.6 41 29 20.7 1.6 4.9 7 14.9 20 12.1 24.3 19.7 29.1 25.8 34.8 8.1 5.5 7.6 8 18.5 16.4 7.3 23.6 12.7 49.1 35.4 47.3 10.9 3.1 3.6 **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Sub Group Percentages (IEP Students) Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 3 44.4 69.2 71.4 33.3 15.4 21.4 22.2 7.1 4 30 50 25 40 58.3 10 16.7 5 41.7 35.7 5.6 6 46.7 30.8 38.5 6.7 7 52.9 35.3 11.8 25.5 8.3 8 53.3 61.5 29.4 29.3 5.9 7.7 **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Sub Group Percentages (ELL Students) Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 3 N/A 100 4 20 40 5 25 75 6 60 7 70 10 8 66.7 33.3 *NA- data was suppressed due to the amount of students tested in that year.

Change in Level 4 and 5 2016 to 2018** Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - District Percentages Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 Change in Level 1 and 2 2016 to 2018 Change in Level 4 and 5 2016 to 2018** 3 21.2 15.7 18.2 41.3 30.6 28.4 27.9 27.8 9.6 23.1 20.5 2.8 - + 4 21.7 12.1 16.5 32.6 40.2 34 29.3 37.4 22.3 14.1 10.3 26.2 2.2 1 5 16.3 24.8 27.2 34.3 42.7 45.7 28.6 8.7 11.4 2.9 6 16.7 23.3 22.1 31.0 28.9 35.6 33.3 31.1 29.8 19 11.5 7 14.4 22.2 3.3 38.9 32.2 40.7 17.8 20 18.7 1.1 -- 8* 24.7 15.9 23.8 16.9 20.7 22.5 18.3 36.3 33.8 4.9 1.3 ALG I / 11.1 100 88.9 *Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - District Percentages

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Sub Group Percentages (Hispanic or Latino) Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 3 18.3 17.7 15 43.7 27.8 25 23.9 30.4 40 14.1 22.8 20 1.3 4 6.8 18.2 34.3 44.6 35.1 29.9 37.8 20.8 9 10.8 24.7 5 15.9 25.6 31.9 38.5 46.5 44.9 24.4 28.2 7.2 10.3 1.4 6 17.5 7.6 22.1 34.9 36.4 31.7 33.3 32.5 21.2 7.8 7 10.2 20.9 4.5 30.5 37.3 45.8 40.3 13.6 14.9 17.9 1.5 8* 8.9 16.9 21 10.7 21.5 24.2 26.8 27.7 24.6 12.9 9.2 1.6 ALG I N/A 100 80 *Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Sub Group Percentages (Black or African American) Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 3 31.3 12.5 40 33.3 37.5 50 20 25 6.7 4 15.4 7.1 38.5 23.1 28.6 14.3 5 30 26.7 10 46.7 6 35.7 21.4 60 13.3 7 27.8 27.3 47.6 5.6 18.2 22.2 16.7 8* 11.8 47.1 17.6 23.5 70.6 ALG I N/A 100 *Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Sub Group Percentages (White) Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 3 15.4 12.5 38.5 25 46.2 37.5 50 4 20 23.1 40 53.8 7.7 5 30 27.3 36.4 10 9.1 6 33.3 16.7 11.1 22.2 7 8* 14.3 28.6 42.9 ALG I N/A 100 *Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Sub Group Percentages (Economic Disadvantage) Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 3 21.4 11.7 18.6 41.7 29.9 32.2 26.2 28.8 10.7 26 20.3 2.6 4 9.8 18.8 36.5 39.0 30.4 27.0 42.7 21.7 14.9 8.5 27.5 1.4 5 19.4 21.3 26.9 36.3 41.8 11.9 15 6 19.7 23 23.2 31.1 35.4 36.1 32.8 28 13.1 18 12.2 1.2 7 16 25 4.5 32 38.5 36 32.1 37.3 14.7 17.9 22.4 1.3 8* 35.6 30.5 24 19.1 38.3 15.3 ALG I N/A 20 100 80 *Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Sub Group Percentages (IEP Students) Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 3 55.6 30.8 71.4 33.3 46.2 28.6 5.6 7.7 15.4 4 70 40 25 20 55 58.3 10 5 8.3 50 14.3 7.1 16.7 6 66.7 53.8 69.2 26.7 23.1 6.7 7 82.4 44.4 11.8 75 5.9 8* 35.3 80 76.9 29.4 17.6 ALG I N/A *Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Sub Group Percentages (ELL Students) Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 3 N/A 40 60 4 27.3 36.4 9.1 5 6 45.5 7 63.6 18.2 8* 50 25 ALG I *Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s 2016 to 2018 Spring PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy – Percentage Changes Grade Levels 1 & 2 District Trend State Level 3 Levels 4 & 5 District Trend 3 + 8.8 - 2.4% 2.6 1.6% 6.2 4.1% 4 3.7 1.8% .6 2.7% 3.1 4.5% 5 10.8 1.9% 11.4 2.9% .5 4.7% 6 8.2 1.7% 8.3 2.2% 16.5 3.9% 7 1.9 3.3% 8.4 3.1% 6.5 6.3% 8 14.2 5.4 5.2% Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. The plus sign (+) indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a minus sign (-) arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s 2016 to 2018 Spring PARCC Administrations Mathematics – Percentage Changes Grade Levels 1 & 2 District Trend State Level 3 Levels 4 & 5 District Trend 3 - 15.9 0.7% + 5.1 0.6% 10.9 1.3% 4 3.5 2.2% 7 0.5% 2.8% 5 24.3 0.2% 18.5 1.5% 5.8 1.6% 6 10 1.2% 6.5 1.5 1.1% 1.8 3.7% 0.2 4.7% 8 4.6 2.1% 11.6 0.4% 16.2 2.6% Algebra I* NA 4.1% 1.1 4.6% *Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. - The plus sign (+) indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a minus sign (-) arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics to New Jersey - Percentages for 2018 Grade Level 1, District Level 1, State Level 2, District Level 2, State Level 3, District Level 3, State Level 4, District Level 4, State Level 5, District Level 5, State 3 18.2 8.0 28.4 15.3 33 23.7 20.5 37.8 15.2 4 16.5 7.5 34 16.8 22.3 26.3 26.2 41.8 7.6 5 27.2 42.7 17.0 26.7 2.9 38.5 10.4 6 22.1 8.5 35.6 20.1 29.8 27.9 11.5 7.9 7 3.3 7.7 37.4 20.4 40.7 28.6 18.7 36.0 7.4 8* 23.8 22.0 22.5 22.7 36.3 27.1 16.3 1.0 Algebra I 11.3 18.6 11.1 24.3 88.9 39.3 6.5 Algebra II N/A 31.0 22.4 18.0 24.6 4.0 Geometry 9.4 31.5 29.6 4.9 *Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy to New Jersey Percentages for 2018 Grade Level 1, District Level 1, State Level 2, District Level 2, State Level 3, District Level 3, State Level 4, District Level 4, State Level 5, District Level 5, State 3 29.5 13.5 20.5 30.7 21.4 19.3 43.5 8.1 4 5.2 7.6 23.7 12.3 30.9 22.1 34 39.1 6.2 18.9 5 13.7 6.9 23.5 12.6 30.4 22.4 32.4 47.2 10.8 6 10.7 27.2 13.6 36.9 24.0 20.4 41.3 4.9 14.9 7 8.9 8.6 22.2 10.2 31.1 18.5 34.1 6.7 28.6 8 14.8 8.7 18.2 11.1 17 19.8 46.6 39.9 3.4 Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

Cohort Comparison

Cohort Comparison

Next Steps- English Language Arts Use faculty meetings to analyze data, curriculum and instructional practice to see areas in need of improvement Provide onsite and offsite professional development opportunities K-8 in guided reading and ELA best practices Rewrite ELA curriculum 2018-19 Purchase new curriculum resources K-8 in ELA for the 2019-20 school year Continue to Initiate new reading initiatives K-8 to encourage students to read as developed by the reading specialists Offer an afterschool program for students who are identified needing Title I services Continue to use walkthrough data and teacher observations to improve instruction in the area of ELA. Continued partnership with WIlliam Paterson University providing professional development and Professor in Residence to share evidence based practices

Next Steps- Math Use faculty meetings to analyze data, curriculum and instructional practice to see areas in need of improvement Provide onsite and offsite professional development opportunities K-8 in guided math and best practices in math instruction Offer an afterschool program for students Continue to use walkthrough data and teacher observations to improve instruction in the area of mathematic Continued partnership with WIlliam Paterson University providing professional development and Professor in Residence to share evidence based practices

DLM Spring 2018 Assessment

Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM) What is the DLM Assessment? Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM) The alternate assessment for students with the most significant intellectual disabilities in English Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science is called the Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM). The DLM test specifications and Essential Elements skill statements, used for instruction and assessment, are currently available and accessible via the DLM website. For information on the DLM, go to the Dynamic Learning Maps New Jersey website.* *information from https://www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/apa/dlm/