BeneFIT SIP: 14-012 A Pilot Program of Mailed FIT Tests to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Medicaid / Medicare health plans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
Advertisements

Advocating for Better Benefits In Oregon Wendy Bjornson, MPH OHSU Smoking Cessation Center.
“Medicare’s Health Care Home Demonstration in Minnesota” Age and Disability Odyssey Conference 6/21/11 Ross Owen DHS Health Care Administration.
1 Wisconsin Partnership Program Steven J. Landkamer Program Manager Wisconsin Dept. of Health & Family Services July 14, 2004.
Appalachian Center for Cancer Education, Screening, and Support (ACCESS) Robin Vanderpool, DrPH, CHES University of Kentucky College of Public Health October.
Health Departments and Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Research: A New Land of Opportunity? Matthew Wise, MPH, PhD Epidemiologist, Office of.
Academic Practice Partnerships Kerry Silvey & Nan Newell Oregon Public Health Genetics Program April 28, 2008.
Turning Data into Action for Colorectal Cancer November 17, 2014 Jessica Shaffer, Director, Maine CDC Colorectal Cancer Control Program
GOVERNOR’S INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON HEALTH DISPARITIES Emma Medicine White Crow Association of Public Hospital Districts, Membership Meeting June 24, 2013.
TYPE 2 TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH 2009 GRANT PROGRAMS UW Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR) Community-Academic Partnership Core (CAP)
1 Addressing Racial & Ethnic Disparities in Health Care AHRQ 2007 Annual Conference September 28, 2007.
“Working Together, Reducing Cancer, Saving Lives”
Informing Public Policy to Address Health Care Disparities Boisey Barnes, MD, F.A.C.C. Founding Member and Trustee Association of Black Cardiologists.
Health Care Reform and Implications for Filipino American Health Increased Access to Care, Improved Preventive Care and Measures to Improve Quality and.
Public State Initiatives in Colorectal Screening: The Colorado Experience Tim Byers MD MPH University of Colorado School of Medicine
Seattle CPCRN Site. Seattle Focus Areas Racial/ethnic minority groups that are over- represented (American Indians and Asian Americans) or rapidly growing.
Lisa Raiz, William Hayes, Keith Kilty, Tom Gregoire, Christopher Holloman Ohio Employer and Ohio Family Health Research Conference July 29, 2011.
KCCSP. The following only applies if you are receiving grant funds from the Department for Public Health for the Kentucky Colon Cancer Screening Program.
CTxCPCRN Central Texas Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network Kick Off Grantee Meeting Atlanta, Georgia October 15-16, 2009.
CLINICAL PREVENTIVE SERVICES Chartbook on Healthy Living.
University of Iowa Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network Sue Curry, Ph.D., Principal Investigator This presentation was supported by Cooperative.
Colorectal Cancer Survivorship in Greene County, Pennsylvania: Assessment and Provider Education Mary Ann Ealy, Marlene Shaw and Carolyn Wissenbach Background.
The FluFIT Program: Leveraging Flu Shot Campaigns to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening October 11, 2013.
80% by 2018 Forum: Increasing CRC Screening Rates 80% by 2018 Forum: Increasing CRC Screening Rates Implementing a Quality Screening Navigation Program.
Co-Director: Rahma Mungia, DDS, MSc.  What is Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN)?  Benefits of Participating in a PBRN  How to Engage Community.
Finding non-traditional allies for CRC screening Gloria D. Coronado, PhD Beverly B. Green, MD, MPH Policy- makers Community Partners Clinic staffPatients.
Joni Reynolds, RN-CNS, MSN Director of Public Health Programs Winnable Battles: Cancer in Colorado.
The Importance of a Strategic Plan to Eliminate Health Disparities 2008 eHealth Conference June 9, 2008 Yvonne T. Maddox, PhD Deputy Director Eunice Kennedy.
UPDATES AND OPPORTUNITIES Community Networks Program & CDC Grant – “Integrating Colorectal Cancer Screening with Chronic Disease Programs”
Medicaid and the 4 A’s: Use of 1115 Waivers and State Plan Amendments American Cancer Society Washington, Dc June 5, 2008 Erin Reidy
Routine Preventive Care and Cancer Surveillance in Long-Term Survivors (LTS) of Colorectal Cancer: Results from NSABP Protocol LTS-01 Hiroko Kunitake MD.
Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network This presentation was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number DP SIP from the Centers for.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act The Greens: Elijah, Amber, Kayla, Patrick.
Focus Area 7: Educational and Community- Based Programs Progress Review September 15th, 2004.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 1: Access to Quality Health Services Progress Review June 15, 2006.
David Colman MD Assistant Professor Albany Medical Center Family Medicine Residency Program May 3, 2013.
Partnerships with Health Plans Review of BENEFIT -- a Medicaid-initiated, direct-mailed CRC screening program Gloria D. Coronado, PhD Kaiser Permanente.
Oral health care: the forgotten need for HIV positive populations in the continuum of care APHA Annual Meeting November, 2007 C. Tobias, S. Rajabiun, S.
Families USA Health Action Conference 2017
Kent CHAP History Health Net of West Michigan. Kent CHAP History Health Net of West Michigan.
Models of Primary Care Primary Care – FAMED 530
Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Manager May 25, 2016
You've got mail: Using to recruit a representative cohort for a healthy lifestyles research study Kayla Confer, BS1, Jessica Garber, MPH1, Jody.
Opioid Management in Primary Care Michael Parchman, MD, MPH
Patient Registries and Health Outcomes in Diabetes: A Retrospective Study Nipa Shah, MD1; Fern Webb, PhD1; Liane Hannah, BSH1; Carmen Smotherman, MS2;
Patient Navigation Process
CCC and the CPCRN Garry Lowry, MPH Mary Frost
MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation
Rural Health Summit June 11, 2010.
Evidence of a Program's Effectiveness in Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Federally Qualified Health Centers Robert L. Stephens, PhD, MPH1;
Arizona Immunization Billing Project
PAM©: Moving from Measurement to Action
Increasing Access to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural East Texas
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Maryland Residents Age 65 and Older Maryland Cancer Survey, Presented by: Carolyn Poppell, MS University.
Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Manager
SAMPLE – Preliminary Results
BACKGROUND RESULTS METHODS
Enhanced Primary Care for Patients with Serious Mental Illness
Putting Public Health Evidence in Action
Value-Based Contracting and Value-Based Decision Making: The Role of PQA as Measure Developer
Reporting in CRC screening
Standard 3.1 Patient Navigation Process
Community Collaboration A Community Promotora Model
Advancing the Science of Transformation in Integrated Primary Care: Informing Options for Scaling-up Innovation   Session 3: Addressing health equity and.
Adrienne D. Mims M.D. MPH Kaiser Permanente, Georgia
Transforming Research Findings into Action: Building a Communications Strategy to Promote Change at the Local, Regional, & State Level Bev Green, Kaiser.
Understanding the Effectiveness of Patient Navigation to Complete a Colonoscopy after an Abnormal FIT Test: Use of a risk model Amanda Petrik, Sr. Research.
Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Pilot Findings from the PROMPT Study Jamie Thompson, MPH Kaiser Permanente.
Implementation..... … of a Direct-Mail FIT Program in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Screen to Prevent Colon Cancer (STOP CRC) Amanda Petrik, Sr.
Transforming Perspectives
Presentation transcript:

BeneFIT SIP: 14-012 A Pilot Program of Mailed FIT Tests to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Medicaid / Medicare health plans

What is BeneFIT? A 4-year SIP grant funded by the Centers for Disease Control in September 2015 to the Health Promotion Research Center at the University of Washington BeneFIT co-PIs: Laura-Mae Baldwin (University of Washington) Gloria Coronado (Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research) Beverly Green (Kaiser Permanente WA) BeneFIT CDC collaborator: Jean Shapiro

BeneFIT Collaborative program with two Medicaid/Medicare health plans to implement and evaluate mailed fecal test (FIT) outreach Overall goal is to improve colorectal cancer screening rates among health plan enrollees

BeneFIT addresses low screening rates in Medicaid populations Colorectal cancer screening rates are low among Medicaid enrollees: Nationally, 36% of Medicaid-insured adults are up to-date on screening compared with 60% of commercially- or Medicare-insured adults. Medicaid enrollees are over 50% more likely than commercially insured adults to present with advanced-stage colorectal cancer. Little is known about the effectiveness of Medicaid direct-to- member mailed outreach programs.

To evaluate BeneFIT using mixed-methods, assessing BeneFIT Specific Aims To support health plans in implementing a mailed FIT outreach program for Medicaid and/or Medicare enrollees in Oregon and Washington To evaluate BeneFIT using mixed-methods, assessing Reach Implementation Effectiveness Maintenance This presentation will present results from the first year effectiveness study.

bENEfit Study Methodology Hybrid implementation-effectiveness study of two mailed FIT program models developed by health insurance plans. Primary effectiveness outcome: FIT completion rate within 6 months of initial mailing.

participating Health Plans Health Plan Oregon insures about 220,000 Medicaid and dual Medicaid- Medicare enrollees in Oregon. Health Plan Washington insures about 650,000 Medicaid and dual Medicaid-Medicare enrollees in Washington state.

Benefit process The health plans developed two very different models Quality teams designed their own programs to fit their contexts Research team provided expertise to the quality teams at the health plans

Health plan mailed fit program models Worked with clinics to confirm the list of eligible enrollees, co-brand mailing materials, and choose FIT test type that was specific to the clinic. Worked with an outside vendor for mailings. Collaborative Model Clinics or providers could opt out if desired. Worked with an outside vendor for most mailed FIT activities. Centralized Model

Collaborative model Eligible Enrollees Medicaid Health Plan Clinic

Collaborative model Eligible Enrollees Medicaid Health Plan Lab Clinic

Centralized model Lab Eligible Enrollees Medicaid Health Plan

Centralized model Lab Eligible Enrollees Medicaid Health Plan Clinic

BeneFIT Colorectal Cancer Screening Results by Health Plan

Predictors of FIT SCREENING for Enrollees in Oregon and Washington Patient characteristic OR WA Effect Gender -- NS Preferred language Race / ethnicity X Asian / Pacific Islanders/ Native Hawaiians FIT completion than whites Health insurance Dual-eligible enrollees FIT completion than Medicaid enrollees Residence location Rural residence FIT completion than urban residence Primary care visits in past year Enrollees with 1-3 or 4+ visits FIT completion than enrollees with 0 visits Jean, the next set of slides are long, and you will likely want to decide how to present. You could simply list significant predictors of FIT screening and all CRC screening for BeneFIT-eligible enrollees in OR and WA We’ve highlighted significant predictors in blue.

Effectiveness analysis Conclusions Health plans implemented two different mailed FIT program models tailored to their resources and culture – a centralized model and a model collaborating with health care systems. Both program models were effective and reached many individuals who were overdue for CRC screening. Next steps: evaluate rates of follow-up colonoscopy for positive FITs, as well as adaptations made and outcomes of the year 2 mailed FIT program

Benefit dissemination Three pronged approach Traditional academic publications 13 paper published, in process, or planned Presentations at national conferences 10 presentations given or planned Transforming our research findings into on-the-ground action More information: Attend communications panel at 2:00pm

BeneFIT Research Team Contact Information Laura-Mae Baldwin, UW co-PI Gloria Coronado, KPCHR co-PI Beverly Green, KPWA co-PI Richard Meenan, KPHCR, co-I Bill Vollmer, KPCHR, co-I Jennifer Schneider, KPCHR, co-I Amanda Petrik, KPCHR, Project Manager Malaika Schwartz, Project Manager CDC Project Officer: Jean Shapiro