September 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2002

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /533r0 Submission September 2002 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et alSlide 1 Preparation of PAR and 5 Criterion addressing Japans 4.9-5GHz.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0022r0 Submission July 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 1 Discussion on Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /1196r1 Submission Data Rate and Spectrum Requirements for IEEE aj (45 GHz) Date: Authors: Haiming Wang (SEU)Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0685r0 Submission May 2011 Ron Porat, Broadcom S1G Spectrum Regulations Outside the US Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Wireless Fundamentals Chapter 6 Introducing Wireless Regulation Bodies, Standards, and Certifications.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0594r0 May 2015 Slide 1 60 GHz band Japanese Regulatory Update Date: 2015-May-xx Authors: Kazu Takahashi, Panasonic.
Doc.: IEEE /0033r0 Submission January 2004 Y. Inoue, et. al., NTTSlide 1 Japanese Frequency Regulations Related to TGn Functional Requirements.
Doc.: IEEE /468r1 Submission July 2002 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 1 WNG Committee Report Vancouver, BC July 2002.
Doc.: IEEE /668r3 Submission November 2002 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 1 Proposed Amendment of a to address Japanese bands and rules Comments.
Doc.: IEEE /480r0 Submission July 2002 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems, et alSlide 1 Preparation of PAR and 5 Criterion addressing Japan’s 4.9-5GHz.
Doc.: IEEE /0437r1 Submission March 2008 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 TGy Overview Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1296r3 Submission September 2011 Rolf de Vegt, QualcommSlide 1 Potential Channelization for ah Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/0972r0 Dezhi Zhang, ZTE CorporationSlide 1 More Information On Four Chinese Bands Date: Authors: July 2011.
RRA Young-Chae Lim. 2 New WAVE, Next WAVE 커뮤니케이션 일류국가의 전파연구 허브 Radio Equipment Regulation Notification No. (Date of Rev.) Before RevisionAfter.
Doc.: IEEE /1062r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /1420r3 December 2010 Stefan Aust, NEC Communication Systems Submission Slide 1 Coexistence in 950MHz-958MHz in Japan Authors: Date:
Submission Il doc.: IEEE /1363r0 Ilan Sutskover, Intel Slide 1 Regulatory Landscape for Narrowband Transmissions in 11ax Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1393r1 Submission November 2011 Slide 1 OFCOM ECC TR 159 TVWS Terminology Date: Authors: Peter Ecclesine, Cisco.
Doc.: IEEE /0845r1 Submission September 2009 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Decoupling Regulation and Standards Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /360r0 Submission September 2002 Stan Bottoms, ConsultantSlide 1 Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /0176r0 Submission Jan 2013 Bo Sun, ZTE/CWPANSlide 1 Date: Presenter: Proposal of Channelization for aj.
Doc.: IEEE /759r0 Submission November 2002 Bruce Kraemer, Intersil TK Tan, PhilipsSlide 1 Proposal to Amend a to address Japanese bands.
Doc.: IEEE /0974r2 SubmissionShusaku Shimada 1 Consultation Summary of Japanese 920MHz Band Rules and Conditions Date: Authors: Note:
Kazuhiro Okanoue, NEC Yasuhiko Inoue, NTT
MMAC Activities for Japanese 4.9GHz and 5.0GHz Bands
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
平成30年6月 March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Technical requirements of Japanese.
平成30年6月 November 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Technical requirements for 950MHz.
平成30年6月 November 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Revised technical requirements.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Regulatory Classes for 80 MHz Channel
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [DSSS Channelization for TG4K ]
Proposed response to 3GPP ED request
Preliminary Evaluation of Japan Band Issues
80-MHz Non-Contiguous Channel Spectrum
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2011
6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget
TGy July Opening Report
RR-TAG Liaison Report for September 2007
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
UWB Teleconference Report
May 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed European Regulations] Date Submitted:
平成30年12月 November 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Technical requirements for 950MHz.
Japanese Frequency Regulations Related to TGn Functional Requirements
MHz FCC Action Date: Authors: March 2005
平成31年1月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 July 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Japanese.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
WNG Closing Plenary Report
Fair Quiet for DFS Date: Authors: February 2008
TGh Monitored Signal Strength Indication (MSSI)
PAR Comments Date: Authors: July 2010 May 2010
5GHz Ad-Hoc Regulatory Standing Committee Closing Report
Japanese Frequency Regulations Related to TGn Functional Requirements
WNG Presentation: 6-9GHz extensions to
Decoupling Regulation and Standards
Per-User Data Rate, Band and Bandwidth Options for VHT
Submission Title: [DSSS Channelization for TG4K ]
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Status Report on Usage of TV White Space in Japan
March 2003 MMAC T71 Ad hoc WG Report Yasuhiko Inoue, NTT Y.Inoue, NTT.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
ARIB Standards Development for Broadband Wireless Access systems
Preparation of PAR and 5 Criterion addressing Japan’s 4
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [LECIM Coexistence Considerations] Date Submitted:
MHz FCC Action Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
80-MHz Non-Contiguous Channel Spectrum
RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Presentation transcript:

September 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 September 2002 Preparation of PAR and 5 Criterion addressing Japan’s 4.9-5GHz bands in September, 2002 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems and Yasuhiko Inoue, NTT with much assistance from Kazuhiro Okanoue, NEC Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

September 2002 Background to date 11-02/480r3 Preparation of PAR and 5 Criterion addressing Japan’s 4.9-5GHz bands described situation in July, 2002 The Japanese Ministry published rules for the use of the bands on August 6th and 7th, 2002 and slides 4-13 of this presentation summarize the requirements Discussion points and actions are presented in slides 14-16. A draft PAR and Five Criterion accompany this presentation. Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

IEEE 802.11 paragraphs .11a 17.3.2.8.2 Regulatory Requirements September 2002 IEEE 802.11 paragraphs .11a 17.3.2.8.2 Regulatory Requirements 17.3.2.8.3 Operating Channel Frequencies – minimum rate by channel 17.3.2.8.4 Transmit and receive in-band and out-of-band spurious emissions 17.3.9.1 Transmit power levels 17.3.9.2 Transmit spectrum mask – and EIRP limits for adjacent and co-adjacent channels 17.3.10.5 CCA Sensitivity .11d 7.3.2.12 Country Information Element – Maximum Transmit Power Level – or EIRP in Japan’s 4.9GHz and 5.0GHz 9.9 Operation across Regulatory Domains – IBSS prohibition may need new attribute Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

September 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 September 2002 Channelization 4.90 4.92 4.94 4.96 4.98 5.00 [GHz] 5.03 5.04 5.06 5.08 5.091 [GHz] http://www.soumu.go.jp/s_news/2002/pdf/020611_3_01.pdf Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

Transmission equipment (1) September 2002 Transmission equipment (1) Frequency tolerance: +/- 20*10-6 or less Maximum Transmission Power 250mW or less AND 50mW/MHz or less Total transmission power is 250mW or less Transmission power tolerance Upper limit: +20%, Lower limit: -80% fc+/-10MHz Total power shall be 250mW or less fc (=4.92, 4.94, 4.96, 4.98, 5.04, 5.06, 5.08 GHz) Technical committee report, http://www.soumu.go.jp/s_news/2002/pdf/020611_3_02.pdf Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

Transmission equipment (2) September 2002 Transmission equipment (2) Adjacent channel emission Maximum value of absolute radiated power at antenna is regulated. -3dBm or less for fc+20-9 < f < fc+20+9 and fc-20-9 < f < fc-20+9 [MHz] -18dBm or less for fc+40-9 < f < fc+40+9 and fc-40-9 < f < fc-40+9 [MHz] fc+20MHz fc-20MHz fc fc+40MHz fc-40MHz 9MHz -3dBm or less -18dBm or less Technical committee report Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

Outband emission For 4.9GHz band system, EIRP should be September 2002 Outband emission For 4.9GHz band system, EIRP should be 15mW/MHz or less for 4880  frequency(f) < 4900MHz 15mW/MHz or less for 5000 < f  5020MHz For 5.0GHz band system, EIRP should be 15mW/MHz or less for 5000  frequency(f) < 5020MHz 0.5mW/MHz or less for 5020  f < 5030MHz 0.5mW/MHz or less for 5091 < f  5100MHz 15mW/MHz or less for 5100 < f  5120MHz Technical committee report Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

Upper limit of spurious September 2002 Upper limit of spurious For 4.9GHz band system, EIRP should be 2mW/MHz or less for frequency(f) < 4870MHz 2.5mW/MHz or less for 4870  f < 4880MHz and 5020 < f  5270MHz 0.2mW/MHz or less for 5270 < f  5342MHz 1mW/MHz or less for 5342MHz < f For 5.0GHz band system, EIRP should be 2mW/MHz or less for frequency(f) < 4990MHz 2.5mW/MHz or less for 4990  f < 5000MHz and 5120 < f  5270MHz http://www.soumu.go.jp/s_news/2002/pdf/020611_3_02.pdf Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

Outband emission and spurious (graphical) September 2002 Outband emission and spurious (graphical) 4.9GHz system 5.0GHz system in-band in-band Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

Transmission rate Transmission systems using 4.92, 4.94 and 5.04GHz September 2002 Transmission rate Transmission systems using 4.92, 4.94 and 5.04GHz shall communicate at the rates of 5Mbps or more and have capability that can communicate at the rate of 10Mbps or more. Transmission systems using 4.96, 4.98, 5.06 and 5.08GHz shall communicate at the rates of 10Mbps or more and have capability that can communicate at the rate of 20Mbps or more. http://www.soumu.go.jp/s_news/2002/pdf/020611_3_02.pdf Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

September 2002 Carrier sense Radio equipment shall have carrier sense mechanism for band sharing Radio equipment shall quit its transmissions, when the equipment detects electrical filed intensity, E, transmitted from other equipment than its correspondent larger than G: antenna gain (linear value) Pt: transmission power [W] n: 20 for 20MHz system Radio equipment shall start its transmissions after carrier sense, except the following conditions: equipment of which transmission and reception are controlled by other equipment and transmissions within 4msec after the carrier sense. http://www.soumu.go.jp/s_news/2002/pdf/020611_3_02.pdf Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

Transmission antenna gain September 2002 Transmission antenna gain 10dBi or less When EIRP is less than power of 250mW transmission power plus 10dBi antenna gain, EIRP can be compensated by additional antenna gain. http://www.soumu.go.jp/s-news/2002/020507_1.html Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

September 2002 Other requirements Subscriber shall communicate with only base stations (access points) and select frequency channel based on the base station control. (This means that ad-hoc mode (IBSS) is prohibited) Following requirements are assumed; base stations shall be licensed and subscriber can be un-licensed. (802.11a compliant subscribers are categorized into un-licensed subscriber) http://www.soumu.go.jp/s-news/2002/020507_1.html Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

September 2002 Discussion Points To confirm OFDM PHY can satisfy the new Japanese regulation It could be OK, because technical committee considered the proposal based on IEEE 802.11a spec. However, it is important for IEEE 802.11 to confirm the spec. To decide channel IDs for 4.9-5.0GHz band Current 802.11a defines channel ID for band 5.0-6.0GHz. It is important to define standardized channel ID for 4.9-5.0GHz band for interoperations. To handle 4msec carrier sense rule The Japanese regulation requires for all equipment to sense carrier every 4msec. The rule could make several impacts for IEEE 802.11 spec such as maximum PCF duration may be limited to 4msec fragmentation length may be limited to 4msec any other? It is discussion point to be standardized or not. To handle IBSS prohibit rule It is discussion point to define new standardized mechanism or not. (I think no new mechanisms will be required. The country and frequency information available in the MAC should be sufficient to prevent people from starting IBSS.) Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

September 2002 The WNG Motion Move to have WNG move that the 802.11 Working Group forward to the 802 exec for approval 802.11-02/564r0 PAR and 802.11-02/565r0 Five Criteria to extend 802.11, 802.11a and 802.11d to the Japanese 4.9GHz-5GHz bands Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al

The WNG motion: to bring the following motion to the WG September 2002 The WNG motion: to bring the following motion to the WG Move to have the Working Group confirm 802.11-02/564r0 PAR and 802.11-02/565r0 Five Criteria to extend 802.11, 802.11a and 802.11d, as necessary, to the Japanese 4.9GHz-5GHz bands, And to forward them for approval at the November 2002 IEEE 802 Plenary Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et al