Chul-Hwan Lee, Jun Wu, Bing Li  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Changes in TAF4b-TFIID Correlate with Promoter Selectivity
Advertisements

Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Generation and Interconversion of Multiple Distinct Nucleosomal States as a Mechanism for Catalyzing Chromatin Fluidity  Geeta J. Narlikar, Michael L.
Stimulation of V(D)J recombination by histone acetylation
Reconstitution of a Functional Core Polycomb Repressive Complex
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Smita Shankar, Asma Hatoum, Jeffrey W. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
The Rpd3 Core Complex Is a Chromatin Stabilization Module
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Distinct Strategies to Make Nucleosomal DNA Accessible
Volume 128, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Nucleosome Contact Triggers Conformational Changes of Rpd3S Driving High-Affinity H3K36me Nucleosome Engagement  Chun Ruan, Chul-Hwan Lee, Haochen Cui,
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e4 (June 2017)
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
Ahmed H. Hassan, Kristen E. Neely, Jerry L. Workman  Cell 
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
Laura Lande-Diner, Jianmin Zhang, Howard Cedar  Molecular Cell 
Dynamic Regulation of Nucleosome Positioning in the Human Genome
Structural Basis of Heterochromatin Formation by Human HP1
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
Xuetong Shen, Ryan Ranallo, Eugene Choi, Carl Wu  Molecular Cell 
Gaku Mizuguchi, Toshio Tsukiyama, Jan Wisniewski, Carl Wu 
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
A Transient Histone Hyperacetylation Signal Marks Nucleosomes for Remodeling at the PHO8 Promoter In Vivo  Hans Reinke, Philip D. Gregory, Wolfram Hörz 
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Histone H4 Lysine 91 Acetylation
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Requires Changes in DNA Topology
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Ali Hamiche, Raphael Sandaltzopoulos, David A Gdula, Carl Wu  Cell 
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
ISWI Is an ATP-Dependent Nucleosome Remodeling Factor
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Presentation transcript:

Chromatin Remodelers Fine-Tune H3K36me-Directed Deacetylation of Neighbor Nucleosomes by Rpd3S  Chul-Hwan Lee, Jun Wu, Bing Li  Molecular Cell  Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 255-263 (October 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.024 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2013 52, 255-263DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.024) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Binding of Rpd3S to Dinucleosomes Is Sensitive to the Length of Linker DNA in a Nonlinear Fashion (A) A schematic illustration of dinucleosome templates. All nucleosomes are identical except for the length of linker DNA, and their positions were confirmed in (B). (B) Nucleosome positioning of reconstituted dinucleosomal templates was confirmed by Bgl1 restriction digestion. As DNA probes were 32P-labeled at the 5′ ends, only the left-side (601-L) nucleosomes and residual undigested dinucleosomes can still be visualized upon digestion. Their migration patterns indicated the correct translational positions of 601-L nucleosomes and the dinucleosomes. (C) The binding of Rpd3S to dinucleosomes with different linker DNA was measured by EMSA assays. (D) Quantification of the results from (C). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Molecular Cell 2013 52, 255-263DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.024) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Histone H3K36 Methylation Regulates Rpd3S HDAC Activity toward Neighboring Nucleosomes within Proper Linker Distance (A) Preparation of heterodinucleosome templates. Gel-purified mononucleosomes (designated as Right or 601-R) containing either unmodified (white-filled) or K36me3 (black-filled) histone H3 were labeled with 3H acetyl-CoA using Ada2-TAP (H3 acetylation) and NuA4 (H4 acetylation). 601-R nucleosomes were ligated at a Bgl1 site to 601-L nucleosomes that carry various lengths of linker DNA. The resulting dinucleosomes were gel purified and directly applied to HDAC assays in (C)–(E) or end labeled using 32P-γATP for EMSA assays in (F)–(H). (B) Confirmation of proper nucleosome positioning of the heterodinucleosomes. The restriction analyses were performed similarly to that described in Figure 1B, except that in this case both ends of the DNA probes were labeled. Therefore, both digested mononucleosomes can be seen. Lanes 19–26 contain the mononucleosomes before they were ligated to form dinucleosomes, and serve as marks for the correct migration pattern of digested dinucleosomes. (C–E) Histone deacetylase assays showing that the HDAC activity of Rpd3S toward neighboring nucleosomes depends on the length of linker DNA. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (F–H) The binding affinity of Rpd3S to each heterodinucleosome was measured using gel mobility shift assays. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Molecular Cell 2013 52, 255-263DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.024) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Deacetylation Preference of Rpd3S on Dinucleosome Substrates (A) The strategy to generate heterodinucleosome templates in which each nucleosome contains an equal amount of acetyl-groups. During the first round of the acetylation reaction, 3H-labeled acetyl-CoA or cold acetyl-CoA was used for either 601-L nucleosomes or 601-R nucleosomes. Subsequently, additional acetylation was carried out for all mononucleosomes using cold acetyl-coA to reach saturated acetylation levels on all nucleosomes. After ligation and gel purification, the resulting two types of dinucleosomes are identical in total acetylation status except for 3H-labeling, depending on the reaction. (B) The acetylation levels of each mononucleosome after two rounds of acetylation were monitored by western blotting using anti-acetylated H3 or acetylated H4 antibodies. An antibody against histone H4 was used to demonstrate the loading consistency. (C) The final heterodinucleosomes prepared above were resolved on a 3.5% acrylamide gel, and the dinucleosome concentrations were quantified based on the amount of DNA. (D) Quantification of HDAC results based on three independent experiments. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (E) A model for different mechanisms of action of Rpd3S on dinucleosomes containing different linker DNA. The thicknesses of the arrows reflect the strength of HDAC activity. Thirty base pairs (mid) is near optimal distance in that Rpd3S can efficiently deacetylate both methylated nucleosome and neighboring unmethylated nucleosome; 15 bp (left) represents the situation where two nucleosomes are too close and Rpd3S can function on neighboring nucleosomes but with less efficiency; at 70 bp (right) distance, Rpd3S can no longer deacetylate neighboring nucleosomes. Molecular Cell 2013 52, 255-263DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.024) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Chromatin Remodeling Factors Fine-Tune the Rpd3S HDAC Activity on Dinucleosomes by Altering Nucleosomal Spacing (A) The experimental design. (B) Rpd3S HDAC activity on dinucleosomes is enhanced by indicated chromatin remodeling complexes in an ATP-dependent manner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (C) Chromatin remodeling per se does not increase Rpd3S activity. Similar experiments were performed as in (B) except that mononucleosomes with indicated modification pattern were used as substrates. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D–F) ISWI family of ATPases mediates nucleosome sliding on dinucleosome templates. (D) Chromatin remodeling assay using dinucleosome substrates containing a 70 bp linker DNA. The reactions were directly loaded on a 3.5% native PAGE gel to resolve dinucleosome populations that are positioned differently. (E) Predicted positioning changes of each nucleosome caused by Isw1-TAP and ACF-mediated dinucleosome sliding. Restriction sites Not1 and Bgl1, which are just outside each nucleosome, are used to monitor nucleosome movement. (F) Restriction site protection assays for dinucleosome sliding suggest that both nucleosomes moved toward the center. Following the remodeling assay described above, the reaction mixtures were subjected to restriction digestion with NotI or BglI. The resulting digested and undigested nucleosomes were resolved on a 4% PAGE gel. Molecular Cell 2013 52, 255-263DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.024) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions