Understanding of the E391a Detector using KL decay

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Advertisements

Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers Monte.
Recent Results on Radiative Kaon decays from NA48 and NA48/2. Silvia Goy López (for the NA48 and NA48/2 collaborations) Universitá degli Studi di Torino.
Investigations of Semileptonic Kaon Decays at the NA48 Еxperiment Milena Dyulendarova (University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”) for NA48 Collaboration.
Reconstruction neutral decay modes (E391) Doroshenko M.(KEK) E391 collaboration Outlines: Data summary Analysis strategy Reconstruction K3p,K2p,Kgg decays.
03 Aug NP041 KOPIO Experiment Measurement of K L    Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO collaborations Contents Physics Motivation.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February
A. Dabrowski, June Ratio(ke3/pipi0) 1 Final Results Γ(Ke3)/ Γ(pipi0) Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Collaboration Meeting 08 June.
Simulation of Z->jets in CMS Outline –Introduction –Technique –Results –Conclusion.
Alessandro Fois Detection of  particles in B meson decay.
July 2001 Snowmass A New Measurement of  from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector  Analysis of 1997 Data Update of Previous Result Conclusions.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
A. Dabrowski, April 20th 2007 Γ(Ke3/pipi0); Γ(Kμ3/pipi0) 1 Kaon Semileptonic Decays Measurements Γ(Ke3) / Γ(π ± π 0 ) Γ(Kμ3) / Γ(π ± π 0 ) Γ(Kμ3) / Γ(Ke3)
Crossed Channel Compton Scattering Michael Düren and George Serbanut, II. Phys. Institut, - some remarks on cross sections and background processes  
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
Status of E391a Search for K L    decay G.Y.Lim IPNS, 32nd ICHEP 19 th August 2004 Beijing.
NA48-2 new results on Charged Semileptonic decays Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Kaon 2005 Workshop 14 June 2005.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
Status of E391a G.Y.Lim IPNS, KEK. K L    decay Experimental difficulties  Tiny branching fraction Great number of K L decays  Weak Kinematical constaints.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
Higher harmonics flow measurement of charged hadrons and electrons in wide kinematic range with PHENIX VTX tracker Maki KUROSAWA for PHENIX collaboration.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
The inсlusive produсtion of the meson resonanсes ρ 0 (770), K * (892), f 0 (980), f 2 (1270) in neutrino- nuсleon сharged сurrent (CC) interaсtions Polyarush.
2012/7/231 Cosmic Ray at STAR Shuai Yang Center of Particle Physics and Technology University of Science and Technology of China STAR Regional Meeting.
Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry and Cross Section of Inclusive  0 Production in Polarized p+p Collisions at 200 GeV Outline  Introduction  Experimental.
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Current estimation of the background level Ken Sakashita ( Osaka University ) for the E391a collaboration 1.Overview/Motivation 2.4  data analysis 3.2.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 2003 Fall Meeting of the Division of Nuclear Physics (2003/10/31) 1 KANETA, Masashi for the PHENIX Collaboration RIKEN-BNL Research.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Introduction to the E391a.
Converted photons efficiency
LKr inefficiency measurement
Observation of a “cusp” in the decay K±  p±pp
Converted photons efficiency
KTeV Results on Chiral Perturbation Theory
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
The h double helicity asymmetry and cross section
Measurement of the γ,W,Z with ATLAS for the ATLAS Collaboration
NA61 and NA49 Collaboration Meeting May 14-19, 2012, Budapest
 Results from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector
Individual Particle Reconstruction
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
A New Measurement of |Vus| from KTeV
First physics from the ALICE electromagnetic calorimeters
I.Larin, PrimEx Analysis meeting
The n-3He Simulation Using Geant4
The KL reconstruction for the Belle experiment at KEK B-factory
K0 beam line for the E391a experiment
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Background rejection in P326 (NA48/3)
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
KEK-PS E391a Run3データを用いたKL→π0νν解析の現状
Measurement of DE and INT in K±→±0g with NA48/2
Search for Lepton Flavour Violation in the decay  → BaBar
Physics event timing Use Pythia to generate hadronic decays at 125 GeV
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Inclusive p0 Production in Polarized pp Collisions using the STAR Endcap Calorimeter Jason C. Webb, Valparaiso University, for the STAR Collaboration Outline.
Presentation transcript:

Understanding of the E391a Detector using KL decay Ken Sakashita ( Osaka University ) for the E391a collaboration Overview KL → 3p0 analysis KL beam & Detector study Conclusion

Overview(1) Engineering Run Detector & KL beam understanding CsI Charged Veto Collar counter (CC03) Edge counter Detector only downstream part Detector & KL beam understanding Data sample vs MonteCarlo KL 3p0 Confirm our MC simulation We need confirmed MC simulation in order to study acceptance and so on.

Overview(2) Data sample (only 3 hours run used in this study) Mainly KL 3p0 6g Energy measured by CsI calorimeter Only neutral decay mode ( no spectrometer !!) MonteCarlo Simulation Input KL beam (avr. P = 4GeV@Detector) GEANT3 based Detector simulation Method Reconstructed KL events Simple clustering (typically 3x3) Reconstructed KL 3p0 with good vertex chi square 0.46 < MKL (GeV) < 0.53 Generated by Beam line Simulation KL momentum (GeV/c)

KL->3p0 Data vs MC Wrong KL momentum distribution Invariant mass of 6 g # of KL Data/MC = 0.74 Data MC Wrong KL momentum distribution Is the problem due to input KL momentum or detector response ? Compare in 0.5 GeV energy bin

KL->3p0 Data vs MC( 0.5GeV EKL bin) Vertex Z distribution Sensitive to energy response Data MC Data MC

KL->3p0 Data vs MC( 0.5GeV EKL bin ) Minimum distance between clusters Sensitive to energy response Data MC Data MC

KL->3p0 Data vs MC( 0.5GeV EKL bin ) Cluster Hit Position (distance from the center) Sensitive to detector response Data MC Data MC

Reweighted input KL momentum MCは、よく detector を再現しているように見える。 実験で得られた KL momentum を、 MC の input KL momentum に反映させてみる。 Data MC KL momentum is softer than estimated one. consistent with results of the Beam survey.

KL->3p0 Data vs MC( reweighted ) Vertex Z match well Cluster Hit position ( Rij ) still match Data MC Data MC

KL->3p0 Data vs MC (reweighted) PT2 distribution is not consistent with MC. Beam shape D 2 ( ) is not also consistent with MC. MC does not reproduce KL Beam shape well. Data MC

Summary E391a detector is working well. We can get good KL pencil beam. Detector & KL beam understanding using KL->3p0 KL Beam Yield Data/MC = 0.74 Momentum distribution Softer than estmated distribution It is consistent with the results of the beam survey After reweighting Data vs MC match well Beam shape MC did not reproduce well. It needs more study. Detector More detail study in the next step

予備OHPs

KL->3p0 Data vs MC( reweighted ) Cluster Hit position ( Rij ) still match Minimum distance between clusters still match

KL->3p0 Z reconstruction Make 3 gamma pairs from 6 clusters Resonstruct Z vertex by asusuming Mp0 from 2g Calculate vertex chi square for 15 combinations of 3p0 Select best combination for KL candidate

KL->3p0 Data vs MC( reweighted ) Beam shape ( vertex X,Y ) Data MC