The Healthy Beverage Index Is Associated with Reduced Cardio-metabolic Risk in US Adults: A Preliminary Analysis Kiyah J. Duffey, PhD Brenda M. Davy, PhD,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Nature Cure to High Blood Lipid Level -Hydrogen Rich Water
Advertisements

Obesity.
CONTROLLING YOUR RISK FACTORS Taking the Steps to a Healthy Heart.
U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services. National High Blood Pressure Education Program. Seventh Report of Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Nutrition Labelling and Prevention of High Blood Pressure.
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption and Incident Cardiovascular Risk Factors: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Christina Shay PhD MA 1.
Special Diabetes Program for Indians Competitive Grant Program SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Competitive Grant Program Clinical Goals for the Healthy.
Energy Balance & Body Composition Nutrition, Weight, and Health.
Understanding blood lipids and glucose How a Healthy Lifestyle can improve your numbers Susan Fullmer, PhD RD Associate Teaching Professor Nutrition, Dietetics,
+ Were Hunters and Gatherers Really Healthier Than Us? An Evidence Based Look at the Paleolithic Diet By: Kelsey Starck.
Effects of Low-Fat Dairy Consumption on Markers of Low- Grade Systemic Inflammation and Endothelial Function in Overweight and Obese Subjects: An Intervention.
METABOLIC Syndrome: a Global Perspective
Low level of high density lipoprotein cholesterol in children of patients with premature coronary heart disease. Relation to own and parental characteristics.
Candy: What is Moderate Consumption?
Understand and Use Nutrition Claims
Diet and Lifestyle Reccomendations American Heart Association.
Read and Use Nutrition Labels. 2 Examples of Recommended Format of Nutrition Label Tabular format 1 7.
Metabolic Syndrome Yusra Mir, MD Zunairah Syed, MD Harjagjit Maan, MD.
1. Relation between dietary macronutrient and fiber intake with metabolic syndrome in Tehranian adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study Hosseinpour S,
HS499 Bachelor’s Capstone Week 6 Seminar Research Analysis on Community Health.
Nutrition Labelling and Weight Maintenance. 2 Weight Maintenance The balance of energy intake and energy output so that we are neither overweight nor.
Taipei Medical University. Adolescents with Higher Althernate Healthy Eating Index For Taiwan (AHEI-T) Scores Have Lower Blood Lipid Level De-Zhi Weng,
Diabetes National Diabetes Control Programme
High level of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in adult children of patients with premature coronary heart disease: relation to own and parental characteristics.
Cultural and Lifestyle Determinants of Mexican American Adolescents’ Risk for Metabolic Syndrome Rafael E. Ruiz, ScM Deborah E. Bender, PhD, MPH Shoou-Yih.
Lesotho STEPS Survey 2012 Fact Sheet John Nkonyana Director Disease Control.
Extra Virgin Olive Oil let food be thy medicine … Mary M. Flynn, PhD, RD, LDN The Miriam Hospital and Brown University, Providence, RI October 2015.
Title: Nutritional status of North Indian obese young adults Meenakshi Garg University of Delhi, India.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 From: Metabolic Risk Factors Worsen Continuously across the Spectrum of Nondiabetic Glucose Tolerance: The Framingham Offspring.
Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Plasma triglycerides and type III hyperlipidemia.
PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS FOR NON- ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE AMONG AN URBAN AGING ADULT SRI LANKAN POPULATION– RAGAMA HEALTH STUDY 7-YEAR FOLLOW.
Adequate consumption of fruit and vegetables is a health behaviour that protects against a range of illnesses prevalent among Australians. For example.
Relationship between Whole- Grain Intake, Chronic Disease Risk Indicators, and Weight Status among Adolescents Laura Simonitch B.S. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Yusra Mir, MD Zunairah Syed, MD Harjagjit Maan, MD
YOUR HEALTH SCREENING RESULTS
Figure 1.1 Prevalence of CKD by stage among NHANES participants,
Volume 32, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Comparison of Four "Time in Intensity“ Physical Activity Indices as
GLYPICAN-4 LEVELS IN RELATION WITH HORMONAL AND METABOLIC PROFILE IN PATIENTS WITH POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME Doç.Dr.Özlem ALTINKAYA.
Nutrition Education Trivia
Dietary patterns in a group of medical students
Copyright © 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
“The Bulgarians stand at the basis of human civilization
When Military Fitness Standards No Longer Apply
Prevalence Of Metabolic Syndrome And Assessment Of Nutritional And Biochemical Parameters Of Overweight And Obese Working Women 1Upasana, 2Chakravarty.
Chapter 1: CKD in the General Population
by Sarah Steinmetz and Amber Brouillette
ASSOCIATIONS OF METABOLIC SYNDROME COMPONENTS WITH CRITERIA FOR THE CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF THE METABOLIC SYNDROME AS PROPOSED BY THE NCEP-ATP III Metabolic.
Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults Risks and Assessment NHLBI Obesity Education.
Body Mass Index, Sex, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Among Hispanic/Latino Adults: Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos by Robert.
Chapter 10 Diet and Health
Dietary patterns and cardiovascular disease-related risks among women living with HIV. by Pedro A. Argueta.
Doyle M. Cummings, Pharm.D.,FCP, FCCP
Kendra K. Kattelmann, PhD, RD: South Dakota State University (SDSU)
Associations between branched chain amino acid intake and biomarkers of adiposity and cardiometabolic health independent of genetic factors: A twin study 
Associations of Diet and Lifestyle with Hyperlipidemia for the Middle-Aged and Elderly in the Guangxi Bai Ku Yao and Han Populations Yin Ruixing, MD: Guangxi.
David Pieper, Ph.D. STATISTICS David Pieper, Ph.D.
The Dietary Guidelines
Combined Association of Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Body Fatness With Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Older Norwegian Adults: The Generation 100 Study 
Bronx Community Health Dashboard: Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity Last Updated: 1/16/2018 See last slide for more information about.
Chapter 1: CKD in the General Population
The Truth: SUGAR ADDICTION - 8 Times More Addictive Than Cocaine
Metabolic Syndrome (N=160) Non-Metabolic Syndrome (N=138) 107/53
Standing, Obesity, and Metabolic Syndrome
Joshua A. Bell et al. JACC 2018;72:
The Dietary Guidelines
Jae Woong Sull, Sun Ha Jee Eulji University, Yonsei University
Associations of Coffee, Tea, and Caffeine Intake with Coronary Artery Calcification and Cardiovascular Events  P. Elliott Miller, MD, Di Zhao, PhD, Alexis.
Kendra K. Kattelmann, PhD, RD: South Dakota State University (SDSU)
Obesity Eppie Habashi.
Presentation transcript:

The Healthy Beverage Index Is Associated with Reduced Cardio-metabolic Risk in US Adults: A Preliminary Analysis Kiyah J. Duffey, PhD Brenda M. Davy, PhD, RD

Table 1: Description of the Healthy Beverage Index (HBI) score components Beverage Component Description Points 1. Water Water comprises at least 20% of fluid requirements 15   No water consumption Water <20% of fluid requirements Proportional points for intake > 0% - < 20%1 2. Coffee & Tea Unsweetened coffee and tea comprise 0-40% of fluid requirements 5 3. Low Fat Milk <1.5%, skim, and/or soy milk comprises 0-16% of fluid requirements 4. Diet Drinks Artificially sweetened beverages, including coffee & tea, comprise 0-16% of fluid requirements 5. 100% Fruit Juice 100% fruit juice comprises 0-8% of fluid requirements 6. Alcohol Between 0-1 drinks2 for women, 0-2 drinks for men 7. 2% or Whole Fat Milk 0% of fluid requirements come from 2% or whole fat milk 8. Sugar-sweetened beverages 0-8% of fluid requirements come from sugar-sweetened Soda, Fruit Drinks, Sweetened Coffee or Tea, Other Sweetened Beverages3, Other Beverages4 9. Total Beverage Energy Energy from beverages <10% of total energy 20 Energy from beverages ≥10% but <15% of total energy proportional points based on reported intake1 Energy from beverages ≥15% of total energy 10. Met Fluid Requirements Amount (mL) of beverages consumed was ≥ fluid requirements Amount (mL) of beverages consumed was < fluid requirements 1Proportional points were assigned as follows: Proportional Score for Water = ((mL of Water * 15) / (0.20 * Total Fluid Requirements)); Proportional Score for Total Beverage Energy, energy from beverages = ((15 – Percent energy from beverages)*3.3333333) where energy from beverages is ≥10% - ≤14%; Proportional score for Met Fluid requirements = ((mL of Water * 15) / (0.20 * Total Fluid Requirements)) where total fluid requirements = 1 mL per 1 kcal of food consumed. 2 One drink is defined as the following: beer - 12 oz, 354.84 grams/mL; wine - 5 oz, 147.85 grams/mL; liquor - 1.5 oz, 44.355 grams/mL 3 Includes beverages like sweetened coffee and tea, and Horchata (a Mexican/Spanish sugar-sweetened beverage). 4 Includes meal replacement and nutritional supplement drinks

Table 2: Examples1 of daily beverage intake from NHANES participants that would provide a healthy and typical Healthy Beverage Index (HBI) score for a US adult (≥ 19 years) with a daily energy requirement of 2000 kcal   “Healthy” Beverage Pattern “Typical” Beverage Pattern Category Beverage Consumed (kcal) Fluid (ml) per Component HBI Score Beverage Consumed (Amount) 1. Water Tap Water Bottled Water 1000 500 15 Tap water 250 9 2. Coffee & Tea Black Coffee Green Tea 5 237 3. Low Fat Milk Skim milk (90 kcal) None 4. Diet Drinks Diet Soda 5. 100% Fruit Juice 6. Alcohol Red wine (106 kcal) 148 7. Whole Fat Milk [Insert slide contents here] 1 These are examples of actual beverage intake drawn from observed consumption patterns in the NHANES sample and are based on individuals whose total daily energy requirements are 2,000 kcal. Values – including those of beverages and the HBI score – are rounded in this table for illustrative purposes. The “healthy” pattern represents consumption which would result in a very high HBI score; the “typical” pattern is more representative of the population’s reported intake. Data are drawn from adults, aged ≥19 years, from NHANES 2005-2010. 1 mL = 0.033814 fl oz.

“Healthy” Beverage Pattern “Typical” Beverage Pattern Table 2: Examples1 of daily beverage intake from NHANES participants that would provide a healthy and typical Healthy Beverage Index (HBI) score for a US adult (≥ 19 years) with a daily energy requirement of 2000 kcal (continued)   “Healthy” Beverage Pattern “Typical” Beverage Pattern Category Beverage Consumed (kcal) Fluid (ml) per Component HBI Score Beverage Consumed (Amount) 8. Sugar-Sweetened Beverages None 15 Soda (200 kcal) Vanilla Latte (290 kcal) 500 250 9. Total Beverage Energy < 10% total energy intake - 20 >14% total energy intake 10. Met Total Fluid Requirements (2000 ml needed) 17 Total Fluids Consumed 2648 ml 1737 ml Total Beverage Energy 196 kcal 490 kcal Total HBI Score 100 56 1These are examples or requirements of actual beverage intake drawn from observed consumption patterns in the NHANES sample and are based on individuals whose total daily energy are 2,000 kcal. Values – including those of beverages and the HBI score – are rounded in this table for illustrative purposes. The “healthy” pattern represents consumption which would result in a very high HBI score; the “typical” pattern is more representative of the population’s reported intake. Data are drawn from adults, aged ≥19 years, from NHANES 2005-2010. 1 mL = 0.033814 fl oz.

Table 3: Distribution of individual beverage components1 and means (SD) within Healthy Beverage Index (HBI) quartiles of US adults (≥ 19 years), NHANES 2005-2010.   HBI Quartile Component Full Sample 1 2 3 4 1. Water 11.80 (0.09) 3.83 (0.16) 12.89 (0.11) 12.83 (0.10) 14.10 (0.06) 2. Coffee & Tea 4.17 (0.03) 4.31 (0.05) 4.44 (0.03) 4.16 (0.04) 3.94 (0.04) 3. Low Fat Milk 4.67 (0.02) 4.74 (0.04) 4.66 (0.04) 4.53 (0.04) 4.73 (0.02) 4. Diet Drinks 4.43 (0.02) 4.72 (0.03) 4.70 (0.03) 4.47 (0.04) 4.10 (0.05) 5. 100% Fruit Juice 4.08 (0.02) 3.65 (0.06) 3.84 (0.05) 3.96 (0.04) 4.50 (0.03) 6. Alcohol 3.78 (0.04) 3.41 (0.07) 3.38 (0.06) 3.53 (0.06) 4.36 (0.03) 7. Whole Fat Milk 3.13 (0.04) 2.33 (0.06) 2.54 (0.07) 3.26 (0.05) 3.79 (0.04) 8. Sugar Sweetened Beverages 6.87 Su (0.12) 0.85 (0.09) 1.40 (0.11) 7.96 (0.18) 12.47 (0.10) 9. Total Beverage Energy 7.68 (0.12) 0.44 (0.03) 1.04 (0.07) 5.18 (0.16) 16.87 (0.11) 10. Met Total Fluid Requirements 17.55 (0.05) 15.31 (0.13) 18.20 (0.07) 17.56 (0.08) 18.16 (0.07) Total HBI 68.17 (0.24) 43.59 (0.13) 57.09 (0.05) 67.44 (0.06) 87.03 (0.15) 1 Values are mean (SD) for each component of the HBI. The HBI scores range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating a healthier beverage pattern. Data are drawn from NHANES 2005-2010 for adults, aged ≥ 19 years.

Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) Table 4: Odds Ratios of cardio-metabolic outcomes1 associated with a 10-point higher Healthy Beverage Index (HBI) score among US adults (≥ 19 years), NHANES 2005-2010. Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) Cardio-metabolic outcomes Males Females Normal Weight Overweight/Obese High Waist Circumference 0.64 (0.47, 0.87)* 1.03 (1.01, 1.04)* 0.96 (0.90, 1.03) 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) Hypertension 0.96 (0.92, 1.00)* 0.97 (0.93, 1.00)** High Fasting Glucose 1.01 (0.99, 1.04) 0.98 (0.95, 1.01) High Fasting Insulin 1.01 (0.92, 1.11) 0.96 (0.94, 0.99)* 0.96 (0.93, 0.99)* High Total Cholesterol 1.00 (0.96, 1.05) 0.97 (0.96, 0.99)* 1.00 (0.98, 1.01) High LDL-C 1.07 (0.99, 1.16) 0.96 (0.93, 1.00)* 0.97 (0.94, 1.00)* Low HDL-C 0.99 (0.97, 1.00) 0.95 (0.90, 1.00)* High Triglycerides 0.98 (0.94, 1.03) 0.89 (0.80, 1.00)* 1.00 (0.96, 1.06) Metabolic Syndrome 1.01 (0.97, 1.04) 1.01 (0.96, 1.05) High CRP 0.93 (0.86, 0.99)* 0.91 (0.83, 0.98)* 0.97 (0.94, 1.01) 1Estimates are from gender stratified multivariable poission regression models of a 10-point higher HBI score on each outcome of interest adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, total household income, highest level of educational achievement, marital status, total household size, total physical activity, total energy intake, and BMI (cardio-metabolic outcomes only where not stratified by overweight status). Models are further stratified by overweight/obese status when tests of interaction were statistically significant, p<0.10. Weight stratified models do not further control for BMI regardless of the outcome. Data are drawn from NHANES 2005-2010 for adults, aged ≥ 19 years. The HBI score ranges from 0-100, with a higher score indicating healthier overall beverage intake patterns. Abbreviations used: CRP, C-Reactive protein; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The following dichotomous outcomes were used: High Waist Circumference, Men: >102 cm (40 inches), Women: >89 cm (35 inches); Hypertension, ≥ 140/90mmHg; High fasting glucose, ≥5.55 mmol/L (100mg/dL); High Fasting Insulin, >60 pmol/L; High total cholesterol, >5.18 mmol/L (200 mg/dL); High LDL-Cholesterol, >4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL); Low HDL- Cholesterol, Men: <1.04 mmol/L (40 mg/dL), Women: <1.295 mmol/L (50 mg/dL); High triglyceride, ≥1.695 mmol/L (150 mg/dL); High C-reactive protein, ≥ 0.6 mg/L (≥6 mg/dL). Metabolic Syndrome was considered present in anyone meeting three of the following five: high waist circumference, high triglycerides, low HDL-C, elevated blood pressure (≥ 130/85 mmHg), high fasting glucose. * Estimate is statistically significantly different from zero, p< 0.05. ** Estimate is statistically significantly different from zero, p< 0.10.

Table 5: Alternative specification models of the association between each 10-point higher Healthy Beverage Index (HBI) score and dichotomous cardio-metabolic outcomes1 among US adults (≥ 19 years), NHANES 2005-2010. Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) Cardio-metabolic outcomes Males Females Normal Weight Overweight/Obese High Waist Circumference 0.65 (0.48, 0.88)* 1.02 (1.00, 1.04)* 0.96 (0.90, 1.03) 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) Hypertension 0.97 (0.94, 1.01) 0.98 (0.94, 1.01) High Fasting Glucose 1.02 (1.00, 1.05)* 0.99 (0.95, 1.02) High Fasting Insulin 1.02 (0.92, 1.13) 0.97 (0.95, 1.00)** 0.96 (0.94, 0.99)* High Total Cholesterol 1.00 (0.95, 1.05) 0.97 (0.95, 0.98)* 1.00 (0.98, 1.01) High LDL-C 1.07 (0.99, 1.16)** 0.97 (0.93, 1.00)** 0.97 (0.95, 1.01) Low HDL-C 1.01 (0.99, 1.02) 0.95 (0.90, 1.01) High Triglycerides 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) 0.90 (0.81, 1.01)** Metabolic Syndrome 1.05 (1.02, 1.08)* 1.02 (0.97, 1.07) High CRP 0.94 (0.88, 1.00)** 0.93 (0.87, 1.01)** 1.00 (0.96, 1.03) 1Estimates are from gender stratified multivariable poission regression models of a 10-point higher HBI score on each outcome of interest adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, total household income, highest level of educational achievement, marital status, total household size, and total physical activity. Models are further stratified by overweight/obesity status when tests of interaction indicated statistically significant different effects, p<0.10. Alternative model specifications, which further controlled for total energy intake and BMI (in cardio-metabolic outcomes only), can be found in the Table 3. Data are drawn from NHANES 2005-2010 for adults, aged ≥ 19 years. The HBI scores range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating a healthier diet pattern. Abbreviations used: CRP, C-Reactive protein; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The following dichotomous outcomes were used: High Waist Circumference, Men: >102 cm (40 inches), Women: >89 cm (35 inches); Hypertension, ≥ 140/90mmHg; High fasting glucose, ≥5.55 mmol/L (100mg/dL); High Fasting Insulin, >60 pmol/L; High total cholesterol, >5.18 mmol/L (200 mg/dL); High LDL-Cholesterol, >4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL); Low HDL- Cholesterol, Men: <1.04 mmol/L (40 mg/dL), Women: <1.295 mmol/L (50 mg/dL); High triglyceride, ≥1.695 mmol/L (150 mg/dL); High C-reactive protein, ≥ 0.6 mg/L (≥6 mg/dL). Metabolic Syndrome was considered present in anyone meeting three of the following five: high waist circumference, high triglycerides, low HDL-C, elevated blood pressure (≥ 130/85 mmHg), high fasting glucose. * Estimated odds ratio is statistically significantly different from one, p< 0.05. ** Estimated odds ratio is statistically significantly different from one, p< 0.10.  

β coefficient (Standard Error) Table 6: Association of each 10-point higher Healthy Beverage Index (HBI) score with cardio-metabolic and anthropometric outcomes in healthy US adults (≥ 19 years)1, NHANES 2005-2010.   β coefficient (Standard Error) Males Females Normal weight Overweight/Obese Waist Circumference -0.07 (0.09) -0.11 (0.17) 0.20 (0.11)** 0.15 (0.11) Systolic BP 0.01 (0.09) 0.07 (0.09) Diastolic BP 0.01 (0.10) 0.19 (0.11) Fasting Glucose -0.23 (0.18) -0.24 (0.11)* Fasting Insulin 0.09 (0.14) -0.14 (0.13) Total Cholesterol -0.32 (0.49) -1.01 (0.29)* 0.37 (0.32) 0.40 (0.30) LDL-C -0.69 (0.64) -0.84 (0.37)* 0.23 (0.32) HDL-C -0.30 (0.16)** 0.28 (0.11) Triglycerides -0.99 (0.52)** -1.08 (0.56)** -1.12 (0.51)* High CRP -0.001 (0.001) 1 Estimated associations of continuous level of each cardio-metabolic outcome on 10-point higher HBI score are derived from gender and weight stratified (where appropriate, with significant interaction term p<0.10) linear regression models adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, total household income, highest level of educational achievement, marital status, total household size, and total physical activity. The HBI scores range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating a healthier diet pattern. Healthy individuals are those who do not meet the criteria to be classified using the dichotomous cut points for: High Waist Circumference, Men: >102 cm (40 inches), Women: >89 cm (35 inches); hypertension, ≥ 140/90mmHg; High fasting glucose concentration, ≥5.55 mmol/L (100mg/dL); High Fasting Insulin concentration, >60 pmol/L; High total cholesterol concentration (TC), >5.18 mmol/L (200 mg/dL); High LDL-Cholesterol concentration (LDL-C), >4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL); Low HDL- Cholesterol concentration (HDL-C), Men: <1.04 mmol/L (40 mg/dL), Women: <1.295 mmol/L (50 mg/dL); High triglyceride concentration, ≥1.695 mmol/L (150 mg/dL); High C-reactive protein concentration (CRP), ≥ 0.6 mg/L (≥6 mg/dL). * Estimated coefficient is significantly different from zero, p<0.05 ** Estimated coefficient is significantly different from zero, p<0.10