Computation of Post Test Probability

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Likelihood ratios Why these are the most thrilling statistics in Emergency Medicine.
Advertisements

Lecture 3 Validity of screening and diagnostic tests
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Diagnosis.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine November, 2004.
Assessing Information from Multilevel (Ordinal) and Continuous Tests ROC curves and Likelihood Ratios for results other than “+” or “-” Michael A. Kohn,
Diagnostic Tests Patrick S. Romano, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics Patrick S. Romano, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics.
Evidence-Based Diagnosis in Physical Therapy Julie M. Fritz, PhD, PT, ATC Department of Physical Therapy University of Pittsburgh.
Making sense of Diagnostic Information Dr Carl Thompson.
(a) (b) (c) (d). What is (1,2,3)  (3,4,2)? (a) (1, 2, 3, 4) (b) (1,2)  (3,4) (c) (1,3,4,2) (d) (3,1)  (4,2)
Judgement and Decision Making in Information Systems Diagnostic Modeling: Bayes’ Theorem, Influence Diagrams and Belief Networks Yuval Shahar, M.D., Ph.D.
Critiquing for Evidence-based Practice: Diagnostic and Screening Tests M8120 Columbia University Fall 2001 Suzanne Bakken, RN, DNSc.
Diagnosis Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and.
Medical decision making. 2 Predictive values 57-years old, Weight loss, Numbness, Mild fewer What is the probability of low back cancer? Base on demographic.
Stats Tutorial. Is My Coin Fair? Assume it is no different from others (null hypothesis) When will you no longer accept this assumption?
EBMRC How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test Akbar Soltani. MD, Endocrinologist Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) Endocrine and Metabolism.
Assessing Information from Multilevel and Continuous Tests Likelihood Ratios for results other than “+” or “-” Tom Newman (based on previous lectures by.
Vanderbilt Sports Medicine How to practice and teach EBM Chapter 3 May 3, 2006.
Screening and Diagnostic Testing Sue Lindsay, Ph.D., MSW, MPH Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Institute for Public Health San Diego State University.
. Ruling in or out a disease Tests to rule out a disease  You want very few false negatives  High sensitivity 
Diagnosis: EBM Approach Michael Brown MD Grand Rapids MERC/ Michigan State University.
Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Payam Kabiri, MD. PhD. Clinical Epidemiologist Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Appraising A Diagnostic Test
Assessing Information from Multilevel (Ordinal) and Continuous Tests ROC curves and Likelihood Ratios for results other than “+” or “-” Michael A. Kohn,
Likelihood 2005/5/22. Likelihood  probability I am likelihood I am probability.
Evidence-Based Medicine Diagnosis Component 2 / Unit 5 1 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 /Fall 2010.
Stats Facts Mark Halloran. Diagnostic Stats Disease present Disease absent TOTALS Test positive aba+b Test negative cdc+d TOTALSa+cb+da+b+c+d.
POP QUIZ !. Nominal, Ordinal or Continuous? 1.Temperature 2. GCS 3. Trauma Score.
Current Concepts Review - Decision Analysis* by JOSEPH BERNSTEIN J Bone Joint Surg Am Volume 79(9): September 1, 1997 ©1997 by The Journal of Bone.
1. Statistics Objectives: 1.Try to differentiate between the P value and alpha value 2.When to perform a test 3.Limitations of different tests and how.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine January 2008.
Evaluating Screening Programs Dr. Jørn Olsen Epi 200B January 19, 2010.
Prediction statistics Prediction generally True and false, positives and negatives Quality of a prediction Usefulness of a prediction Prediction goes Bayesian.
HSS4303B – Intro to Epidemiology Feb 8, Agreement.
11/20091 EPI 5240: Introduction to Epidemiology Screening and diagnostic test evaluation November 2, 2009 Dr. N. Birkett, Department of Epidemiology &
/ 131 A. Sattar Khan*, Zekeriya Akturk*, Turan Set** Wonca Europe, September 2008, Istanbul How to value a diagnostic test in family practice * Center.
Bayes Theorem. Prior Probabilities On way to party, you ask “Has Karl already had too many beers?” Your prior probabilities are 20% yes, 80% no.
Diagnostic Test Characteristics: What does this result mean
1 Medical Epidemiology Interpreting Medical Tests and Other Evidence.
/ 101 Saudi Diploma in Family Medicine Center of Post Graduate Studies in Family Medicine EBM Diagnostic Tests Dr. Zekeriya Aktürk
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :傅斯誠 Date : 2005/10/26.
P(B)P(B)P(B ) Bayes’ Formula Exactly how does one event A affect the probability of another event B? 1 AP(B)P(B) prior probability posterior probability.
Laboratory Medicine: Basic QC Concepts M. Desmond Burke, MD.
Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.
Prenatal Diagnosis affecting Pregnancy Decisions Sarah Jones Research in Allied Health.
PTP 560 Research Methods Week 12 Thomas Ruediger, PT.
Diagnostic Likelihood Ratio Presented by Juan Wang.
Diagnosis:Testing the Test Verma Walker Kathy Davies.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Receiver- Operator Characteristic Curves 10/10/2013.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Prognostic Value of Cardiac Computed Tomography.
Dr. Michael R. Hyman Use of Bayesian Decision Analysis to Assess if Conducting Marketing Research is Worthwhile.
Diagnostic studies Adrian Boyle.
A pooled analysis of MRI in the detection of bone marrow infiltration in patients with malignant lymphoma  X.-X. Jiang, Z.-X. Yan, Y.-Y. Song, W.-L. Zhao 
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Evidence-Based Medicine
Types of Designs.
ارزیابی تست های تشخیصی ارائه: سید عماد احمدی.
Diagnosis II Dr. Brent E. Faught, Ph.D. Assistant Professor
Refining Probability Test Informations Vahid Ashoorion MD. ,MSc,
posterior probability
COUNTERPOINT: Should BAL Be Routinely Performed in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis? No  Joshua J. Mooney, MD, Harold R. Collard,
کارگاه تکميلی کشوری تربيت مربی آموزش طب مبتنی بر شواهد
Clinical Utility of Likelihood Ratios
The Fagan's nomogram. The Fagan's nomogram. For example: the MRI screening test for breast cancer in high-risk female patients has an estimated diagnostic.
Bayesian analysis The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Meta-analytical probability modifying plot, illustrating the relationship between pretest probability of psychosis onset 38 months and post-test probability.
Figure 3 Analysis of the prognostic value of IL-10–producing B cells or IL-6/IL-10–B-cell ratio measurements in patients with RIS/CIS MS Analysis of the.
posterior probability
The role of likelihood ratio in clinical diagnosis: Applicability in the setting of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis  Fernando Sierra, Diana Torres,
posterior probability
The two-step Fagan's nomogram.
Presentation transcript:

Computation of Post Test Probability Diagnosis Computation of Post Test Probability

Sensitivity and Specificity Test results True Status(Golden Standard) Diseased Not Diseased Total Positive a b a + b Negative c d c + d a + c b + d a + b + c + d

Using Sen. and Spec. to Revise Probability We often use maternal serum α-fetoprotein (MSAFP) test to screen the fetal abnormalities. Pretest Probability = P(D+) = 0.20 Sensitivity = P(T+|D+)=0.34 Specificity = P(T-|D-)=0.86 →PV+=? →PV-=?

Methods to Revise Probability 2 by 2 Table Methods Decision Tree Methods Bayesian Methods Likelihood Ratio Methods

The 2 by 2 Method (1) D+ D- T+ T- Total 200 800

The 2 by 2 Method (2) D+ D- T+ 68 112 T- 132 688 Total 200 800

The 2 by 2 Method (3) D+ D- total T+ 68 112 180 T- 132 688 820 Total 200 800 1000 PV+=P(|D+| T+)=68/180=0.378 PV-= P(D-|T-)=688/820=0.839

Decision Tree Method (1) 6.8 % 13.2 % 11.2 % 68.8 %

Decision Tree Method (2) 6.8 % 11.2 % 13.2 % 68.8 %

Bayesian Methods

Likelihood Ratio Method (1) LR+=Sen./(1-Spec.) LR+=0.34/0.14=2.43 Pretest Odds=0.2/0.8=0.25 Posttest Odds=0.25×2.43=0.607 Posttest Prob.= Posttest Odds/(1+ Posttest Odds) PV+= Posttest Prob. =0.607/(01+0.607)=0.378

Likelihood Ratio Method (2) LR-=(1-Sen.)/Spec. LR-=0.66/0.86=0.767 Pretest Odds=0.2/0.8=0.25 Posttest Odds=0.25×0.767=0.192 Posttest Prob.= Posttest Odds/(1+ Posttest Odds) Posttest Prob.=0.192/(1+0.192)=0.161 PV-=1-0.161=0.839