Modelling the concentration and deposition of heavy metals in the UK

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Advertisements

Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Assessment of air pollution by cadmium CZECH REPUBLIC EMEP Heavy metal case study Milan Váňa, Pavel Machálek + MSC-E.
Analysis of 12 years of IMPROVE data in the Columbia River Gorge By Dan Jaffe University of Washington Northwest Air Quality Photo from the Wishram IMPROVE.
Russian experience within the UNECE LRTAP Convention: Bridging policy with science for effective mitigation of transboundary air pollution Mrs. Kristina.
Chris Dore AEA Energy and Environment Uncertainties in the UK Heavy Metal Emissions Inventory UK Emissions Inventory Programme Funded by Defra: RMP2106.
© NERC All rights reserved London’s Soil Chemistry: A continental scale anomaly Dee Flight, Andreas Scheib and the Geochemical Baselines Team British Geological.
ICP VEGETATION 29 th session WGE Integrated science for our changing world European moss survey 2010/11  Confirmed participation: HM & N.
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
TFMM & TFEIP Workshop, Dublin, 2007 Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E.
Addo van Pul Eiko Nemitz Tony Dore Liu Xuejun Hilde Fagerli Camilla Geels Ole Hertel Roy van Kruijt Maciej Kryza Robert Bergström Massimo Vieno Rognvald.
38 th Session of the Working Group on Strategies and Review, Item 3, Review of the 1998 protocol on heavy metals Coordination Centre for Effects(CCE),
Transboundary Air Pollution Plan of Islamic Republic of Iran
7 th Joint TFEIP & EIONET meeting, Thessaloniki, 2006 Heavy metal modelling: Use of different emission inventories Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E.
Attaining urban air quality objectives- links to transboundary air pollution Helen ApSimon, Tim Oxley and Marios Valiantis UK Centre for Integrated Assessment.
1 Trends in soil solution chemistry in temperate forests under on-going recovery from acidification and climate change in Flanders, Belgium Arne Verstraeten.
Evaluation of pollution levels of lead and PCB-153 over Central Asian (CA) countries within CAPACT project (preliminary results) Ilia Ilyin, EMEP/MSC-E.
Joint EMEP/WGE meeting, Geneva, 2015 Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP Oleg Travnikov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Improving the Quality of HM Emission Inventories Expert estimates for Heavy Metals from the ESPREME Project TFEIP - Thessaloniki Oct 2006.
A study to the effectiveness of the HM & POP Protocols and costs of additional measures Phase II - Emission reduction and cost of a possible revision of.
Evaluation of concentrations of air pollutants and depositions of HMs over the EECCA and SEE regions Ilia Ilyin, EMEP/MSC-E EMEP/MSC-E TFHM, May 14-16,
TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling Oleg Travnikov, Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor.
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2011 Co-operation between EMEP/MSC-E and WGE Oleg Travnikov, Ilia Ilyin Meteorological Synthesizing Centre East of EMEP (EMEP/MSC-E)
Hemispheric transport – Why is EMEP interested? Peringe Grennfelt, Jurgen Schneider.
EMEP/WGE Bureaux, March 2015 MSC-E work plan, 2015 TaskItem Calculations of HMs/POPs for b Testing of HM/POP models in the new EMEP grid1.3.4.
EMEP WGSR, EMEP Progress on HMs, 2006  Review and evaluation of the MSCE-HM model (TFMM)  Atmospheric pollution in 2004 (emissions, monitoring.
29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM TRENDS OF ATMOSPHERIC HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN THE EMEP COUNTRIES.
17 th TFMM Meeting, May, 2016 EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin,
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Evaluation of pollution levels in urban areas of selected EMEP countries Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East.
Impact of various emission inventories on modelling results; impact on the use of the GMES products Laurence Rouïl
Joint EMEP/WGE meeting, Geneva, 2016 Evaluation of B[a]P pollution in the EMEP region: temporal trends and spatial variability Alexey Gusev, Olga Rozovskaya,
Progress in 2017 Work-plan elements
Joint thematic session on B(a)P pollution: main activities and results
Nitrogen Deposition: Measurement Techniques and Field Studies
Overview of country-specific studies of heavy metal and POP pollution
Model assessment of heavy metal pollution from global to local scales
Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
EMEP case study on heavy metal pollution assessment:
POPs and HMs Summary , EMEP TFMM.
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
Alison Redington* and Derrick Ryall* Dick Derwent**
John Munthe and Ingvar Wängberg
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
MSC-E: Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulykh
ENEA, National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable
EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Oleg Travnikov.
CMAQ model as a tool for generating input data for HM and POP modeling
The Heavy Metal Case study for the Netherlands
MSC-E contribution concerning heavy metals
Progress and problems of POP modelling
Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment
EMEP case studies on HMs: State of the art
Case study lead concentration & deposition in the Netherlands
Contributions to total changes in emissions of ozone precursors
Title Why do we underestimate Elemental Carbon in PM?
Model uncertainties because of inconsistencies of emissions
Trend analysis of contamination in the EMEP region by HMs & POPs
Uncertainties in the UK Heavy Metal Emissions Inventory
Research of heavy metal pollution on regional (EMEP) and national (Germany) scales Ilyin I, Travnikov O. EMEP/MSC-E.
Multi-scale approach to HM and POP modelling
Emissions What are the most sensitive parameters in emissions to improve model results (chemical species, spatio-temporal resolution, spatial distribution,
Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E
Ilyin I., Travnikov O., Varygina M.
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
Comparison of model results with measurements
Heavy Metal Case Study for the Netherlands
Atmospheric modelling of HMs Sensitivity study
Presentation transcript:

Modelling the concentration and deposition of heavy metals in the UK Tony Dore1, Massimo Vieno1, Ilia Ilyin2, Heath Malcolm1, Heather Yorston1, Fiona Fordyce3, Mark Cave4, Harry Harmens5,Małgorzata Werner6, Maciej Kryza6, Stefan Reis1 1 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK 2 EMEP/MSC-East, Moscow, Russia 3 British Geological Survey, Edinburgh, UK 4 British Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK 5 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bangor, Wales, UK 6 Department of Climatology and Atmosphere Protection, University of Wrocław, Poland. Task Force on Modelling and Measurements 18 – 20 May 2016, Utrecht

Introduction The UNECE protocol on heavy metals was signed in 1998, targeting the emissions of three key metals: Lead (Pb), Cadmium (Cd) and Mercury (Hg – not considered in this study). Pb is a multi-organ system toxicant that can cause neurological, cardiovascular, renal, gastrointestinal, haematological and reproductive effects. Main emissions sources are metal production and combustion of lubricants. Emissions have declined since introduction of unleaded petrol and decreased use of coal. Cd is a toxic element for humans which can result in kidney and bone damage and is carcinogenic by inhalation. Main emissions sources are energy production, non-ferrous metal production and iron and steel manufacture. Emissions have declined due to a fall in coal combustion. Estimates in the UK indicate large areas of forest where exceedance of critical loads occurs for Pb UNECE protocol committed UK to reducing emissions of metals to below 1990 levels, phasing out leaded petrol and using Best Available Technology to reduce emissions from stationary sources.

Emission Trends for Pb and Cd from the UK 99% reduction in Pb emissions between 1990 and 2010 Decline in emissions due to introduction of unleaded petrol, decline in heavy metals industry, reductions in coal combustion and improved technology 93% reduction in Cd emissions between 1990 and 2008

Multi-pollutant Exchange model FRAME The Fine Resolution Atmospheric Multi-pollutant Exchange model Simple Lagrangian model of the UK with 5 km grid resolution used primarily for nitrogen & sulphur deposition Annually averaged meteorology: straight line trajectories with wind direction frequency weighting Emissions of: Cd and Pb for the year 2012 Point source emissions treated with plume rise model Particulate concentrations with four separate size categories Wet removal using constant drizzle and a map of annual rainfall Vegetation-specific resistance model for dry deposition Vertical diffusion (33 layers) calculated using K-theory Boundary conditions: European 50 km resolution simulation (EMEP grid)

2012 FRAME Modelled concentration and deposition of Cd and Pb Cd air concentration (ng m-3) Cd dry deposition (g Ha-1) Cd wet deposition (g Ha-1) Pb air concentration (ng m-3) Pb dry deposition (g Ha-1) Pb wet deposition (g Ha-1) Generally strong gradients showing decreases from south-east to north-west due to bothy UK emissions sources from urban areas in the south and import from European concentrations from south-east. Wet deposition doesn’t appear to show up hill areas – Needs to be checked

UK Heavy Metal monitoring network Bulk collectors used for precipitation chemistry – these could be subject to dry deposition. Tipping bucket measurements of precipitation were not successful so precipitation chemistry collectors were used to calculate annual precipititation – this could lead to underestimate in measured precipitation

major under-estimates in modelled Cd and Pb concentration! Comparison of model with monitoring data for 2012 using primary emissions only major under-estimates in modelled Cd and Pb concentration! Cd air concentration Pb air concentration NMB = -0.91 r = 0.94 NMB = -0.80 r = 0.91 Good correlation with measurements but major underestimate in modelled concentrations (note different scales on x-axis and y-axis). Using primary emissions only gives an 80% under-estimate in Cd concentrations and 90% under-estimate in Pb concentrations Other metals have also shown similar under-estimates in modelled concentrations with NMB of -0.91, -0.71, -0.79, -0.64, -0.64, -0.77 for As, Cr, Cu, Ni, Se, Zn Dore, A.J., Hallsworth, S., McDonald, A.G., Werner, M., Kryza, M., Abbott, J., Nemitz, E., Dore, C.J., Malcolm, M., Vieno, M., Reis, S. and Fowler, D. (2014) Quantifying missing sources of heavy metals in the United Kingdom with an atmospheric transport model Science of the Total Environment. 479-480C, 171-180.

The gap between the model and measurements of air concentrations is evidence for missing / under-estimated emissions sources RE-SUSPENSION High concentrations of heavy metals in road-side dust can be re-suspended by vehicle turbulence The surface dust layer on bare agricultural fields contains heavy metals which can be re-suspended by high winds On a national scale res-suspension from bare soils will make a larger contribution to re-suspension but roadside dust could be important in urban areas. We should also consider: Uncertainty in metal content of imported coal Missing fugitive emissions

Re-suspension calculations Spatial estimates of re-suspended emissions of Cd and Pb for the UK for the year 2012 were calculated with the MSc-east model using dynamic meteorology to simulate the wind driven re-suspension of surface dust These values suggest that re-suspension makes a higher contribution to total emissions than primary emissions sources Emissions (Mg) Cd Pb Primary 2.0 65 Re-suspended 3.5 233 Re-suspension of Pb is high relative to primary emissions due to the very rapid reduction in primary emissions, such that the ‘legacy’ of historic emissions is relatively more important

Comparison of model with monitoring data for 2012 with re-suspended emissions included Cd air concentration Cd wet deposition NMB = -0.20 r = 0.66 Pb air concentration Pb wet deposition Inclusion of re-suspension estimates is effective in ‘closing the gap’ between measurements and modelled estimates which was present when only primary emissions were considered. Cd wet deposition shows considerable scatter – could dry deposition of particulate matter to the precipitation chemistry collectors be an issue? NMB = -0.10 r = 0.60

Pb concentration in air Inter-comparison of preliminary results of high resolution (10 km) MSC-east simulation over UK with FRAME Both models get reasonable agreement with measurements. Less scatter is evident for the MSC-east model due to its more complex representation of meteorology and dynamic linking of re-suspension with high wind speed events. Note – some differences with the previous slide as 12 sites are used here but only 10 sites were used in my (FRAME) plot – this is being checked

Future work (in progress): Use UK data on metal concentrations in topsoil with high resolution meteorological simulations to generate spatially distributed re-suspension estimates Pb Cd To date re-suspension estimates have used the low resolution European scale simulations (50 km?) and European data on soil concentrations. BGS have now supplied UK specific data on Pb and Cd concentration in soil. Acknowledgement: Contains British Geological Survey materials © NERC 2016 Rawlins, B.G., McGrath, S.P., Scheib, A.J., Cave, M., Lister, T.R., Ingham, M., Gowing, C. & Carter. S. 2012. The Advanced Soil Geochemical Atlas of England and Wales. Keyworth: British Geological Survey.

Future work: Comparison of modelled metal deposition with measurements from moss sampling Cd Pb Slide shows site based measurements of metal concentrations in soils and the results of interpolation (part of wider European survey). Data for the UK is available only for 2005 as UK funding was stopped for this work. Harmens et al. (2011). Mosses as biomonitors of atmospheric heavy metal deposition: spatial and temporal trends in Europe. Environmental Pollution 158: 3144-3156.

Conclusion Cd and Pb are a concern for both human health and the natural environment. Atmospheric emissions of Cd and Pb from the UK have greatly reduced during recent years. Metals are still present in the environment due to the legacy of higher historic emissions. Wind re-suspension of surface dust can make a more important contribution than primary emissions. Measurement of heavy metal concentrations in the surface dust layer is required to better establish the contribution of re-suspension. Simulations with a Eulerian model (using dynamic meteorology) can capture the episodic nature of re-suspension during high wind speed events.

Thank you for your attention ! Acknowledgement Thank you for your attention ! Any questions? Lake Morlich, the Cairngorms