Unmasking the Annexin I Interaction from the Structure of Apo-S100A11

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Structure of TAR RNA Complexed with a Tat-TAR Interaction Nanomolar Inhibitor that Was Identified by Computational Screening  Zhihua Du, Kenneth E Lind,
Mapping of the Interaction Interface of DNA Polymerase β with XRCC1
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2001)
The loop E–loop D region of Escherichia coli 5S rRNA: the solution structure reveals an unusual loop that may be important for binding ribosomal proteins 
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Moses Prabu-Jeyabalan, Ellen Nalivaika, Celia A. Schiffer  Structure 
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2002)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
R. Elliot Murphy, Alexandra B. Samal, Jiri Vlach, Jamil S. Saad 
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Ubiquitin Recognition by the Human TSG101 Protein
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
James J Chou, Honglin Li, Guy S Salvesen, Junying Yuan, Gerhard Wagner 
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of the ATP/apo State of a Multidrug ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Provide a Structural and Mechanistic Basis for the.
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Structure and Site-Specific Recognition of Histone H3 by the PHD Finger of Human Autoimmune Regulator  Suvobrata Chakravarty, Lei Zeng, Ming-Ming Zhou 
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Tertiary Structure of Destrin and Structural Similarity between Two Actin-Regulating Protein Families  H Hatanaka, K Ogura, K Moriyama, S Ichikawa, I.
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Solution Structure of the Interacting Domains of the Mad–Sin3 Complex
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
LC8 is structurally variable but conserved in sequence.
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
The AXH Domain Adopts Alternative Folds
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Presentation transcript:

Unmasking the Annexin I Interaction from the Structure of Apo-S100A11 Anne C Dempsey, Michael P Walsh, Gary S Shaw  Structure  Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages 887-897 (July 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00126-6

Figure 1 Selected Regions of 600 MHz NMR Spectra Used for the Backbone Assignment of Apo-S100A11 The spectra show 15N planes for the residues N40–A44 at the C terminus of helix II and start of the linker. For each pair of planes, the CBCA(CO)NH is shown on the left and the HNCACB is shown on the right. The Cα and Cβ for the indicated residue are shown on the HNCACB spectra and the corresponding Cα and Cβ for the previous (i − 1) residue are shown in the CBCA(CO)NH. The spectrum was collected on a 1.0 mM apo-S100A11 sample in 90% H2O/10% D2O containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM dithiothreitol (pH 7.25) at 35°C. Structure 2003 11, 887-897DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00126-6)

Figure 2 Structures of Apo-S100A11 Stereo view of the backbone superposition for the family of 19 low-energy structures of apo-S100A11 based on nOe, dihedral, and chemical shift NMR restraints. The two S100A11 monomers in the protein are colored magenta and blue to distinguish them. Helices are labeled I–IV in the first monomer and I′–IV′ in the second. The superposition utilized the residues found in the regular secondary structure of the protein (eight helices; 5–20, 32–38, 56–60, and 74–85 and 5′–20′, 32′–38′, 56′–60′, and 74′–85′) and had an rmsd to the mean structure of 0.45 ± 0.08 Å for backbone residues and 1.15 ± 0.21 Å for all heavy atoms, respectively. Structure 2003 11, 887-897DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00126-6)

Figure 3 Identification of Residues at the Dimer Interface of Apo-S100A11 Regions of the 13C,15N NOESY (A) and 13C F1-filtered, F3-edited NOESY (B) showing the 13C plane at 23.95 ppm where L43 δ2 CH3 is located at a 1H frequency of 0.56 ppm (shown in [A] by the vertical line). The 13C,15N NOESY (A) shows nOe crosspeaks from all protons whose attached 13C is found on this plane in apo-S100A11. The 13C F1-filtered, F3-edited NOESY spectrum (B) shows only those nOes (indicated by dashed lines) across the dimer interface involving L43 δ2 CH3 from the linker on one monomer of apo-S100A11 and T6, E7, and I10 of helix I′ of its partner monomer. Structure 2003 11, 887-897DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00126-6)

Figure 4 Global Conformational Change in S100A11 The ribbon diagrams of apo-S100A11 (A) and calcium-bound S100A11 (B) complexed to the N-terminal annexin I peptide (Rety et al., 2000) are shown in similar orientations. Although the structures are symmetric, only one monomer from each dimer is colored for easier viewing. For calcium-bound S100A11 (B), the annexin I peptide (magenta) interacts with helices III and IV and the linker of one monomer and helix I′ of the partner monomer. The structures show that the orientations of helices I (purple) and II (yellow) in site I are similar upon calcium binding and complex formation. Helix I has shifted by approximately 17°, opening up the helix I-IV interhelical interaction. Helix III is nearly parallel (Ω = 154 ± 4°) to helix IV in apo-S100A11 and is almost perpendicular (Ω = 115°) in the calcium-bound structure. Helix IV is notably shorter in apo-S100A11, ending near residue A85, whereas this helix is 10 residues longer in the annexin I complex. The calcium-bound S100A11 structure also contains a short helix in the linker region (gray) found in some structures of apo-S100A11. Structure 2003 11, 887-897DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00126-6)

Figure 5 Unmasking of Buried Residues in Apo-S100A11 Important for Annexin I Interactions in the Calcium-Bound S100A11/Annexin I Complex The fractional accessible surface areas for the side chains of residues in apo-S100A11 (A) and calcium-bound S100A11 (B) (Rety et al., 2000) were calculated from their three-dimensional structures using the program VADAR (University of Alberta). The accessible surface area for the calcium-bound S100A11 complex was determined after removal of the peptide coordinates from the structure. The bottom panel (C) shows the difference in fractional accessible surface area between the two structures and corresponds to the surface area for side chains in apo-S100A11 that become exposed in the calcium-bound annexin I complex. Bars colored dark blue represent residues in S100A11 that have contact (<5 Å) with the annexin I peptide. Many of these increase in side chain exposure by greater than 20% upon calcium binding. Cyan-colored bars represent residues in apo-S100A11 that increase their side chain exposure by >20% but do not have direct contact with annexin I in the calcium-bound complex. To facilitate comparison, all sequence numbers correspond to those of rabbit S100A11. Structure 2003 11, 887-897DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00126-6)

Figure 6 Formation of the Annexin I Binding Surface from Calcium Binding to Apo-S100A11 Accessible surface area representations of apo-S100A11 (A) and calcium-bound S100A11 (B) in complex with annexin I (Rety et al., 2000). Each protein is oriented approximately 90° with respect to that shown in Figure 4. In both molecules, residues in S100A11 that directly interact (<5 Å) with annexin I are indicated and colored dark blue and those whose side chain exposure increases by >20% upon calcium binding but have less interaction are colored cyan. For apo-S100A11 (A), many of these residues have less than 20% of their side chains accessible to the surface and are disjoint on the surface of the protein. In the calcium-bound structure (B), most residues that contact the annexin I peptide increase their side chain-accessible surface areas by >20% as shown in Figure 5C to form a contiguous site for the annexin interaction (dark blue). To facilitate comparison, all sequence numbers correspond to those of rabbit S100A11. Structure 2003 11, 887-897DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00126-6)