NRP2 and CD63 Are Host Factors for Lujo Virus Cell Entry

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e4 (September 2017)
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
UUKV NSs interacts with MAVS
Shu-Jung Chang, Jeongmin Song, Jorge E. Galán  Cell Host & Microbe 
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
The Nogo Receptor NgR1 Mediates Infection by Mammalian Reovirus
Stuart W. Hicks, Guillaume Charron, Howard C. Hang, Jorge E. Galán 
Nithya Raman, Elisabeth Weir, Stefan Müller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
Figure 3. MAb 19H9 displays broad cross-reactivity with IAV strains of different subtypes. (A), Amino acid sequence ... Figure 3. MAb 19H9 displays broad.
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e5 (October 2017)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages e7 (July 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e5 (October 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages e7 (February 2018)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages e6 (April 2018)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Nucleocapsid Phosphorylation and RNA Helicase DDX1 Recruitment Enables Coronavirus Transition from Discontinuous to Continuous Transcription  Chia-Hsin.
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages e7 (February 2018)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Qing Feng, Sujatha Jagannathan, Robert K. Bradley  Molecular Cell 
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Cellular 5′-3′ mRNA Exonuclease Xrn1 Controls Double-Stranded RNA Accumulation and Anti-Viral Responses  Hannah M. Burgess, Ian Mohr  Cell Host & Microbe 
Vaccinia Virus F11 Promotes Viral Spread by Acting as a PDZ-Containing Scaffolding Protein to Bind Myosin-9A and Inhibit RhoA Signaling  Yutaka Handa,
Coxsackievirus Entry across Epithelial Tight Junctions Requires Occludin and the Small GTPases Rab34 and Rab5  Carolyn B. Coyne, Le Shen, Jerrold R. Turner,
Alphaherpesvirus Infection Disrupts Mitochondrial Transport in Neurons
Translocation of a Vibrio cholerae Type VI Secretion Effector Requires Bacterial Endocytosis by Host Cells  Amy T. Ma, Steven McAuley, Stefan Pukatzki,
Shrestha Ghosh, Baohua Liu, Yi Wang, Quan Hao, Zhongjun Zhou 
Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages (August 2006)
An Inhibitory Activity in Human Cells Restricts the Function of an Avian-like Influenza Virus Polymerase  Andrew Mehle, Jennifer A. Doudna  Cell Host.
Oxysterol-Binding Protein-Related Protein 1L Regulates Cholesterol Egress from the Endo-Lysosomal System  Kexin Zhao, Neale D. Ridgway  Cell Reports 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Michael U. Shiloh, Paolo Manzanillo, Jeffery S. Cox 
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Dengue Virus-Induced Autophagy Regulates Lipid Metabolism
Translocation of a Vibrio cholerae Type VI Secretion Effector Requires Bacterial Endocytosis by Host Cells  Amy T. Ma, Steven McAuley, Stefan Pukatzki,
Virus Subversion of the MHC Class I Peptide-Loading Complex
Presentation transcript:

NRP2 and CD63 Are Host Factors for Lujo Virus Cell Entry Matthijs Raaben, Lucas T. Jae, Andrew S. Herbert, Ana I. Kuehne, Sarah H. Stubbs, Yi-ying Chou, Vincent A. Blomen, Tomas Kirchhausen, John M. Dye, Thijn R. Brummelkamp, Sean P. Whelan  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 688-696.e5 (November 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.10.002 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Host & Microbe 2017 22, 688-696. e5DOI: (10. 1016/j. chom. 2017 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 LUJV GP-Mediated Cell Entry Requires a Distinct Set of Host Factors (A) Wild-type (WT) and α-DG knockout (DAG1ko) HAP1 cells were inoculated with the indicated VSVs (multiplicity of infection [MOI] = 0.5). In parallel, HAP1 cells were mock-treated or pre-treated with TfR1-blocking antibodies for 1 hr before infection. Cells were fixed 8 hr post virus inoculation and stained with DAPI (to detect the nuclei), and infection (visible through virus-encoded eGFP expression) was detected by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bar, 10 μm. (B) Data from the haploid screen with VSV-LUJV. The y axis indicates the significance of enrichment of gene-trap insertions compared with unselected control cells. Circles represent individual genes, and their size corresponds to the number of unique disruptive insertion sites identified in the virus-selected population. Genes with significance scores above 10 are labeled, colored, and grouped according to function. (C) Wild-type HAP1 cells (WT), knockout clones (TMEM30Ako, CD63ko, and NRP2ko), and reconstituted clones (+TMEM30A, +CD63, and +NRP2) were infected with VSV (control) or VSV-LUJV (MOI = 3). Cells were fixed 6 hr post virus inoculation, and infection was visualized by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bar, 10 μm. (D) HAP1, HEK293T, and BSR-T7 cells were transduced with empty (mock) retrovirus or with virus expressing NRP2-HA. Next, cells were inoculated with the indicated viruses (MOI = 3). Cells were fixed 6 hr post inoculation, and infection was measured by quantifying eGFP fluorescence. The data are presented as the percentage eGFP expression of each virus in cells overexpressing NRP2 compared to mock-transduced cells for each cell line. Significant differences (t test; p value < 0.05) between each condition (n = 3 experimental replicates) are indicated by the asterisks. (E) Western blot of total cell lysates from HAP1 cells and HUVECs. Membranes were probed with anti-NRP2, anti-α-DG, or anti-TfR1 antibodies to detect endogenous expression in both cell types. An anti-CDK4 antibody was used as a loading control. (F) HUVECs were inoculated with the indicated viruses (MOI = 1, as determined on HAP1 cells). Cells were fixed 6 hr post virus inoculation, and infection was visualized by fluorescence microscopy. Cells were counter-stained with DAPI (shown as a separate panel). Scale bar, 10 μm. (G) Quantification of the experiment shown in (F). The data are presented as the percentage of infected (eGFP-positive) cells (n = 3 experimental replicates). Cell Host & Microbe 2017 22, 688-696.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 LUJV GP Binds the N-Terminal Domain of NRP2 (A) Flag-tagged LASV GP and LUJV GP were immobilized on beads and incubated with cell lysates from HEK293T cells (transduced with control [vector] or NRP2-HA retrovirus). Bound proteins (IP, immunoprecipitation) and input samples were subjected to immunoblot analysis. (B) Schematic representation of all the NRP2 constructs used in the biochemistry and infection experiments described in (C) and (D). The design of the constructs was based on the reported NRP2 crystal structure (Appleton et al., 2007). (C) Flag-tagged LASV GP and LUJV GP were immobilized on beads and incubated with cell lysates from HEK293T cells expressing vector control, HA-tagged full-length NRP2, or the individual mutants depicted in (B). Bound proteins (IP, immunoprecipitation) and input samples were subjected to immunoblot analysis. An anti-CDK4 antibody was used as a loading control. (D) Soluble Fc-tagged LUJV GP1 (sGP1Fc-LUJV) was immobilized on beads and incubated with total cell lysate from HEK293T cells expressing NRP2-HA. Empty beads served as a control. Bound proteins (pull-down and beads) and the input samples were subjected to immunoblot analysis. (E) HAP1 cells expressing vector control, HA-tagged full-length NRP2, or the individual NRP2 mutants were inoculated with VSV (control) or VSV-LUJV (MOI = 0.2) for 6 hr at 37°C. Cells were fixed and stained with DAPI, after which infection was visualized by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bar, 10 μm. (F) HAP1 wild-type or NRP2ko cells were co-inoculated with fluorescently labeled VSV-LUJV (in red) and VSV-LASV (in white) for 15 min at 37°C. Cells were subsequently washed and stained with fluorescently labeled WGA (in cyan) to visualize the cell boundaries and the viral particles attached to it. Representative images are shown. (G) Quantification of (F) (combined data of two independent experiments). Shown is the percentage of cell-associated VSV-LUJV particles over VSV-LASV particles in HAP1 wild-type (WT) or NRP2ko cells (n = 22 and 27 cells, respectively). The significant difference (unpaired t test; p value = 0.0023) is indicated by the asterisk. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 22, 688-696.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 CD63 Promotes LUJV GP-Mediated Membrane Fusion under Acidic Conditions (A) HEK293T cells overexpressing mCherry-tagged CD63 (in red) were inoculated with VSV-LUJV-MeGFP (MOI = 150; in cyan), and inoculum was removed 1 hr post infection. Virus entry was monitored by live-cell imaging 105 min post virus inoculation (see Movie S1). Shown is an image of a representative cell for which still frames are depicted with 20 s intervals. (B) HAP1 cells were pre-treated with DMSO (control) or with 100 nM Bafilomycin A1 (BafA1) for 30 min at 37°C. Cells were subsequently inoculated with VSV (control) or VSV-LUJV (MOI = 3) for 6 hr and fixed. Infection was visualized by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bar, 10 μm. (C) HEK293T cells transduced with control (empty) retrovirus or with virus expressing NRP2-HA, mCherry-tagged wild-type CD63, or a mutant with a disrupted lysosomal targeting motif (mCherry-CD63AA) were transfected with pCAGGS-LUJV GP-Flag and pCMV-eGFP. Forty-eight hours post transfection, cells were washed with neutral or acidic culture medium for 5 min at 37°C. Medium was replaced with normal medium, and cells were recovered for 30 min at 37°C. Subsequently, cells were fixed and syncytia (visible through extensive content [eGFP] mixing) were visualized by fluorescent microscopy (outlined in red). Scale bar, 10 μm. (D) HUVECs were transduced with control (empty) lentivirus or with virus expressing a guide RNA targeting CD63. Cells were inoculated with VSV (control) or VSV-LUJV (MOI = 3), fixed, stained with DAPI and CD63 antibodies (shown as separate panels), and analyzed for infection by fluorescence microscopy. White arrows indicate infected cells that are CD63 positive. Scale bar, 10 μm. (E) Wild-type (WT) and CD63ko HAP1 cells were inoculated with the indicated viruses (MOI = 3). Cells were fixed 6 hr post inoculation, and infection was measured by quantifying eGFP fluorescence. The data are presented as the percentage eGFP expression of each virus in CD63ko cells compared to WT cells. A significant difference (two-way ANOVA, p value < 0.05) between conditions is indicated by the asterisk (n = 3 experimental replicates). Cell Host & Microbe 2017 22, 688-696.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Wild-Type LUJV Requires NRP2 for Infection (A) HUVECs were transduced with control (empty) lentivirus or with virus expressing a guide RNA targeting NRP2. Next, cells were inoculated with VSV (control) or VSV-LUJV (MOI = 3), fixed, stained with DAPI (shown as a separate panel), and analyzed for infection by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bar, 10 μm. (B) Western blot analysis of the cells described in (A). Membranes were probed with an anti-NRP2 antibody for detection of endogenous NRP2. An anti-CDK4 antibody was used as a loading control. (C) The pools of HUVECs mentioned in (A) were transduced with control (empty) retrovirus or with virus expressing NRP2-HA. Subsequently, cells were inoculated with VSV-LUJV and analyzed for infected cells as described above. Scale bar, 10 μm. (D) Wild-type (WT), NRP2ko, and NRP2-HA reconstituted HUVECs were infected with authentic LUJV (MOI = 0.5). Cells were fixed 16 hr post virus inoculation, permeabilized, and stained with DAPI. Infection was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy using an α-NP antibody. Scale bar, 10 μm. (E) In parallel to the immunofluorescence experiment in (D), cells were inoculated with LUJV (MOI = 0.2), and the production of viral progeny after 36 hr was monitored by plaque assays. The data are presented as plaque-forming units (PFU) per mL of culture medium. Significant differences (ANOVA test; p value < 0.05) between each condition are indicated by the asterisks (n = 4 experimental replicates). (F) HUVECs were mock-treated or treated with serial dilutions of polyclonal NRP2 antibody. Following 30 min incubation on ice, cells were exposed to LUJV Zambia R4356 (MOI = 1) for 1 hr at 37°C in the presence or absence of NRP2 antibody and incubated at 37°C for an additional hour. Cells were then washed and incubated for 36 hr before fixation. Infected cells were visualized by immunostaining using an arenavirus NP-specific polyclonal guinea pig serum. The number of infected cells was quantified for all conditions, and numbers are expressed as percentage of inhibition (n = 2 experimental replicates). The continuous line represents the nonlinear fit of all the data points (R2 = 0.93). Depicted are representative images of the control versus the highest NRP2 antibody concentration. All experiments involving wild-type LUJV infections were carried out under BSL4 conditions. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 22, 688-696.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions