Binding-Linked Protonation of a DNA Minor-Groove Agent

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In Vitro Discriminative Antipseudomonal Properties Resulting from Acyl Substitution of N-Terminal Sequence of Dermaseptin S4 Derivatives  Keren Marynka,
Advertisements

Willem K. Kegel, Paul van der Schoot  Biophysical Journal 
Nanoparticles as Fluorescence Labels: Is Size All that Matters?
Computer Simulation of Small Molecule Permeation across a Lipid Bilayer: Dependence on Bilayer Properties and Solute Volume, Size, and Cross-Sectional.
Heat Capacity Effects on the Melting of DNA. 1. General Aspects
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Binding of Calcium Ions to Bacteriorhodopsin
Thermodynamics of Forming a Parallel DNA Crossover
A Comparative Study of DNA Complexation with Mg(II) and Ca(II) in Aqueous Solution: Major and Minor Grooves Bindings  R. Ahmad, H. Arakawa, H.A. Tajmir-Riahi 
Insertion of Alzheimer’s Aβ40 Peptide into Lipid Monolayers
Stretching Single-Stranded DNA: Interplay of Electrostatic, Base-Pairing, and Base-Pair Stacking Interactions  Yang Zhang, Haijun Zhou, Zhong-Can Ou-Yang 
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
A Comprehensive Calorimetric Investigation of an Entropically Driven T Cell Receptor- Peptide/Major Histocompatibility Complex Interaction  Kathryn M.
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Santosh K. Dasika, Kalyan C. Vinnakota, Daniel A. Beard 
The Binding Affinity of Ff Gene 5 Protein Depends on the Nearest-Neighbor Composition of the ssDNA Substrate  Tung-Chung Mou, Carla W. Gray, Donald M.
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 106, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Salt Effects on Ionization Equilibria of Histidines in Myoglobin
Binding the Mammalian High Mobility Group Protein AT-hook 2 to AT-Rich Deoxyoligonucleotides: Enthalpy-Entropy Compensation  Suzanne Joynt, Victor Morillo,
A Consistent Experimental and Modeling Approach to Light-Scattering Studies of Protein-Protein Interactions in Solution  D. Asthagiri, A. Paliwal, D.
Jamie M. Dettler, Robert Buscaglia, Vu H. Le, Edwin A. Lewis 
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
A Comprehensive Calorimetric Investigation of an Entropically Driven T Cell Receptor- Peptide/Major Histocompatibility Complex Interaction  Kathryn M.
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Binding and Clustering of Glycosaminoglycans: A Common Property of Mono- and Multivalent Cell-Penetrating Compounds  André Ziegler, Joachim Seelig  Biophysical.
Protein Free Energy Landscapes Remodeled by Ligand Binding
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Ion Specificity and Nonmonotonic Protein Solubility from Salt Entropy
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages (October 2015)
Influence of Protein Scaffold on Side-Chain Transfer Free Energies
Ivan V. Polozov, Klaus Gawrisch  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Thermodynamic Profiling of Peptide Membrane Interactions by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: A Search for Pores and Micelles  J.R. Henriksen, T.L. Andresen 
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 99, Issue 9, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Structural Basis of Homology-Directed DNA Repair Mediated by RAD52
Heiko Heerklotz, Joachim Seelig  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 98, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Density Functional Theory for the Nonspecific Binding of Salt to Polyelectrolytes: Thermodynamic Properties  Chandra N. Patra, Arun Yethiraj  Biophysical.
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Interaction of Verapamil with Lipid Membranes and P-Glycoprotein: Connecting Thermodynamics and Membrane Structure with Functional Activity  M. Meier,
Ancestral Interactions of Ribosomal RNA and Ribosomal Proteins
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Thermodynamic Characterization of the Unfolding of the Prion Protein
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Congju Chen, Irina M. Russu  Biophysical Journal 
Translational Entropy and DNA Duplex Stability
Mei Wang, Maggie Law, Jean Duhamel, P. Chen  Biophysical Journal 
A Flexible Approach to the Calculation of Resonance Energy Transfer Efficiency between Multiple Donors and Acceptors in Complex Geometries  Ben Corry,
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Mayank M. Patel, Thomas J. Anchordoquy  Biophysical Journal 
Ca2+ Regulation of Gelsolin Activity: Binding and Severing of F-actin
Michael Thomas, Dylan Jayatilaka, Ben Corry  Biophysical Journal 
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Binding of Alkyl Polyglucoside Surfactants to Bacteriorhodopsin and its Relation to Protein Stability  M. Gabriella Santonicola, Abraham M. Lenhoff, Eric.
Computed Pore Potentials of the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor
Christina Karatzaferi, Marc K. Chinn, Roger Cooke  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages (October 2015)
Protein Structure and Hydration Probed by SANS and Osmotic Stress
Presentation transcript:

Binding-Linked Protonation of a DNA Minor-Groove Agent Binh Nguyen, Jaroslav Stanek, W. David Wilson  Biophysical Journal  Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 1319-1328 (February 2006) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.071381 Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of CGP 40215A. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 1319-1328DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.071381) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Fractional absorbance change of the free (■) and bound (●) ligand, and the fractional proton uptake (○). Solid lines are the fits using Eq. 1; the pKa values are 6.3±0.1 and 9.0±0.1 for the free and bound ligands, respectively. Maximum proton uptake occurs at pH 7.7. Calorimetric titration results at two pH values (□) are also plotted, illustrating a good agreement. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 1319-1328DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.071381) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ITC titrations of CGP with poly(dAdT) · poly(dAdT) in MES and cacodylate buffers. Top panel is a representative titration curve of 3-μL injections of 0.473mM CGP into 0.12mM DNA base pairs in cacodylate buffer at pH 6.25, 25°C. Bottom panel is a plot of integrated heats per mol of CGP in cacodylate buffer (●) and in MES buffer (■) versus the ratio of the ligand to DNA base pairs. The primary binding occurs at a ratio of 0.125 that is equivalent to one compound per eight base pairs. It can be seen that 1), a significant difference in the heat release occurs at the primary binding between the two buffers under the same conditions; and 2), secondary binding to the polymer occurs at higher ratios in both buffers. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 1319-1328DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.071381) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 An isothermal calorimetric titration curve of CGP 40215A into AATT hairpin solution. Every peak represents the heat released from a 5-μl injection of 50μM CGP into 2μM oligomer concentration in MES buffer with 0.1M NaCl, pH 6.25 at 298K. The corrected heat was fitted to obtain thermodynamic binding parameters. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 1319-1328DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.071381) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Effects of solution pH on the heat capacity change. In MES buffer (10mM MES, 0.1M NaCl, 1mM EDTA, pH 6.25), linear fitting of the observed binding enthalpy as a function of temperature yields a slope of –155±16 cal/(mol·K). The slope becomes more negative (−234±11 cal/(mol·K)) in acetate buffer (10mM acetate, 0.1M NaCl, 1mM EDTA, pH 5.00), where proton linkage is minimized. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 1319-1328DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.071381) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 SPR binding affinities. Top panel is a plot of sensorgrams for the interaction of CGP with 5′biotin-CGAATTCGTCTCCGAATTCG-3′ hairpins in HEPES buffer at pH 7.45, 0.2M NaCl, and 25°C. Bottom panel is a plot of stoichiometry-normalized binding isotherms at three different NaCl concentrations: 0.1M, 0.2M, and 0.4M. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 1319-1328DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.071381) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Binding affinities at different salt concentrations and two different pHs. The dependence of free energies on salt concentrations at pH 6.25 and pH 7.45. The slopes are −2.1 at pH 6.25 and −2.0 at pH 7.45. Using these slopes and the ligand charges, the counterion density per phosphate at the binding site is 0.68±0.02. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 1319-1328DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.071381) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Solvent-accessible surface area of the complex generated by the GRASP program. A view is at the minor groove with the ligand bound at the AATT site. The polar atoms are in red and nonpolar atoms are in white. Arrays of polar phosphate-bound oxygen atoms are visible along the DNA backbone. The red areas in the minor groove are the nitrogen, and nitrogen-bound hydrogen atoms of the ligand. The accessible surface was generated using Cornell et al radii (39) with a probe radius of 1.7683Å. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 1319-1328DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.071381) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions