Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protocol for SU and MU Sounding Feedback
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0802r0 Consideration on UL MU transmission Date: Slide 1Jinyoung Chun et. al, LG Electronics July 2014 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1329r0 PS-Poll for Downlink Bufferable Units Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom November 2012 Authors:
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE /0324r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel March 2010 DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0567r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel May 2010 DL MU MIMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 1 Authors: Transmission Mechanism in MU-MIMO Date:
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r0 Michelle Gong, et alSlide 1 Transmission Rules for Wider Bandwidth TXOP Date: Authors: Jan
Submission doc.: IEEE /0567r0 May 2015 Xiaofei Wang (InterDigital)Slide 1 Multi-STA BA for SU Transmissions Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1349r0 November 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Sounding for Uplink Transmission Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Distributed-Queue Access for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Authors: V. Baiamonte, C. Casetti, C.-F. Chiasserini Dipartimento di Elettronica, Politecnico di.
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection for MU Transmission Date: Authors: July 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0662r0 May, 2016 Jing Ma, NICTSlide 1 Further consideration on channel access rule to facilitate MU transmission opportunity.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
ACK Protection Schemes for the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink
Hybrid Beamforming Protocol Design Details
Channel Access Efficiency
Feedback-jamming ARQ mechanisms
Feedback Element Compression for ax
EDCA and BlockAck Extensions for Reliable Multicast/Broadcast Services
Regarding UL MU protection
Scheduled Medium Access For Large Low Power BSS
Regarding HE fragmentation
Hybrid Beamforming Protocol Design Details
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
BlockAck Enhancement for Multicast Transmissions
Comment Resolutions Date: Authors: February 2008
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2005
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
Power Efficient PS Poll
HT Features in Mesh Network
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
DL MU-MIMO MAC efficiency issue
ACK Protection Schemes for the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
CSI Feedback Scheme using DCT for Explicit Beamforming
[Multi-RTS Proposal] Date: Authors: September 2010
Feedback-jamming ARQ mechanisms
Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
MIMO phase in MU-MIMO Beamforming
Considerations on post wake-up sequences
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
Consideration on Multi-AP Ack Protocol
80 MHz Channelization Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Sounding for AP Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack Date: 2010-05-19 Authors:

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Background Two ACK mechanisms for DL MU MIMO are being discussed in TGac Scheduled Ack protocol Polled Ack protocol Pros and Cons for polled ack mechanism More robust when there is no MAC protection and has lower complexity More overhead by sending multiple BAR/BA exchanges yet STAs don’t need to schedule BA transmissions Pros and Cons for scheduled ack Slightly more efficient than polled ack Still there is no solution to fill the gap caused by missing BA  Error recovery mechanism is necessary

Outline Possible DL MU MIMO scenarios using scheduled ack without error recovery mechanism Scheduled ack without error Scheduled ack with an error Introduction of scheduled ack protocol with error recovery Error recovery for invalid BlockAck Error recovery for missing BlockAck Conclusions

Downlink MU-MIMO functions Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Downlink MU-MIMO functions General Downlink MU-MIMO functions Sounding Group control schemes NAV distribution Beamformed data transmissions Response phase  Scope of this contribution

DL MU MIMO using scheduled acks without error Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 DL MU MIMO using scheduled acks without error By channel access rules MU-MIMO data transmission AP STA1 SIFS BA STA2 SIFS BA STA3 SIFS BA By channel access rules, MU MIMO data transmission follows sounding procedure, group control scheme and NAV distribution procedure After MU-MIMO data transmission, each STA sends its BlockAck frame using SIFS time in sequence

DL MU MIMO using scheduled acks with an error: Invalid BA Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 DL MU MIMO using scheduled acks with an error: Invalid BA By channel access rules MU-MIMO data transmission AP STA1 SIFS BA STA2 SIFS BA STA3 SIFS BA When the AP does not correctly receive an BlockAck frame from STA2, the arrived frame is invalid but the channel is not idle According to the scheduled ack mechanism, the AP has to wait for the arrival of the last BA frame in multiple BA sequence

DL MU MIMO using scheduled acks with an error: Missing BA Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 DL MU MIMO using scheduled acks with an error: Missing BA By medium access rules MU-MIMO data for STA1 MU-MIMO data for STA2 MU-MIMO data for STA3 AP STA1 SIFS BA STA2 SIFS STA3 SIFS BA When STA2 does not correctly receive the beamformed data from AP, it does not send BA and the external channel is idle The probability of collision for the medium is increased during the gap because the AP also waits for the arrival of the last BA frame

Recovery mechanism for Invalid BlockAck Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Recovery mechanism for Invalid BlockAck By medium access rules MU-MIMO data transmission AP Backoff procedure Group BAR … STA1 SIFS BA STA2 SIFS SIFS BA BA STA3 SIFS SIFS BA BA After the last BA frame in the response sequence is arrived, the AP sends a Group BAR frame for recovery at a rate that is less or equal to the rate of the previous BA frame arrived Group BAR solicits BlockAck from STAs whose BlockAck was not correctly received

Recovery mechanism for Missing BlockAck Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Recovery mechanism for Missing BlockAck By medium access rules MU-MIMO data for STA1 MU-MIMO data for STA2 MU-MIMO data for STA3 PIFS AP Group BAR STA1 SIFS BA STA2 SIFS SIFS BA STA3 SIFS BA If an AP senses a missing BlockAck frame in response at predefined time, the AP sends Group BAR frame for recovery at PIFS after the previous BlockAck frame Group BAR frame occupies the medium during gap owing to missing BA and the probability of collision is reduced Group BAR may reschedule the BlockAck response sequence

Example of group BlockAckReq frame Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Example of group BlockAckReq frame Group ID receiving STAs’ information Figure. Group Control Information configuration (example) Group BlockAckReq is a BAR frame containing group control information Group control information contains the Group ID and the receiving STAs’ information Using this information, Group BAR can reschedule the BA response sequence on the wireless circumstance

Conclusion In general, polled ack is more robust than scheduled ack schemes on error prone channels Scheduled Ack mechanism introduces less overhead but a STA needs to schedule its BA transmission and does not have an error recovery mechanism Proposed an error recovery scheme to overcome disadvantages of scheduled ack  It is necessary to consider using two ack protocols for DL MU-MIMO transmission

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 References [1] Robert Stacey, et. al., DL MU-MIMO ack protocol, IEEE 802.11-09/1172r0, Nov. 16, 2009 [2] Michelle Gong, et. al., DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results, IEEE 802.11-10/0324r1, Mar. 15, 2010