Natural course of rotator cuff syndrome in a French working population

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performing An Ergonomics Review. Why should I perform an ergonomics review? What is the function of an ergonomics review? How do I apply the steps involved.
Advertisements

CARICOM. Definition Issues and concerns Indicators and Rationale CARICOM.
1 ISE Ch. 14 Musculoskeletal Disorders Definition: Intermediate-term (months/years) effects of body activity upon the nerves, muscles, joints, and.
Difficulties to go back to work in case of common and chronic Low Back Pain Points of view of patients, of general practitioners and of National Health.
Ergonomics Industrial. © Business & Legal Reports, Inc Session Objectives You will be able to: Understand the principles of ergonomics Recognize.
1 Preventing Injuries and Illnesses Series Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSD)
EVALUATION OF INTER- RATER RELIABILITY FOR MOVEMENT AND POSTURE OBSERVATIONS OF WORKERS IN AN AUDIO COMPACT CASSETTE PLANT.
Instructor: Dr. Patrick Tschida PUBH Environmental Health Presented By Arunachalam Subramanian Walden University July 30, 2011.
Psy 552 Ergonomics & Biomechanics Lecture 20. MSDs  “A descriptor for disorders and diseases of the musculoskeletal system having proven or hypothetical.
This website is dedicated to engineering students, and serves as a resource for anyone interested in Occupational Biomechanics. Biomechanics of Work Home.
Psy 552 Ergonomics & Biomechanics Lecture 19. Your workstation chair  Seat height:  Seat depth:  Seat width:  Backrest:  Seat back angle:  Lumbar.
1/05 School Safety Training Ergonomics for Schools.
Introduction to Occupational Safety and Health An Approach to addressing injuries and illnesses at work.
Workplace Health Monitoring in Romania Adriana Todea Teodor Haratau Romania.
Repetitive Strain Injury (RSI) Professor T.C. Aw MBBS, PhD, FRCP, FRCPC, FFOM, FFPHM Head, Division of Occupational Health University of Kent.
Incidence of low back pain related occupational diseases in the Netherlands Harald S. Miedema 1,2 Henk F. van der Molen 3 Paul P.F.M. Kuijer 3 Bart W.
Work, stress and health in the Netherlands? Annet de Lange 28 Maart 2003 Mount Sinai Medical School New York.
HU 151 Lecture 8 Ergonomics Fall 2012/13 HU151_ Lect8_Ergonomics.
HARDHAT ERGONOMICS Hardhat Ergonomics-PowerPoint Presentation 1.2 (November 2000) Slide 1 Ergonomics Awareness Training for Construction Workers A workshop.
PErforM introduction for managers. Aims of the session Introduce how to use PErforM to identify and control hazardous manual tasks. Outline workplace.
Viive Pille Pshychological and social factors are generally more strongly assosiated with back pain than with shoulder pain. Furthermore,
CONCLUSIONS FROM THE WORKSHOPS. Workshop 1 MSDs in figures: data and statistics Conclusions Rapporteur: Antti Karjalainen European Commission DG ESTAT.
Chapter 13 Worker Selection and Training Criteria.
CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS OF THE UPPER EXTREMITY Thomas G. Bergfield, M.D., M.S.
Julie Routledge Occupational Health Manager Hampton Knight.
Coronel Institute AmCOGG Review A tool for distinguishing gender research from gender difference research- examples from work-related health Author: A.
Prevention of MSDs by workload optimization based on external and internal load assessment methods Danuta Roman-Liu Central Institute for Labour Protection.
Application in professional activity of theoretical knowledge and practical skills acquired during residency program Dr. Ion Bîrcă National Center of Public.
Manual Handling STAFF BRIEFING – No 3
Evaluation of Inter-rater Reliability for Movement and Posture Observations of workers in an Audio Compact Cassette Plant Dararat Techakamolsuk Pornchai.
 Ergonomics is “the art and science of reducing physical discomfort while maximizing productivity”.  A way of studying your work environment, the kind.
Implementing the guidelines in Continuous Medical Education by the Audit méthod. Josiane ALBOUY (Regional Work Inspection for the « Région Centre »), Annie.
Musculoskeletal Disorders Target the Problem, Not the Symptom.
International conference – Women’s health and work March , Brussels Physical Strength: Results and Differences in Age and Gender Patrick Serafin,
Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo TWG-IS Ergonomic Intervention Pilot Study Objectives Assess the effectiveness.
CONCLUSIONS FROM THE WORKSHOPS. Workshop 3 Back to work and reintegration Conclusions Rapporteur José Ramón Biosca de Sagastuy European Commission.
Is for Epi Epidemiology basics for non-epidemiologists.
Module 1: Ergonomics Issues in the Workspace. Why is effective ergonomics so important? Back injuries are the leading cause of disability in the United.
Copyright P.Buckle 2000 Robens Centre for Health Ergonomics University of Surrey Europe and work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders.
Adverse Outcomes After Hospitalization and Delirium in Persons with Alzheimer Disease Charles Wang, PharmD Candidate.
Findings from Taylor & Jason (2001) study Taylor, R.R. & Jason, L.A. (2001). Sexual abuse, physical abuse, chronic fatigue, and chronic fatigue syndrome:
 Ergonomics is the science of fitting workplace conditions and job demands to the capabilities of the working population. Effective and successful "fits"
Sick Leave in Patients with Chronic Pain due to Occupational Injury in an Employer-Financed Work-Injury Compensation System Sandy Lee, J Yap, PP Chen Pain.
Occupational History and Examination
PREVENTION OF MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (MSDs) AT WORK: EXCHANGE OF KNOWLEDGE USING A PARTICIPATIVE APPROACH AND SOFTWARE TOOLS Wells, R.P. (1), Frazer,
OCCUPATIONAL MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Ergonomics WRULD and musculoskeletal disorders Loisa Sessman, Halmstad University.
Musculoskeletal Disorders among Dentists in Alexandria Prof. Dr. Samy A. Nassif PhD, PT Dean of Faculty of Physical Therapy - PUA Professor of Physical.
Ergonomics.
Use of Ergonomic Measures Related to Musculoskeletal Complaints among Construction Workers: A 2-year Follow-up Study  Julitta S. Boschman, Monique H.W.
ESOHMS ERGONOMICS TRAINING
ErgoTools: Desktop and Mobile Applications for MSD Prevention
The use of balneology in prevention of MSD in working age people
MEAT PACKING SENG5335 JEEVANKUMAR A R.
2nd NOVEL PHYSIOTHERAPIES , 11TH JUNE 2016, HOTEL CROWNE PLAZA, LONDON
VUmc Basispresentatie
Sleep Patterns and Risk of Injury among Rural Minnesota Adolescents
Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal injury identified through medical screening and training load monitoring in professional football (soccer): a systematic.
© FIOH | Mikko Härmä | Working hours, health, well-being and participation in working life (WOW) Creating new working time models and solutions.
Qualitative versus Quantitative evaluation of Whole body Vibration
Research in hairdressers Tasks, posture and MSDs
HAV Review – IOSH South Wales
Ergonomics Brought to you by: OESD 114
CEN3722 Human Computer Interaction Ergonomics
HAV Review – IOSH South Wales
Points to consider Study design Study population Case definition
How can your webcam improve your health?
Natural history of lateral epicondylitis among French Workers
EVALUATION OF FUNCTIONAL PHYSICAL HEALTH STATUS AHEAD OF THE HIGH ENDURANCE EXCERCISES ID Liana Plavina¹, Silva Smagare¹, Andris Čakstiņš ¹, Anete.
Ergonomics.
Presentation transcript:

Natural course of rotator cuff syndrome in a French working population J Bodin1, C Ha2, A Petit1,3, A Descatha4, M Goldberg4, A Leclerc4, Y Roquelaure1,3 1 LUNAM University, University of Angers, Laboratory of Ergonomics and Epidemiology in Occupational health, Angers, France 2 French Institute for Public Health Surveillance, Department of Occupational Health, Saint-Maurice, France 3 CHU Angers, Angers, France 4 University of Versailles St-Quentin, UMRS 1018, Population-Based Epidemiological Cohorts’ Research Platform, Villejuif, France PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 1 1

Context: Rotator cuff syndrome Common upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) in the working population In France (2011), shoulder disorders represented 37% of MSD compensated as occupational diseases Prognosis of rotator cuff syndrome (RCS): In general practice: 54% recovered after one year (Van Der Windt et al, 1996) In industrial and services workers: 50% recovered after 10 months (Bonde et al, 2003) PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 2

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 Objectives To assess the persistence of RCS in workers several years after diagnosis And to study associations between the persistence of RCS and personal and work-related factors and change of exposure since baseline Using the data of the surveillance program for MSD in the French Pays de la Loire region PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 3

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 Methods Baseline: 2002-2005 Network of 83 occupational physicians (18% of OP of the region) 3,710 workers randomly selected Self-administered Questionnaire Individual factors Work-related factors (work organization, biomechanical and psychosocial factors) Physical examination Follow-up: 2007-2010 PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 4

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 Methods Case definition Rotator cuff syndrome defined following the recommendations of the Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of MSD1 1Sluiter JK, Rest KM, Frings-Dresen MH. Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001;27 Suppl 1:1–102. PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 5

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 Methods Workers with RCS at baseline 3 groups RCS recovery: workers without shoulder symptoms and RCS Shoulder symptoms without clinically diagnosed RCS No recovery RCS: workers with clinically diagnosed RCS PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 6

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 Statistical methods Associations between recurrence of RCS and Baseline characteristics Personal and work-related factors (organizational, biomechanical and psychosocial factors) Follow-up characteristics Change of physical load, postural load, psychological load and time constraints during the preceding 12 months Separately for men and women Chi-square, Fisher and Mann-Withney tests PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 7

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 Results 3,710 workers 2002-2005 274 workers with RCS (7.4%) 40 not working: 3 deaths 32 retired 5 on maternity/paternity leave or long-term sick leave 2007-2010 39 at work: 34 not examined for the protocol 5 refused to participate in the follow-up 45 lost to follow-up: 4 usually monitored by a non-participating OP 41 lost to follow-up by their OP due to loss of job 150 workers seen by an OP: 78 men and 72 women PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 8

Physical examination at follow-up among workers with RCS in 2002-2005 PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 9

Characteristics at baseline according to health group in men PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013

Characteristics at baseline according to health group in women PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013

Characteristics at follow-up according to health group Men *p<0,05. **p<0,01 During the preceding 12 months: No differences for psychological load and times constraints Women: No differences PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 Discussion RCS clinically diagnosed by trained OPs Low follow-up rate Only workers still at work considered Unemployed people and retired people excluded Exposure data self-reported Extra-occupational physical activities and individual psychological factors not assessed PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 13

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 Conclusion High level of recovery from RCS 62% for men and 51% for women Factors associated with no recovery: Men: work-related factors Women: personal factors It would be interesting to act on these factors to prevent them, and to identify workers in whom RCS might become chronic. PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 14

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 Thank you for your attention PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 15

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 16

RCS without recovery (n=23) RCS without recovery (n=26) Working postures and biomechanical constraints   Men Women Recovery RCS (n=48) RCS without recovery (n=23) p-value* Recovery RCS (n=37) RCS without recovery (n=26) n % Working postures and biomechanical constraints High repetitiveness of tasks (≥4h/day) 11 22.9 47.8 0.034 17 47.2 14 53.9 0.607 High perceived physical exertion† 13 27.7 56.5 0.019 9 24.3 5 19.2 0.632 Posture with the arms above the shoulder level (≥2h/day) 6 26.1 0.770 16.2 24.0 0.521** Posture with the arms abducted (60° to 90°) (≥2h/day) 8 16.7 0.359** 21.6 7 28.0 0.565 Holding hand behind the trunk (≥2h/day) 3 6.3 2 8.7 0.656** 4 10.8 12.0 1.000** Biomechanical exposure‡ 0.053 21 44.7 21.7 12 33.3 32.0 1 16 34.0 30.4 30.6 20.0 2-5 10 21.3 36.1 48.0 Use of hand tools (≥2h/day) 28 58.3 60.9 0.839 53.8 Use of vibrating hand tools (≥2h/day) 39.1 0.155 0.0 0.136** Pushing or pulling load (≥2h/day) 31.8 0.429 8.1 0.257** Working seated (≥ 4h/day) 18.8 13.0 0.739** 56.8 34.6 0.083 RCS: rotator cuff syndrome. *χ² test. **Fisher exact test. †Rating Perceived Exertion Borg scale ≥15 for men and ≥14 for women. ‡Included variables: high repetitiveness of tasks (≥4h/day), high perceived physical exertion (≥15 for men and ≥14 for women), posture with the arms above the shoulder (≥2h/day), posture with the arms abducted (60 to 90°, ≥2h/day) and holding hand behind the trunk (≥2h/day) PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013

Work characteristics at follow-up according to health group in men   Recovery RCS (n=48) No recovery RCS (n=23) p n % Job change in the same company 13 27.1 5 22.7 0.699 Company change 4 8.3 0.128 PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013

Work characteristics at follow-up according to health group in women   Recovery RCS (n=37) No recovery RCS (n=26) p n % Job change in the same company 7 18.9 9 34.6 0.159 Company change 6 16.2 0.0 0.038 PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 21

3 PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 30th International Congress on Occupational Health March 18-23, 2012 22

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 4 23

5 PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 30th International Congress on Occupational Health March 18-23, 2012 24

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 6 PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 25

7 PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 30th International Congress on Occupational Health March 18-23, 2012 26

PREMUS 2013 – Busan, Korea, 8-11 July 2013 27