The 4 Å X-Ray Structure of a Tubulin:Stathmin-like Domain Complex

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Crystal structure of mammalian purple acid phosphatase
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Glycerol Dehydrogenase
The three-dimensional structure of PNGase F, a glycosyl asparaginase from Flavobacterium meningosepticum  Gillian E Norris, Timothy J Stillman, Bryan.
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Rahul C. Deo, Caroline M. Groft, K.R. Rajashankar, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
15 Å Resolution Model of the Monomeric Kinesin Motor, KIF1A
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Bending at Microtubule Interfaces
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Edith Schlagenhauf, Robert Etges, Peter Metcalf  Structure 
Conformational changes on substrate binding to methylmalonyl CoA mutase and new insights into the free radical mechanism  Filippo Mancia, Philip R Evans 
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages (October 1996)
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages (August 2001)
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Tertiary Structure of Destrin and Structural Similarity between Two Actin-Regulating Protein Families  H Hatanaka, K Ogura, K Moriyama, S Ichikawa, I.
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 1995)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Presentation transcript:

The 4 Å X-Ray Structure of a Tubulin:Stathmin-like Domain Complex Benoît Gigant, Patrick A. Curmi, Carole Martin-Barbey, Elodie Charbaut, Sylvie Lachkar, Luc Lebeau, Samila Siavoshian, André Sobel, Marcel Knossow  Cell  Volume 102, Issue 6, Pages 809-816 (September 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00069-6

Figure 1 The T2R Electron Density Map The Fourier synthesis map was calculated using phases from the tubulin model and density modification. (a) The long density stretch attributed to RB3-SLD (blue) is contoured at the 1 standard deviation level of the map. It is represented along the two tubulins used in the calculation of the structure factors (drawn as Cα traces). (b) Stereo close-up of the T2R electron density overlapped with the RB3-SLD α helix polyAla model. Figure 1 has been represented using the Bobscript program (Esnouf 1997). Cell 2000 102, 809-816DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00069-6)

Figure 2 Positions of Tubulin Subunits Where Contacts Are Made with the RB3-SLD α Helix Residues were considered to contact the RB3-SLD α helix when their Cαs were distant by less than 8 Å from Cαs of the RB3-SLD α helix; 15 positions in four different peptides were identified and at 10 of them contacts are made with the RB3-SLD α helix in each of the four tubulin subunits of T2R. All contacts are represented on the same tubulin α subunit. (Left) Footprint of the RB3-SLD on a tubulin subunit. The N-terminal nucleotide binding domain is in light blue, with its bound nucleotide drawn in ball-and-stick and residues contacting the RB3-SLD α helix highlighted as blue spheres. The second domain is in light green and the C-terminal domain is in pink. In the N-terminal domain the contacts with the RB3-SLD α helix are made by the end of the loop connecting strand S3 and helix H3 (residues 108 and 109), the two C-terminal turns of the H4 helix and the first residues of the H4–S5 turn (residues 155, 156, 158, 159, 162, and 163) and one residue in the H5–S6 turn (residue 196). In the C-terminal domain, the RB3-SLD α helix contacts the turn that precedes the H12 helix (residues 409 to 413, highlighted as red spheres). (Right) Modeled footprint of the RB3-SLD α helix on a straight protofilament in a microtubule (Nogales et al. 1999); the modeling is such that the RB3-SLD helix would interact with the same residues as it does in T2R. Two adjacent tubulin α subunits are drawn as Cα traces in this cross section of the microtubule. On one of these tubulin α subunits, residues contacting the RB3-SLD α helix in T2R are shown as spheres and the corresponding RB3-SLD moiety is represented as a helix ribbon. The shortest distance of the Cαs of this RB3-SLD region to the Cαs of the adjacent protofilament would be 14 Å. Atomic coordinates of two neighboring protofilaments in a microtubule were kindly provided by Dr. E. Nogales. Figure 2 and Figure 3 have been drawn with Molscript (Kraulis 1991). Cell 2000 102, 809-816DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00069-6)

Figure 3 The (T2R)n Structure Resulting from the Repetition of T2R which Illustrates the Curvature of This Complex This picture was obtained by superimposing the α1β1 moiety of the mth complex onto the α2β2 moiety of the (m-1)th complex and by keeping in the final structure (α1β1)1, (α2β2)1, (α2β2)2,…, (α2β2)n. Each T2R complex, drawn as a Cα trace, is in a different color from its neighbors except the RB3-SLD helix which is in black. Top: view along the helix axis (noted as a cross); 8 complexes are represented. Bottom: view perpendicular to the helix axis, which is noted as a straight line; one turn of the helix, i.e., 8 T2R complexes, is represented. Cell 2000 102, 809-816DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00069-6)

Figure 4 Comparison of T2R and Zinc Sheet Protofilament Tubulin (a) Schematic representation of the changes of the orientations of tubulin subunits in T2R as compared to straight protofilaments. The same colour code is used to identify tubulin subunits domains as in Figure 2. Nucleotides are represented as crosshatched blue (GDP) and red (GTP) motifs. T7 and H10 indicate the localizations of the T7 loop and of the H10 helix (intermediate domain, light green) that contact the neighboring subunit in Zn2+ sheet protofilaments (Nogales et al. 1999) (right) but not in T2R (left). The stathmin-like domain long α helix is represented by a thick dark blue line in T2R. The localizations of tubulin residues of the C-terminal domain and of the nucleotide binding domain that contact the stathmin-like domain long α helix are also noted (full circle and full oval, respectively). (b) Alignment of the RB3-SLD sequence with itself. The sequence alignment was performed with BLAST (Altschul et al. 1997), which detects 13 identities and 23 similarities over two 35-residue regions with a 16-residue gap. Only the regions of RB3-SLD with a significant sequence similarity are represented (top and bottom lines); identical residues and similarities (+) are plotted on the middle line. Residue numbering is as defined in Experimental Procedures. The sequence spacing of the stathmin-like domain residues with identical tubulin contacts is represented in (a) and corresponds to the spacing of the aligned stathmin-like domain residues. Cell 2000 102, 809-816DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00069-6)