Volume 152, Issue 3, Pages (January 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Up-Regulation of Activating Transcription Factor-5 Suppresses SAP Expression to Activate T Cells in Hemophagocytic Syndrome Associated with Epstein-Barr.
Advertisements

Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
CaMKII promotes TLR-triggered proinflammatory cytokine and type I interferon production by directly binding and activating TAK1 and IRF3 in macrophages.
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Swarupa Panda, Jonas A. Nilsson, Nelson O. Gekara  Immunity 
Identification and Characterization of MAVS, a Mitochondrial Antiviral Signaling Protein that Activates NF-κB and IRF3  Rashu B. Seth, Lijun Sun, Chee-Kwee.
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 142, Issue 7, Pages e6 (June 2012)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (March 2015)
LPS induces CD40 gene expression through the activation of NF-κB and STAT-1α in macrophages and microglia by Hongwei Qin, Cynthia A. Wilson, Sun Jung Lee,
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages e5 (September 2018)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
The Ubiquitin E3 Ligase RAUL Negatively Regulates Type I Interferon through Ubiquitination of the Transcription Factors IRF7 and IRF3  Yanxing Yu, Gary.
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
SOCS-1 Participates in Negative Regulation of LPS Responses
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
The KSHV Immediate-Early Transcription Factor RTA Encodes Ubiquitin E3 Ligase Activity that Targets IRF7 for Proteosome-Mediated Degradation  Yanxing.
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
TET3 Inhibits Type I IFN Production Independent of DNA Demethylation
Daniel B. Stetson, Ruslan Medzhitov  Immunity 
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β Regulates IRF3 Transcription Factor-Mediated Antiviral Response via Activation of the Kinase TBK1  Cao-Qi Lei, Bo Zhong, Yu.
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 160, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages e4 (October 2017)
USP15 Negatively Regulates Nrf2 through Deubiquitination of Keap1
NF-κB Is Required for UV-Induced JNK Activation via Induction of PKCδ
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages e6 (October 2018)
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (August 2016)
A Direct HDAC4-MAP Kinase Crosstalk Activates Muscle Atrophy Program
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
c-IAP1 Cooperates with Myc by Acting as a Ubiquitin Ligase for Mad1
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 152, Issue 3, Pages 467-478 (January 2013) Induction of Siglec-G by RNA Viruses Inhibits the Innate Immune Response by Promoting RIG-I Degradation  Weilin Chen, Chaofeng Han, Bin Xie, Xiang Hu, Qian Yu, Liyun Shi, Qingqing Wang, Dongling Li, Jianli Wang, Pan Zheng, Yang Liu, Xuetao Cao  Cell  Volume 152, Issue 3, Pages 467-478 (January 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 RNA Viral Infection Upregulates Siglecg Expression by Histone H3 Modification through the NF-κB Pathway (A) Microarray analysis of mouse peritoneal macrophages infected with VSV. Shown is the heatmap of lectin family genes upregulated or downregulated in macrophages following VSV infection for 8 hr. Untreated macrophages were as control. (B) Q-PCR analysis of Siglec-G, Klre1, Clec2l, Clec2j, and Colec11 mRNA expression in macrophages infected with LM, E. coli, HSV-1, or VSV for the indicated hours. Data were normalized to the expression of β-actin reference gene. (C) Q-PCR analysis of Siglec-G mRNA expression in macrophages transfected with poly(I:C) (intracellular poly(I:C)), stimulated with poly(I:C), or infected with RNA virus SeV for the indicated hours. (D) Q-PCR analysis of Siglec-G mRNA expression in Rigi−/− macrophages infected with VSV. (E) Q-PCR analysis of Siglec-G mRNA expression in macrophages pretreated for 1 hr with NF-κB inhibitor PDTC (10 μM) before VSV infection for indicated hours. (F) ChIP analysis of macrophages treated for 4 hr with LPS or VSV by using H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 antibodies. Two sets of primers and probes (P1 and P2) of Siglec-G used for Q-PCR. (G and H) ChIP analysis of macrophages treated for indicated hours with LPS or VSV by using SET7/9 antibody (G) or MLL antibody (H). Data are means ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. See also Figure S1. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Siglecg-Deficient Mice Are More Resistant to RNA Viral Infection by Producing More IFN-β (A) Determination of VSV loads in organs by TCID50 assay 24 hr after Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– mice (n = 6 per group) were intraperitoneally injected with VSV. (B) Q-PCR analysis of VSV expression in organs from Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– mice in (A). (C) Survival of ∼7-week-old Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– mice given intraperitoneal injection of VSV (1 × 108 pfu/g) (n = 10 per group). p < 0.01. (D) Pathology of Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– mice in response to VSV. Scale bar, 100 μm. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of lung sections from mice in (A). (E) ELISA of cytokine production in sera from Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– mice in (A). (F) Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β mRNA expression in organs from Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– mice in (A). (G) Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β mRNA expression in peritoneal macrophages from Siglecg+/+ or Siglecg–/– mice in (A). Data are means ± SEM. ∗∗p < 0.01. See also Figure S2. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Siglec-G Selectively Inhibits RNA-Virus-Induced Production of Type I Interferon in Macrophages (A) ELISA of IFN-β in supernatants of Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– peritoneal macrophages infected for 24 hr with VSV, SeV, or HSV-1. (B) Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β and IFN-α4 mRNA expression in Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– macrophages infected for 8 hr with VSV, SeV, or HSV-1. (C) Q-PCR analysis of Siglec-G mRNA expression in macrophages 48 hr after transfection with Siglecg siRNA. (D) ELISA of IFN-β in supernatants of macrophages transfected as in (C) and 48 hr later infected for 24 hr with VSV, SeV, or HSV-1. (E) Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β and IFN-α4 mRNA expression in macrophages transfected as in (C) and 48 hr later infected for 8 hr with VSV, SeV, or HSV-1. (F) Immunoblot analysis of Siglec-G expression in Siglec-G-overexpressing RAW264.7 macrophages with α-Flag. (G) ELISA of IFN-β in supernatants of Siglec-G-overexpressing RAW264.7 macrophages infected for 24 hr with VSV, SeV, or HSV-1. (H) Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β and IFN-α4 mRNA expression in Siglec-G-overexpressing RAW264.7 macrophages infected for indicated time with VSV, SeV, or HSV-1. (I) Determination of VSV titers in supernatants of Siglecg +/+ and Siglecg–/– peritoneal macrophages changed culture medium for indicated hours after VSV infection for 8 hr by TCID50 assay. (J) Determination of VSV titers in supernatants of Siglec-G-overexpressing RAW264.7 macrophages infected for indicated hours with VSV by TCID50 assay. Data are means ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. See also Figure S3. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Siglecg Deficiency Enhances IRF3 Activation in RNA-Virus-Infected Macrophages with Higher Expression of RIG-I (A and B) Immunoblot analysis of phosphorylated (p-) or total proteins in lysates of Siglecg+/+ or Siglecg–/– peritoneal macrophages infected for indicated hours with VSV. (C) Immunoblot analysis of IRF3 among nuclear proteins from Siglecg+/+ or Siglecg–/– macrophages infected with VSV; lamin A/C serves as a loading control. (D) Immunoblot analysis of RIG-I and MAVS in lysates of Siglecg+/+ or Siglecg–/– macrophages infected with VSV. (E) Immunoblot analysis of RIG-I and Siglec-G in lysates of Siglecg+/+ or Siglecg–/– macrophages infected with VSV. (F) Immunoblot analysis of RIG-I and p-IRF3 in lysates of Siglec-G-overexpressing RAW264.7 macrophages infected with VSV. (G) Immunoblot analysis of RIG-I in lysates of Siglecg+/+ or Siglecg–/– macrophages treated with CHX (100 mg/ml) for indicated hours after infection with VSV for 2 hr. Quantification of relative RIG-I levels is shown in the bottom panel. Numbers below lanes (top) indicate densitometry of the protein presented relative to β-actin or GAPDH expression in that same lane (below). See also Figure S4. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Siglec-G Promotes c-Cbl-Mediated Degradation of RIG-I via SHP2 (A) c-Cbl is an E3 ligase for ubiquitin to RIG-I. Plasmids encoding Flag-RIG-I and HA-ubiquitin were cotransfected into HEK293T cells with or without a plasmid encoding V5-c-Cbl. The RIG-I ubiquitination was monitored by immunoprecipitation. All cells were treated with MG132 (10 μM). (B) c-Cbl mediates RIG-I degradation in a proteasome-dependent manner. The HEK293T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding Flag-RIG-I, HA-ubiquitin, and varying doses of a plasmid encoding V5-c-Cbl (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 μg). Half of each cell aliquot was treated with MG132 (10 μM). The level of RIG-I protein was examined in cells harvested 24 hr after transfection. (C) Siglec-G promotes c-Cbl-mediated degradation of RIG-I in a dose-dependent manner. The HEK293T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding Flag-RIG-I, HA-ubiquitin, V5-c-Cbl, and varying doses of a plasmid encoding Myc-Siglec-G (0.5 and 1 μg). The level of RIG-I protein was examined in cells harvested 24 hr later. (D) VSV infection induces tyrosine phosphorylation of Siglec-G. Flag-Siglec-G-overexpressing RAW264.7 macrophages were infected with VSV for the indicated hours. Immunoblot analysis of phosphorylated tyrosine (p-Tyr) protein in cell lysates immunoprecipitated with antibody to Flag tag. (E) Siglec-G promotes phosphorylation of c-Cbl and SHP2. Immunoblot analysis of phosphorylated (p-) c-Cbl and p-SHP2 protein in lysates of Siglecg–/– or Siglecg+/+ macrophages infected with VSV. (F and G) Siglec-G inhibits IFN-β production through c-Cbl or SHP2. Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β mRNA expression in macrophages transfected with c-Cbl siRNA (F) or SHP2 siRNA (G) and 48 hr later infected for indicated hours with VSV. (H) SHP2 functions upstream of c-Cbl in Siglec-G inhibition of IFN-β production. Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β mRNA expression in shp2−/− macrophages transfected with Siglec-G siRNA or c-Cbl siRNA and 48 hr later infected for indicated hours with VSV. Data are means ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05. See also Figure S5. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Siglec-G Interacts with SHP2, c-Cbl, and RIG-I (A) Protein complex of Siglec-G, SHP2, c-Cbl, and RIG-I in overexpressing system. The HEK293T cells were transfected for 24 hr with plasmids encoding HA-RIG-I, Flag-SHP2, Flag-c-Cbl, and Myc-Siglec-G. Immunoblot analysis of Myc-Siglec-G, HA-RIG-I, Flag-SHP2, or Flag-c-Cbl immunoprecipitated with antibodies to myc or HA tags. (B) Protein complex of Flag-Siglec-G, SHP2, c-Cbl, and RIG-I in macrophages. Siglec-G-overexpressing RAW264.7 macrophages were infected with VSV for indicated hours. Immunoblot analysis of endogenous RIG-I, SHP2, or c-Cbl immunoprecipitated with antibody to SHP2 or Flag tag. (C) Interaction of Siglec-G, c-Cbl, and RIG-I with SHP2 in peritoneal macrophages. Siglecg–/– or Siglecg+/+ macrophages were infected with VSV for indicated hours. Immunoblot analysis of endogenous Siglec-G, RIG-I, c-Cbl, or SHP2 immunoprecipitated with antibody to SHP2. IgG was as control. (D) Confocal microscopy of HEK293 infected for 6 hr with SeV. HEK293T cells were transfected with Flag-RIG-I, Myc-c-Cbl, Flag-Siglec-G, or Myc-RIG-I for 24 hr and then infected with SeV and labeled with antibodies to the appropriate molecules. (E) Intracellular domain of Siglec-G associates with RIG-I. Schematic structure of Siglec-G and the derivatives used were shown (top). WCLs of HEK293T cells transfected with Myc-Siglec-G (WT), Myc-Siglec-G (Del), Myc-Siglec-G (4YF), and Flag-RIG-I were used for immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting, as indicated. (F) Siglec-G associates with the Helix/CTD of RIG-I. Schematic structure of RIG-I and the derivatives used were shown (top). WCLs of HEK293T cells transfected with Myc-RIG-I (WT), Myc-RIG-I (2CARD), Myc-RIG-I(Heli), Myc-RIG-I(CTD), or with Myc-RIG-I(ΔCARD) and HA-Siglec-G were used for immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting, as indicated. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Lys813 of RIG-I Is a Critical Site in c-Cbl-Mediated K48-Linked Ubiquitination and Degradation of RIG-I (A) Siglec-G promotes c-Cbl-mediated K48-linked ubiquitination of RIG-I. The HEK293T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding Flag-RIG-I, HA-ubiquitin, V5-c-Cbl, and varying doses of a plasmid encoding Myc-Siglec-G (0, 0.5, and 1 μg). Half of each cell aliquot was treated with MG132 (10 μM). Cells were harvested 24 hr after transfection for immunoblot analysis of K48-Ub immunoprecipitated with antibody to Flag tag. (B) c-Cbl mediates K48-linked ubiquitination of RIG-I in a dose-dependent way. The HEK293T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding Myc-RIG-I, HA-ubiquitin, Flag-Siglec-G, and varying doses of a plasmid encoding V5-c-Cbl (0, 0.5, and 1 μg). Half of each cell aliquot was treated with MG132 (10 μM). Cells were harvested 24 hr after transfection for immunoblot analysis of K48-Ub immunoprecipitated with antibody to myc tag. (C) K813 of RIG-I is the major site of c-Cbl-mediated K48-linked ubiquitination. WCLs of HEK293T cells transfected with HA ubiquitin, V5-c-Cbl, Myc-RIG-I (WT), or K→R mutants were used for immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of K48-Ub. Half of each cell aliquot was treated with MG132 (10 μM). (D) K813 is critical site in c-Cbl-mediated degradation of RIG-I. WCLs of HEK293T cells transfected with V5-c-Cbl, HA-ubiquitin, Flag-Siglec-G, Myc-RIG-I WT, or K813R mutants were used for immunoblot analysis of RIG-I with antibody to myc tag. (E) IFN-β promoter activity in RIG-I-WT or RIG-I-K813R-transfected HEK293T cells detected by luciferase reporter assay. Luciferase activity was analyzed as fold induction. Data are means ± SEM. ∗∗p < 0.01. (F) Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β mRNA expression in Rigi−/− macrophages transfected with RIG-I-WT or RIG-I-K813R plasmid and 24 hr later infected for 8 hr with VSV. Data are means ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05. (G) Model of the RNA-virus-activated Siglec-G-SHP2-c-Cbl-mediated RIG-I degradation. Upon RNA virus infection, Siglec-G is activated, and then its phosphorylated ITIMs recruit tyrosine phosphatase SHP2. Siglec-G promotes phosphorylation of SHP2 and c-Cbl. RIG-I is also recruited and associated with Siglec-G-SHP2-c-Cbl, leading to K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of RIG-I by E3 ligase c-Cbl. Lys813 of RIG-I is a critical site for c-Cbl-mediated RIG-I degradation. On the other hand, RNA virus infection triggers RIG-I downstream signal activation through RIG-I-MAVS interaction, and the activated NF-κB upregulates Siglec-G mRNA expression, which inhibits RIG-I-triggered type I interferon production in the innate immune response, forming a negative feedback loop. See also Figure S7. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 RNA Virus Infection Upregulates Siglecg Expression by Histone H3 Modification through the NF-κB Pathway, Related to Figure 1 (A) Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β mRNA expression in macrophages transfected with control siRNA, Clec2j siRNA, Clec2l siRNA, Klre1 siRNA, Colec11 siRNA or Siglecg siRNA, 48 hr later, infected for indicated time with VSV. (B) Q-PCR analysis of Siglec-G mRNA expression in macrophages infected for indicated MOIs with VSV for 8 hr. (C and D) Q-PCR analysis of Siglec-G mRNA expression in peritoneal macrophages stimulated with LPS, CpG, R837 or transfected with various DNA by Jetpei. (E) Q-PCR analysis of Siglec-G mRNA expression in macrophages pretreated for 1 hr with SP600125 (10 μM), PD98059 (10 μM), SB203580 (10 μM), Wortmannin (100ng/ml) or Gö6976 (2.5 μM) before infected with VSV for indicated hours. (F) Q-PCR analysis of Siglec-G mRNA expression in Ifnβ−/−, Ifnα/βR−/− or Irf3−/− macrophages infected for indicated hours with VSV. (G) Luciferase assay analysis of Siglecg promoter activation. HEK293T cells transfected with Siglecg promoter-luc and p65 were infected with SeV for 12 hr. Empty vector was as control. Data are means ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Siglecg-Deficient Mice Are More Resistant to RNA Virus Infection by Producing More IFN-β, Related to Figure 2 (A) HE staining of lung sections from Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– mice in response to SeV or HSV-1. Scale bar, 100 μm. (B) Immunohistochemical staining for F4/80 or myeloperoxidase (MPO) of lung sections from Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– mice in response to VSV. Scale bar, 20 μm. (C) ELISA of cytokines production in sera of Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– mice intraperitoneally injected with SeV or HSV-1 for 24 hr. (D) Q-PCR analyses of IFN-β mRNA expression in organs of Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– mice intraperitoneally injected with SeV or HSV-1 for 24 hr. (E) Q-PCR analyses of IFN-β mRNA expression in peritoneal macrophages from Siglecg+/+ or Siglecg–/– mice that were infected with SeV or HSV-1 for 24 hr. (F) Determination of VSV loads in organs by TCID50 assay on day 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 after Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– mice (n = 5, each group) were intraperitoneally injected with lower dose VSV (2 × 107 pfu per mouse). (G) HE staining of lung sections from Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– mice in (F). Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are means ± SEM. ∗∗p < 0.01. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Siglec-G Selectively Inhibits RNA-Virus-Induced Production of Type I Interferon in Macrophages and DCs, Related to Figure 3 (A) ELISA of TNF-α and IL-6 in supernatants of Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– peritoneal macrophages infected for 24 hr with VSV, SeV or HSV-1. (B) Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β and IFN-α4 mRNA expression in Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– BMDCs infected for 8 hr with VSV, SeV or HSV-1. (C) ELISA of cytokines in supernatants of Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– BMDCs infected for 24 hr with VSV, SeV or HSV-1. (D) ELISA of IFN-β in supernatants of Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– macrophages transfected with poly(I:C) by Interferin for 12 h. (E) ELISA of IFN-β in supernatants of Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– macrophages transfected with poly(dG:dC), poly(dA:dT) by Jetpei for 12h or stimulated with LPS, polyI:C, LM, R837 for 12h. Data are means ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 Siglecg Deficiency Enhances IRF3 Activation in RNA-Virus-Infected Macrophages with Higher Expression of RIG-I, Related to Figure 4 (A) Immunoblot analysis of RIG-I, MAVS and phosphorylated (p-) IRF3 in lysates of Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– peritoneal macrophages infected with SeV for indicated hours. (B) Immunoblot analysis of RIG-I, MAVS and phosphorylated (p-) IRF3 in lysates of Siglec-G- overexpressing RAW264.7 cells infected with SeV for indicated hours. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S5 Siglec-G Promotes c-Cbl-Mediated Degradation of RIG-I via SHP2, Related to Figure 5 (A) List of E3 ligase proteins for top peptide hits (defined by Mascot score) identified in mass spectrometry study. (B) Immunoblot assay of RIG-I degradation in lysates of macrophages transfected with control siRNA or c-Cbl siRNA, 48 hr later, infected for 2 hr with VSV and then treated for various times with cyclocheximide (CHX, 100mg/ml). Numbers below lanes (top) indicate densitometry of the RIG-I presented relative to β-actin expression in that same lane (below). Quantification of relative RIG-I levels in right panel. (C) Siglec-G inhibits IFN-β production through c-Cbl. Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β mRNA expression in Siglec-G-overexpressing RAW264.7 cells transfected with control siRNA or c-Cbl siRNA, 48 hr later, infected for indicated time with VSV. (D) Siglec-G inhibits IFN-β production through SHP2. Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β mRNA expression in Siglec-G-overexpressing RAW264.7 cells transfected with control siRNA or SHP2 siRNA, 48 hr later, infected for indicated time with VSV. (E) Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β mRNA expression in c-Cbl-overexpressing RAW264.7 cells infected for indicated time with VSV. (F) Q-PCR analysis of Siglec-G mRNA expression in WT or CD24−/− macrophages infected for indicated time with VSV. (G) ELISA of IFN-β in supernatants of WT or CD24−/− macrophages infected for 24 hr with VSV. (H) Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β mRNA expression in WT or CD24−/− macrophages infected for indicated time with VSV. (I) ELISA of IFN-β in supernatants of CD24−/− macrophages transfected with Siglecg siRNA, 48 hr later, infected for 24 hr with VSV. (J) ELISA of IFN-β in supernatants of Siglecg+/+ and Siglecg–/– macrophages treated with or without sialidase (Sia, 2U/l) before infected with VSV for 24h. Data are means ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S6 Siglec-G Interacts with SHP2, c-Cbl, and RIG-I, Related to Figure 6 (A) SHP2 promotes Siglec-G to associate with RIG-I. The HEK293T cells were transfected for 24 hr with plasmids encoding Flag-RIG-I, Myc-SHP2 and HA-Siglec-G. Immunoblot analysis of HA-Siglec-G, Flag-RIG-I and Myc-SHP2 immunoprecipitated with antibody to flag tag. (B) c-Cbl associates with the CTD of RIG-I. WCLs of HEK293T cells transfected with V5-c-Cbl, and Myc-RIG-I (WT), Myc-RIG-I(2CARD), Myc-RIG-I(CTD), Myc-RIG-I(Heli), or with Myc-RIG-I(ΔCARD) were used for immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting, as indicated. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S7 Lys813 of RIG-I Is a Critical Site in c-Cbl-Mediated K-48-Linked Ubiquitination of RIG-I, Related to Figure 7 (A) Siglec-G promotes c-Cbl-mediated K48-linked ubiquitination of RIG-I. Short exposure image of Figure 7A. (B) c-Cbl mediates K48-linked ubiquitination of RIG-I in dose-dependent way. Short exposure image of Figure 7B. (C) K813 of RIG-I is the major site of c-Cbl-mediated K48-linked ubiquitination. Short exposure image of Figure 7C. (D) Siglec-G promotes c-Cbl-mediated K48-linked ubiquitination of RIG-I. The HEK293T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding Myc-RIG-I, V5-c-Cbl, Flag-Siglec-G and HA-K48-Ub. Cells were treated with MG132 (10 μM). Cells were harvested 24 hr after transfection for immunoblot analysis of HA immunoprecipitated with antibody to myc tag. (E) Siglec-G promotes c-Cbl-mediated K48-linked degradation of RIG-I. The HEK293T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding Myc-RIG-I, V5-c-Cbl, Flag-Siglec-G, HA-K48-Ub or HA-K63-Ub. Cells were harvested 24 hr after transfection for immunoblot analysis of RIG-I with antibody to myc tag. (F) c-Cbl does not affect substantially K63-linked ubiquitination of RIG-I. The HEK293T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding Flag-RIG-I, HA-ubiquitin and varying doses of a plasmid encoding V5-c-Cbl (0, 0.5, and 1 μg). Cells were treated with MG132 (10 μM). Cells were harvested 24 hr after transfection for immunoblot analysis of K63-Ub immunoprecipitated with antibody to flag tag. (G) Lys813 of RIG-I is critical site for K48-linked ubiquitination of RIG-I. The HEK293T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding Myc-RIG-I (WT), Myc-RIG-I-K813R and HA-K48-Ub. Cells were harvested 24 hr after transfection for immunoblot analysis of HA immunoprecipitated with antibody to myc tag. (H) Q-PCR analysis of IFN-β mRNA expression of RIG-I stable overexpressing or RIG-I-K813R stable overexpressing RAW cells infected for indicated hours with VSV. Data are means ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05. Cell 2013 152, 467-478DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.011) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions