Urea kinetic analysis of automated peritoneal dialysis allows calculation of a CAPD- equivalent Kt/Vurea  Scott J. Schurman, Lawrence R. Shoemaker, Bradley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 1: Definition and classification of CKD Kidney International Supplements Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013) DOI: /kisup
Advertisements

Urea and nitrogen excretion in pediatric peritoneal dialysis patients
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh  Kidney International 
Acid-base profile in patients on PD
Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis
A skeptical view of assisted home peritoneal dialysis
Improved patient/technique survival and peritonitis rates in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis when compared to continuous ambulatory.
Steven Fishbane, Jeffrey S. Berns, M.D.  Kidney International 
Long-term evolution of cardiomyopathy in dialysis patients
Acid-base profile in patients on PD
End-stage renal disease in developing countries
Role of diuretics in the preservation of residual renal function in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis  James F. Medcalf, Kevin P.G.
Long-term follow-up of patients randomized to biocompatible or conventional peritoneal dialysis solutions show no difference in peritonitis or technique.
Superior dialytic clearance of β2 microglobulin and p-cresol by high-flux hemodialysis as compared to peritoneal dialysis  H. Yoshida, K. Yokoyama, K.
Volume 64, Pages S3-S12 (December 2003)
Incremental peritoneal dialysis: Effects on the choice of dialysis modality, residual renal function and adequacy  G. Viglino, L. Neri, S. Barbieri  Kidney.
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 1998)
Fibrin plug Kidney International Volume 78, Issue 9, (November 2010)
Ali K. Abu-Alfa, John Burkart, Beth Piraino, Joe Pulliam, Salim Mujais 
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Response to is the reduction in urea distribution volume over time in clinically stable dialysis patients real?  S. Andrulli, S. Di Filippo, F. Locatelli 
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh  Kidney International 
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 73, Pages S5-S17 (April 2008)
Dedicated outpatient vascular access center decreases hospitalization and missed outpatient dialysis treatments  R. Mishler, J.J. Sands, N.J. Ofsthun,
Body size and outcomes on peritoneal dialysis in the United States
The calcium–phosphorus in guidelines for CKD-MBD
Improved patient/technique survival and peritonitis rates in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis when compared to continuous ambulatory.
Analysis of fluid transport pathways and their determinants in peritoneal dialysis patients with ultrafiltration failure  A. Parikova, W. Smit, D.G. Struijk,
Blood pressure targets in hemodialysis patients
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Peritoneal dialysis adequacy and risk of death
Volume 76, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Microbiology and outcomes of peritonitis in North America
Alternate-day dialysis may be needed for hemodialysis patients
Nephrology Crossword: Peritoneal Dialysis
Cardiovascular disease in pediatric chronic dialysis patients
Worldwide variation of dialysis-associated peritonitis in children
Long-term evolution of cardiomyopathy in dialysis patients
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Profiling of peritoneal ultrafiltration
Volume 73, Pages S72-S75 (April 2008)
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
A skeptical view of assisted home peritoneal dialysis
Quality of life in peritoneal dialysis patients: Decline over time and association with clinical outcomes  Sr. Anne B. Bakewell, Rob M. Higgins, Mair.
Adult peritoneal dialysis patients
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
Urea and nitrogen excretion in pediatric peritoneal dialysis patients
Volume 70, Pages S84-S90 (November 2006)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Adequacy of automated peritoneal dialysis with and without manual daytime exchange: A randomized controlled trial  D. Demetriou, A. Habicht, M. Schillinger,
Volume 80, Issue 10, Pages (November 2011)
Charles A. Herzog  Kidney International 
Quantification of free water transport in peritoneal dialysis
Bradley A. Warady, Mwaffek Bashir, Lynn A. Donaldson 
Review of clinical trial experience with icodextrin
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages (September 2006)
Changes to the End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 70, Issue 10, Pages (November 2006)
The International Pediatric Peritonitis Registry: Starting to walk
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Stephen Pastan, J. Michael Soucie, William M. McClellan 
American Journal of Kidney Diseases 
Presentation transcript:

Urea kinetic analysis of automated peritoneal dialysis allows calculation of a CAPD- equivalent Kt/Vurea  Scott J. Schurman, Lawrence R. Shoemaker, Bradley A. Warady  Kidney International  Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 1318-1324 (September 2000) DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00288.x Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Variation in ultrafiltration volume. Definitions include: V, patient volume of urea distribution; δ, volume of the daytime dwell drained; φ, ultrafiltration volume; t, dialytic time. The Kt/Vurea (weekly) necessary to provide urea mass removal equal to the same patient receiving CAPD and a Kt/Vurea (weekly) of 2.0 is seen for (A) nightly intermittent peritoneal dialysis (NIPD) and (B) continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD). Twenty milliliters of ultrafiltration per liter of distribution volume decreases the Kt/Vurea (weekly) approximately 0.02 for NIPD and CCPD. This relationship is independent of the decrease in Kt/Vurea (weekly) with increasing continuous clearance (Kprt/Vurea), such that lines altering the ultrafiltration volume in the same patient are parallel. Symbols in A are: (•) V = 50 L, φ = 1000 mL, t = 600min; (ʘ) V = 50 L, φ = 2000 mL, t = 600min; (▼) V = 50 L, φ = 3000 mL, t = 600min. Symbols in B are: (•) V = 50 L, φ = 1000 mL, δ = 2000 mL, t = 600min; (ʘ) V = 50 L, φ = 2000 mL, δ = 2000 mL, t = 600min; (▼) V = 50 L, φ = 3000 mL, δ = 2000 mL, t = 600min. Kidney International 2000 58, 1318-1324DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00288.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Variation in daytime dwell volume. Definitions are: V, patient volume of urea distribution; δ, volume of the daytime dwell drained; φ, ultrafiltration volume; t, dialytic time. The Kt/Vurea (weekly) necessary to provide urea mass removal equal to the same patient receiving CAPD and a Kt/Vurea (weekly) of 2.0 decreases with increasing daytime dwell volume. The magnitude of this reduction is dependent on the proportion of the daytime dwell volume to distribution volume and decreases to a small degree with increasing continuous clearance (Kprt/Vurea), such that the lines gradually converge. Symbols are: (•) V = 50 L, φ = 2000 mL, δ = 1000 mL, t = 600min; (▼) V = 50 L, φ = 2000 mL, δ = 1500 mL, t = 600min; (▾) V = 50 L, φ = 2000 mL, δ = 2000 mL, t = 600min. Kidney International 2000 58, 1318-1324DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00288.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Variation in dialytic time. Definitions are: V, patient volume of urea distribution; δ, volume of the daytime dwell drained; φ, ultrafiltration volume; t, dialytic time. The Kt/Vurea (weekly) necessary to provide urea mass removal equal to the same patient receiving CAPD and a Kt/Vurea (weekly) of 2.0 decreases with increasing dialytic time. The magnitude of these differences narrows with increasing continuous clearance (Kprt/Vurea). Symbols in (A) are: (•) V = 50 L, φ = 2000 mL, t = 480min; (ʘ) V = 50 L, φ = 2000 mL, t = 600min; (▼) V = 50 L, φ = 2000 mL, t = 720min. Symbols in (B) are: (•) V = 50 L, φ = 2000 mL, δ = 2000 mL, t = 480min; (ʘ) V = 50 L, φ = 2000 mL, δ = 2000 mL, t = 600min; (▼) V = 50 L, φ = 2000 mL, δ = 2000 mL, t = 720min. Kidney International 2000 58, 1318-1324DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00288.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions