2010 SACS-COC Annual Meeting December 6, 2010 CS-69 Administrative Program Review Assuring Quality in Administrative and Academic Support Units.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
BY RAYMOND GREENLAW ARMSTRONG ATLANTIC STATE UNIVERSITY ABET-Accreditation Timeline.
My AmeriCorps AmeriCorps and VISTA Programs Create and Manage an eGrants Account Presentation developed for the Corporation for National and Community.
1 Responding to Extreme Changes between Self-Study and the Evaluation Visit Dr. Andrew Thompson, Provost Dr. Richard Resch, Provost (Retired) The American.
Membership & Roster Maintenance Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Kevin Shanahan 1.
NCATS REDESIGN METHODOLOGY A Menu of Redesign Options Six Models for Course Redesign Five Principles of Successful Course Redesign Four Models for Assessing.
The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National Reputation By Successfully Serving its Region The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National.
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
The GEO Secretariat Progress Report to GEO-2 November 2003 Helen M. Wood Secretariat Director.
Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) 1 Quality Education Investment Act (QEIA) of 2006 County Superintendents Oversight and Technical Assistance.
1 The Academic Profession and the Managerial University: An International Comparative Study from Japan Akira Arimoto Research Institute for Higher Education.
California Preschool Learning Foundations
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
World’s Largest Educational Community
Leading for High Performance. PKR, Inc., for Cedar Rapids 10/04 2 Everythings Up-to-Date in Cedar Rapids! Working at classroom, building, and district.
2010 fotografiert von Jürgen Roßberg © Fr 1 Sa 2 So 3 Mo 4 Di 5 Mi 6 Do 7 Fr 8 Sa 9 So 10 Mo 11 Di 12 Mi 13 Do 14 Fr 15 Sa 16 So 17 Mo 18 Di 19.
Tyra Goodgain & Debi Higbie-Holmes, Make It Happen! Innovation Grant: FYE Student Ambassadors Program ~ Information Session Montgomery College.
Planning for Academic Program Review Site Visits
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
1 September 27 and October 1, Introduction Jenny Hartfelder– Speaker, Rocky Mountain WEA Janet Hurley Cann– Speaker-Elect, WEA of South Carolina.
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Enhancing an Organizations Capabilities for Technical Assistance.
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
2009 Strategic Planning playbook
ABC Technology Project
Financial System Replacement Project
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
Support Services Review Support Services Review (SSR) is a representative, responsive form of assessment and self-evaluation to ensure continuous quality.
VOORBLAD.
Southeastern Association of Educational Opportunity Program Personnel 38 th Annual Conference January 30 – February 3, 2010 Upward Bound Internal & External.
Strategic Financial Management 9 February 2012
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Future Fellowship Seminar Humanities and Social Sciences AD Hope Conference Room 17 September 2013.
Environment Launch & Student Project Presentation Environment Policy Environment Action Plan 2010 Faculty of the Built Environment Designing a Student.
Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director Ohio Planning Conference Organizing for Reliability – A State Perspective.
Dr. Craig Campbell St. Edward’s University Online learning and teaching.
25 seconds left…...
1. 2 The San Jacinto Unified School District presents: Strategic Plan For
Student Survey
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
EXCITING NEW OPPORTUNITIES Strategic Innovation Fund Global Water Center Innovation Campus.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #4 April 12th, 2011.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
PSSA Preparation.
Weekly Attendance by Class w/e 6 th September 2013.
1. Karadeniz Technical University Continuing Education Center has been established to organize Karadeniz Technical University’s continuing education programs,
World’s Largest Educational Community
NIMS Resource Management IS-700.A – January 2009 Visual 5.1 NIMS Command and Management Unit 5.
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Administrative Council September 21, 2009.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.
University of Central Florida Assessment Toolkit for Academic, Student and Enrollment Services Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Dr. Ron Atwell Dr. Paula Krist Dr.
PROGRAM PRIORITIZATION for Administrative and Service Units.
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
University Career Services Committee
Presentation transcript:

2010 SACS-COC Annual Meeting December 6, 2010 CS-69 Administrative Program Review Assuring Quality in Administrative and Academic Support Units

Who we are Dr. Melissa Canady Wargo Assistant Vice Chancellor, Institutional Planning and Effectiveness David Onder Assessment Coordinator, Institutional Planning and Effectiveness Mardy Ashe Director, Career Services 2

Objectives for session 3 Describe the development and implementation of administrative program review at WCU Outline the process and standardsDiscuss example: Career Services

Why administrative program review? Catalysts –Shrinking Budgets –Demands for Accountability – internal and external –UNC Tomorrow Buy-in –Campus leadership –Staff input 4

How was the process developed? Administrative Council –Charged by Provost –Membership – directors of all academic support units Vetting the criteria Outlining the process 5

What are the goals of the process? 6 Alignment with core mission, vision, values of the University Ensure efficient and effective use of University resources Promote excellence and quality Enhance services to all University constituents Reduce/Eliminate unnecessary duplication and redundancy

What is the structure of the process? 7 Notification & Planning Selection of Review Team Preparation of self-study Campus Visit Review Team Report Program Development Plan

What are the review standards? 8 Unit History & Description Alignment with mission/values Program Demand Program Quality Cost Effectiveness Opportunity Analysis

Unit history and description Purpose and key functions Unit goals/priorities Brief history of unit on campus Organizational structure of the unit/staff bios (including student workers) 9 Unit History & Description

Mission Alignment Unit mission alignment with the university mission - QEP, UNC Tomorrow and the academic colleges/schools Past changes in unit purpose Anticipated changes to unit purpose 10 Alignment with mission/values

Program Demand Key users/participants Means for identifying and measuring demand Nature of interactions with other campus units Related programs and services provided by other units Unique contributions of this unit 11 Program Demand

Program Quality Means for identifying and measuring quality of programs or services (including top benchmarks used to assess quality) Description of how results are used for improvement (with examples) Major accomplishments of past 5 years related to unit functions AND/OR other contributions related to University goals. 12 Program Quality

Cost Effectiveness Means for identifying and measuring cost effectiveness (include top benchmarks used to assess cost effectiveness) Itemized revenues and expenses for last 3 years (including salaries) 13 Cost Effectiveness

Opportunity Analysis Possible enhancements to programs or services (including automation of processes, collaboration opportunities, outsourcing, etc.) Activities of other units that advance or hinder the effectiveness of your unit Redundant or secondary programs and services Comparison to peer or aspirant units Possibilities for cost savings 14 Opportunity Analysis

WCU Career Services/Cooperative Education Why we volunteered…… –Had data –Had a positive sense about the outcome –CAS summary from 2006 –Wanted to be first 15

Timeline Pre-Visit Site Visit December 9-11, August 6, 2009 Volunteered to be 1 st August 28, 2009 GET ORGANIZED; whos doing what September 2, 2009 Selected Review Team Mid October, 2009 Documentation to OIPE

Documents Submitted 17 Response to Criteria (15 pages) Executive Summary (1 ½ pages) Appendices Budget (3 years) (Cost Effective) Org Chart Resumes Staff University Activities (Value, Alignment, Opportunity Analysis, Cost Effective) CAS study (2006) (Demand, Quality, Cost Effective) Student usage (5 years) (Demand, Quality, Opportunity Analysis) Student and employer participation in career events (5 years) (Demand, Quality) Staff involvement in university activities (Value, Alignment, Opportunity Analysis, Cost Effective) Graphs of Evaluations of Events (Demand, Quality) Senior survey –responses to Career Services (Demand, Quality) Benchmark survey of Peer institutions (Cost Effective, Quality, Demand)

18 Timeline Site Visit November 2009 Planned group meetings, scheduled rooms – who, where and when December 4, 2009 Met with CS staff for last minute preparations December 9, 2009 Met external reviewer

19 Timeline Post-Visit January 30-31, 2010 Reviewers report received January present Implementing changes March 2010 PDP

Outcomes Recognition– word spreads fast Opportunity to get needs noticed…. Larger space, Add staff, Associate Director, Budget, Salaries, Travel Some Suggestions/recommendations for us.. +Visibility - Peer Career Mentors; Faculty Liaisons +On – line Services; Maximize Software +Expand Services - Collaborate with other offices; Service Learning, OIPE, etc. 20

Other Units Colleges Academic Program Lessons Learned Process Very different audiences –Greater number and variety Unit Administrative 21

Lessons LearnedProcess 2 Time Management o More meetings o More review team time Added pre-meeting Meetings on class schedule 22

Lessons LearnedProcess 3 Costs More More people involved Needs more time 23

Lessons LearnedSite Visit Response to Criteria and/or Executive Summary should be available for group members to review if requested Center director needs to meet with the review team early in the schedule 24

Lessons Learned For the Unit 25 Be thoughtful in the choosing of the review team, especially the external reviewer Meeting room clean, water/snacks available for participants

See our website for the presentation slides and handouts 26