Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages e3 (October 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1. CD11b+CD33+CD14+HLA-DR−/lo myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion by human immunodeficiency virus.
Advertisements

Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Epitope targeting and viral inoculum are determinants of Nef-mediated immune evasion of HIV-1 from cytotoxic T lymphocytes by Diana Y. Chen, Arumugam Balamurugan,
Constitutively Active β-Catenin Confers Multilineage Differentiation Potential on Lymphoid and Myeloid Progenitors  Yoshihiro Baba, Karla P. Garrett,
CD4+CD25+ Immunoregulatory T Cells
Transcription factor GATA-1 potently represses the expression of the HIV-1 coreceptor CCR5 in human T cells and dendritic cells by Mark S. Sundrud, Scott.
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (March 2016)
Th9 Cells Drive Host Immunity against Gastrointestinal Worm Infection
HIV-1 Latency by Transition
Local Inflammatory Cues Regulate Differentiation and Persistence of CD8+ Tissue- Resident Memory T Cells  Tessa Bergsbaken, Michael J. Bevan, Pamela J.
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Type 3 innate lymphoid cells induce proliferation of CD94+ natural killer cells  Shuo Li, PhD, Hideaki Morita, MD, PhD, Beate Rückert, Sci Tec, Tadech.
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 147, Issue 1, Pages e7 (July 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 141, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
T-box 21 transcription factor is responsible for distorted TH2 differentiation in human peripheral CD4+ T cells  Osamu Kaminuma, DVM, PhD, Fujiko Kitamura,
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (January 2017)
Acquisition of a Functional T Cell Receptor during T Lymphocyte Development Is Enforced by HEB and E2A Transcription Factors  Mary Elizabeth Jones, Yuan.
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 135, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
The Expression Pattern of Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Genes In Vivo Is Dependent upon the Differentiation Stage of the Infected B Cell  Gregory J Babcock,
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 158, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages e6 (April 2018)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Identification of a T Lineage-Committed Progenitor in Adult Blood
Blimp-1 Transcription Factor Is Required for the Differentiation of Effector CD8+ T Cells and Memory Responses  Axel Kallies, Annie Xin, Gabrielle T.
Human Inflammatory Dendritic Cells Induce Th17 Cell Differentiation
Engineering HIV-Resistant, Anti-HIV Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Effects of a Single Escape Mutation on T Cell and HIV-1 Co-adaptation
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Targeted Cleavage of Signaling Proteins by Caspase 3 Inhibits T Cell Receptor Signaling in Anergic T Cells  Irene Puga, Anjana Rao, Fernando Macian  Immunity 
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Cellular Heterogeneity in the Mouse Esophagus Implicates the Presence of a Nonquiescent Epithelial Stem Cell Population  Aaron D. DeWard, Julie Cramer,
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Cell-surface expression of CD4 reduces HIV-1 infectivity by blocking Env incorporation in a Nef- and Vpu-inhibitable manner  Juan Lama, Aram Mangasarian,
IL-9–expressing TH cells are highly enriched in CCR4+/CCR8+ effector memory TH cells. IL-9–expressing THcells are highly enriched in CCR4+/CCR8+effector.
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 766-775.e3 (October 2017) Transcriptional Reprogramming during Effector-to-Memory Transition Renders CD4+ T Cells Permissive for Latent HIV-1 Infection  Liang Shan, Kai Deng, Hongbo Gao, Sifei Xing, Adam A. Capoferri, Christine M. Durand, S. Alireza Rabi, Gregory M. Laird, Michelle Kim, Nina N. Hosmane, Hung-Chih Yang, Hao Zhang, Joseph B. Margolick, Linghua Li, Weiping Cai, Ruian Ke, Richard A. Flavell, Janet D. Siliciano, Robert F. Siliciano  Immunity  Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 766-775.e3 (October 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.014 Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Immunity 2017 47, 766-775.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.014) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Latent Infection by CCR5-tropic HIV-1 Is Not Efficient in Naive, Resting Memory, or Activated CD4+ T Cells (A and B) Replication competent HIV-1 (A) was isolated from resting CD4+ T cells of eight patients using a limiting dilution virus outgrowth assay. The patient from whom only CXCR4-tropic virus was recovered was highlighted in blue. Genomic DNA (B) was isolated from resting CD4+ T cells of 11 patients. Viral env sequences were analyzed by the PSSM system. (C and D) Bcl-2-transduced resting or activated CD4+ T cells were infected using a pseudotyped HIV-1 (NL4-3-Δenv-drEGFP) with a R5 (Yu-2) or X4 (NL4-3) envelope. HIV-1 gene expression was assessed by flow cytometry. Productive infection (C) was measured 3 days after infection. To generate latent infection, infected cells were cultured in basal medium without supplement of antibodies or cytokine for another 25 days before removal of GFP-positive cells. Latent infection (D) of Bcl-2-transduced CD4+ T cells was measured 2 days after reactivation of latent virus by stimulation with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies. The limit of detection of latent HIV-1 infection by flow cytometry is 0.01%. Blood samples from 12 healthy donors were used for the analysis. Immunity 2017 47, 766-775.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.014) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Latent Infection of CCR5-tropic HIV-1 Is Not Efficient in CCR5+ or CCR5− Resting Memory CD4+ T Cells (A) CD4+ T cells isolated from a healthy donor were stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies or left untreated for 3 days. Activated and resting (CD25−, CD69−, and HLA-DR−) CD4+ T cells were analyzed for CD45RO, CCR5, or CCR7 expression. (B) Resting memory CCR5+ or CCR5− CD4+ T cells were purified by sorting from freshly isolated healthy donor CD4+ T cells and cultured for 24 hr. Culture medium was then collected for the measurement of cytokine production. Activated CD4+ T cells were used as control. Error bars represent SEM, n = 3. (C) Productive and latent infection of resting memory CCR5+ CD4+ T cells. Three populations of Bcl-2-transduced CD4+ T cells were purified by FACS for infection experiments: (1) CCR5− activated cells, (2) CCR5+ memory cells, and (3) CCR5− memory cells. Purified cells were infected with NL4-3-Δenv-drEGFP pseudotyped with HIV-1-X4 or -R5 envelope. Error bars represent SEM, n = 3. Flow data were presented in standard, 4 log biexponential plots. In (B) and (C), data were pooled from three healthy donors. Immunity 2017 47, 766-775.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.014) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 EMT CD4+ T Cells Are More Susceptible to CCR5-tropic HIV-1 Infection due to Upregulation of CCR5 Expression (A) HIV-1 co-receptor expression and markers of T cell activation and proliferation were measured and compared in naive (CD25−, CD69−, HLA-DR−, and CD45RA+), fully activated, EMT, and resting memory (CD25−, CD69−, HLA-DR−, and CD45RO+) CD4+ T cells generated from freshly isolated healthy donor CD4+ T cells. (B and C) CCR5 gene transcription and surface expression in EMT CD4+ T cells. In (B), blood samples from ten healthy donors were used for CCR5 staining. In (C), data were pooled from two donors. (D and E) R5-tropic HIV-1 enters EMT CD4+ T cells expressing high level of CCR5. Data were pooled from two donors. (D) Total CD4+ T cells; (E) CCR5+ CD4+ T cells. Error bars represent SEM, n ≥ 3. t test values: ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗p < 0.01. See also Figures S1–S4. Immunity 2017 47, 766-775.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.014) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 CCR5-tropic HIV-1 Preferentially Infects EMT CD4+ T Cells CD4+ T cells isolated from healthy donor were used to generate resting, activated, and EMT CD4+ T cells. (A) 24 hr or 72 hr after infection of different CD4+ T cell populations with X4-tropic virus, late reverse transcription products were measured by qPCR and normalized to levels in activated cells. (B and C) Productive expression by R5-tropic HIV-1 was assessed by GFP expression 72 hr after infection. (D) CD4+ T cells at different activation states were co-transfected by electroporation (Lonza) with a proviral construct (pNL4-3-Δenv-drEGFP) with eGFP in the env ORF, and a control expression vector in which BFP expression was driven by SV40 promoter. GFP and BFP expression was measured 24 hr after transfection. Error bars represent SEM, n = 3. t test values: ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗p < 0.05. Data were pooled from three independent infections or transfections. See also Figure S5. Immunity 2017 47, 766-775.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.014) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Establishment of HIV-1 Latent Infection Occurs Preferentially in EMT CD4+ T Cells Freshly isolated CD4+ T cells from healthy donors were used in (A)–(C). Bcl2-transduced CD4+ T cells from healthy donors were used in (D) and (E). (A) Microarray analysis of gene transcription profile was performed in CD4+ T cells at different activation states. The top 100 most upregulated (comparing to resting cells) and top 50 most upregulated NF-κB responsive genes in activated CD4+ T cells were represented. Three healthy donor CD4+ T cells were used for microarray analysis. (B) Cytokine production was measured from CD4+ T cells at different activation states. Data were pooled from three independent experiments. (C) CD4+ T cells at different activation states were infected with NL4-3-Δnef-EGFP pseudotyped with X4 envelope. Individual GFP-positive cells were purified by single cell sorting 24 hr after infection for mRNA isolation and quantification. Quantitative measurement of pol2a and HIV-1 gag transcripts was performed in individual HIV-1-infected cells. Data were pooled from two healthy donor CD4+ T cells. (D and E) NL4-3-Δenv-drEGFP pseudotyped with HIV-1-X4 or -R5 envelope was used to infect CD4+ T cells at different activation states. Productive (D) and latent (E) infection was measured as describe in Figure 1. Data were pooled from six healthy donor CD4+ T cells. Error bars represent SEM, n ≥ 3. t test values: ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗p < 0.05. See also Figures S6 and S7. Immunity 2017 47, 766-775.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.014) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Latent HIV-1 Is Enriched in CCR5+ Resting Memory CD4+ T Cells from HIV-1 Patients (A) Frequency of HIV-1 proviral DNA in naive, CCR5−CD45RO+, and CCR5+CD45RO+ resting CD4+ T cells was measured by qPCR. t test values: ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗p < 0.05. (B) Frequency of latent HIV-1 in CCR5− and CCR5+ resting memory CD4+ T cells was measured by limiting dilution virus outgrowth assay. Ratio-paired t test was performed for statistical analysis. (C) Relative contribution of CCR5+ and CCR5− subsets to the reservoir for latent HIV-1 in memory CD4+ T cells in each patient was calculated according to the frequency of latently infected cells in each subset and the frequency of each subset in the whole memory CD4+ T cell population. Immunity 2017 47, 766-775.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.014) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 HIV-1-Specific CTLs Inhibits Latent HIV-1 Infection in EMT CD4+ T Cells (A) Patient-derived Bcl-2-transduced EMT CD4+ T cells were infected with NL4-3-Δenv-drEGFP pseudotyped with HIV-1 R5 envelope. Autologous CD8+ T cells pre-stimulated with Gag peptides mixture were added to the culture 24 hr after infection at the ratio of 1:1. Productive infection with (dotted line) or without (solid line) the presence of autologous CD8+ T cells was monitored over time by FACS. (B) GFP-positive cells as well as CD8+ T cells described in (A) were removed from the co-culture 15 days after infection. The remaining cells were stimulated with CD3&CD28 antibodies for the measurement of latent infection. Data were pooled from three HIV-1 patient samples. Error bars represent SEM, n = 3. t test values: ∗p < 0.05. Immunity 2017 47, 766-775.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.014) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions