Study of split-off events in PandaRoot

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lauri A. Wendland: Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle flow algorithm at CMS, cHarged08, Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle.
Advertisements

Particle Flow Template Modular Particle Flow for the ILC Purity/Efficiency-based PFA PFA Module Reconstruction Jet Reconstruction Stephen Magill Argonne.
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
Simulation of Z->jets in CMS Outline –Introduction –Technique –Results –Conclusion.
Alessandro Fois Detection of  particles in B meson decay.
EF with simple multi-particle states Vishnu V. Zutshi NIU/NICADD.
Ties Behnke, Vasiliy Morgunov 1SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Pflow in SNARK: the next steps Ties Behnke, SLAC and DESY; Vassilly Morgunov, DESY and.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
Algorithm design for MAPS clustering Bradley Hopkinson / Birmingham Introduction: ● Using LDC01 detector model in Mokka ● MAPS Mokka geometry (Yoshi.
Status of EMC background data Tim West University of Manchester.
Potpourri Vishnu V. Zutshi Northern Illinois University.
Dave Risch. Project Specifications There is a “knapsack” that you want to fill with the most valuable items that are available to you. Each item has a.
Status of calorimeter simulations Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
Cluster Finding Comparisons Ron Cassell SLAC. Clustering Studies This report studies clustering in the EM calorimeter, using SLIC simulated ttbar events.
Fast reconstruction of tracks in the inner tracker of the CBM experiment Ivan Kisel (for the CBM Collaboration) Kirchhoff Institute of Physics University.
Neighborhood-Based Topology Recognition in Sensor Networks S.P. Fekete, A. Kröller, D. Pfisterer, S. Fischer, and C. Buschmann Corby Ziesman.
Simulation of the energy response of  rays in CsI crystal arrays Thomas ZERGUERRAS EXL-R3B Collaboration Meeting, Orsay (France), 02/02/ /03/2006.
24 June Thoughts on Jet Corrections in Top Quark Decays Outline: 1. List of some issues regarding jets 2. Figures of merit 3. Eg: Underlying Event.
PFA Template Concept Performance Mip Track and Interaction Point ID Cluster Pointing Algorithm Single Particle Tests of PFA Algorithms S. Magill ANL.
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
Two Density-based Clustering Algorithms L. Xia (ANL) V. Zutshi (NIU)
1 Calorimetry Simulations Norman A. Graf for the SLAC Group January 10, 2003.
Track Finding based on a Cellular Automaton Ivan Kisel Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Uni-Heidelberg Tracking Week, GSI January 24-25, 2005 KIP.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Experimental Search for the Decay K. Mizouchi (Kyoto University) (1) Physics Motivation (2) Detector (3) Selection Criteria (4) Branching Ratio (5) Background.
Optimization of  exclusion cut for the  + and  (1520) analysis Takashi Nakano Based on Draft version of Technical Note 42.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
PFAs – A Critical Look Where Does (my) SiD PFA go Wrong? S. R. Magill ANL ALCPG 10/04/07.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
The method of the low-energy antiproton identification by stopping in the coordinate- sensitive PAMELA calorimeter 1 Svetlana Rodenko (MEPhI) Moscow International.
Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1.
Cellular Automaton Method for Track Finding (HERA-B, LHCb, CBM) Ivan Kisel Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Uni-Heidelberg Second FutureDAQ Workshop, GSI.
1 D.Chakraborty – VLCW'06 – 2006/07/21 PFA reconstruction with directed tree clustering Dhiman Chakraborty for the NICADD/NIU software group Vancouver.
Status of the hadronic cross section (small angle) Federico Nguyen February 22 nd 2005  the 2002 data sample and available MC sets  trigger efficiency.
BESIII EMC Simulation & Reconstruction He Miao
1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.
Alain Romeyer - Sept Light Higgs search in SUSY cascades Introduction (Previous studies) Plans for this analysis Simulation chain Reconstruction.
Jet reconstruction with Deterministic Annealing Davide Perrino Dipartimento di Fisica – INFN di Bari Terzo Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di Alice – 13/11/2007.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
Taikan Suehara et al., CERN, 21 Oct page 1 Flavor tagging performance in multi-jet environments (a part of LCFIVertex study) Taikan Suehara.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD-WG2, July
Genetic Algorithm(GA)
Full Simulation Session SuperB General Meeting
Inclusive Tag-Side Vertex Reconstruction in Partially Reconstructed B decays -A Progress Report - 11/09/2011 TDBC-BRECO.
ITS “parallel” tracking
SiD tracking using VXD as a primary tracking device
DCH missing turn analysis
Distributed Clustering for Online Event Reconstruction
CMS-Bijing weekly meeting
Top Tagging at CLIC 1.4TeV Using Jet Substructure
T2 Jet Reconstruction Studies
Introduction Goal: Can we reconstruct the energy depositions of the proton in the brain if we are able to reconstruct the photons produced during this.
Validation of valid3 samples Zee(106050) and Jpsiee(105751)
Track Extrapolation/Shower Reconstruction in a Digital HCAL
CLAS12 MesonEx trigger studies
Individual Particle Reconstruction
EFA/DHCal development at NIU
Prospects for sparticle reconstruction at new SUSY benchmark points
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
 discrimination with converted photons
Background understanding and detector inefficiency
Current Status of EMC Reconstruction
Experimental Search for the Decay
Song LIANG CMS-IHEP/Beijing group meeting
BesMUC Reconstruction Algorithm
Problems in π0 Reconstruction
Presentation transcript:

Study of split-off events in PandaRoot Áron Kripkó

Split offs In some cases a secondary maximum is created a few crystals away from the impinging point of the primary photon The currently used algorithm usually reconstructs these events as individual photons - wrongly Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

The Problem Many low energy photons are created falsely In case of 10000 simulated events, more than 92000 photons are reconstructed Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Possible solutions Modify the default algorithm Merging Try out other algorithms: Island algorithm Cellular automaton Machine learning Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Default Algorithm Loops over all digis If one of the neighbors of the digi is in a cluster it puts it into the cluster If not a new cluster is created If a digi belongs to 2 clusters, the clusters are merged Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Default Algorithm – Bump splitting Based on certain criteria, it splits the created clusters Searches for local maxima with a certain condition Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Default Algorithm with merging Before the bump splitting those clusters, which will not be split by the bump splitter are merged Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Island algorithm Searches for seeds: local maxima with sufficiently high energy Puts digis to the cluster while moving in phi and theta until a rise in energy (>5%) or a hole is found The remaining digis are put into the closest cluster Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Cellular automaton Searches for seeds as previously The cells “infect” their neighbors with their seed-number Cells with the same number go to the same cluster Unmarked cells in the end are assigned to clusters as previously Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Measures of the reconstruction Number of events in the peak – not accurate, depends on the window Use the MC information for cluster definition: if a track created a digi, then all digis created by this track or its daughter tracks should be in one cluster and no other digis Count the number of digis with the same ID to determine the clusters ID Measures: The difference between the numbers of created and reconstructed clusters - event Purity: number of digis with other IDs in the cluster - cluster Completeness: number of digis with the same ID in other clusters - cluster Uniqueness: number of clusters with same ID - event Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Results – 100 events, 5 gammas/evt, 5 GeV Default Merging Island Cellular 1028 396 381 377 Cluster difference 4915 5484 4669 4214 Purity 39087 9649 8658 8257 Completeness 1123 178 204 177 Uniqueness 393 380 392 Counts in 4.7-5.2 Measures: The difference between the numbers of created and reconstructed clusters - event Purity: number of digis with other IDs in the cluster - cluster Completeness: number of digis with the same ID in other clusters - cluster Uniqueness: number of clusters with same ID - event Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Results – 100 events, 5 gammas/evt, 1 GeV Default Merging Island Cellular 448 215 191 189 Cluster difference 1408 1931 2027 1538 Purity 7878 2530 2891 1929 Completeness 563 112 139 94 Uniqueness 356 374 368 372 Counts in 0.95-1.05 Measures: The difference between the numbers of created and reconstructed clusters - event Purity: number of digis with other IDs in the cluster - cluster Completeness: number of digis with the same ID in other clusters - cluster Uniqueness: number of clusters with same ID - event Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Peak Shapes Merging Island Cellular Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Results – 10000 events, 5 gammas/evt, 5 GeV Default Merging Island Cellular 106919 36593 35585 36049 Cluster difference 491221 549496 455822 428613 Purity 3831232 916144 889954 876243 Completeness 114508 18550 20927 19483 Uniqueness Measures: The difference between the numbers of created and reconstructed clusters - event Purity: number of digis with other IDs in the cluster - cluster Completeness: number of digis with the same ID in other clusters - cluster Uniqueness: number of clusters with same ID - event Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Decays 𝜋 + 𝜇 + 𝑝 𝑝 J/𝜓 𝜇 − 𝜋 − Default Merging Island Cellular 387 128 160 Cluster difference 62 234 475 333 Purity 4721 1499 2760 2162 Completeness 388 161 202 159 Uniqueness Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Decays 𝛾 𝜋 0 𝛾 𝛾 𝑝 𝑝 𝜂 𝛾 𝛾 𝜋 0 𝛾 Default Merging Island Cellular 655 425 428 427 Cluster difference 2062 2603 2380 1680 Purity 13271 4163 6523 5042 Completeness 787 207 317 231 Uniqueness Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Decays 𝛾 𝜋 0 𝛾 𝛾 𝑝 𝑝 𝜂 𝛾 𝛾 𝜋 0 𝛾 Default Merging Island Cellular Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Conclusions Split off events create high combinatorial background All newly implemented algorithms are better than the default one They perform almost the same – the user should decide which to use Further studies are needed Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen

Plans Currently working on machine learning Algorithms: Benchmarking Optimization A wrapper class for all Try other algorithms Experiment with other neighbor definitions Study of split-off events in PandaRoot – Áron Kripkó – JLU Gießen