Spring 2011 Marco Valtorta mgv@cse.sc.edu CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Three Simple Cases by Robert Barger: Absolutist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DIGNITY THROUGH ACTION WORKSHOP
Advertisements

Letters of Recommendation A Practical Guide for Obtaining Effective References.
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Department of Computer Science and Engineering CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch.3: Philosophic.
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Department of Computer Science and Engineering CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch.3: Philosophic.
IST346: Information Ethics. Ethics  Ethics are the principles of conduct that govern a group of people.  Ethics are not morals.  Morals are the proclamation.
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Department of Computer Science and Engineering CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch.3: Philosophic.
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Department of Computer Science and Engineering CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch.6: The.
Deputy Registrar 035 Grant And Title System For Financial institutions.
I Can Stay Safe Online!. We can use the computer to…
ADVISING NOTES AND PRIVACY AdvisingAugust ON FERPA The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is a federal law designed to protect the.
Building a Privacy Foundation. Setting the Standard for Privacy Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Patient Bill of Rights Federal.
Online Safety 6th grade. Rules to know Protect your privacy Protect your password Protect the privacy of others Beware of contests, clubs, prizes, & gifts.
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Department of Computer Science and Engineering CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Three Simple.
© 2015 albert-learning.com How to talk to your boss How to talk to your boss!!
My Digital Footprint. How Might Your Digital Foot Print Effect Your Future Opportunities Your Digital Foot Print is an interesting trail that you could.
Pitfalls of your first paper Shu Cai Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Avalon Science and Engineering Fair 2015 Let’s Get Started Science and Engineering Fair packets will go home this week. All 2 nd, 3 rd, 4 th and 5 th.
Welcome to Parent’s Rights SEPAC Meeting September 26, 2016.
Social Media August 2014.
Unit 2 – Data Collection & Problem Solving
answer the questions and check your answers by clicking on blue arrows
Complex Ethical Dilemmas
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
What Do You Think? The principal is walking down the hall at the end of lunch, hurrying students to class. As he passes the bathroom, he smells marijuana.
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
Hello? Using the telephone
ROADMAP TO INITIAL ELIGIBILITY
Road Map In this presentation, you will learn:
Keeping safe and private on the internet
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
Emotional Regulation: Checking the Facts
Internet Safety Guidelines
Text Purpose.
I Can Stay Safe Online! Read the title slide with the students or have the group read it aloud. Introduce the lesson by saying that we can use the computer.
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
Level 4 Diploma in Dance Teaching
Online Probation Workshop
Experiencia #2 Communicative Objective:
PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS PRACTICE
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
Lecture 2: Data Collecting and Sampling
CSCE 390 Fall 2016 Four Cases by Robert N. Barger
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
Fall 2014 Marco Valtorta CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Three Simple Cases by Robert Barger: Absolutist.
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
Computer Science Testing.
Problem EP 16-4, Page 882 At the end of her audit of Jolie Angelique Inc., Emma concludes that there are material misstatements affecting many accounts,
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
Here are some good questions to start out the presentation:
FERPA The Buckley Amendment.
First Grade Sight Words
PHYS 202 Intro Physics II Catalog description: A continuation of PHYS 201 covering the topics of electricity and magnetism, light, and modern physics.
Fall 2017 Marco Valtorta CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Three Simple Cases by Robert Barger: Absolutist.
Why study ethics?.
Bartering and Trading.
Welcome to UNC-Chapel Hill
Trick Words Level 1 Press space bar to begin and then again after student has read each word.
Trick Words 1st grade.
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
Key Academic Words If you know these words you will be able to respond to FRQ prompts more appropriately & earn more points.
Fall 2016 Marco Valtorta CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Three Simple Cases by Robert Barger: Absolutist.
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
Registration Overview 2019 UCF Orientation Program
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
Active Learning Let’s get physical!.
Example 1 Scenario: You come into the office and find you have 5 active tickets in your queue: -- Ticket 1: customer requests a password reset -- Ticket.
NCFE Business Administration L2 Communication
Presentation transcript:

Spring 2011 Marco Valtorta mgv@cse.sc.edu CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Three Simple Cases by Robert Barger: Absolutist and Relativist Positions Spring 2011 Marco Valtorta mgv@cse.sc.edu The slides are based on the textbook and other sources Reference: http://www.nd.edu/~rbarger/metaethics.html, written in 1993, accessed 2010-02-04

The Piracy Dilemma Here is the piracy dilemma (i.e., a dilemma concerning wrongful appropriation of computing resources). Suppose I use my account on one of my university's mainframe computers for something that has no direct relation to University business. This use could be anything from sending an e-mail message to a friend, to conducting a full-blown private business on the computer (billing, payroll, inventory, etc.). The absolutist [idealist or realist] solution to this dilemma would probably be that the above-described activities are unethical -- whether only the e-mail message is involved, or the larger-scale business activities (although the absolutist would recognize a difference between the two in the amount of wrong being done). On the other hand, a relativist [pragmatist or existentialist] might say that the latter activities were wrong because they tied up too much memory and slowed down the machine's operation, but the e-mail message wasn't wrong because it had no significant effect on operations.

Student Privacy Dilemma Next consider a dilemma having to do with privacy. I use my account to acquire the cumulative grade point average of a student who is in a class which I instruct. I obtained the password for this restricted information from someone in the Records Office who erroneously thought that I was the student's advisor. The absolutist [idealist] solution to this dilemma would probably be that I acted wrongly, since the only person who is entitled to this information is the student and his or her advisor. The relativist [pragmatist] would probably ask why I wanted the information. If I said that I wanted it to be sure that my grading of the student was consistent with the student's overall academic performance record, the relativist might agree that such use was acceptable. [Note that laws are now in place that govern this type of situation]

Power and Computer Accounts [L]et us look at a dilemma concerning power. While I was a Professor at another university, if I wanted a computer account all I had to do was request one. But if I was a student at that university, I must obtain faculty sponsorship in order to receive an account. An absolutist (possibly because of a proclivity for hierarchical thinking) might not have a problem with this dual standard. A relativist, on the other hand, might question what makes these two cases essentially different (e.g., Are faculty assumed to have more need for computers than students? Are students more likely to cause problems on the system than faculty? Is this a hold-over from the days of "in loco parentis?").