Mod 209 – Rolling AQ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seasonal Normal Weather Base
Advertisements

Energy Balancing Credit Proposal MOD 315 Energy Balancing Credit Proposal MOD 315 To Enhance Section X of the UNC Transportation Principal Document to.
1 Project Nexus Modelling costs and benefits Andrew Wallace, Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus IA Subgroup 25 July 2012.
© 2007 E.ON Nexus AQ Requirements To support the current business processes We need to maintain performance and enable market operation as is using current.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic) Meeting 3, 18 th July 2011.
Individual Meter Point Reconciliation. What? Calculation of actual energy used at meter point level for all supply points Allow sites to be accurately.
Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
Copyright 2013 by Baringa Partners LLP. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary. PPA Route to Market Imbalance Risk Analysis An Update Oliver.
Senior Stakeholder Forum 04/02/2014. Agenda UK-Link Programme Update –Including Data Cleansing Update Nexus Modification Update Faster Switching EU Reform.
1 Project Smart Metering Portfolio Foundation Updates June 2013.
Implementation of Non Effective Days Nexus Workgroup – March
21 May 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Mod 115 An alternative view Phil Broom Gaz de France ESS.
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
PN UNC Workgroup Supply Point Register 25 th October 2011.
Project Nexus Workgroup AQ Backstop Date Options 7 th October 2014.
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
MOD506 – Gas Performance Assurance Framework and Governance Arrangements.
Performance Assurance 21 st May Value Chain. Value Chain Xoserve would like to propose an approach to further aid the development of the Performance Assurance.
Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February : Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following.
11 User Pays User Committee 12th November Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
AQ Tolerance Proposal Mod 209 – August Page 2Theme Date Department AQ Tolerances  Provide a view of appropriate tolerances for AQ validation 
Modification Proposal 0395 & 0398 – Limitation on Retrospective Invoicing and Invoice Correction 1 st December 2011.
1 Review Group 264 Rules & Options Analysis for BSSOQ Methodology Changes Post MOD th September 2009.
ScottishPower, Energy Retail MOD 282 – Introduction of a process to manage Long Term Vacant Sites May 2010 Elaine Carr ScottishPower.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2014/15 15 th May 2013.
Version PNUNC AQ Principles Workgroup Mod 0209 – Rolling AQ Presenter: Steve Nunnington 23 rd March 2010.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 24 th October Objectives of the Workgroups To determine detailed business requirements Consider/review comments made.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
CONFIDENTIAL - Mod Initial Business Rules © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
Supply Point Register 7th December 2011
Supply Point Register 21st November 2011
Supply Point Register 10th January 2012
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
Options for Mod 640 Replacement
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement - Update
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 4th October 2011.
Rebecca Knight Mod 644 UIG Analysis.
Incentives 26 September 2018.
Project Nexus Workgroup
UNC Modification 0335 – Offtake Metering Error Payment Timescales
Rolling AQ Review Group 177.
Impacts of Project Nexus Implementation Date to AQ17
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
Key Value Indicators (KVIs)
Project Nexus Workgroup
Mod Proposal 0268 : AQ Backstop Date
Actions for Mod209 Workgroup
Transporter Initiated SPA Confirmations on behalf of User Potential Impact Discussion with UK Link Committee.
AUG Query Responses 21st November 2013.
Modification proposal 330
UK Link Replacement Programme additional supporting UNC modifications
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
Deferral of Retrospective Updates Functionality
Project Nexus Workgroup
Overview of RbD Risk Modelling 31 March 2008
AQ Threshold Analysis Steve Taylor Centrica plc.
UNC Modification 0634 (Urgent) – Post Implementation Assessment
Review Group 177 Rolling AQ.
Modification Proposal 136
Project Nexus Workgroup
COR3007: UNC MOD 450B – Monthly revision of erroneous SSP AQs outside the User AQ Review Period Implementation UK Link Committee – May 2014.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
Customer Issue Management CoMC Update
Enabling Large Scale Utilisation of Class 3
Customer Issue Management Dashboard CoMC - July 2019
Customer Issue Management Dashboard CoMC - July 2019
Customer Issue Management Dashboard CoMC
Customer Issue Management Dashboard CoMC
Presentation transcript:

Mod 209 – Rolling AQ

Rationale for the proposal Current AQ process has operated in much the same form and timescales since inception of code AQ is a fundamental piece of information used throughout the industry Although AQ is a historical calculation it is used as a proxy for future consumption Consumption patterns are changing, evidence shows that demand is reducing, and the current process can create AQs that are on average 18 months old at the time they are applied Where demand is changing more radically this can increase commercial risk for Shippers and Transporters Theme Date Department

Review Group 177 E.ON raised review group 177 to assess the potential for changing from an annual AQ change to a more regular update Annual process causes ‘shocks’ on 1st October Significant manpower required over a short period Significant impacts to the UKLink system AQ errors can be difficult or slow to correct Regular updates smooth the impact across the year AQ can respond faster to demand change AQ errors can be corrected faster System security is improved Manpower resources can be consistent across the year Should allow Smart Meter benefits to be incorporated more rapidly Theme Date Department

Modification 209 Review group 177 provided assurance that others across the industry also saw benefits from changing the AQ update process A straw man was derived but didn’t resolve more detailed questions With a complex issue like this it seems sensible to have developed a better understanding of the detailed requirements before proceeding to consultation See this process as enabling the group to clarify how rolling AQ could be implemented in practice to enable full and informed responses to consultation Theme Date Department