Assessment and Improvement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

Embedding Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes in Regularly Scheduled Assignments Dr. Larry H. Kelley Auburn, Alabama
General Education Assessment 2013: Introduction
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Assessment Plans Discussion Career Services Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer February 6, 2006.
QU’s Core Curriculum Program. About Qatar University’s Core Curriculum Program What is QU’s Core Curriculum Program? What are Its Main Features?  What.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
1. An ability to:  Understand the academic requirements you need to obtain your degree  Calculate your GPA  Prepare a draft schedule 2.
The Current Refocusing of General Education. Objectives for the Workshop Proposing and/or Renewing a Course Assessing the general education aspect of.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Assessing Students Ability to Communicate Effectively— Findings from the College of Technology & Computer Science College of Technology and Computer Science.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost Gainesville, FL THE BASICS OF STUDENT LEARNING.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Faculty Driven Assessment Karla Guilford Shipp Tidewater Community College Virginia Beach, VA.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Transfer Course Credit – Institutions of Higher Education Credit for Prior Learning Industry Recognized Credentials/Test Credit AGC – March 2016.
Core Curriculum Workgroup Presentation to UEAC April 16, 2010.
325K: COMBINED PRIORITY FOR PERSONNEL PREPARATION Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
325D: PREPARATION OF LEADERSHIP PERSONNEL Webinar on Project Objective and Performance Measures for the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding.
Transfer Course Credit – Institutions of Higher Education Credit for Prior Learning Industry Recognized Credentials/Test Credit AGC – February 2016.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Quantitative Reasoning Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Fall 2017 Cohort Welcome to the
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
UNIVERSITY 101: Curriculum and GE
Data You Can Use for Accreditation
Introduction to Curriculum Mapping
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Consider Your Audience
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
Assessment of Student Learning
Placing courses in local GE patterns: Models for Effective Practice
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Curriculum and Accreditation
Curriculum and Accreditation
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment
Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation Module
Timothy S. Brophy, Director of Institutional Assessment
The General Education CLAS Core
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
The Pain and Promise of CRITICAL CORE Implementation
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
March 25, 2014 Dr. Adena Williams Loston President
Clark Atlanta University’s Six-Step Institutional Assessment
Center for Academic Programs Assessment
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
General Education Redesign Task Force
Shazna Buksh, School of Social Sciences
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK!
Criminal Investigation Program School of Science, Health, and CJ Fall 2015 Assessment Report
PLA from a SACSCOC Perspective
Curriculum Committee Report
Online Undergraduate Psychology B.A. Program
Center for Academic Programs Assessment
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Be Advised: Academic Advisement & General Education
Core Concepts of the Standards 2019
Spring 19 Master of Science in Health Care Administration (MS-HCA)
Seone S. Lolesio, Kesaia Seniloli and Emalini Nakabea
Presentation transcript:

Assessment and Improvement 3rd Annual CAU GE Faculty Retreat Presented By: Dr. Lauren Lopez, AVP and SACSCOC Accreditation Liaison Officer Ms. Stephanie Suddith, Assessment and Program Evaluation Coordinator THE OFFICE OF PLANNING, ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH

WHY Do We Assess General Education? SACSCOC: Core Requirement 8.2.b General Education Rationale: This standard ensures that general education competencies are specifically addressed by establishing expected learning outcomes, assessing these outcomes, and providing evidence of seeking improvements based on the findings. This Core Requirement establishes 2 key principles regarding general education courses: Is based on a coherent rationale General education courses are college-level and comprise a substantial component of each undergraduate degree. Office of Planning, Assessment and Institutional Research

WHY Do We Assess General Education? SACSCOC: Core Requirement 9.3 Educational Program Structure & Content Rationale: The institution requires the successful completion of a general education component at the undergraduate level that: This Core Requirement establishes 3 key principles regarding general education courses: is based on a coherent rationale. is a substantial component of each undergraduate degree program for baccalaureate programs, a minimum of 30 semester hours or the equivalent. ensures breadth of knowledge. These credit hours include at least one course from each of the following areas: humanities/fine arts, social/ behavioral sciences, and natural science/mathematics. These courses do not narrowly focus on those skills, techniques, and procedures specific to a particular occupation or profession. (General education requirements) [CR] Office of Planning, Assessment and Institutional Research

ACTION PLAN for Improvement AY 2018-2019 Utilization of Fall 2018 to strategically plan GE’s: Planning & Preparations Activities Development of the Assessment Schedule for the GE Core Competencies Identifying GE Assessment Liaisons Development of the University Learning Goals (UGLs) Improvement to IMPROVE Office of Planning, Assessment and Institutional Research

COMING Summer 2019 Aligning GE Competencies to the Undergraduate Academic Programs Aligning University Learning Goals (UGLs) to Undergraduate and Graduate Academic Degree Programs Office of Planning, Assessment and Institutional Research

ASSESSMENT Data Preparation Select Key Assessment Assignment (i.e. exam, written assignment, project, presentation, etc) Collect the results (scores) for this assessment, Each Assessment should be a evaluated using GE rubric (attachment). Rubric scores from 1 to 4. Use the percent conversions listed under the rubric to obtain the rubric score for each student. Calculate the percentage of students in your class who have earned a 2 or higher. Insert your results/findings using the following exact language Ex. At least 70% of the students completing the Position paper are expected to score a 3 or higher on the evaluation rubric in CSCJ215) Office of Planning, Assessment and Institutional Research

GE AY 2017-2018 Assessment Summary Competency Total General Education Appreciative Of Humanities And Fine Arts Communication Skills Critical And Creative Thinking Financial, Quantitative, Technologies, Scientific Literacy Integrative And Collaborative Learning Multicultural And Global Interactions Personal And Professional Ethics, Human Values And Holistic Wellness Total # Courses 85 15 11 22 39 2 18 12 Courses Completed Assessment 24 (28% Conducted Assessment) CMUS120 CENG 105 CENG 106 CBIO 111L CBIO101 CMUS 120 CPHI 105 CPHY 102 CBIO 101 CBIO111 CPHY 121 CPHY 111 CSCJ 337 CSCJ 387 CENG 201 CENG 202 CHIS 212 CHIS 201 CPSY 211 CPSY 218 CPSY 301 CSCJ 215 CSCJ 216 CSCJ 218 CSCJ 310 Key Assessment Final Exam Essay Final Project Writing Assignment Research Project Lab Report Written Final Exam N/A % Criteria Met 91.6% 100% 80% 85.7% Office of Planning, Assessment and Institutional Research

GE Assessment in IMPROVE Result Assessment Year Criterion Met Assessment Tool Criteria of Success Assessment Schedule (when assessed) Section(s) Assessed Planned Action for Improvement/Enhancement

Thank You Dr. Lauren Lopez x6294 Llopez@cau.edu www.cau.edu/opar/institutional-assessment Ms. Stephanie Suddith x8655 Ssuddith@cau.edu www.cau.edu/opar/institutional-assessment