Sno Unit testing tool MaNIK BALI NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating Calibration of MODIS Thermal Emissive Bands Using Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer Measurements Yonghong Li a, Aisheng Wu a, Xiaoxiong.
Advertisements

A Fundamental Climate Data Record for the AVHRR Jonathan Mittaz Manik Bali & Andrew Harris CICS/ESSIC University of Maryland.
Global Space-based Inter-calibration System (GSICS) 4 th WCRP Observations and Assimilation Panel (WOAP) Meeting Barbara J. Ryan Director, WMO Space Programme.
1 Detection and Determination of Channel Frequency Shift in AMSU-A Observations Cheng-Zhi Zou and Wenhui Wang IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada, July 24-28,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Effective shift of SRF assuming 2.1  m ice Global Space-based Inter-Calibration.
Xiangqian Wu and Mitch Goldberg NOAA/NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) P1.16 GLOBAL SPACE-BASED INTER-CALIBRATION SYSTEM (GSICS)
Global Space-based Inter- Calibration System (GSICS) Progress Report Mitch Goldberg, NOAA/NESDIS GSICS Executive Panel chair.
Bias analysis and correction for MetOp/AVHRR IR channel using AVHRR-IASI inter-comparison Tiejun Chang and Xiangqian Wu GSICS Joint Research and data Working.
June, GSICS USER GUIDE Using GSICS Products and Services Manik Bali, Tim Hewison, Larry Flynn and Jerome Lafeuille 2016 GSICS Executive Panel Meeting.
GSICS meeting 5-8 March 2012, Beijing, China Slide: 1 Discussion Using GOME and SCIAMACHY as re- calibration reference for Visible and Near-Infrared channels.
Inter-Sensor Comparison for Soumi NPP CrIS Likun Wang 1, Yong Han 2*, Denis Tremblay 3, Fuzhong Weng 2, and Mitch Goldberg 4 1. CICS/ESSIC/University of.
2013 GSICS Joint Meeting, Williamsburg VA, USA, March GSICS Collaboration Servers Status: 2013 Peter Miu (EUMETSAT) CMA, CNES, EUMETSAT, ISRO,
GSICS MW products and a path forward.?
GSICS Telecon July 2012 AVHRR, MODIS, VIIRS Radiance Monitoring in MICROS and GSICS help to SST Sasha Ignatov.
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
GSICS Inter-Calibration for Infrared Bands with Hyperspectral Sounder
Minimising Uncertainty in SBAF - Using AIRS to bridge gap HIRS/2-IASI GSICS meeting, March 2014, Darmstadt, Germany - Change title to more general one.
Manik Bali, Aleksandar Jelenak
VIS/NIR reference instrument requirements
Report to 8th GSICS Exec Panel
In-orbit Microwave Reference Records
Traceability and Uncertainty of GSICS Infrared Reference Sensors
JMA’s GSICS and SCOPE-CM activities Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group II session, agenda item 3 (from MTSAT-2) Japan Meteorological Agency.
GSICS Data Management and Availability to Users
Fangfang Yu and Fred Wu 22 March 2011
Document Management System
Closing the GEO-ring Tim Hewison
Manik Bali1 Cheng-Zhi Zou2 and Ralph Ferraro2 1ESSIC/CICS, 2NOAA
Manik Bali Jonathan Mittaz
Inter-Sensor Comparison for Soumi NPP CrIS
Building-in a Validation cycle for GSICS Products
Combining Multiple References
2b. GSICS Coordination Centre (GCC)
GSICS MW products and a path forward.?
GSICS Coordination Center GSICS EP- Debrief
Update on GSICS Product Development
Infrared Inter-Calibration Product Announcements
MW Products and Deliverables
GSICS IR Reference Uncertainty & Traceability Report
GSICS Research Working Group Web Meeting :00-13:00 UTC Reference Instruments and their Traceability.
GRWG+GDWG Web Meeting on Calibration Change Alerts
Intercalibration of AMSU-A,MHS and Update on mitigating loss of AATSR
Preparatory Web meeting for 2018 Annual Meeting in Shanghai, China
Viju John, Rob Roebeling, Tim Hewison
SRF Retrieval Using VIIRS/AIRS/IASI radiances
Use of GSICS to Improve Operational Radiometric Calibration
Masaya Takahashi1, Yusuke Yogo1, Qiang Guo2, Xiuqing Hu2, and Na Xu2
GSICS IR Reference Uncertainty & Traceability Report Tim Hewison
GSICS Products’ Improvements and Developments
GSICS Server Upgrade - Requirements for New Deliverables
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
Monitoring SLSTR calibration using IASI: status and way forward
Formation of IR Sub-Group and Reference Selection
Tim Hewison1 and all GSICS Developers EUMETSAT
Presentation of GSICS Inter-Calibration Results - Web Displays
Progress with GRUAN observations in comparisons with
Monitoring SLSTR calibration using IASI: status and way forward
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
Why use NWP for GSICS? It is crucial for climate and very desirable for NWP that we understand the characteristics of satellite radiance biases Simultaneous.
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
Infrared Sub-Group Report Tim Hewison
Masaya Takahashi1, Yusuke Yogo1, Qiang Guo2, Xiuqing Hu2, and Na Xu2
GSICS IR Reference Uncertainty & Traceability Report
Sno Prediction and Unit testing
Selecting a GSICS reference instrument IR , VIS and Microwave
Traceability and Uncertainty of GSICS Infrared Reference Sensors
How good is IASI-A as an in-orbit reference in GSICS in LWIR and IR
Towards a GSICS DCC product...
GSICS Newsletter Microwave mini issue
Presentation transcript:

Sno Unit testing tool MaNIK BALI NOAA/NESDIS/STAR

Contents Introduction SNO Code Input and Output Unit Testing Method Conclusions.

Introduction Simultaneous Nadir overpass algorithm produces collocation between two instruments. This algorithm lies at the heart of the Classical GSICS product generation. Accuracy and precision of this code is critical to instrument monitoring, anomaly detection and correction. There is a need to have a unit testing suite for the SNO algorithm. Aim is to detect and remove logical and programmatically errors

SNO Code Input and Outputs Input -Level -1B, Sat-1 Sat-2 Output- Collocation data

Unit Testing is a series of tests at times using test data sets Sat 1 Vs Sat 1 inter-comparision Should produce 1 collocation for each pixel.

Should produce 1 collocation for each pixel. TEST 2 te Data Should produce 1 collocation for each pixel. Simulate data which is similar to real life scenario and number of collocated pixels are predetermined Sat-1: Is the gridded AATSR L1B Sat-2: Is produced by ignoring every alternate pixel of Sat-1 Resulting data set has pixels that are large enough to collocate with exactly 3x3 AATSR L1B pixels. Helps in detecting logical errors in SNO algorithm

Conclusion A Unit Testing suite for GSICS SNO –baseline algorithm has been presented here. This suite uses a two step process to test the SNO code for logical accuracy. Suite has been used at NOAA for SNO code of GEO-LEO and LEO- LEO algorithm and helped to detect and remove key errors.

THANK YOU

Pre Vs Post launch Three years (2009-2011) of AATSR/IASI collocation…. Offset= -0.11K < 0.068K < 0.03K Three years (2009-2011) of AATSR/IASI collocation…. AIRS and IASI displays Pre-Launch like behavior in Space to a few 100th of a degree. ATSR2 and AATSR have SI traceable blackbodies. Since SRF was determined pre-launch so we can in principal determine SRF in space