Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Structure and Function of Argonaute Proteins
Structure of a Ternary Transcription Activation Complex
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Structure of the Endonuclease Domain of MutL: Unlicensed to Cut
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Structural Basis for NusA Stabilized Transcriptional Pausing
The THI-box Riboswitch, or How RNA Binds Thiamin Pyrophosphate
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Structure and Function of Argonaute Proteins
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
A Different Look for AB5 Toxins
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ski7 Is a GTP-Binding Protein Adopting the Characteristic Conformation of Active Translational GTPases  Eva Kowalinski, Anthony.
The Unmasking of Telomerase
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Srabani Mukherjee, Luis G. Brieba, Rui Sousa  Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2018)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
RNA Displacement and Resolution of the Transcription Bubble during Transcription by T7 RNA Polymerase  Manli Jiang, Na Ma, Dmitry G. Vassylyev, William.
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Structural Basis for Ligand Recognition and Activation of RAGE
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 488-495 (March 2014) Structure of the DNA-Binding and RNA-Polymerase-Binding Region of Transcription Antitermination Factor λQ  Sergey M. Vorobiev, Yocheved Gensler, Hanif Vahedian-Movahed, Jayaraman Seetharaman, Min Su, Janet Y. Huang, Rong Xiao, Gregory Kornhaber, Gaetano T. Montelione, Liang Tong, Richard H. Ebright, Bryce E. Nickels  Structure  Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 488-495 (March 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.12.010 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 λQ Regulates Gene Expression from λPR′ (A) λQ (depicted as a blue oval) enables RNAP that initiates transcription from the phage late promoter, λPR′, to read through terminator tR′ located upstream of the phage late genes. Highlighted are the λPR′ −35 and −10 elements, the QBE, the TTGACT motif (−35-like element; gray), and the pause-inducing −10-like sequence (red). (B) Initiation complex at λPR ′. σR4 (σ4) is bound to the β flap (purple triangle). σR2 (σ2) is bound to the β′ clamp helices (β′ CH; green oval). (C) λQ-engaged complex at λPR ′. λQ interacts with the β flap tip and stabilizes the binding of σR4 to the TTGACT motif. RNAP holoenzyme adopts a conformation with σR4 displaced from the β flap tip. Structure 2014 22, 488-495DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.12.010) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Crystal Structure of λQ39–207 (A) Linear map of λQFL. Indicated is the portion of λQ ordered in the crystal structure, locations of α helices 1–5 (yellow), and location of the cysteine residues (118, 121, 144, and 147) of the metal binding site. (B) Stereoview representation of the crystal structure of λQ prepared with PyMOL Version 1.6.0.4. β strands are colored cyan, α helices yellow, and the loops magenta. The Zn ion is shown as a sphere and colored gray. Cys residues of the metal binding site are shown as sticks (carbon in gray and sulfur in yellow). (C) Electrostatic surface potential (Baker et al., 2001) of λQ oriented as in the left panel of (B), with fully saturated colors representing negative (red) and positive (blue) potentials of ± 4 kT. See also Figure S1. Structure 2014 22, 488-495DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.12.010) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 λQ39–207 and λQ62–207 Retain Biochemical Properties of λQFL (A) Test promoters pQBE−64 and pΔQBE. (B) Graph shows the ratio of β-galactosidase activity in the presence of the indicated α-λQ fusion to β-galactosidase activity in the absence of Q (α). Hatched bars indicate α-λQ contains substitution E134K. Cells were grown using medium containing 5 μM IPTG. See also Figure S2. (C) Bacterial two-hybrid assay. (D) Graph shows the ratio of β-galactosidase activity observed in assays performed with cells containing the indicated α-λQ fusion and the indicated λCI-β-flap fusion compared to the activity observed in assays performed with cells containing the indicated α-λQ fusion and λCI alone. Hatched bars indicate α-λQ contains substitutions T101I, A160V, and T165A. Cells were grown using medium containing 100 μM IPTG. See also Figure S3. (E) Test promoter pQBE−49. (F) Graph shows the ratio of β-galactosidase activity in the presence of Q (α-λQ) to β-galactosidase activity in the absence of Q (α). Cells carried either wild-type σ70 or σ70 with substitution A553D. Cells were grown using medium containing 100 μM IPTG. Graphs represent the values and SEM obtained from quadruplicate measurements. Structure 2014 22, 488-495DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.12.010) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Functional Modules of λQ (A) Least-squares superposition of residues 160–180 of λQ (yellow and magenta) with the HTH DNA-binding motifs of λ Cro (blue; rmsd 2.23 Å; residues 15–34 from PDB 5CRO) and λ CI (green; rmsd 2.8 Å; residues 32–52 from PDB 1LRD). (B and C) Highlighted are the DNA interaction region (DIR; red and pink residues), RNAP flap interaction region (FIR; green residues), σ interaction region (SIR; magenta residue), C-terminal antitermination region (ATR-C; yellow residues), and Cys4 zinc finger (ZF; blue residues). Dashed oval indicates the proposed location of the N-terminal antitermination region (ATR-N). See also Figure S4. Structure 2014 22, 488-495DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.12.010) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions