Volume 10, Issue 23, Pages (November 2000)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Advertisements

MicroRNA-92a-3p regulates the expression of cartilage-specific genes by directly targeting histone deacetylase 2 in chondrogenesis and degradation  G.
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
MicroRNA-92a-3p regulates the expression of cartilage-specific genes by directly targeting histone deacetylase 2 in chondrogenesis and degradation  G.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Histone deacetylase inhibitors increase microRNA-146a expression and enhance negative regulation of interleukin-1β signaling in osteoarthritis fibroblast-like.
Michael W. Linhoff, Saurabh K. Garg, Gail Mandel  Cell 
Histone deacetylase 3 associates with and represses the transcription factor GATA-2 by Yukiyasu Ozawa, Masayuki Towatari, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Fumihiko Hayakawa,
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
Volume 119, Issue 1, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara Birkaya, Satrajit Sinha 
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Xianfeng Morgan Xu, Tea Meulia, Iris Meier  Current Biology 
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 1998)
Multiple PKCδ Tyrosine Residues Are Required for PKCδ-Dependent Activation of Involucrin Expression—a Key Role of PKCδ-Y311  Ling Zhu, Chaya Brodie, Sivaprakasam.
The Kit receptor promotes cell survival via activation of PI 3-kinase and subsequent Akt- mediated phosphorylation of Bad on Ser136  Peter Blume-Jensen,
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 116, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2003)
Custom Zinc-Finger Nucleases for Use in Human Cells
The mRNA bearing the IRES element is arranged in cytoplasmic clusters.
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages (May 2016)
TET3 Inhibits Type I IFN Production Independent of DNA Demethylation
Andrew W Snowden, Philip D Gregory, Casey C Case, Carl O Pabo 
Volume 11, Issue 22, Pages (November 2001)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Halofuginone, an Inhibitor of Type-I Collagen Synthesis and Skin Sclerosis, Blocks Transforming-Growth-Factor-β-Mediated Smad3 Activation in Fibroblasts 
Repression by Ume6 Involves Recruitment of a Complex Containing Sin3 Corepressor and Rpd3 Histone Deacetylase to Target Promoters  David Kadosh, Kevin.
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Juxtaposition of GFP-Rab1b with IRES-containing RNA.
Codependent Activators Direct Myoblast-Specific MyoD Transcription
Regulation of the Expression of Peptidylarginine Deiminase Type II Gene (PADI2) in Human Keratinocytes Involves Sp1 and Sp3 Transcription Factors  Sijun.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
The p73 Gene Is an Anti-Tumoral Target of the RARβ/γ-Selective Retinoid Tazarotene  Marina Papoutsaki, Mauro Lanza, Barbara Marinari, Steven Nisticò, Francesca.
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 1999)
Yuri Oleynikov, Robert H. Singer  Current Biology 
Histone–GFP fusion protein enables sensitive analysis of chromosome dynamics in living mammalian cells  Teru Kanda, Kevin F. Sullivan, Geoffrey M. Wahl 
SUMO-1 Modification Represses Sp3 Transcriptional Activation and Modulates Its Subnuclear Localization  Sarah Ross, Jennifer L Best, Leonard I Zon, Grace.
Volume 21, Issue 17, Pages (September 2011)
Amanda O'Donnell, Shen-Hsi Yang, Andrew D. Sharrocks  Molecular Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (May 2000)
Transcriptional Repression of miR-34 Family Contributes to p63-Mediated Cell Cycle Progression in Epidermal Cells  Dario Antonini, Monia T. Russo, Laura.
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 1995)
Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages (October 2000)
Defining the Regulatory Elements in the Proximal Promoter of ΔNp63 in Keratinocytes: Potential Roles for Sp1/Sp3, NF-Y, and p63  Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara.
Michael J Dye, Nick J Proudfoot  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Mammalian SIRT1 Represses Forkhead Transcription Factors
Formation of the Androgen Receptor Transcription Complex
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Selective Recruitment of TAFs by Yeast Upstream Activating Sequences
H. pylori induces STAT3 nuclear translocation and transcriptional activation in a CagA-dependent manner. H. pylori induces STAT3 nuclear translocation.
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Keiji Miyazawa, MSc, Akio Mori, MD, PhD, Hirokazu Okudaira, MD, PhD 
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Volume 10, Issue 23, Pages 1531-1534 (November 2000) Higher concentrations of histone macroH2A in the Barr body are correlated with higher nucleosome density  Pierre-Yves Perche, Claire Vourc'h, Lara Konecny, Catherine Souchier, Michel Robert-Nicoud, Stefan Dimitrov, Saadi Khochbin  Current Biology  Volume 10, Issue 23, Pages 1531-1534 (November 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00832-0

Fig. 1 (a) Identification of the Barr body in normal human fibroblasts. Normal primary human dermal fibroblasts [2] were grown and fixed on LabTek glass slides. The inactive X chromosome was identified with an XIST RNA probe used in FISH [3] (right panel), and the nuclei counter-stained with DAPI (left panel). The arrow points to the Barr body in a DAPI-stained nucleus. The arrowhead indicates the XIST RNA revealed by FISH. (b–e) Both core histones and macroH2A are concentrated in the Barr body. Normal human fibroblasts were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 5min at room temperature and the indicated antibodies were used to immunolocalize (b) macroH2A, (c) acetylated histone H4, (d) histone H2B and (e) histone H3. Arrowheads indicate the position of the Barr body. Anti-macroH2A antibody is a mouse ascitic fluid obtained in our laboratory after the injection of the bacterially expressed non-histone domain of human macroH2A1.2 in mice. Anti-H2B and anti-H3 antibodies were kindly provided by S. Muller. Anti-acetylated histone H4 was from a commercially available source. The scale bars represent 2.5μm. Current Biology 2000 10, 1531-1534DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00832-0)

Fig. 2 Specific targeting of the Barr body by GFP fusions with histones macroH2A and H2A. Normal human fibroblasts were transfected using Exgen reagent (Euromedex) and constructs expressing the indicated fusion proteins, according to the supplier's recommendations; 24h post-transfection, cells were fixed and the GFP and DAPI fluorescence recorded. Arrowheads indicate the position of the Barr body. The scale bar represents 2.5 μm. Current Biology 2000 10, 1531-1534DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00832-0)

Fig. 3 Incorporation of GFP–histone fusions into chromatin. (a–e) Absence of diffusion of GFP–H2A and GFP–macroH2A but not of GFP–NHR in transfected living human fibroblast nuclei. Human primary fibroblasts were transfected and, 24h post-transfection, the GFP fluorescence of the living cells was measured (0 sec). The boxed region (0 sec, left panel) is shown magnified in the five panels on the right. The zone indicated in the 0 sec, right panel was then bleached according to the FRAP technique and the fluorescence recovery recorded at the indicated times after bleaching. Arrowheads indicate the irradiated regions in each panel. (f–h) GFP–histone fusion proteins were incorporated into the Barr body chromatin. Confocal sections including the GFP-labeled Barr body (arrowheads) were chosen and irradiated as above. Current Biology 2000 10, 1531-1534DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00832-0)

Fig. 4 The non-histone region of macroH2A can repress transcription. (a) Schematic representation of the luciferase reporter Gal4–TK–Luc. The five Gal4-binding sites upstream of the thymidine kinase promoter (TK) are indicated. (b) HeLa cells were transfected with 1μg of the reporter plasmid together with the indicated amounts of expression vectors encoding Gal4 DNA-binding domain alone (Gal4) or Gal4 DNA-binding domain fused to the non-histone region of macroH2A (Gal4–NHR). Gal4–HD indicates an expression vector encoding the Gal4 DNA-binding domain fused to the histone deacetylase domain of HDAC5, shown to efficiently repress transcription [10]. In all transfections, 100ng of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) β-galactosidase reporter plasmid was also used for normalization purposes; 24h post-transfection, luciferase activity was measured and normalized with respect to that of β-galactosidase (±SD). Current Biology 2000 10, 1531-1534DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00832-0)