Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MCDB 4650 Developmental Genetics in Drosophila
Advertisements

Identification of a Stat Gene That Functions in Drosophila Development
Visualization of trans-Homolog Enhancer-Promoter Interactions at the Abd-B Hox Locus in the Drosophila Embryo  Matthew Ronshaugen, Mike Levine  Developmental.
Are Complex Behaviors Specified by Dedicated Regulatory Genes
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Cosuppression in Drosophila: Gene Silencing of Alcohol dehydrogenase by white-Adh Transgenes Is Polycomb Dependent  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 103, Issue 1, Pages (September 2000)
Leslie Dunipace, Abbie Saunders, Hilary L. Ashe, Angelike Stathopoulos 
A Conserved Chromatin Architecture Marks and Maintains the Restricted Germ Cell Lineage in Worms and Flies  Christine E Schaner, Girish Deshpande, Paul.
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (August 1996)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Hedgehog Movement Is Regulated through tout velu–Dependent Synthesis of a Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan  Inge The, Yohanns Bellaiche, Norbert Perrimon 
Douglas J Guarnieri, G.Steven Dodson, Michael A Simon  Molecular Cell 
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages (April 2001)
Bernard Duvic, Jules A Hoffmann, Marie Meister, Julien Royet 
Transcription in the Absence of Histone H3.2 and H3K4 Methylation
Adrian Halme, Michelle Cheng, Iswar K. Hariharan  Current Biology 
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
Periodic Lunatic fringe Expression Is Controlled during Segmentation by a Cyclic Transcriptional Enhancer Responsive to Notch Signaling  Aixa V. Morales,
SIR2 Is Required for Polycomb Silencing and Is Associated with an E(Z) Histone Methyltransferase Complex  Takehito Furuyama, Rakhee Banerjee, Thomas R.
Boss/Sev Signaling from Germline to Soma Restricts Germline-Stem-Cell-Niche Formation in the Anterior Region of Drosophila Male Gonads  Yu Kitadate, Shuji.
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (February 1997)
The Noncanonical Binding Site of the MED-1 GATA Factor Defines Differentially Regulated Target Genes in the C. elegans Mesendoderm  Gina Broitman-Maduro,
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Paramutation: From Maize to Mice
Temporal and Spatial Control of Germ-Plasm RNAs
Mark Van Doren, Anne L. Williamson, Ruth Lehmann  Current Biology 
Identification of a Stat Gene That Functions in Drosophila Development
The Regulation of the Drosophila msl-2 Gene Reveals a Function for Sex-lethal in Translational Control  Greg J Bashaw, Bruce S Baker  Cell  Volume 89,
Volume 106, Issue 2, Pages (July 2001)
insomniac and Cullin-3 Regulate Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila
Satoko Nishimoto, Susan M. Wilde, Sophie Wood, Malcolm P.O. Logan 
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Dosage-Sensitive and Complementary Functions of Roundabout and Commissureless Control Axon Crossing of the CNS Midline  Thomas Kidd, Claire Russell, Corey.
Cell-Nonautonomous Regulation of C. elegans Germ Cell Death by kri-1
Evolution of yellow Gene Regulation and Pigmentation in Drosophila
Drosophila JAK/STAT Pathway Reveals Distinct Initiation and Reinforcement Steps in Early Transcription of Sxl  Frank W. Avila, James W. Erickson  Current.
The Role of Oocyte Transcription, the 5′UTR, and Translation Repression and Derepression in Drosophila gurken mRNA and Protein Localization  Carol Saunders,
Recruitment of Ectodermal Attachment Cells via an EGFR-Dependent Mechanism during the Organogenesis of Drosophila Proprioceptors  Adi Inbal, Talila Volk,
Magalie Lecourtois, François Schweisguth  Current Biology 
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
The Master Switch Gene Sex-lethal Promotes Female Development by Negatively Regulating the N-Signaling Pathway  Jill K.M. Penn, Paul Schedl  Developmental.
Novel Functions of nanos in Downregulating Mitosis and Transcription during the Development of the Drosophila Germline  Girish Deshpande, Gretchen Calhoun,
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages (June 1996)
A Genetic Link between Morphogenesis and Cell Division during Formation of the Ventral Furrow in Drosophila  Jörg Großhans, Eric Wieschaus  Cell  Volume.
Paracrine Signaling through the JAK/STAT Pathway Activates Invasive Behavior of Ovarian Epithelial Cells in Drosophila  Debra L. Silver, Denise J. Montell 
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
A Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor, Dacapo, Is Necessary for Timely Exit from the Cell Cycle during Drosophila Embryogenesis  Joriene C de Nooij, Mary.
Control of Colinearity in AbdB Genes of the Mouse HoxD Complex
Justin Blau, Michael W Young  Cell 
Posttranscriptional Regulation of Smoothened Is Part of a Self-Correcting Mechanism in the Hedgehog Signaling System  Joy Alcedo, Yu Zou, Markus Noll 
Spatial Regulation of Developmental Signaling by a Serpin
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Gene Amplification as a Developmental Strategy
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (August 1996)
Marelle Acts Downstream of the Drosophila HOP/JAK Kinase and Encodes a Protein Similar to the Mammalian STATs  Xianyu Steven Hou, Michael B Melnick, Norbert.
Allison L. Blum, Wanhe Li, Mike Cressy, Josh Dubnau  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 581-587 (March 2000) The JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway Is Required for the Initial Choice of Sexual Identity in Drosophila melanogaster  Timothy M. Jinks, Alexandros D. Polydorides, Gretchen Calhoun, Paul Schedl  Molecular Cell  Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 581-587 (March 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80451-7

Figure 1 Sxl-Pe Constructs and Their Patterns of Expression in Early Embryos (Left) structure of the D. melanogaster Sxl-Pe region and the Sxl-Pe transgene constructs. Sxl-Pe extends ∼3 kb upstream of the transcription start site. In the Sxl-Pe constructs, Sxl-Pe3.0kb, Sxl-Pe1.7kb, Sxl-Pe1.4kb, and Sxl-Pe0.4kb sequences extending upstream of +32 are fused to LacZ. In Sxl-PeGOF, four tandem copies of the 72 bp conserved region from −284 to −212 are inserted at the end of the smallest sex-specific promoter, Sxl-Pe0.4kb. Sxl-PeLOF has a deletion of the multimerized sequence. Sequences in D. melanogaster Sxl-Pe conserved in D. subobscura and D. virilis are indicated by white blocks. Triangles show the position of three potential STAT sites. The sequences of these sites closely match the optimal in vitro D-STAT site as well as the D-STAT sites in the eve promoter (Hou et al. 1996; Yan et al. 1996). (Right) Sxl-Pe is expressed specifically in female embryos, while the expression of the Sxl-PeGOF is not sex specific. (A) Expression of Sxl-Pe3.0kb is high throughout the soma of 2X/2A embryos. This promoter is active in only half of the embryos. (B) Although Sxl-Pe0.4kb is active in all female embryos, LacZ expression is less than Sxl-Pe3.0kb. (C) Sxl-PeGOF expression in early female embryos. Note that staining is low at the poles. (D) Sxl-PeGOF expression in early male embryos. Note the stripes. (E) Expression of Sxl-PeGOF in stage 9–10 female embryos is high in most somatic cells. (F) Sxl-PeGOF in stage 9–10 male embryos is lower and is spatially restricted. Embryos in (A)–(F) were generated from fly stocks homozygous for the respective transgene. The embryos shown in the figure are representative of all embryos of the same sex within each population. Molecular Cell 2000 5, 581-587DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80451-7)

Figure 2 Sxl-Pe Is Activated by X-Linked Transcription Factors and Is Dependent on Gene Dosage Sxl-Pe transgene constructs are used to monitor the effects of mutations on the regulation of expression of Sxl-Pe. (A) Female embryos heterozygous for sis-a− express the Sxl-Pe3.0kb reporter at levels that are essentially indistinguishable from wild-type female embryos. In this experiment, half of the embryo population is stained, and they are presumed to correspond to 2X/2A embryos. (B) Female embryos trans-heterozygous for sis-a− and the deficiency Df(1)N19 express Sxl-Pe3.0kb at significantly lower levels than their heterozygous siblings and display regional variation of expression. Half the embryos express β-galactosidase, and these fall into two equal classes. One class is weakly stained like the example shown here while the other resembles the sis-a− control. (C) Females heterozygous for sis-b− express the Sxl-Pe3.0kb reporter at levels roughly equivalent to that of wild-type females. (D) Female embryos trans-heterozygous for sis-b− and Df(1)N19 express Sxl-Pe3.0kb at a lower level than heterozygous siblings. As with sis-a−, half the embryos express β-galactosidase, and these fall into two equal classes. One class is weakly stained like the embryo shown here while the other resembles the sis-b− control. (E) Sxl-Pe1.4kb female embryos are not sensitive to a reduction in the dose of genes uncovered by Df(1)N19. (F) The expression of Sxl-PeGOF in males requires a gene(s) deleted in Df(1)N19. (G) The gain-of-function activity of Sxl-PeGOF is abolished in males hemizygous for upd−. The crosses to generate these embryos (shown as female × male) were wild type × sis−;Sxl-Pe3.0kb/Sxl-Pe3.0kb for (A) and (C), Df(1)N19/FM7 × sis−;Sxl-Pe3.0kb/Sxl-Pe3.0kb for (B) and (D), Df(1)N19/FM7 × Sxl-Pe1.4kb/Sxl-Pe1.4kb for (E), Df(1)N19/FM7 × Sxl-PeGOF/Sxl-PeGOF for (F), and upd−/FM7 × Sxl-PeGOF/Sxl-PeGOF for (G). Molecular Cell 2000 5, 581-587DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80451-7)

Figure 4 Sxl Expression Is Dependent on D-STAT Activity in the Medial Regions of Female Embryos SXL protein detected by antibody staining. (A and B) SXL protein is expressed uniformly in female soma at the blastoderm stage and at later stages. In female embryos from mrl− germline clones, SXL protein expression is not uniform at the blastoderm stage (C and E), and the autoregulatory feedback loop is not properly initiated (D and F). X-gal staining shows that Sxl-Pe3.0kb is active throughout the soma in female progeny of wild-type mothers (G), but only in the anterior of mrl− embryos (H). Sxl-PeGOF is active at high levels in wild-type 2X (I) and 1X (K) embryos but shows little activity in 2X (J) and 1X (L) mrl− embryos. Molecular Cell 2000 5, 581-587DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80451-7)

Figure 3 The Activity of the JAK Pathway Affects the Response of Sxl to the X/A Signal Either wild-type (A, C, and E) or hopTum-1/FM7 (B, D, and F) females were crossed to P[Sxl-Pe]/P[Sxl-Pe] males. The Sxl-Pe reporters were: (A and B) Pe0.4kb, (C and D) Sxl-Pe1.4kb, and (E and F) Sxl-Pe3.0kb. To visualize the increased activity of the different promoters from the hop mutant mothers, embryos carrying the Sxl-Pe1.4kb and Sxl-Pe3.0kb promoters were stained for 1.5 hr rather than 5 hr as in the other experiments. All of the stained embryos from each collection showed essentially the same level of staining. Molecular Cell 2000 5, 581-587DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80451-7)