Evolution of Bootstrap-Sustained Discharge in JT-60U

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
November 3-5, 2003Feedback Workshop, Austin NORMAL MODE APPROACH TO MODELING OF FEEDBACK STABILIZATION OF THE RESISTIVE WALL MODE By M.S. Chu(GA), M.S.
Advertisements

AC Circuits II Physics 2415 Lecture 23 Michael Fowler, UVa.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outline Chapter 23 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker.
Discussion on application of current hole towards reactor T.Ozeki (JAERI) Current hole plasmas were observed in the large tokamaks of JT-60U and JET. This.
Plasma Current Start-up Experiments without the Central Solenoid in TST-2 and Future Plans Y. Takase Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of.
Physics Analysis for Equilibrium, Stability, and Divertors ARIES Power Plant Studies Charles Kessel, PPPL DOE Peer Review, UCSD August 17, 2000.
Physics of fusion power
S. Coda, 46 th APS-DPP meeting, Savannah, 19 Nov S. Coda, 34 th EPS Conf. on Plasma Physics, Warsaw, 5 July 2007 S. Coda, MHD workshop, PPPL, 22.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10 : Running a discharge / diagnostics.
Steady State High  N Discharges and Real-Time Control of Current Profile in JT-60U T. Suzuki 1), A. Isayama 1), Y. Sakamoto 1), S. Ide 1), T. Fujita 1),
-Self Inductance -Inductance of a Solenoid -RL Circuit -Energy Stored in an Inductor AP Physics C Mrs. Coyle.
D. Borba 1 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu China 21 st October 2006 Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with sub-Alfvénic neutral beam ions in.
Chapter 32 Inductance. Joseph Henry 1797 – 1878 American physicist First director of the Smithsonian Improved design of electromagnet Constructed one.
Chapter 32 Inductance. Self-inductance  A time-varying current in a circuit produces an induced emf opposing the emf that initially set up the time-varying.
1 ST workshop 2008 Conception of LHCD Experiments on the Spherical Tokamak Globus-M O.N. Shcherbinin, V.V. Dyachenko, M.A. Irzak, S.A. Khitrov A.F.Ioffe.
Recent Results from the STOR-M Tokamak A.Hirose, M. Dreval, S. Elgriw, O. Mitarai(1), A. Pant, M. Peng(2), D. Rohraff, A.K. Singh(3), D. Trembach, C. Xiao.
H. Urano, H. Takenaga, T. Fujita, Y. Kamada, K. Kamiya, Y. Koide, N. Oyama, M. Yoshida and the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency JT-60U Tokamak: p.
JT-60U Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) Study on JT-60U Go Matsunaga 松永 剛 Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka, Japan JSPS-CAS Core University Program 2008 in ASIPP.
Initial Exploration of HHFW Current Drive on NSTX J. Hosea, M. Bell, S. Bernabei, S. Kaye, B. LeBlanc, J. Menard, M. Ono C.K. Phillips, A. Rosenberg, J.R.
When the switch is closed, the current does not immediately reach its maximum value Faraday’s law can be used to describe the effect As the source current.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
Chapter 32 Inductance. Joseph Henry 1797 – 1878 American physicist First director of the Smithsonian Improved design of electromagnet Constructed one.
Magnetic Flux and Faraday’s Law of Induction
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.
PF1A upgrade physics review Presented by D. A. Gates With input from J.E. Menard and C.E. Kessel 10/27/04.
RF simulation at ASIPP Bojiang DING Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Workshop on ITER Simulation, Beijing, May 15-19, 2006 ASIPP.
1 Instabilities in the Long Pulse Discharges on the HT-7 X.Gao and HT-7 Team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box 1126, Hefei,
ASIPP Long pulse and high power LHCD plasmas on HT-7 Xu Qiang.
CHI Run Summary for March 10-12, 31 & April 9, 2008 Flux savings from inductive drive of a Transient CHI started plasma (XP817) R. Raman, B.A. Nelson,
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
Discharge initiation and plasma column formation in aspect ratio A=2 tokamak. R.R. Khayrutdinov 1 E.A. Azizov 1, A.D. Barkalov 1, G.G.Gladush 1, I.L.Tajibaeva.
Edge and Internal Transport Barrier Formations in CHS S. Okamura, T. Minami, T. Akiyama, T. Oishi 1, A. Fujisawa, K. Ida, H. Iguchi, M. Isobe, S. Kado.
Progress on NSTX towards steady state at low aspect ratio D. A. Gates, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory on behalf of the NSTX Research Team Supported.
JT-60U -1- Access to High  p (advanced inductive) and Reversed Shear (steady state) plasmas in JT-60U S. Ide for the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency.
Work with TSC Yong Guo. Introduction Non-inductive current for NSTX TSC model for EAST Simulation for EAST experiment Voltage second consumption for different.
Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,
Cheng Zhang, Deng Zhou, Sizheng Zhu, J. E. Menard* Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, P.O. Box 1126, Hefei , P. R. China *
MCZ Active MHD Control Needs in Helical Configurations M.C. Zarnstorff 1 Presented by E. Fredrickson 1 With thanks to A. Weller 2, J. Geiger 2,
Solenoid Free Plasma Start-up Mid-Run Summary (FY 2008) R. Raman and D. Mueller Univ. of Wash. / PPPL 16 April 2008, PPPL 1 Supported by Office of Science.
20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, 2004 Naka Fusion Research Establishment, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Stationary high confinement plasmas.
Merging/compression plasma formation in Spherical Tokamaks
Simulation of Non-Solenoidal Current Rampup in NSTX C. E. Kessel and NSTX Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory APS-DPP Annual Meeting, Savannah, Georgia,
Off-axis Current Drive and Current Profile Control in JT-60U T. Suzuki, S. Ide, T. Fujita, T. Oikawa, M. Ishikawa, G. Matsunaga, M. Takechi, M. Seki, O.
Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.
Decrease of transport coefficients in the plasma core after off-axis ECRH switch-off K.A.Razumova and T-10 team.
9-12 Sept. 2002E. BARBAT0-ENEA, TTF, Cordoba1 Electron Internal Transport barriers by LHCD and ECRH in FTU-high density plasmas E. Barbato Associazione.
Concept Questions with Answers 8.02 W15D2
Construction and Status of Versatile Experiment Spherical Torus at SNU
Eddy Current A current induced in a solid conducting object, due to motion of the object in an external magnetic field. The presence of eddy current in.
15TH WORKSHOP ON MHD STABILITY CONTROL
11th IAEA Technical Meeting on H-mode Physics and Transport Barriers" , September, 2007 Tsukuba International Congress Center "EPOCHAL Tsukuba",
Integrated discharge scenario
ENE/EIE 325 Electromagnetic Fields and Waves
Advanced Power Systems
Electric braking Powerpoint presentation by:- Poonam sharma
I2 is decreasing in magnitude I2 is constant
Studies of Bias Induced Plasma Flows in HSX
Chapter 32 Inductance 32-1 Self-Inductance 32-3 Energy of a Magnetic Field.
Influence of energetic ions on neoclassical tearing modes
Chapter 32 Inductance 32-1 Self-Inductance 32-3 Energy of a Magnetic Field.
Chapter 32 Inductance 32-1 Self-Inductance 32-3 Energy of a Magnetic Field.
University Physics Chapter 14 INDUCTANCE.
New Results for Plasma and Coil Configuration Studies
20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference,
New Development in Plasma and Coil Configurations
Electrical Principles
Induction and Inductance Chapter 30
Chapter 32 Inductance 32-1 Self-Inductance
Presentation transcript:

Evolution of Bootstrap-Sustained Discharge in JT-60U EX1-4 Evolution of Bootstrap-Sustained Discharge in JT-60U Y. Takase,a S. Ide,b Y. Kamada,b H. Kubo,b O. Mitarai,c H. Nuga,a Y. Sakamoto,b T. Suzuki,b H. Takenaga,b and the JT-60 Team aUniversity of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8561 Japan bJapan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka 311-0193 Japan cKyushu Tokai University, Kumamoto 862-8652 Japan 21st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Chengdu, China 16 - 21 October 2006 I am pleased to report the experimental results of bootstrap-dominated plasmas produced in JT-60U, on behalf of the JT-60 Team.

Outline Introduction Experimental Results Conclusions Motivation and Objective Experimental Results Bootstrap-driven discharge (fBS ~ 1) Evolution of self-sustained phase Comparison with high fBS discharge (fBS ~ 0.9) Bootstrap overdrive (fBS > 1) Conclusions The outline of my talk is as follows: Motivation and objective of research are presented. In the experimental results section, a fully bootstrap-driven plasma is described, and evolution of such a discharge is discussed. A comparison is made with a discharge which has a finite contribution of positive beam-driven current. Evidence of bootstrap overdrive is presented. And conclusions are given.

Motivations and Research Objectives External power required to drive the necessary Ip has a large impact on the recirculating power fraction, and therefore on the cost of electricity. Study characteristics and controllability of plasmas with fBS ~ 1 If BS overdrive (fBS > 1) could be achieved, this may be used for Ip ramp-up. In this case requirements for external current drive can be reduced substantially. Demonstration of BS overdrive External power required to drive the necessary plasma current has a large impact on the recirculating power fraction, and therefore on the cost of electricity. Hence, it is important to study the characteristics and controllability of plasmas with nearly 100% bootstrap current fraction. If bootstrap overdrive could be achieved, this may be used for plasma current rampup. In this case requirements for external current drive can be reduced substantially. This leads us to prove experimentally that bootstrap overdrive is indeed possible. These results have a fundamental impact on the design of ST reactors and slim-CS tokamak reactors with limited central solenoid capability. Fundamental impact on designs of ST reactors and “slim-CS” tokamak reactors with limited central solenoid (CS) capability.

JT-60U Coil System and Operational Scenarios JT-60U Coil Configuration Surface loop voltage is given by Vl = - Ml,OHİOH -  Ml,PFİPF - Lextİp 3 types of control scenarios: constant Ip Lext dIp/dt = 0 constant OH coil current Ml,OH dIOH/dt = 0 constant surface flux Vl = 0 co/ctr The cross section of JT-60U is shown here. The red coils comprise the Ohmic transformer, which is called the F-coil in JT-60U. The yellow coils provide the main vertical field, whereas the blue coils control the triangularity. Green lines are projections of NB trajectories. The surface loop voltage is determined by induction from the OH coil, other PF coils, and the plasma current. 3 types of control scenarios are used. In the constant Ip mode, the last term is zero. In the constant OH coil current mode, the first term is zero. In both cases, noninductive overdrive produces a negative surface voltage, and in the constant OH coil current mode, Ip rampup should also be observed. In the constant surface flux mode, the left hand side of the equation is zero, ensuring that no net flux crosses the plasma surface. In this case, noninductive overdrive results in Ip rampup. Bt = 3.7 - 4.0 T Ip = 0.5 - 0.6 MA (q > 10)

Power Balance for Ramp-up Experiment Poynting flux across the plasma surface is kept at zero. VlIp = Pext – dWmext/dt = dWmint/dt – Pel + V2/RSp Ip = INI + V/RSp ; INI = ICD + IBS ; Pext = VlextIp ; Pel = – VINI ; Wmext = LextIp2/2 ; Wmint = LintIp2/2 ; Wm = Wmext + Wmint   EjNIdV EjOHdV power balance for poloidal field magnetic energy Overdrive power (INI > Ip) Pel = dWm/dt – Pext +V2/RSp > 0 for ramp-up For constant flux control (VlIp = 0) dWmint/dt = Pel – V2/RSp  Pel > 0 Pext = dWmext/dt > 0 is supplied by the external circuit. PNB Pel Ph Multiplying the expression for the surface voltage yields the power balance equation for the poloidal magnetic field. I have time for only a brief summary in this talk, but I would be happy to discuss the details if you could visit my poster. Noninductive overdrive means that the noninductive current exceeds the total plasma current. The work that the noninductive current does against the reverse loop voltage, denoted by P_electric, generates the poloidal field. Noninductive current includes the bootstrap current in addition to the beam driven current. Another way to generate the poloidal field is by induction from external coils, denoted by P_external. A small fraction of poloidal field energy is dissipated resistively, and the difference goes into increasing the poloidal field energy. Pext Wm Wp V2/RSp Ploss dWm/dt dWp/dt

Fully Bootstrap-Driven Discharge Fully BS-driven plasma is realized Duration of self-sustained phase is limited by slow confinement degradation (this case), or by b collapses slow decrease of Wp & Ip I would like to turn now to experimental results. As Takenaga-san mentioned in the Overview talk this morning, steady sustainment of Ip by bootstrap current alone is extremely challenging. The discharge shown on this page is an example of a fully bootstrap-driven plasma realized using the constant OH coil current mode. This was realized for about 0.2s indicated by the arrow. After this time the energy confinement degraded slowly, and it became impossible to keep the stored energy constant. The vertical field is ramped down in response to the decreasing stored energy, and caused the plasma current to decay slowly over several seconds. The current density profile measured by MSE, and the q profile are shown. The evolution of the ion temperature profile is also shown.

Loop Voltage is Kept Nearly Zero for 0.2 s MSE-based reconstruction: Poloidal flux is nearly constant for ~ 0.2 s. dIp/dt  0 dIp/dt < 0 Vl ~ 0 V This graph shows the evolution of poloidal flux at different radial locations inside the plasma, calculated based on magnetic reconstruction using the MSE measurement. It can be seen that the time derivative is kept nearly zero for 0.2s. During this time the calculated beam driven current is -33~-35kA, and the inductive current is -5~-30kA. Iind = -5kA -30kA Iind > 0 INB = -35kA -33kA

Bootstrap-Sustained Discharge Total current = 543 kA (MSE) Inductive current = -5 kA (calculated from Vl profile) Beam driven current = -35 kA (calculated by OFMC/ACCOME)  Bootstrap current = 583 kA (possibly slight overdrive) E046687 @ 4.6 s Profiles of the total current density (measured by MSE), the calculated beam driven current density, and the inductively driven current density, calculated from the loop voltage profile shown in the previous page, are shown. The inferred bootstrap current of 583kA is slightly greater than the total current of 543kA, possibly indicating a slight overdrive. Although there is a rather large uncertainty of nearly 50kA in the determination of the bootstrap current, it is clear that the bootstrap current fraction of approximately 100% was achieved.

Examples of BS-Sustained Plasma all with const. OH coil current Several discharges with fBS ~ 100% were obtained E046293 constant Ip maintained at 0.51MA for 1.3 s noninductively (BS + negative NB) Bv ramp-up ~ 100% BS In order to show that there is more than one discharge in which f_BS ~ 100% was achieved, three discharges are shown. All these discharges used the constant OH coil current mode. In particular, at a lower current of 510kA, a constant Ip was maintained for 1.3s.

Dynamics of BS-Driven Plasma Stored energy Wp increases and Ip increases to 610kA ITB shrinks at b collapses, then recovers partially Ip is self-sustained (not driven by NBCD or OH coil) const. IF b collapse 610kA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 It was shown earlier that a slow degradation of confinement resulted in the reduction of Ip that could be self-sustained. When beta is higher, beta collapses can occur. In the discharge shown here, several beta collapses were observed. At a beta collapse, the ITB shrinks in radius, but then recovers spontaneously. In this kind of discharge, the plasma current is self-sustained by the bootstrap current, and is not determined by external sources such as NBCD or the OH coil.

Evolutions of Ti and q Profiles ITB is eroded (becomes narrower) at b collapses, and both Wp and Ip decrease. Spontaneous recovery of ITB, Wp, and Ip occurs. However, complete recovery to the original level is not achieved. 2nd collapse q The evolutions of the ion temperature profile and the q profile are shown. It can be seen that at sequential beta collapses, erosion of the ITB occurs and the q_minimum radius shrinks inward. Although there is spontaneous recovery following each beta collapse, the recovery is not perfect and settles at a state with lower Wp and Ip. 1st collapse qmin radius

Stable Sustainment Aided by Co-NBI Steady sustainment achieved for over 2s with INB ~ 40 kA (fBS ~ 0.9) Confinement is better with co-NBI (1.2 MJ / 5.9 MW vs. 1.0 MJ / 8.1 MW) dIp/dt > 0 dIp/dt  0 const. IF control In order to lengthen the duration of stationary state, a co-tangential NB was added to a discharge otherwise identical to the fully bootstrap driven discharge (46293). The robustness of steady sustainment was improved greatly by the addition of only a small fraction of co NBCD. The net beam driven current is about +40kA, less than 10% of the total plasma current in this discharge. In contrast to the slowly degrading energy confinement in the fully BS-driven discharge, energy confinement was maintained at a high level, and a nearly constant plasma current exceeding 515kA was sustained for over 2s.

Evidence of Bootstrap Overdrive IAEA 2004: CS recharging with Vl < 0 achieved (const. Ip control) Slow ramp-up at 10 kA/s for 0.5 s with zero inductive flux input const. flux control ctr &  NBI only In the 2004 IAEA Conference, CS recharging with negative loop voltage, achieved in the constant Ip mode, was reported as a possible evidence of BS overdrive. In order to demonstrate BS overdrive more clearly, the constant surface flux mode was implemented. In this mode, real-time equilibrium reconstruction is used to compute the poloidal flux at the plasma surface, and this flux is kept at a constant level by feedback control using the OH coil current. This method ensures that there is no net flux crossing the plasma boundary, and the plasma current rampup becomes a direct indication of noninductive overdrive. In this example, a slow rampup at a rate of 10kA/s was maintained for about 0.5s. For comparison, in the LHCD rampup discharge reported in the 2002 IAEA Conference, which was substantially overdriven, the rampup rate was about 40kA/s. Considering that the present discharge is only slightly overdriven, the rampup rate of 10kA/s is not an unreasonably small value.

Conclusions A fully bootstrap-driven discharge with fBS ~ 1 was realized Ip = 510 kA was maintained for 1.3 s (with net INB = -35 kA). Dynamics of BS-sustained plasma In discharges without a b collapse, slow degradation of confinement resulted in slowly declining Wp and Ip. ITB shrinks radially at b collapses, resulting in Wp and Ip decrease. Subsequently, partial recovery of ITB and Ip occurs spontaneously. Addition of positive INB (< 10% of Ip) helps steady sustainment of Ip greatly. Evidence of bootstrap overdrive was observed Slow Ip rampup (10 kA/s for 0.5 s) was observed with no inductive flux input. In conclusion, a fully bootstrap-driven discharge with a bootstrap fraction of nearly 100% was realized. A nearly constant Ip of 510kA was maintained for 1.3s. The evolution of such a BS-sustained plasma was studied. In discharges without a beta collapse, a slow degradation of confinement resulted in slowly declining Wp and Ip. At higher beta, beta collapses are observed. ITB shrinks radially at beta collapses, resulting in Wp and Ip decrease. Subsequently, partial recovery of ITB and Ip occurs spontaneously. The addition of a positively directed beam-driven current of < 10% of the total current, helps steady sustainment of Ip greatly. Evidence of bootstrap overdrive was observed using the newly implemented constant surface flux feedback control, which ensures no net flux input to the plasma. A slow Ip rampup at a rate of 10kA/s was achieved for 0.5s. Extension of these results to higher Ip and a more complete characterization of controllability of such a plasma remain topics of further research. Extension to higher Ip and a more complete characterization of controllability of such a plasma remain topics of further research.